我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

杨麦间作系统硝态氮淋失的原位研究(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2012年02期
Page:
111-116
Column:
城镇绿地特殊生境生态修复关键技术研究专栏
publishdate:
2012-04-10

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Study on nitrate nitrogen leaching in poplar-wheat intercropping ecosystem by in situ analysis
Author(s):
WU Dianming XUE Jianhui* LUO Ying SHI Hao
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecological Engineering, College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Keywords:
poplar-wheat intercropping ecosystem nitrate leaching stand density
Classification number :
S718
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.02.023
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
By using in situ leaching device, a field experiment was conducted to study the nitrate leaching amount and density at 60 cm soil depth, nitrate accumulation in soil profile(0-80 cm)of poplar-wheat intercropping ecosystem. Four treatments were installed, no fertilization(N0,0 kg/hm2),conventional fertilization(N140,140 kg/hm2),reduced N application(N70,70 kg/hm2),increased N application(N210,210 kg/hm2). The results indicated a positive correlation between quantity of leachate water and precipitation, the poplar-wheat intercropping ecosystem can reduce the quantity of eluviate solution. The nitrate leaching loss increased according to the increasing N fertilization rate. In treatment spot N210, the nitrate nitrogen loss from N fertilization at 60 cm soil depth was the greatest(13.89 kg/hm2), it declined by 60.27% and 50.11% in poplar-wheat intercropping ecosystem away from the poplar row 0.5 m and 1.5 m, respectly. The nitrogen leaching and accumulation were significantly lower in poplar-wheat intercropping ecosystem, and variances of the distribution for soil nitrate nitrogen were significant.

References

[1] 朱兆良,范晓晖,孙永红,等.太湖地区水稻土上稻季氮素循环及其环境效应[J].作物研究,2004(4): 187-191.
[2] 田玉华,贺发云,尹斌,等.太湖地区氮磷肥施用对稻田氨挥发的影响[J].土壤学报,2007,44(5):893-900.
[3] 黄明蔚,刘敏,陆敏,等.稻麦轮作农田系统中氮素渗漏流失的研究[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(4):629-636.
[4] 尹晓芳,同延安,张树兰,等.关中地区小麦/玉米轮作农田硝态氮淋溶特点[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(3):640-646.
[5] 黄东风,王果,李卫华,等.不同施肥模式对蔬菜生长、氮肥利用及菜地氮流失的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(3):631-638.
[6] 谭德水,江丽华,张骞,等.不同施肥模式调控沿湖农田无机氮流失的原位研究—以南四湖过水区良田为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3488-3496.
[7] 叶优良,孙建好,李隆,等.小麦/玉米间作根系相互作用对氮素吸收和土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(11):33-37.
[8] 吴家森,姜培坤,谢秉楼,等.不同施肥处理对雷竹林土壤氮、磷渗漏流失的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(3):60-64.
[9] 易时来,石孝均,温明霞,等.小麦生长季氮素在紫色土中的迁移和淋失[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(4):46-49.
[10] 汪涛,朱波,祝福虹,等.有机-无机肥配施对紫色土坡耕地氮素淋失的影响[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(4):781-788.
[11] Jose S. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview[J]. Agroforestry System, 2009, 76:1-10.
[12] 王庆成,于红丽,姚琴,等.河岸带对陆地水体氮素输入的截流转化作用[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(11): 2611-2617.
[13] Zamora D S, Jose S, Napolitano K. Competition for 15N labeled nitrogen in a loblolly pine-cotton alley cropping system in the southeastern United States[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2009, 131: 40-50.
[14] 孙辉,谢嘉穗,唐亚.坡耕地等高固氮植物篱复合经营系统根系分布格局研究[J].林业科学,2005, 41(2):8-15.
[15] Allen S C, Jose S, Nair P K R, et al. Safety-net role of tree roots: evidence from a pecan(Carya illinoensis K. Koch)-cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.)alley cropping system in the southern United States[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 192:395-407.
[16] 尹飞,毛任钊,付博杰,等.枣粮间作生态系统土壤氮空间分布特性[J].生态学报,2009,29(1):325-331.

Last Update: 2012-04-10