我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

伐木制品碳储量计量方法的比较(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2014年03期
Page:
149-154
Column:
论坛
publishdate:
2014-05-15

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Evaluation of approaches for estimating carbon storage of wood products
Article ID:
1000-2006(2014)03-0149-06
Author(s):
YUAN Leilei CHEN Xingliang*
Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091,China
Keywords:
harvested wood products climate change greenhouse gas emissions changes in carbon stock
Classification number :
S718.56
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.03.029
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
This study employed four approaches for estimating carbon storage in HWP, including the IPCC Default Approach, the Stock-Change Approach, the Production Approach, and the Atmospheric-flow Approach, according to the four criteria being feasibility of approach, accuracy of approach, the relevance to the reporting needs of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC)and Kyoto Protocol(KP), and relevance to national policies. This study is to help policy-makers choose an approach to be used in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories under the IPCC Guidelines before it is mandatory to report the HWP for the Parties under the KP. We found that at the national level, the four approaches gave significantly different results and had different political, social-economic and environmental implications. Indeed, an internationally agreed approach was crucial to avoid double accounting or omission. However, all the approaches have both advantages and disadvantages concerning the achievement of political goals, while none of them is perfect. Then, this paper makes no policy recommendations as it is extremely complicated to take the direct and indirect incentives, as well as different scenarios assumed and conflicting policy goals into consideration.

