我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

4株菌根辅助细菌对苗木猝倒病菌的抑制作用(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2011年01期
Page:
43-46
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2011-01-01

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Inhibition of mycorrhizal helper bacteria against dampingoff disease of Pinus thunbergii
Author(s):
HOU Liangliang WU Xiaoqin SHENG Jiangmei
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Prevention and Management of Invasive Species,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China
Keywords:
mycorrhizal helper bacteria Pinus thunbergii dampingoff disease inhibition
Classification number :
S763
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.01.010
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
Mycorrhizal helper bacteria(MHB)has effect on promoting the plant growth. In order to discuss its biocontrol function to soilborne fungus pathogen, we used the plate confrontation in vitro and in vivo inoculation methods to assay the inhibition effect to soilborne fungus of 4 MHB isolates. The result showed that, in plate confrontation in vitro experiment, Bacillus cereus HB12,HB59 isolates and B. pumilus HR10 isolate had the obvious inhibition effect on Rhizoctonia sp, which caused the seedling dampingoff disease. In these isolates, B. pumilus HR10 isolate had the strongest inhibition effect, with 85.58 % inhibition rate. B. cereus HB12, HB59 isolates, B. pumilus HR10 isolate, and Micrococcus luteus HR15 isolate all had no inhibition effect on seedling dampingoff pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. Then the screened B. pumilus HR10 isolate was chosen for in vivo inoculation test, the result indicated HR10 had the better biocontrol function to P. thunbergii dampingoff disease with only 15 % disease incidence and 10 % mortality after inoculation, while the control had 80 % disease incidence and 65 % mortality, with just inoculate Rhizoctonia sp.. Based on the above results, MHB not only had the growthpromoting effect on plant, but also had biocontrol function to some kind of plant soilborne fungus pathogen. So it could serve as a valuable reference for further investigation on tree nursery management practice.

References

[1]盛江梅,吴小芹. 菌根真菌与植物根际微生物互作关系研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(5):104-108,135.
[2]Jetiyanon K, Kloepper J W. Mixtures of plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria for induction of systemic resistance against multiple plant diseases[J].Biol Control,2002,24(3):285-291.
[3]Ran L X, Pieterse C M J, Bakker P A H M, et al. Understanding the involvement of rhizobacteriamediated induction of systemic resistance in biocontrol of plant diseases[J].Can J Plant Pathol,2003,25(1):5-9.
[4]El Ghaouth A, Wilson C L, Wisniewski M. Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit with Candida saitoana and induction of defense responses[J].Phytopathology,2003,93:344-348.
[5]He C Y, Hsiang T, Wolyn D J. Induction of systemic disease resistance and pathogen defense responses in Asparagus officinalis inoculated with nonpathogenic strains of Fusarium oxysporum[J].Plant Pathology,2002,51:225-230.
[6] Ramamoorthy V, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R.Enhancing resistance of tomato and hot pepper to Pythium diseases by seed treatment with Fluorescent pseudomonads[J].Euro J Plant Pathol, 2002,108:429-441.
[7]Rangeshwaran R, Wasnikar A R, Prasad R D, et al. Isolation of endophytic bacteria for biological control of wilt pathogens[J].Journal of Biol Control,2002,16(2):125-134.
[8]Someya N, Nakajima M, Hibi T, et al. Induced resistance to rice blast by antagonistic bacterium, Serratia marcescens strain B2[J].J Gen Plant Pathol,2002,68:177-182.
[9]陈晓斌,张炳欣.植物根围促生细菌(PGPR)作用机制的研究进展[J].微生物学杂志,2000,20(1):38-44.
[10]盛江梅.黑松菌根根际菌根辅助细菌(MHB)筛选研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.

Last Update: 2011-01-14