基于多源数据及三层模型的小班林型识别
|
黄健, 吴达胜, 方陆明
|
Identification of sub-compartment forest type based on multi-source data and three-tier models
|
HUANG Jian, WU Dasheng, FANG Luming
|
|
表6 基于LightGBM-4及3种雷达遥感因子及特征选择方案的建模精度对比
|
Table 6 Accuracy comparison based on the LightGBM-4 and the three schemes with remote sensing factors and feature selection
|
|
林型 forest type | 雷达遥感因子及特征选择方案 radar remote sensing factor and feature selection scheme | 方案A plan A | 方案B plan B | 方案C plan C | 用户精度/% UA | 生产者精度/% PA | 用户精度/% UA | 生产者精度/% PA | 用户精度/% UA | 生产者精度/% PA | 山核桃林 Carya cathayensis forest | 91.87 | 92.93 | 92.32 | 93.24 | 92.32 | 93.05 | 阔叶混交林 broad-leaved mixed forest | 63.36 | 59.96 | 62.93 | 59.79 | 63.22 | 58.97 | 其他硬阔林 other hard broad-leaved forest | 60.43 | 63.00 | 59.97 | 63.34 | 57.97 | 62.27 | 杉木林 Cunninghamia lanceolata forest | 85.93 | 81.79 | 86.28 | 81.82 | 86.42 | 81.47 | 毛竹林 Phyllosstachys edulis forest | 94.86 | 94.32 | 94.46 | 94.19 | 95.03 | 93.83 | 茶树林 Camellia sinensis forest | 92.27 | 92.27 | 92.76 | 93.03 | 92.15 | 93.31 | 马尾松林 Pinus massoniana forest | 69.77 | 75.51 | 69.94 | 75.79 | 69.14 | 75.86 | 总体精度/% OA | 83.08 | 83.21 | 82.91 | Kappa系数 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
|
|
|