我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

江苏省重点公益林生态服务功能及价值评估(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2017年06期
Page:
205-210
Column:
研究简报
publishdate:
2017-11-30

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Assessment of ecological service function and its value of key public welfare forest in Jiangsu Province
Article ID:
1000-2006(2017)06-0205-06
Author(s):
ZHANG Gu12 YUE Jinping2 WANG Yi2 HU Haibo13* LIU Xuan1 MA Bing1ZHAO Shuo1 WANG Kai2
1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.Centre for Forest Resources Monitoring of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210036, China; 3.Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210037, China
Keywords:
Keywords:key public welfare forest ecological services value assessment Jiangsu Province
Classification number :
S718; F326.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201506025
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
【Objective】 This study was aimed at evaluating the ecological service function and value of a public welfare forest in Jiangsu Province, China, based on the “Specifications for Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services in China”(LY/T 1721—2008). 【Mothed】 The ecological services and value of a key public welfare forest in Jiangsu Province were evaluated by using long-term data obtained from the forest ecological station of the Yangtze River Delta and inventory data on the public welfare forest collected from Jiangsu Province. 【Result】The total value of the ecological services of the key public welfare forest was 40.063 billion Yuan(RMB). The ecological services in descending order according to value were: water conservation > carbon fixation and oxygen release > biodiversity conservation > forest recreation > nutrient accumulation > atmosphere purification > forest protection > soil conservation. The ecological service functions of economic tree species, such as coniferous tree, Pyrus, Diospyros, Castanea mollissima, Eucommia ulmoides, Aleurites fordii, were higher than these of hard broad tree species, the areas inhabited by poplar and other hard broad tree species were quite large; however, the value of ecological service functions per unit area was low. 【Conclusion】 Therefore, poplar and other hard broad tree species should be replaced by conifers, or Pyrus, Diospyros, Castanea mollissima, Eucommia ulmoides, Aleurites fordii, and so on to improve the ecological service function and value of public welfare forests in Jiangsu Province.

References

[1] 中国森林生态服务功能评估项目组.中国森林生态服务功能评估[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2010.
[2] DAILY G C.Nature's services:social dependence on natural ecosystems[M].Washington D C:Island Press, 1997.
[3] COSTANZA R,ARGE R,GROOT R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:233-240.
[4] COSTANZA R.Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services[J].Ecosystem,2000(3):4-10.
[5] 黄耀,王乃江,裴乔,等. 庆阳市油松人工林生态服务功能评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017,32(1): 74-81. HUANG Y,WANG N J,PEI Q, et al.Assessment of Pinus tabulaeformis ecological service function in Qingyang area[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University. 2017,32(1): 74-81.
[6] 刘海波,符志根,薛杨,等. 万宁市生态公益林生态服务功能评估与建设管理对策[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017(17): 142.
[7] 孔东升,张灏. 张掖黑河湿地自然保护区生态服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2015,26(4): 972-983. KONG D S, ZHANG H. Economic value of wetland ecosystem services in the Heihe National Nature Reserve of Zhangye[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,26(4): 972-983.
[8] 王祖华.淳安县森林生态系统服务功能价值评价研究[D] 南京: 南京林业大学,2008: 20-35. WANG Z H. The research on the value assessment of forest ecosystem of Chun'an County[D].Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University,2008:20-25.
[9] 江苏省森林资源监测中心.江苏省森林资源二类调查成果报告[R].南京:江苏省森林资源监测中心,2010.
[10] LY/T 1721—2008.森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[11] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云,郑华,等.中国森林系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(4):480-491. ZHAO T Q,OUYANG Z Y,ZHENG H,et al.The assessment of the forest ecosystem services evaluation in China[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2004,19(4):480-491.
[12] 靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评价[J].生态学报,2005,16(8):1531-1536. JIN F,LU S W,YU X X,et al.The assessment of the forest ecosystem services evaluation in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,16(8):1531-1536.
[13] 余新晓,鲁绍伟,靳芳.中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2005,25(8):2096-2102. YU X X,LU S W,JIN F.The assessment of the forest ecosystem services evaluation in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(8):2096-2102.
[14] 王斌,杨效生,张彪,等.1973—2003年中国森林生态系统服务功能变化研究[J].浙江林学院学报, 2009,26(5):714-721. WANG B,YANG X S,ZHANG B,et al.Dynamics of ecosystem services in China during 1973-2003[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College,2009,26(5):714-721.
[15] 王兵,任晓旭,胡文.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J].林业科学,2011,47(2):145-153. WANG B,REN X X,HU W.Assessment of forest ecosystem services value in China[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2011,47(2):145-153.
[16] 段晓峰,许学工.区域森林生态系统服务功能评价:以山东省为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2006,42(6):751-756. DUAN X F,XU X G.Regional forest ecosystem services assessment:a case study of Shandong Province[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2006,42(6):751-756.
[17] 王兵,鲁绍伟,尤文忠,等.辽宁省森林生态系统服务价值评估[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7): 1792-1798. WANG B,LU S W,YOU W Z,et al.Evaluation of forest ecosystem services value in Liaoning Province[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2010,21(7):1792-1798.
[18] 徐成立,王雄宾,余新晓,等.北京山地森林生态服务功能评估[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(7): 79-82. XU C L,WANG X B,YU X X,et al.Assessment of service function of forest ecosystem in Beijing mountain area[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2010,38(7):79-82.
[19] 姚鸿文,陶吉兴,杜群,等.浙江省森林生态服务功能评估与分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(4):13-17.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2012.04.03. YAO H W,TAO J X,DU Q,et al.Evaluation and analysis of forest ecosystem services in Zhejiang Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition),2012,36(4):13-17.

Last Update: 1900-01-01