我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2015年03期
Page:
71-77
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2015-05-30

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Soil quality comprehensive assessment of different plant communities in Shanghai green belt
Article ID:
1000-2006(2015)03-0071-07
Author(s):
ZHANG Kaixuan1 SHANG Kankan2 DA Liangjun3*
1. Department of Tourism and Food, Shanghai Business College, Shanghai 201400, China;
2. Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China;
3. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Ecology of Urbanization Process and Eco-restoration, College of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062,China
Keywords:
urban forest Shanghai green belt plant community soil quality principal components analysis
Classification number :
S714
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.014
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
To explore the soil improvement service of plant communities, and provide a scientific basis for urban forest planning and management, soil samples were collected from seven plant communities in Shanghai green belt with bare lands as the control. Eight soil physical and chemical indicators were measured in different soil depth, including soil bulk density, capillary porosity, total porosity, organic matter, total N, total P, NH+4-N and NO-3-N. Principal component analysis was used to assess the comprehensive soil quality based on those indicators. Results showed that soil improvements were mainly on the surface of soil(0-20 cm), with different soil improvement effects of each plant communities. Deciduous broad leaved forest with Platanus×hispanica as dominate species and deciduous coniferous forest with Taxodium distichum var. imbricarium as dominate species had the greatest improvement effect, deciduous broad-leaved forest with Koelreuteria bipinnata var. integrifoliola as dominate species had the least improvement effect, and the other communities were in the middle level. Lower-intense-management was helpful to litter layer accumulating, and facilitate the recruitment of understory seedlings and herbs, which could contribute to the overall improvement of soil quality.

