我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2015年06期
Page:
119-124
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2015-11-30

Article Info:/Info

Title:
The forest landscape quality evaluation of the natural scenic beauty mainly made of secondary forest
Article ID:
1000-2006(2015)06-0119-06
Author(s):
LIANG Shuang1 ZHANG Jie1 QI Jizhong1* XU Chengyang2
1.Forestry College of Beihua University, Jilin 132013, China;
2.College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Keywords:
secondary scenic forest quality of forest landscape SBE method Corn-growing Ditch Forest Park
Classification number :
S718.55+7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.021
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
The landscape quality of natural scenic forest mainly made of secondary forest was in a state of medium or low. The main basis of adjustment and transformation was the result of quality evaluation of in-forest landscape. A secondary scenic forest at Corn-growing Ditch Forest Park's in Jilin City, Jilin Province was taken as an example in this study. The beauty degree was objective target and the Scenic Beauty Estimation(SBE)method was adopted in this study. Main factors affecting the landscape quality of the forest were determined through correlation analysis, ANOVA analysis, regression analysis and cluster analysis. At the same time, a prediction model of quality evaluation was established, and the types of landscape quality were devided. The results showed that the tree form(X4), naturalness degree(X17), perspective distance(X16)and the shrub height(X8)were the main indicators that influenced on the landscape quality of secondary forest. The beauty degree model was built: MSBE=-128.391+15.63X4-3.615X8+20.379X16+17.933X17. With the improvement of tree form, naturalness degree and perspective distance's scores, the beauty degree improved significantly(P<0.05), and when the height of the shrub got higher, the beauty degree's level reduced significantly(P<0.05). According to the results of cluster analysis, the forest landscape was divided into high, medium and low beauty degree of landscape. On the basis of three quality types of the study objects, the forest stand transformation approach were suggested, such as structure adjust, naturalness degree enhancement, forest form optimization, proper shrub's density and height control.

References

[1] Buhyoff G J, Leusehner W A. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands[J]. Forest Science, 1978, 24(3): 242-432.
[2] 翟明普, 张荣, 阎海平. 风景评价在风景林建设中应用研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2003, 16(6): 16-19. Zhai M P, Zhang R, Yan H P. Review on the studies on scenic evaluation and its application in scenic forest construction both at home and abroad[J]. World Forestry Research, 2003, 16(6): 16-19.
[3] Rilbe R G. The aesthetics of forestry:what has empirical preference research taught us[J]. Environmental Management, 1989, 13(1): 55-74.
[4] 邓送求, 闫家锋, 关庆伟. 南京紫金山枫香风景林空间结构分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 34(4): 117-122. Deng S Q, Yan J F, Guan Q W. Spatial structure of scenic forest of Liquidamabar formosana in Nanjing Zijing Mountain[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2010, 34(4): 117-122.
[5] 李明阳, 申世广, 吴翼, 等. 南京紫金山风景林多情景规划方法研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 31(5): 29-33. Li M Y, Shen S G, Wu Y, et al. A study on scenario planning of scenic forest in Zijingshan Mountain of Nanjing[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2007, 31(5): 29-33.
[6] 赵德海. 风景林美学评价方法的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报,1999,14(4):50-54. Zhao D H.Study on method of scenic aesthetics evaluation[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 1999, 14(4):50-54.
[7] Lothian A. Amenity value of scattered and isolated trees[R]. Report to South Australian Native Vegetation Council. Scenic Solutions, Unley, 2004.
[8] 毛斌, 徐程阳, 李乐, 等. 人工油松风景林的林木分级技术[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 49-58. Mao B, Xu C Y, Li L, et al. Tree classification for pinus tabulaeformis scenic plantation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 49-58.
[9] 章志都. 京郊低山风景游憩林质量评价及调控关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010. Zhang Z D. Quality assessing and key adjusting technologies for scenic-recreational forests in the lower mountains of suburbans in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
[10] 毛斌, 徐程扬, 李翠翠, 等. 不同修枝强度对侧柏、油松人工林林内景观美景度的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(3): 123-125. Mao B, Xu C Y, Li C C, et al. Effects of pruning intensity on in-forest landscape of Platycladus orientalis and Pinus tabulaeformis plantations[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28(3): 123-125.
[11] Arthur L M. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests[J]. Forest Science, 1977, 23(2):151-160.
[12] Buhyoff G J, Wellman J D, Daniel T C. Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas[J]. Forest Science, 1982, 28(4): 827-838.
[13] 黄广远. 北京市城区城市森林结构及景观美学评价研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2012. Huang G Y. Studies on species composition and landscape aesthetics evaluation of urban forest in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012.
[14] 李翠翠. 京郊典型风景游憩林林内景观质量评价技术研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2010. Li C C. Assessment on landscape quality in stands of typical scenic and recreation forests in suburbs in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
[15] 欧阳勋志, 廖为明, 彭世揆. 天然阔叶林景观质量评价及其垂直结构优化技术[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(6): 1388-1392. Ouyang X Z, Liao W M, Peng S K. Landscape quality evaluation and vertical structure optimization of natural broadleaf forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(6): 1388-1392.
[16] 杨鑫霞, 亢新刚, 杜志, 等. 基于SBE法对长白山森林景观美学评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2012,40(6): 86-90. Yang X X, Kang X G, Du Z, et al. SBE method-based forest landscape aesthetic quality evaluation of Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University:Natural Science Edition, 2012,40(6): 86-90.
[17] 王鹏, 陈丽华, 卞西陈,等. 北沟林场天然次生林群落结构与种群分布格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(7):1668-1674. Wang P, Chen L H, Bian X C, et al. Community structure and distribution pattern of a natural secondary forest in Beigou Forest Farm[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(7):1668-1674.
[18] 金永焕, 李敦求, 姜好相,等. 长白山区次生林恢复过程中天然更新的动态[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(5):65-68. Jin Y H, Li D Q, Jiang H X, et al. Quantitative dynamics on natural regeneration of secondary forest during the restoration period in Changbai Mountain area[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2005, 29(5):65-68.
[19] 吴光辉. 景德镇市天然次生林经营管理的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2005. Wu G H.Study on the natural secondary forest management of Jingdezhen[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2005.
[20] 李杰,宁杨翠,郑小贤. 金钩岭林场杨桦次生林健康评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(2):191-195. Li J, Ning Y C, Zhen X X. Health assessment of Polar-Birch secondary forest in Jingouling[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28(2):191-195.
[21] 李俊英, 闫红伟, 唐强, 等. 天然次生林林内景观评价模型[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(6): 923-927. Li J Y, Yan H W, Tang Q, et al. A scenic beauty estimation model for a natural secondary forest[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2010, 27(6): 923-927.
[22] 牛君丽. 北京风景游憩林质量评价的指标体系研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008. Niu J L. Study on attribute system of quality assessment for scenic and recreational forest in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2008.
[23] 董建文, 翟明普, 徐程杨. 京郊侧柏刺槐混交林植物物种组成特征对林内景观美景度的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2007, 29(5): 756-761. Dong J W, Zhai M P, Xu C Y. Effect of the characters of species composition on scenic beauty of in-forest landscape of Platycladus orientalis-Robinia pseudoacacia plantation forest in the suburbs of Beijing[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2007, 29(5): 756-761.
[24] 顾亚春, 卢建国. 南京郊野公园地被植物调查与分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2012, 39(2): 15-20. Gu YC, Lu J G. Investigation and application analysis of ground cover plants of suburban parks around Nanjing[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2012, 39(2):15-20. (责任编辑 郑琰燚)

Last Update: 2015-11-30