我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

阿尔泰山林区云杉和落叶松生物量分配格局研究(PDF/HTML)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2017年01期
Page:
203-208
Column:
研究简报
publishdate:
2017-01-31

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Biomass allocation patterns of Picea obovata and Larix sibirica in the Altai Mountains forest area
Article ID:
1000-2006(2017)01-0203-06
Author(s):
ZHANG Huifang ZHU Yali DILIXIATI·Baoerhan GAO Yaqi* DING Chengfeng WANG Lei
Modern Forestry Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of forestry, Urumqi 830000, China
Keywords:
biomass allocation patterns Picea obovata Larix sibirica Altai Mountains
Classification number :
S718
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.032
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
【Objective】In order to understand the biomass allocation pattern of main conifer species in the Altai mountains.【Method】Based on the sample wood data which measured from Picea obovata and Larix sibirica in 2012 and 2013, the changing law of biomass proportion of different organs was analyzed from age, DBH and the forest canopy. 【Result】The proportion of biomass of trunk which accounts for whole tree in Picea obovata and L. sibirica, was 48.1% and 61.9% respectively; The proportion of biomass of branches and leaves which accounts for whole tree in P. obovata was higher than that in L. sibirica. The proportion of aboveground biomass accounts for whole tree in two conifer species was 79.8% and 79.5% respectively, the root shoot ratio of P. obovata and L. sibirica was 0.268 and 0.270 respectively. With the increase of the diameter class, the biomass proportion of the trunks in P. obovata increased, the biomass proportion of leaves and roots decreased and the biomass proportion of branches varied slightly. With the increase of the diameter class, the biomass proportion of the trunks in L. sibirica increased, but it slightly decreased when the diameter was over 30cm, and the biomass proportion of branches and leaves showed an opposite trend to the trunks. With the increase of the age, the biomass proportion of the trunks in the two conifer species increased, the biomass of the branches and leaves decreased. With the increase of the age, the biomass proportion of the roots in P. obovata decreased, and the biomass proportion of the roots in L. sibirica decreased initially and then increased. With the increase of the canopy density, the biomass proportion of the trunks in P. obovata increased and the biomass proportion of branches, leaves and roots decreased. With the increase of the canopy density, the biomass proportion of trunks in L. sibirica decreased initially and then increased, the branches and roots showed an opposite trend to the trunks and the leaves slightly decreased.【Conclusion】 The biomass allocation ratio of P. obovata and L. sibirica showed trunks > roots > branches > leaves trend. With the increase of the diameter class, age and canopy density,the biomass allocation ratio of trunks in P. obovata gradually increased and the biomass proportion of leaves decreased, the ratio of branches and roots presented as one increase with the other’s decrease. The biomass proportion in different organs of L. sibirica slightly varied, and the overall trend was unchanged.