References

[1] Aerts R, Chapin Ⅲ F S. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns [J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 2000, 30:1-67.
[2] Fitter A H. Darkness visible: reflection on underground ecology [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2005, 93(2): 231-243.
[3] 阎恩荣.常绿阔叶林退化过程中土壤的养分库动态及植物的养分利用策略[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2006.Yan E R. Dynamics of soil nutrient pools, nutrient use strategies of dominant trees in the typical and degraded evergreen broad-leaved forests [D].Shanghai:East China Normal University,2006.
[4] 葛永金, 袁位高, 江波,等.浙江省生态公益林土壤理化性质的初步研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2006, 28(6):828-832.Ge Y J, Yuan W G, Jiang B, et al. Preliminary studies on soil physic-chemical properties of ecological forest in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2006, 28(6): 828-832.
[5] 司志国, 彭志宏, 俞元春, 等. 徐州城市绿地土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 37(3): 60-64. Si Z G, Peng Z H, Yu Y C, et al. Fertility quality assessment of urban green space soils in Xuzhou City[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013, 37(3): 60-64.
[6] 项建光, 方海兰, 杨意, 等.上海典型新建绿地的土壤质量评价[J].土壤, 2004, 36(4): 424-429.Xiang J G,Fang H L, Yang Y, et al. Soil quality evaluation of some typical newly-established green belts in Shanghai[J]. Soils, 2004, 36(4): 424-429.
[7] 包兵, 吴丹, 胡艳燕,等. 重庆主城区市街绿地土壤肥力质量评价及管理对策[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2007, 29(11):100-105.Bao B, Wu D, Hu Y Y, et al. Assessment of soil fertility quality for urban green spaces in Chongqing City and measures for their management[J]. Journal of Southwest University:Natural Science Edition, 2007,29(11):100-105.
[8] 单奇华, 俞元春, 张建锋,等.城市森林土壤肥力质量综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):186-189, 223.Shan Q H, Yu Y C, Zhang J F, et al. Comprehensive estimation of soil fertility in urban forest[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009,29(4):186-189,223.
[9] 刘为华,张桂莲,徐飞,等.上海城市森林土壤理化性质[J].浙江林学院学报,2009, 26(2):155-163.Liu W H, Zhang G L, Xu F, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties in Shanghai’s urban forests[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2009, 26(2):155-163.
[10] 张凯旋,车生泉,马少初,等.城市化进程中上海植被的多样性、空间格局和动态响应(Ⅵ):上海外环林带群落多样性与结构特征[J]. 华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2011(4):1-14.Zhang K X, Che S Q, Ma S C,et al. Diversity, spatial pattern and dynamics of vegetation under urbanization in Shanghai(Ⅵ):community diversity and its structural characteristics of Shanghai green belt[J]. Journal of East China Normal University:Natural Science, 2011(4):1-14.
[11] 张凯旋,张建华.上海环城林带保健功能评价及其机制[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(13):4189-4198Zhang K X,Zhang J H. Health function evaluation and exploring its mechanisms in Shanghai green belt[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(13):4189-4198.
[12] Yan E R, Wang X H, Guo M, et al. Temporal patterns of net soil N mineralization and nitrification through secondary succession in the subtropical forests of eastern China [J]. Plant Soil, 2009, 320(1-2):181-194.
[13] 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所.LY/T 1215—1999 森林土壤水分-物理性质的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.
[14] 刘世梁, 马克明, 傅伯杰,等.北京东灵山地区地形土壤因子与植物群落关系研究[J].植物生态学报, 2003,27(4): 496-502.Liu S L, Ma K M, Fu B J, et al.The relationship between landform, soil characteristics and plant community structure in the Donglingshan Mountain Region, Beijing[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003,27(4):496-502.
[15] 孙慧珍, 陈明月, 蔡春菊,等.不同类型城市森林对土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2009,20(12): 2871-2876.Sun H Z, Chen M Y, Cai C J, et al.Effects of different type urban forest plantations on soil fertility [J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009,20(12): 2871-2876.
[16] 吴玉红, 田霄鸿, 同延安,等.基于主成分分析的土壤肥力综合指数评价[J].生态学杂志, 2010, 29(1):173-180.Wu Y H, Tian X H, Tong Y A. Assessment of integrated soil fertility index based on principal components analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29(1):173-180.
[17] 许明祥, 刘国彬, 赵允格.黄土丘陵区侵蚀土壤质量评价[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2005,11(3): 285-293.Xu M X, Liu G B, Zhao Y G. Quality assessment of erosion soil on hilly Loess Plateau [J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2005,11(3): 285-293.
[18] Logsdon S D, Karlen D L. Bulk density as a soil quality indicator during conversion to no-tillage [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004, 78(2):143-149.
[19] Carter M R. Soil quality for sustainable land management: Organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions [J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94(1): 38-47.
[20] 曹鹤, 薛立, 谢腾芳,等.华南地区八种人工林的土壤物理性质[J].生态学杂志, 2009, 28(4): 620-625.Cao H, Xue L, Xie T F, et al. Cluster analysis of eight artificial forest stands in south China based on soil physical properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(4): 620-625.
[21] 王震洪, 段昌群, 文传浩,等.滇中三种人工林群落控制土壤侵蚀和改良土壤效应[J].水土保持通报, 2001,21(2):23-27.Wang Z H, Duan C Q, Wen C H, et al. Soil erosion and soil improvement of three artificial forest communities in middle Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001,21(2): 23-27.
[22] 郑思俊, 张庆费, 吴海萍,等.上海外环线绿地群落凋落物对土壤水分物理性质的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2008,27(7):1122-1126.Zheng S J, Zhang Q F, Wu H P, et al. Effects of greenbelt plant communities’ litterfalls in Shanghai outer ring on soil water physical properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(7):1122-1126.
[23] Mishar A, Sharma S D, Khan G H. Improvement in physical and chemical properties of sodic soil by 3, 6 and 9 years old plantation of Eucalyptus tereticornis: Biorejuvenation of sodic soil [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 184(1-3):115-124.
[24] 杨淑贞, 马原, 蒋平,等.浙江西天目山土壤理化性质的海拔梯度格局[J].华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2009(6):101-107.Yang S Z, Ma Y, Jiang P, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties along altitudes of western Tianmushan, Zhejiang[J]. Journal of East China Normal University:Natural Science, 2009(6):101-107.
[25] 王希华,黄建军,阎恩荣.天童常绿阔叶林若干树种的叶片营养转移研究[J].广西植物, 2004,24(1):81-85.Wang X H, Huang J J,Yan E R. A study on leaf nutrient resorption of some trees in Tiantong National Forest Park [J].Guihaia, 2004,24(1):81-85.

Last Update: 2015-05-30