我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

基于CVM的崇明东滩湿地非使用价值评价(PDF/HTML)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2017年01期
Page:
21-27
Column:
专题报道
publishdate:
2017-01-31

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Non-use value assessment of the Chongming Dongtan wetland based on the contingent valuation method
Article ID:
1000-2006(2017)01-0021-07
Author(s):
JIANG Shaoyan1 CAO Mu2 TANG Chendong3 MA Qiang3 CAO Ying2 XUE Jianhui2*
1.College of Economics and Management,Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
2.Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
3. Shanghai Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve, Shanghai 202183, China
Keywords:
non-use value contingent valuation method(CVM) Chongming Dongtan wetland
Classification number :
S718.53; Q 14
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.004
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
【Objective】Chongming Dongtan wetland plays an important role in ecological services, including the maintenance of bird biodiversity, purification of the atmosphere, water quality and sediment deposition. It can provide the reference for the ecological resource value accounting and the policy making of the ecological compensation in the wetland ecosystem. 【Method】The contingent valuation method(CVM)was used to evaluate the non-use value of Chongming Dongtan wetland. A questionnaire of payment card based on CVM was developed for the survey study. 【Result】 We sent out the questionnaires to 490 respondents,and received 462 usable responses.Data analysis reveals that the value of willingness to pay(WTP)of Dongtan wetland is RMB 58.3 Yuan per year.The total annual non-use value of Chongming Dongtan wetland is RMB 4.875 billion Yuan per year.The results showed that age,occupation and travel times in recent three years were extremely closely correlated with WTP, also educational status, familiarity to Dongtan wetland were closely correlated with WTP, while gender, domicile, monthly income level were not correlated with WTP. Further more, the gender, educational level and travel times in recent three years were extremely correlated with the WTP value, while age, occupation, monthly in come, familiarity to Dongtan wetland and domicile were not correlated with WTP value. 【Conclusion】 This study highlights the need for publicity and awareness of wetland ecosystem services among the public. This could be useful for increasing the non-use value of the wetland, and then would be benefit to the wetland management.

References

[1] 曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,40(5):163-169. DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026 CAO M,XUE J H. Review of service function and value research on Chongming Dongtan wetland ecosystem [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016,40(5):163-169.
[2] Daily G C. Nature’s Services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. 4th ed. Washington D.C.:Island Press, 1997.
[3] 赵士洞, 张永民, 赖鹏飞.千年生态系统评估报告集[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2007:16-67.
[4] 吉丽娜, 温艳萍. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 中国农学通报,2013,29(5):160-166. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.05.030 JI L N, WEN Y P. Wetland ecosystem services valuation of Chongming Dongtan[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(5):160-166.
[5] O’NEIL WILLIAM B. On the usefulness of the contingent valuation method for resource damage assessments and ecosystem valuation[J]. Forum for Social Economics, 1990, 20(1):40-44.DOI: 10.1007/BF02778826
[6] 敖长林, 李一军, 冯磊, 等. 基于CVM的三江平原湿地非使用价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477. AO C L, LI Y J, FENG L, et al. Evaluating the non-use value of sanjiang wetland based on contigent valuation method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477.
[7] 崔丽娟, 张曼胤. 扎龙湿地非使用价值评价研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2006, 19(4):491-496. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2006.04.016 CUI L J, YIN Z M. Valuation on non-use values of Zhalong wetlands[J]. Forest Research, 2006, 19(4): 491-496. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2006.04.016.
[8] 庄大昌. 基于CVM的洞庭湖湿地资源非使用价值评估[J]. 地域研究与开发,2006, 25(2):105-110. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2006.02.022. ZHUANG D C. Evaluation of the no-use values of the wetland resources in Dongting Lake based on CVM[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2006, 25(2): 105-110.
[9] 俞玥, 何秉宇. 基于CVM的新疆天池湿地生态系统服务功能非使用价值评估[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(12):53-58. YU Y, HE B Y. Estimation of the non-tratable value of Xinjiang Tianchi wetland ecosystem service function based on the CVM[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment, 2012, 26(12):53-58.
[10] 杜浩, 甘芳, 危起伟, 等. 基于条件价值法对长江宜昌中华鲟自然保护区的非使用价值评估[J]. 四川动物, 2010, 29(6):933-937. DU H, GAN F, WEI Q W, et al. Non-use value assessment of Chinese Sturgeon Nature Reserve of Yangtze River in Yichang, Hubei Province based on the contingent valuation method[J]. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 2010, 29(6):933-937.
[11] 胡喜生, 洪伟, 吴承祯. 基于CVM的闽江河口湿地生态系统非使用价值评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(6):64-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2012.06.011 HU X S, HONG W, WU C Z. Evaluating the non-use value of Minjiang estuary wetland ecosystem based on contigent valuation method[J]. Science of Soil & Water Conservation, 2012, 10(6):64-70.
[12] 郑伟, 沈程程, 乔明阳, 等. 长岛自然保护区生态系统维护的条件价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1):82-87. DOI:10.5846/stxb201304280848 ZHENG W, SHEN C C, QIAO M Y, et al. Contingent valuation of preserving ecosystem of Changdao Island Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(1):82-87.
[13] 陆健健. 中国湿地[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1990:96-105.
[14] 王凤珍, 周志翔, 郑忠明. 武汉市典型城市湖泊湿地资源非使用价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(12):3261-3269. WANG F Z, ZHOU Z X, ZHENG Z M. Evaluation on non-use values of typical lake wetlands in Wuhan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(12):3261-3269.
[15] LO A Y, JIM C Y. Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: implications for contingent valuation method[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 114:58-66. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.012
[16] RANDALL A, MITCHELL R C, CARSON R T. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method[J]. Land Economics, 1990, 66(1): 107. DOI:10.2307/3146688.
[17] 张翼飞, 赵敏. 意愿价值法评估生态服务价值的有效性与可靠性及实例设计研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(11):1141-1149. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2007.11.006 ZHANG Y F, ZHAO M. Review on the validity and reliability of CVM in evaluation of ecosystem service and a case design study[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2007, 22(11):1141-1149.
[18] MARKANTONIS V, BITHAS K. The application of the contingent valuation method in estimating the climate change mitigation and adaptation policies in Greece: an expert-based approach[J]. Environment Development & Sustainability, 2010, 12(5):807-824.DOI:10.1007/s10668-009-9225-0.
[19] 庞丙亮, 崔丽娟, 马牧源,等. 基于CVM的扎龙湿地生物多样性维持服务价值评价[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2014,10(4):20-25. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2014.04.06 PANG B L,CUI L J, MA M Y,et al. Valuation of the services of Zhalong wetland for maintaining biodiversity based on contingent valuation method[J]. Wetland Science & Management, 2014,10(4):20-25.

Last Update: 2017-01-30