我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

慈竹不同变异类型的纤维形态研究(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2013年04期
Page:
99-104
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2013-07-15

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Fiber morphology of different variation types of Neosinocalamus affinis(Rendle)Keng f.
Article ID:
1000-2006(2013)04-0099-06
Author(s):
GAN Xiaohong12 CHEN Feng12 LIN Shuyan3 DING Yulong3 XIE Hai4
1. College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009,China;
2. Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation of Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009,China;
3. Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
4. Chemistry and Biology Engineering Department, Panzhihua College, Panzhihua 617000,China
Keywords:
Neosinocalamus affinis(Rendle)Keng f. variation types fiber morphology utilization value
Classification number :
S795.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.019
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
The fiber morphologies of six variation types of Neosinocalamus affinis(Rendle)Keng f. at Qingshen county of Sichuan province were investigated and compared each other, and their utilization value were also examined. The average length of fibers of six variation types was all longer than 1.6 mm, and longer than that of Moso except ‘Luohanci’. The maximum frequency of fiber length distribution of N.affinis, Neosinocalamus affinis cv. flavidorivens and ‘Shetouci’, was within 2.0-3.0 mm, and that of other variations was within 1.0-2.0 mm. The average length/width ratio of different variations except for ‘Luohanci’ was bigger than 100, and bigger than that of Moso. The average wall/lumen ratio of all fiber type was from 1.77 to 3.96, and smaller than that of Moso. Longitudinally, the variation rules of fiber length, width, and length/width ratio and lumen of all variation types, were different among different variation types, but that of fiber wall thickness and wall/lumen ratio were similar. Radically, the variation rules of all fiber morphological indexes of all variation types were similar, and the length and lumen of fibers in the inner part of culm wall were all bigger than that in the outer, but the fiber width, length/width ratio, and wall thickness and wall/lumen ratio in inner part were all smaller than that in the outer. The results showed that they are good for paper-making except for ‘Luohanci’, and the property for making the pulp and paper of N. affinis cv. flavidorivens is the best.

References

[1] 易同培,史军义,马丽莎,等.中国竹类图志[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[2] 易同培.四川竹类植物志[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997.
[3] 谭宏超,贺帮钊.慈竹丰产栽培及效益分析[J].云南林业,2003,24(2):16. Tan H C, He B Z.The high yielding and cultivation of Neosinocalamus affini and its benefit analysis[J].Yunnan Forestry, 2003,24(2):16.
[4] 隆学武,江心,杨冬生.慈竹施肥研究[J].福建林业科技,1996,23(2):38-43. Long X W, Jiang X, Yang D S. Fertilization research of Neosinocalamus affinis[J].Fujian Forestry Scientific and Technology, 1996,23(2):38-43.
[5] 吴萌,韩铎.慈竹的采伐年龄[J].资源开发与保护杂志,1987,3(1):32-34. Wu M, Han D. The cutting age of Neosinocalamus affinis [J]. Journal of Resource Development and Protection,1987, 3(1):32-34.
[6] 苏智先,钟章成.慈竹无性系种群生长发育规律初探[J].应用生态学报,1992,3(3):289-291. Su Z X, Zhong Z C. Growth and development patterns of clone population of Neosinocalamus affinis [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,1992,3(3):289-291.
[7] 李志清,陈中豪,林曙明.不同年生慈竹木质素特性及分布的研究[J].纤维素科学与技术,1993, 1(2):39-46. Li Z Q, Chen Z H, Lin S M.Distribution and characterization of different aged bamboo(Sinocalamus affinis)lignin[J]. Cellulose Science and Technology, 1993, 1(2):39-46.
[8] 胡尚连,蒋瑶,陈其兵,等.四川两种丛生竹理化特性及纤维形态研究[J].植物研究,2010,30(6):708-712. Hu S L, Jiang Y, Chen Q B,et al. Physical and chemical characteristics and fiber morphology of two sympodial bamboos in Sichuan[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2010,30(6):708-712.
[9] 陈其兵,蒋瑶,卢学琴,等.四川不同地区慈竹的遗传多样性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2009,37(6):188-193. Chen Q B, Jiang Y, Lu X Q, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity in Neosinocalamus affinis from different regions of Sichuan province[J]. Journal of Northwest A &F University:Nat Sci Ed, 2009,37(6):188-193.
[10] 马灵飞,朱丽青.浙江省6种丛生竹纤维形态及组织比量的研究[J].浙江林学院学报,1990,7(1):63-68. Ma L F, Zhu L Q. Fibre forms and tissue percentage of six species of sympodial bamboos in Zhejiang province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 1990,7(1):63-68.
[11] Liese W.The Anatomy of Bamboo Culms[R].Beijing:INBAR Tech Rep 18, 1998.
[12] 夏玉芳.料慈竹纤维形态和造纸性能及与其他竹种的比较研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,1997,16(4):16-20. Xia Y F. Study of the fiber forms and papermaking properties of Bambusa distegia and comparision with other bamboo species[J]. Bamboo Research, 1997,16(4):16-20.
[13] 刘晓波,韩绍中,穆道友,等. 德宏州巨龙竹纤维形态和化学成分与制浆性能的初步研究[J].昆明理工大学学报:理工版,2006,31(1):83-88. Liu X B, Han S Z, Mu D Y, et al. Preliminary study on the chemical component and fiber morphology and pulping properties of Dendrocalamus sinicus from Dehongzhou[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology:Science and Technology, 2006,31(1):83-88.
[14] 杨淑敏,江泽慧,任海青.竹类解剖特性研究现状及展望[J].世界竹藤通讯,2006,4(3):1-6. Yang S M, Jiang Z H,Ren H Q. Present status and advances in anatomical characteristics of bamboo[J]. World Bamboo and Rattan,2006,4(3):1-6.
[15] 方红,刘善辉.造纸纤维原料评价[J].木材工业,1996,16(2):19-22. Fang H, Liu S H. The evaluation of papermaking fibrous material[J]. China Wood Industry,1996,16(2):19-22.

Last Update: 2013-07-30