我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

城市道路绿化对行车视线诱导的植物合理种植间距(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2017年05期
Page:
180-184
Column:
研究简报
publishdate:
2017-09-30

Article Info:/Info

Title:
The reasonable planting distance of urban road greening induced by driving sight line
Article ID:
1000-2006(2017)05-0175-05
Author(s):
TANG Guilan1 YOU Liangwang2 LU Jianguo2
1.College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China; 2.College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037, China
Keywords:
Keywords:road landscaping traffic safety sight induction plant spacing
Classification number :
S731
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201605002
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
【Objective】The purpose of this study is to standardize safety functions of city road landscaping, and to verify the reliability of vegetation effect on the traffic sight induction. 【Method】Based on the driver's visual characteristic analysis, two mathematical models were constructed based on a two-way, four-lane road as the basic linear model according to CJJ 37-2012(Urban Road Engineering Design Code). Model 1 is a straight section model which can form a continuous landscape at different design speeds. Model 2 is a curved section model with the best perception of the curvature at different design speeds. 【Results】On the straight road section, when the vehicle speed is 30, 40, 60, 80 and 100 km/h, the planting distance L is 1.74, 2.32, 3.48, 4.64, and 5.80 m, respectively, for the driver to view a continuous landscape. On the curved road section, when the vehicle speed is 40, 60, 80 and 100 km/h, the L' of the plant, i.e., the best perceived effect on the curvature of the road, is 2.49, 3.56, 4.25 and 0.44 m, respectively. 【Conclusion】On the straight section of city roads, the best effect can be achieved by planting plants at spacing L. On the curved section of the urban road, plants can be planted at the minimum spacing between L and L' at the same design speed to achieve the best effect while maintaining higher perception accuracy of curves.

References

[1] 王浩.城市道路绿地景观设计[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2003:20-21.
[2] 任刚,王卫杰,张永.非机动化交通参与者交通行为安全性、建模、评价及决策系统[M].北京:科学出版社,2012: 54-55.
[3] 董大明.驾驶员的视觉特性与行车安全的关系[J].农业科技与装备,2006(3):25-26.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1161.2006.03.015. DONG D M.Visual characteristics of drivers and driving safety relationship[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2006(3): 25-26.
[4] 周建鹏,黄虎,严运兵.现代汽车性能检测技术.[M].2版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2009:140.
[5] 赵永平,王建军,罗石贵.指示性线形诱导标设置间距探讨[J].河南交通科技,1998(1):28-29. ZHAO Y P, WANG J J, LUO S G.Discussion on the setting spacing of indicated linear inducing markers[J].Journal of Henan Communications Science and Technology, 1998(1): 28-29.
[6] ZADOR P, STEIN H S, WRIGHT P,et al. Effects of chevrons, post-mounted delineators, and raised pavement markers on driver behavior at roadway curves[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1987, 1114:1-10.
[7] ZWAHLEN H T.Conspicuity of suprathreshold reflective targets in a driver's peripheral visual field at night[M/OL].Transportation Research Record 1213.TRB,National Research Council,1989:35-46.(2016-05-01)http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1989/1213/1213-006.pdf.
[8] 上海汽车灯具研究所.GB 4599—2007 汽车用灯丝灯泡前照灯[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[9] 裴昌幸,刘乃安.电视原理与现代电视系统[M].西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,1997:18-19.
[10] ZWAHIEN H T, JIN Y P. Curve radius perception accuracy as function of number of delineation devices(chevrons)[J]. Thin Solid Films, 1995, 518(2):518-521.
[11] 中国城市规划设计研究院.CJJ 37—2012 城市道路工程设计规范[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
[12] 彭武雄.驾驶员视线诱导设施设置合理间距研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2007. PENG W X.Study on the reasonable spacing of driver sight line inducing facilities[D].Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2007.
[13] 张雪梅,温志刚.道路交通安全[M].北京:群众出版社,2007.
[14] 中国城市规划设计研究所.CJJ 75—1997 城市道路绿化规划与设计规范[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,1998.
[15] 陈芳.公路视觉环境对行车安全的影响[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2009. CHEN F. Highway visual environment on the impact of traffic safety[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2009.

Last Update: 1900-01-01