我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

刘氏短须螨危害对水杉生理生化物质及挥发物的影响(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2012年03期
Page:
28-32
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2012-05-30

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Effects of Brevipalpus lewisi infested on physiological, biochemical and volatile components in Metasequoia glyptostroboides leaves
Author(s):
FAN Binqi12SU Peng1HAO Dejun1*WANG Yan2 ZHANG Yuefeng2
1.College of Forest Resources and Environment,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China; 2.Forest Station of Shanghai,Shanghai 200072,China
Keywords:
Brevipalpus lewisi Metasequoia glyptostroboides physiological and biochemical substances volatiles protective enzyme
Classification number :
S763; S718.43
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.03.007
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
Chlorophyll, soluble sugar, free amino acids, flavonoids, tannin, volatiles components and the activities of protective enzymes in healthy and mite-infested leaves of Metasequoia glyptostroboides were measured by plant physiological and biochemistry methods. The results showed that compared with healthy leaves of M. glyptostroboides, the content of chlorophyll, soluble sugar and free amino acids reduced 18.5%, 12.8% and 12.2% respectively, while the content of flavonoids and tannin increased 26.6% and 25.8%, respectively. The activities of peroxidase increased 65%, and the activities of superoxide dismutase increased 139%, which were obviously higher than that of control. 35 compositions in healthy leaves and 33 compositions in infested leaves were detected and identified respectively by SPME-GC-MS. 28 compositions of which were the same. The results suggested that some physiological and biochemical parameters were changed in M. glyptostroboides leaves injured by Brevipalpus lewisi.

References

[1] 马恩沛,沈兆鹏,陈熙雯,等.中国农业害螨[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1984.
[2] 樊斌琦,郝德君,叶建仁,等.四种农药对刘氏短须螨的毒力测定及药效试验[J].中国森林病虫,2010(6):42-43.
[3] 樊斌琦.刘氏短须螨生物学及危害特性研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2010.
[4] Agrawal A A. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance[J]. Science, 1998, 279: 1201-1202.
[5] 秦秋菊,高希武.昆虫取食诱导的植物防御反应[J].昆虫学报,2005,48(1):125-134.
[6] 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[7] 项昭保,任绍光,石轶松,等.吸光光度法测定荞麦中总黄酮[J].理化检验:化学分册,2002,38(9):436-437.
[8] 武予清,郭予元.棉花植株中的单宁测定方法研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):243-245.
[9] 许雅娟,赵艳景,胡虹.邻苯三酚自氧化法测定超氧化物歧化酶活性的研究[J].西南民族大学学报,2006,32(6):1207-1212.
[10] 郝德君,马良进.火炬松挥发物的固相微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法分析[J].分析科学学报,2008,24(1):88-90.
[11] 朱麟,杨振德,赵博光,等.植食性昆虫诱导的植物抗性最新研究进展[J].林业科学,2005,44(1):165-173.
[12] 杨振德,常明山,韦立秀,等.黛袋蛾取食及喷施农药对尾叶桉幼苗某些生理生化指标的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(7):11-12.
[13] 陈应武,窦彩虹,张新虎,等.苹果梨叶片几种生理生化指标对梨上瘿螨为害的响应[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2006,23(4):509-513.
[14] Hoffland E, Dicke M, Tintelen W V, et al. Nitrogen availability and defense of tomato against two-spotted spider mite[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2000, 26(12): 2697-2711.
[15] 吴娟,李琳一,许翔,等.番茄刺皮瘿螨对番茄叶片生理指标的影响[J].园艺学报,2006,33(6):1215-1218.

Last Update: 2012-05-30