我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

喀斯特森林林分环境对光皮桦幼树生物量的影响(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2009年01期
Page:
143-145
Column:
研究简报
publishdate:
2009-01-30

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Effects of different environment of Karst forest on the biomass of Betula luminifera saplings
Author(s):
YANG Rui1YU Lifei1*LUO Yun2LUO Yuanfei2
1.College of Forestry, Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China;2.Forestry Bureau of Xiuwen County, Xiuwen 550200,China)Abstract:Biomass of Betula luminifera samplings(2—9 years old, 136 saplings
Keywords:
Betula luminiferasaplingbiomassforest environmentKarst forest
Classification number :
S718
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2009.01.031
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
in different environments of Karst forest for aboveground individual and its allocation among stem, branch and leaf were studied using power function model. The results showed that estimation model of the biomass on the edge of forest was Wo=0.8243(D2H)0.8340, Ws=0.2087(D2H)0.9214,Wb=0.2191(D2H)0.7982,Wl=0.5225(D2H)0.6880 respectively. The estimation model of the biomass in the middle of forest was Wo =1.1848(D2H)0.7479,Ws=0.5151(D2H)0.7887,Wb=0.2048(D2H)0.7626 ,Wl=0.5089(D2H)0.6390 respectively. The estimate model of the biomass isolated forest was Wo=1.2109(D2H)0.7807,Ws=0.3605 (D2H)0.8897,Wb=0.4118(D2H)0.7269,Wl=0.9301(D2H)0.6315 respectively. All correlative coefficients of these functions were in excess of 0.90. The model of basal diameter fitted better than that of height, when basal diameter was in the range of 0.4 —8.0cm.

References

[1]郑作孟,宋丁全,赵世荣.福建卫闽光皮桦林特征的初步研究[J].江苏林业科技,1999,26(3):1013.
[2]宋丁全,姜志林,郑作孟,等.福建卫闽光皮桦种群与主要伴生树种的生态位[J].南京林业大学学报,1999,23(1):5356.
[3]宋丁全,姜志林,郑作孟,等.光皮桦林优势树种间的竞争[J].南京林业大学学报,2000,24(4):2628.
[4]易咏梅,罗世家.光皮桦苗期生长特性的初步研究[J].湖北民族学院学报:自然科学版,1998,16(6):1619.
[5]宋丁全,姜志林,郑作孟.光皮桦群落邻体干扰指数的研究[J].生态学杂志, 2002,21(3):1517.
[6]李建民, 谢芳, 陈存及,等.光皮桦天然林群落优势种群的种间联结性研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):168170.
[7]易咏梅,叶芬,杨本立.光皮桦与青冈栎苗期生理生化特性研究[J].湖北林业科技,1998(4):811.
[8]高波.光皮桦育林技术简介[J].陕西林业科技,1997(3):80.
[9]罗丕印.光皮桦造林技术初探[J].四川林勘设计,1995(3):3437.
[10]宋丁全,姜志林,郑作孟,等.光皮桦种群生物量的测定[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2002,26(3):4042.
[11]宋丁全,姜志林,郑作孟.光皮桦种群自疏调节的初步研究[J].南京林业大学学报,1999,23(3):3336.
[12]王献溥,孙世洲,李信贤.广西光皮桦林的分类和演替[J].广西植物,1998,18(2):123138.

[13]刘芳.杉木光皮桦纯林及混交林生物量[J].浙江林学院学报,2002,19(2):143147.
[14]黄承标,邓绍林,农必昌.杉木光皮桦混交林效益的研究[J].生态科学,2001,20:1720.
[15]蒋妙定,周子贵,孙敏华,等.杉木光皮桦混交林优化模式的研究[J].浙江林业科技,1994,14(3):1319.
[16]张连水,庄志贤,李秀全.湿地松地上生物量变化研究[J].林业科技开发,2001,15(增刊):4243.
[17]郑景明,张育红.林分生物量研究综述[J].辽宁林业科技,1998(4):4345.
[18]周再知,郑海水,尹光天,等.橡胶树生物量估测的数学模型[J].林业科学研究,1995,8(6):624629.

Last Update: 2009-05-06