我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

华南3种人工林土壤有机质和养分含量及其综合评价(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2014年02期
Page:
81-85
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2014-03-24

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Soil organic matter and nutrient contents and integrated evaluation of them under three typical planted forests in south China
Article ID:
1000-2006(2014)02-0081-05
Author(s):
LIU Feipeng1 CHU Shuangshuang2 PEI Xiangyang2MO Luojian3 CHEN Jieying2ZENG Shucai2*
1. Guangdong Forest Investigation and Planning Institute, Guangzhou 510520, China;
2. College of Forestry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;
3. Dongguan City Forest Research Institute of Guangdong Province, Dongguan
Keywords:
soil organic matter soil nutrient integrated evaluation coefficient Eucalyptus spp. Masson pine Chinese fir
Classification number :
S718
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.016
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
Based on the soil data of the 6th forest resource inventory of Guangdong province, this paper analyzed the soil organic matter(SOM)and nutrient contents of three important plantations, Eucalyptus spp.(ES), masson pine(MP)and Chinese fir(CF)plantations,in south China, and conducted integrated evaluation of SOM and soil nutrients. Results showed that SOM and available phosphorus(P)contents in soil horizon A under ES were significantly higher than that under CF and MP, but total and available potassium(K)contents in horizons A and B under ES were significantly lower than that under CF and MP(p<0.05).The three plantations did not significantly differ from each other in total and available nitrogen(N), total P, available copper(Cu)or available zinc(Zn)in horizons A and B(p>0.05). Under the three plantations, the SOM, total N, available N, P and Zn contents in soil horizon A were significantly higher than that in horizon B, but total P, total K and available Cu were not significantly different between the two horizons.Soil integrated evaluation coefficients of horizon A followed an order of ES>MP> CF, while those of horizon B exhibited an order of CF> MP> ES.

References

[1] 赵筱青,和春兰,易琦.大面积桉树引种区土壤水分及水源涵养性能研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2012,26(3):205-210. Zhao X Q, He C L, Yi Q. Soil moisture and water conservation in Eucalyptus uraphylla spp. introduction mountain area[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,26(3):205-210.
[2] Miehle P, Grote R, Battaglia M, et al. Evaluation of a process-based ecosystem model for long-term biomass and stand development of Eucalyptus globulus plantations[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2010, 129(3): 377-391.
[3] Chen F L, Zheng H, Zhang K, et al. Changes in soil microbial community structure and metabolic activity following conversion from native Pinus massoniana plantations to exotic Eucalyptus plantations[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 291:65-72.
[4] Zohar Y, Gafni A, Morris J, et al. Eucalyptus plantations in Israel: an assessment of economic and environmental viability[J]. New Forests, 2008, 36(2): 135-157.
[5] 吴琼辉,张浩. 广东省桉树人工林发展现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 广东林业科技, 2006, 22(3):133-136. Wu Q H,Zhang H. The presentconditionofdevelopment and sustainable management of Eucalyptus plantation in Guangdong province[J]. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology,2006, 22(3):133-136.
[6] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[7] 钟继洪,骆伯胜. 短轮伐林地土壤肥力的数值化综合评价[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2003,19(1):75-80. Zhong J H, Luo B S. Integrated digitization evaluation on soil fertility of short rotation Eucalyptus land[J]. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture, 2003,19(1):75-80.
[8] 司志国,彭志宏,俞元春,等.徐州城市绿地土壤肥力质量评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(3):60-64. Si Z G, Peng Z H, Yu Y C, et al. Fertility quality assessment of urban green space soils in Xuzhou city[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013,37(3):60-64.
[9] 熊毅,李庆逵. 中国土壤[M]. 2版.北京:科学出版社,1988.
[10] Liu Z P, Shao M, Wang Y Q, et al.Effect of environmental factors on regional soil organic carbon stocks across the Loess Plateau region, China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 142(3):184-194.
[11] Yuan Z Q, Gazol A, Lin F, et al. Soil organic carbon in an old-growth temperate forest: spatial pattern, determinants and bias in its quantification[J].Geoderma, 2013, 195: 48-55.
[12] 林开敏,章志琴,叶发茂,等.杉木人工林下杉木、楠木和木荷叶凋落物分解特征及营养元素含量变化的动态分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2010, 19(2):34-39. Lin K M, Zhang Z Q, Ye F M, et al. Dynamic analysis of decomposition characteristics and content change of nutrient elements of leaf litter of Cunninghamia lanceolata, Phoebe bournei and Schima superb under C. lanceolata artificial forest[J].Journal of Plant Resources and Environment,2010, 19(2):34-39.
[13] 王淑平,周广盛,吕育财,等. 中国东北样带(NECT)土壤碳、氮、磷的梯度分布及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(5):513-517. Wang S P,Zhou G S,Lv Y C, et al. Distribution of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus along northeast China transect(NECT)and their relationships with climatic factors[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2002, 26(5):513-517.
[14] 陈刚才,甘露, 王仕禄,等. 土壤氮素及其环境效应[J]. 地质地球化学, 2001, 29(1):63-67. Chen G C,Gan L, Wang S L, et la. Soil nitrogen and its environmental effects[J]. Geology-geochemistry, 2001, 29(1):63-67.
[15] 欧勇胜,张世熔,余琼,等. 横断山北部生态脆弱区土壤磷素空间分布特征[J].生态学报,2005,25(10):2776-2781. Ou Y S, Zhang S R, Yu Q, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of the soil phosphorus in the ecological fragile area in the north of Hengduan Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(10):2776-2781.
[16] 田大伦,方晰,项文化.湖南会同杉木人工林生态系统碳素密度[J].生态学报,2004,24(11):2382-2386. Tian Da L, Fang X, Xiang W H. Carbon density of the Chinese fir plantation ecosystem at Huitong, Hunan province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(11):2382-2386.
[17] 陶贞,沈承德,高全洲,等. 高寒草甸土壤有机碳储量及其垂直分布特征[J]. 地理学报,2006,61(7):720-728. Tao Z, Shen C D, Gao Q Z, et al. Soil organic carbon storage and vertical distribution of alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006,61(7):720-728.
[18] 纪浩,董希斌.大兴安岭低质林改造后土壤肥力综合评价[J].林业科学, 2012, 48(11):117-123. Ji H, Dong X B. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility after transformation of the low-quality forest in the Daxing'anling Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(11):117-123.
[19] 高志勤,傅懋毅.经营方式对毛竹林土壤肥力指数的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,32(4):81-85. Gao Z Q, Fu M Y. Effects of management styles on soil fertility index of different structure Phyllostachys edulis stands[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2008,32(4):81-85.
[20] 许晓伟,万福绪,杨东,等.3种中山杉种植模式对上海沿海土壤肥力的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(1):163-167. Xu X W, Wan F X, Yang D, et al. Effects of three planting patterns of Ascendens mucronatum on soil fertility in Shanghai costal areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013,37(1):163-167.

Last Update: 2014-03-10