References

[1] 汪金松, 张春雨, 范秀华, 等. 臭冷杉生物量分配格局及异速生长模型[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(14): 3918-3927. WANG J S,ZHANG C Y,FAN X H. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Abies nephrolepis Maxim[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(14):3918-3927.
[2] LANDSBERG J J,LINDER S,MCMURTRIE R E. Effects of global change on managed forests: a strategic plan for research on managed forest ecosystemsin a globally changing environment[G]∥Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems Report.Canberra: Core Project of the IGBP, 1995: 1-17.
[3] 杨昊天,李新荣,刘立超,等.荒漠草地4种灌木生物量分配特征[J].中国沙漠,2013.33(5):1340-1348. DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694x.2013.00197. YANG H T, LI X R, LIU L C, et al. Biomass allocation patterns of four shrubs in desert grassland[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2013, 33(5): 1340-1348.
[4] 张绘芳,高亚琪,李霞. 新疆西伯利亚云杉生物量模型研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(11): 0115-0120. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.11.021 ZHANG H F, GAO Y Q, LI X. Research on biomass model of Picea obovata in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015,35(11): 0115-0120.
[5] 钟泽兵,周国英,杨路存,等.柴达木盆地几种荒漠灌丛植被的生物量分配格局[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(4):1042-1048. DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694x.2013.00406. ZHONG Z B, ZHOU G Y, YANG L C, et al. The biomass allocation patterns of desert shrub vegetation in the Qaidam Basin,Qing-hai,China[J].Journal of Desert Research,2014,34(4):1042-1048.
[6] 方江平, 项文化. 西藏色季拉山原始冷杉林生物量及其分布规律[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(5): 17-23. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.05.006. FANG J P, XIANG W H. Biomass and its distribution of a primeval Abies georgei var. smithii forest in Sejila Mountain in Tibet Plateau[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(5): 17-23.
[7] 张绘芳, 高亚琪, 朱雅丽, 等. 新疆雪岭杉生物量模型对比研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(6): 52-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.06.09. ZHANG H F, GAI Y Q, ZHU Y L, et al. A comparative study on biomass models for Picea schrenkiana in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(6): 52-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.06.09.
[8] 丁晓娟,陈蜀江,黄铁成. 阿尔泰山南坡西伯利亚落叶松生长量与气候变化的关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(2):098-104. DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.053. DING X J,CHEN S J,HUANG T C. The relationship between growth of Larix sibirica Ledb and the climate change in the south slope of Altai Mountains[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016,30(02):098-104.
[9] 郑路,蔡道雄,卢立华。南亚热带不同树种人工林生物量及其分配格局[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(4): 454-458. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2014.04.002. ZHENG L,CAI D X,LU L H. Biomass allocation of different species plantations in subtropical area of China[J]. Forest Research, 2014,27(4):454-458.
[10] 高成杰, 唐国勇, 孙永玉, 等. 不同恢复模式下干热河谷幼龄印楝和大叶相思生物量及其分配[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(4): 482-490. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.002. GAO C J, TANG G Y, SUN Y Y, et al. Biomass and allocation of young Azadirachta indica and a Cacia auriculiformis for different restoration patterns in dry-hot valley[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2012, 29(4): 482-490.
[11] 贾全全,罗春旺,刘琪璟,等. 不同林分密度油松人工林生物量分配模式[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(6):87-93. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.016. JIA Q Q, LUO C W, LIU Q J, et al. Biomass allocation in relation to stand density in Pinus tabuliformis plantation[J]. Journal of nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015,39(6):87-93.
[12] 王宁,王百田,王瑞君. 晋西山杨和油松生物量分配格局及异速生长模型研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2013,33(2):151-156. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.02.061. WANG N, WANG B T, WANG R J, et al. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Populus davidiana and Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.in west of Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(2): 151-155,159.
[13] 赵金龙, 王泺鑫, 韩海荣, 等. 辽河源不同龄组油松天然次生林生物量及空间分配特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(23): 7026-7037. DOI:10.5846/stxb201303060357. ZHAO J L,WANG L X,HAN H R. Biomass and spatial distribution characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis natural secondary forest at different age groups in the Liaoheyuan Nature Reserve,Hebei Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(23): 7026-7037.
[14] 孙巧玉,刘 勇,李国雷. 坡位对油松人工林地上生物量分配格局的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(9): 0102-0105. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2012.09.027 SUN Q Y, LIU Y, LI G L. Effect of slope position on above-ground biomass distribution pattern in Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2012,32(9): 0102-0105.
[15] 樊后保,李燕燕,苏兵强. 马尾松-阔叶树混交异龄林生物量与生产力分配格局[J].生态学报,2006,26(8):2463-2472. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.08.007. FAN H B, LI Y Y, SU B Q. Allocation pattern of biomass and productivity in the mixed uneven-aged stands of Masson’s pine and hardwood species[J]. Actaecologica Sinica, 2006,26(8):2463-2472.
[16] 赵金龙, 梁宏温, 温远光, 等. 马尾松与红锥混交异龄林生物量分配格局[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(2): 60-64,71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2011.02.010. ZHAO J L, LIANG H W, WEN Y G, et al. Distribution pattern of biomass in the mixed uneven-aged stands of Pinus massoniana and Castanopsis hystrix[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2011, 31(2): 60-64,71.
[17] 张治军, 王彦辉, 于澎涛, 等. 不同优势度马尾松的生物量及根系分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(4): 71-75. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2008.04.016. ZHANG Z J, WANG Y H, YU P T, et al. Characteristics of biomass and root distribution of Pinus massoniana with different dominance[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2008, 32(4): 71-75.
[18] 李巍,王传宽,张全智. 林木分化对兴安落叶松异速生长方程和生物量分配的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(6):1679-1687. LI W,WANG C K,ZHANG Q Z.Differentiation of stand individuals impacts allometry and biomass allocation of Larix gmelinii trees[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015, 35(6):1679-1687.
[19] 罗云建, 张小全, 王效科, 等. 华北落叶松人工林生物量及其分配模式[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(1): 13-18. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2009.01.003. LUO Y J, ZHANG X Q, WANG X K, et al. Biornass and its distribution patterns of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(1): 13-18.
[20] 刘广营, 赵国华, 王广海, 等. 华北落叶松人工林生物量分配格局[J]. 河北林果研究, 2011, 26(3): 222-226. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4961.2011.03.002. LIU G Y, ZHAO G H, WANG G H, et al. Allocation pattern of Larix principis-rupprechtii biomass[J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2011, 26(3): 222-226.
[21] 徐郑周. 燕山山地华北落叶松人工林生物量分配格局及植物多样性的研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2010. XU Z Z. Study on spatial distribution pattern of the biomass and plant diversity in Larix princicpis-rupprechtii Mayr. plantation in Yanshan Mountainous Regious[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2010.
[22] 代海燕, 张秋良, 魏强, 等. 不同林分生物量分配格局受密度影响效应的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(11): 4514-4516. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.11.063. DAI H Y, ZHANG Q L, WEI Q, et al. Study on effects of density on biomass allocation pattern in different forests[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(11): 4514-4516.
[23] 白志强, 刘华, 方岳, 等. 喀纳斯国家自然保护区针叶林生物量分配特征[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2014, 37(4): 14-19,24. DOI:10.13320/j.cnki.jauh.2014.0081. BAI Z Q, LIU H, FANG Y, et al. The biomass distribution pattern of coniferous forest in the Kanas National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2014, 37(4): 14-19,24.
[24] CAIRNS M A, BROWN S, HELMER E H, et al. Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests[J]. Oecologia, 1997, 111(1): 1-11. DOI:10.1007/s004420050201.

Last Update: 2017-01-30