References

[1] Richards K R, Stokes C. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research [J]. Climatic Change, 2004, 63(1-2): 1-48.
[2] Sohngen B, Brown S. Extending timber rotations: carbon and cost implications [J]. Climate Policy, 2008, 8(5): 435-451.
[3] Buchanan A H, Levine S B. Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 1999, 2(6): 427-437.
[4] Dias A C, Arroja L, Capela I. Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal [J]. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2007, 12(7): 521-528.
[5] González-García S, Moreira M T, Artal G, et al. Environmental impact assessment of non-wood based pulp production by sodaanthtraquinone pulping process [J]. J Clean Prod, 2010, 18(2): 137-145.
[6] Winjum J K, Brown S, Schlamadinger B. Forest harvests and wood products: sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide [J]. Forest Science, 1998, 44(2): 272-284.
[7] Liu G L, Han S J. Long-term forest management and timely transfer of carbon into wood products help reduce atmospheric carbon [J]. Ecological Modeling, 2009, 220(13-14): 1719-1723.
[8] Daigneault A J, Miranda M J, Sohngen B. Optimal forest management with carbon sequestration credits and endogenous fire risk [J]. Land Econ, 2010, 86(1): 155-172.
[9] Green C, Avitabile V, Farrell E P. et al. Reporting harvested wood products in national greenhouse gas inventories: implications for Ireland [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30(2): 105-114.
[10] Andrew R G, Leif G, Erik E, et al. Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution [J]. Can J For Res, 2007, 37(3): 671-681.
[11] Metz B, Davidson O R, Bosch P R, et al. Forestry. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of IPCC [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[12] Pingoud K, Perälä A L, Soimakllio S, et al. Greenhouse gas impacts of harvest wood products. Evaluation and development of methods [C]// Research Centre of Finland. VTT Research Notes 2189. Espoo: VTT, 2003.
[13] Matthews R, Robertson K. Answers to ten frequently asked questions about bioenergy, carbon sinks and their role in global climate change[EB/OL]//
[2013-08-25] http://www.joanneum.at/IEA-Bioenergy-Task 38.
[14] Niles J O, Schwarze R. The value of careful carbon accounting in wood products [J]. Climatic Change, 2001, 49(4): 371-376.
[15] Petersen A K, Solberg B. Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden [J]. For Policy Econ, 2005,7(3):249-259.
[16] Gustavsson L, Pingoud K, Sathre R. Carbon dioxide balance of wood substitution: comparing concrete and wood-framed buildings [J]. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2006, 11(3): 667-691.
[17] Werner F, Taverna R, Hofer P, et al. Greenhouse gas dynamics of an increased use of wood in buildings in Switzerland [J]. Climatic Change, 2006, 74(1-3):319-347.
[18] Jandi R, Vesterdal L, Ollson M, et al. Carbon sequestration and forest management [EB/OL]//
[2013-08-25] http://www.cababstroctsplus.org/cabreviews. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science:Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2007, 2(17):1-16.
[19] Walker N, Bazilian M, Buckley P. Possibilities of reducing CO2 emissions from energy-in tensive industries by the increased use of forest-derived fuels in Ireland [J]. Biomass Bioenergy, 2009, 33(9):1229-1238.
[20] Tsunetsugu Y, Tonosaki M. Quantitative estimation of carbon removal effects due to wood utilization up to 2050 in Japan: effects from carbon storage and substitution of fossil fuels by harvested wood products[J]. Journal of Wood Science, 2010, 56(4):339-344.
[21] Lim B, Brown S, Schlamadinger B. Carbon accounting for forest harvesting and wood products: review and evaluation of different approaches [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 1999, 2(2): 207-216
[22] 白彦峰. 中国木质林产品碳储量 [D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2010. Bai Y F. Carbon stock in harvested wood products in China [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2010.
[23] Chen J, Colombo S J, Ter-Mikaelian M T, et al. Carbon budget of Ontario’s managed forests and harvested wood products, 2001 2100 [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259: 1385-1398.
[24] Skog K E, Nicholson G A. Carbon cycling through wood products: the role of wood and paper products in carbon sequestration [J]. Forest Products Journal, 1998, 48(7-8): 75-83.
[25] Stockmann K D, Anderson N M, Skog K E, et al. Estimates of carbon stored in HWPs from the United States forest service northern region, 1906-2010 [J]. Carbon Balance and Management, 2012, 7:1-16.
[26] Nepal P, Robert K G, Donald L G. Financial feasibility of increasing carbon sequestration in harvested wood products in Mississippi [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2012,14: 99-106.
[27] Kayo C, Tsunetsugu Y, Noda H. et al. Carbon balance assessments of harvested wood products in Japan taking account of inter-regional flows [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2014,37:215-226.
[28] Dias A C, Louro M, Arroja L et al. Carbon estimation in harvested wood products using a country-specific method: Portugal as a case study [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2007, 10(3):250-259.
[29] Dias A C, Louro M, Arroja L. et al. Comparison of methods for estimating carbon in harvested wood products [J]. Biomass and bioenergy, 2009, 33(2): 213-222.
[30] Hashimoto S, Nose M, Obara T, et al. Wood products: potential carbon sequestration and impact on net carbon emissions of industrialized countries [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2002,5(2): 183-193.
[31] Marland E S, Stellar K, Marland G H. A distributed approach to accounting for carbon in wood products [J]. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2010, 15(1):71-91.
[32] Profft I, Martina M, Georg-Ernst W. et al. Forest management and carbon sequestration in wood products [J]. Eur J Forest Res, 2009, 128(4):399-413.
[33] Pandey D, Agrawal M, Pandey J. Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation [J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2011, 178: 135-160.
[34] Heath L S, Maltby V, Miner R, et al. Greenhouse gas and carbon profile of the U.S. forest products industry value chain [J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44(10): 3999-4005.
[35] Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, et al. Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry [C]// Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies(IGES)for the IPCC, 2004.
[36] Upton B, Miner R, Spinney M, et al. The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States [J]. Biomass Bioenergy, 2008, 32(1):1-10.
[37] Gerilla G P, Teknomo K, Hokao K. An environmental assessment of wood and steel rein forced concrete housing construction [J]. Building Environ, 2007, 42(7):2778-2784.
[38] Sathre R, O’Connor J. Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution [J].Environmental Science & Policy, 2010, 13(2):104-114.
[39] IPCC. Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories[C]// Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Technical Support Unit, 2000.
[40] Nabuurs G J, Sikkema R. International trade in wood products: its role in the land use change and forestry carbon cycle [J]. Climatic Change, 2001, 49(4): 377-395.
[41] Hashimoto S. Different accounting approaches to HWP in national greenhouse gas inventories: their incentives to achievement of major policy goals [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2008, 11(8):756-771.

Last Update: 2014-05-15