我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

江苏省森林碳储量动态变化及其经济价值评价(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2010年02期
Page:
1-5
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2010-03-30

Article Info:/Info

Title:
The dynamic carbon storage and economic value assessment of forest in Jiangsu province
Author(s):
WANG Lei12 DING Jingjing1 JI Yonghua1 LIANG Zhenhai1 LI Rongjin1 RUAN Honghua3
1.Jiangsu Academy of Forestry, Nanjing 211153, China; 2.Institute of Forest Ecology and Environment Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; 3.College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Keywords:
biomass carbon storage carbon sink carbon density economic value Jiangsu province
Classification number :
S718
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.02.001
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
According to the forest inventory data of Jiangsu in 2000 and 2005, the dynamic carbon storage, carbon density and the economic value of forest in Jiangsu were assessed by means of the regression equation between stand biomass and volume of different forest types. The results showed that total carbon storage of forest in Jiangsu was 25 165 600 t in 2005, with an annual increment of about 1 600 000 t from 2000 to 2005, which suggested that the forests in Jiangsu province were the important sink of CO2. The average carbon density was 21.2 t/hm2, far less than the national and global average level. The carbon storage in three different geographical areas (the south, the centre and the north of Jiangsu province) accounted for 18.54 %, 8.68 % and 72.78 % respectively. Xuzhou had the most carbon storage among all of the 13 prefectures in Jiangsu (20.93 %), followed by Suqian and Huai’an, while Nantong had the least carbon sink (0.92 %). The north of Jiangsu had the highest average carbon density, and the next is the centre and the south of Jiangsu. Among the forest types, most of the carbon storage sank in the broadleaved forest, in which, poplar was dominant species. Poplar plantation areas accounted for 90.27 % of all the new forest and carbon sank in poplars increased from 39.51 % to 66.12 %. The planting area and carbon storage have been declining of coniferous forest. From the age group, carbon storage is abundant in the young and middleaged forests, which accounts for 72.86 % of the total carbon sink in trees in 2005. In those five years, the total economic value of carbon sink was about 9.6 billion RMB in Jiangsu province.

References

[1]Ceulemans R, Janssens I A, Jach M E. Effects of CO2 enrichment on trees and forests: lessons to be learned in view of future ecosystem studies[J]. Annals of Botany, 1999, 84: 577 -590.
[2]Lal R. Forest soils and carbon sequestration[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 220: 242-258.
[3]Fang J Y, Chen A P, Peng C H. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998[J]. Science, 2001, 292: 2320-2323.
[4]Piao S L, Fang J Y, Philippe Ciais. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China [J]. Nature, 2009, 458: 1009-1014.
[5]周玉荣,于振良,赵士洞. 我国主要森林生态系统碳贮量和碳平衡[J]. 植物生态学报,2000,24(5):518- 522.
[6]方精云,陈安平. 中国森林植被碳库的动态变化及其意义[J]. 植物学报,2001,43(9):967-973.
[7]张德全,桑卫国,李日峰,等. 山东省森林有机碳储量及其动态的研究[J]. 植物生态学报,2002,26(增 刊):93-97.
[8]曹军,张镱锂,刘燕华. 近20年海南岛森林生态系统碳储量变化[J]. 地理研究,2002,21(5):551-560.
[9]焦秀梅,项文化,田大伦. 湖南省森林植被的碳贮量及其地理分布规律[J]. 中南林学院学报,2005,25 (1):4-8.
[10]光增云. 河南省森林碳储量及动态变化研究[J]. 林业资源管理,2006,4:56-61.
[11]黄从德,张健,杨万勤,等. 四川省及重庆地区森林植被碳储量动态[J]. 生态学报,2008,3:966-975.
[12]黄从德,张健,杨万勤,等. 四川森林植被碳储量的时空变化[J]. 应用生态学报,2007,18(12):2687- 2692.
[13]江苏省林业局. 江苏省森林资源报告[R]. 南京:江苏省林业局,2005.
[14]唐罗忠,生原喜久雄,黄宝龙,等. 江苏省里下河地区杨树人工林的碳储量及其动态[J]. 南京林业大学学 报:自然科学版,2004,28(2):1-6.
[15]方精云,陈安平,赵淑清,等. 中国森林生物量的估算:对Fang等Science一文(Science,2001,291:2320- 2322)的若干说明[J]. 植物生态学报,2002,26(2):243-249.
[16]刘国华,傅伯杰,方精云. 中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献[J]. 生态学报,2000,20(5):733- 740.
[17]方精云,刘国华,徐嵩龄. 我国森林植被的生物量和净生产量[J]. 生态学报,1996,16(5):497-508.
[18]王兵,杨锋伟,郭浩. LY/T 1721,森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S]. 北京:国家林业局,2008.
[19]于贵瑞. 全球变化与陆地生态系统碳循环和碳蓄积[M]. 北京:气象出版社,2003.

Last Update: 2010-05-14