我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

退化湿地恢复中土壤节肢动物的群落结构(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2011年02期
Page:
51-55
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2011-03-28

Article Info:/Info

Title:
The responses of soil arthropod composition to wetland restoration in West
Author(s):
zhuojiaying BeijingWANG Tianle1 LI Wei2 DING Jie1 YU Daoyuan1 LIU Maosong1*
1.School of Life Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; 2.Research Institute of Wetland, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
Keywords:
soil fauna community structure wetland restoration Beijing
Classification number :
Q958.15;S154
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.011
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
By the methods of handsorting, Tullgrens, the soil arthropod composition structure in the wetland restored for a year in Westzhuojiaying of Beijing was investigated, also compared with the wasteland and surrounding apricot forest. A total of 3 226 soil animals in 39 groups belonging to 4 classes, 19 orders, 36 families were collected. Compared with the wasteland, the number of individuals and groups, and the diversity of the soil arthropods in restored wetland were significantly (p<005) increased, while with the surrounding apricot forest not significantly different. The community structure of soil arthropod had no significant difference (p>005) among the areas of Amorpha fruticosa, Salix saposhnikovii, Morus mongolica, and Hippophae rhamnoides, also no significant difference (p>005) among the different soil layers.The results showed that wetland restoration truly achieved some effects, but it was still in the early stages of recovery due to short restoration time.

References

[1]Gibbs J P. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation[J].Conservation Biology, 2000, 14(1):314-317.
[2]William J Mitsch, Wang Naiming. Largescale coastal wetland restoration on the Laurentian Great Lakes: Determining the potential for water quality improvement[J].Ecological Engineering, 2000, 15(3): 267-282.
[3]崔丽娟, Stephane Asselin. 湿地恢复手册:原则·技术与案例分析[M].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2006.
[4]陈卫,胡东,付必谦,等.北京湿地生物多样性研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2007.
[5]韩立亮,王勇,王广力,等.洞庭湖湿地与农田土壤动物多样性研究[J].生物多样性,2007,15(2):199-206.
[6]武海涛,吕宪国,姜明,等.三江平原典型湿地土壤动物群落结构及季节变化[J].湿地科学,2008,6(4):459-465.
[7]武海涛,吕宪国,杨青,等.三江平原湿地岛状林土壤动物群落结构特征及影响因素[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(2):50-58.
[8]武海涛,于少鹏,吕宪国,等.三江平原乌拉苔草-毛苔草湿地土壤动物多样性及其枯落物分解功能[J].湿地科学,2008,6(2):285-292.
[9]徐国良,周国逸,莫江明,等.鹤山丘陵退化生态系统植被恢复的土壤动物群落结构[J].生态学报,2005,25(7):1670-1677.
[10]殷秀琴,顾卫,董炜华,等.公路边坡人工恢复植被后土壤动物群落变化及多样性[J].生态学报,2008,28(9):4295-4305.
[11]吕世海,卢欣石,高吉喜.呼伦贝尔草地风蚀沙化土壤动物对环境退化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(9):2055-2060.
[12]尹文英,宋大祥,赵立军,等.中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
[13]尹文英,宋大祥,赵立军,等.中国亚热带土壤动物[M].北京:科学出版社,1992.
[14]郑乐怡,归鸿.昆虫分类[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,1999.
[15]廖崇惠,李健雄.再论DG指数的性质与应用[J].生物多样性,2009,17(2):127-134.
[16]柯欣,梁文举,宇万太,等.下辽河平原不同土地利用方式下土壤微节肢动物群落结构研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):600-604.
[17]吴玉红,蔡青年,林超文,等.四川紫色土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下中型土壤动物群落结构[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(2):277-282.
[18]董博,张仁涉,荆世杰,等.寿光市不同棚龄温室土壤动物群落结构[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(8):1769-1774.
[19]刘满强,胡锋,李辉信,等.退化红壤不同人工林恢复下土壤节肢动物群落特征[J].生态学报,2002,22(1):54-61.

Last Update: 2011-04-13