我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

喀斯特山地不同人工林土壤酶活性与草本层结构特征的关系(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2011年02期
Page:
99-102
Column:
喀斯特地区生态恢复研究专栏
publishdate:
2011-03-28

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Relationship between soil enzyme activities and structural characteristics of herbaceous layer in different plantations in Karst area
Author(s):
LIU Chenggang RONG Yu XUE Jianhui* YAO Jian
iangsu Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecological Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Keywords:
plantationsoil enzyme activities structural characteristicsKarst area
Classification number :
S718;S714
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.021
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
The relationship between soil enzyme activities and structural characteristics of herbaceous layer in different types of stand were studied by taking three different types of young plantations (Robinia pseudoacacia,Cupressusduclouxiana and R.pseudoacacia-C.duclouxiana) and nonplanted land in Karst area, Guizhou province as the study area. The results showed that (1) Soil enzyme activities of urease, invertase, alkaline phosphatase and catalase were the lowest except polyphenoloxidase in nonplanted land; (2) Characteristic values of herbaceous layer:ShannonWeiner diversity index (H), Pielou evenness index (Ep) and species richness index (R) showed the same trend,the ecological dominance index (C′) was opposite; (3)The correlation between soil enzyme and characteristic values of herbaceous layer had some differences due to types of soil enzymes. Significant correlation was found between soil enzyme activities of urease, invertase, alkaline phosphatase or catalase and H,Ep,R,C′, while it was very lower of polyphenoloxidase.

References

[1]杨万勤,王开运.森林土壤酶的研究进展[J].林业科学,2004,40(2):152-159.
[2]Cao C, Jiang D, Teng X, et al.Soil chemical and microbiological properties along a chronosequence of Caragana microphylla Lam.plantations in the Horqin sandy land of Northeast China[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2008,40(1):78-85.
[3]李国雷,刘勇,李瑞生,等.油松人工林土壤质量的演变[J].林业科学,2008,44(9):76-81.
[4]王兵,刘国彬,薛萐,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(3):282-287.
[5]何斌,贾黎明,金大刚,等.广西南宁马占相思人工林土壤肥力变化的研究[J].林业科学,2007,43(5):10-16.
[6]兰雪,戴全厚,喻理飞,等.喀斯特退化森林不同恢复阶段土壤酶活性研究[J].农业现代化研究,2009,30(5):620-624.
[7]韩文衡,李先琨,叶铎,等.桂西北喀斯特区常绿落叶阔叶混交林种群种间联结性与相关性[J].山地学报,2009,27(6):719-726.
[8]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[9]周礼恺.土壤酶学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
[10]李振高,骆永明,滕应.土壤与环境微生物研究法[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[11]刘占锋,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(3):901-913.
[12]郭蓓,刘勇,李国雷,等.飞播油松林地土壤酶活性对间伐强度的响应[J].林业科学,2007,43(7):128-133.
[13]胡延杰,翟明普,武觐文,等.杨树刺槐混交林及纯林土壤酶活性的季节性动态研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2001,23(5):23-26.
[14]汪贵斌,曹福亮,程鹏,等.不同银杏复合经营模式土壤酶活性及综合评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010,34(4):1-6.
[15]王健,刘作新.油松刺槐混交林土壤生物学特性研究[J].干旱区研究,2004,21(4):348-352.
[16]Moscatelli M C,Lagomarsino A, Angelis P D, et al.Seasonality of soil biological properties in a poplar plantation growing under elevated atmospheric CO2[J].Applied Soil Ecoloogy,2005,30(3):162-173.
[17]Pinay G,Barbera P,Carreras P A,et al.Impact of atmospheric CO2 and plant life forms on soil microbial activities[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2007,39(1):33-42.
[18]Elfstrand S, Hedlund K, Martensson A.Soil enzyme activities,microbial community composition and function after 47 years of continuous green manuring[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2007,35(3):610–621.
[19]陈立明,丁雷,满秀玲.云冷杉林土壤酶活性与植物多样性[J].东北林业大学学报,2009,37(3):58-61.

Last Update: 2011-04-13