我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

不同栽培基质条件对4种行道树苗木根系生长的影响(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2019年04期
Page:
192-198
Column:
研究简报
publishdate:
2019-07-24

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Effects of different planting matrices on the root growth of four roadside trees in Shanghai
Article ID:
1000-2006(2019)04-0192-07
Author(s):
YAN Wei1 3 YANG Ruiqing13 HU Yonghong2 3*
(1.Shanghai Green Management Guidance Station, Shanghai 200020,China; 2. Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602,China; 3. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Urban Trees Ecological Application, Shanghai 200020,China)
Keywords:
street tree Ginkgo biloba Cinnamomum camphora Platanus acerifolia Magnolia grandiflora planting matrix root development Shanghai City
Classification number :
S718
DOI:
10. 3969/ j. issn. 1000-2006. 201711022
Document Code:
A
Abstract:
【Objective】 The aim of this study was to improve the growth and natural urban ecosystems service functions of four roadside trees in Shanghai City. 【Method】 An orthogonal design was used to study three factors(soil content diameter, proportion of structure soil, and soil moisture)under four levels that influenced the root growth of four roadside trees(Ginkgo biloba,Cinnamomum camphora, Platanus acerifolia and Magnolia grandiflora). 【Result】 The results indicated that different treatments significantly influence root expansion and biomass accumulation. The best response level of factors for the dry weight of root and root length of G. biloba and M. grandiflora was soil content diameter, the best granule diameter of soil were 5 and 1 cm for G. biloba, and 5 and 5 cm for M. grandiflora. The best response level of factors were soil granule diameter and soil moisture for C. camphora; the best levels were 3 cm and 60%, respectively. The best respond level of factors were the proportion of structure soil and soil granule diameter; the best levels were 60% and 5 cm, respectively. The best response level of factors for the root growth of G. biloba, C. camphora and P. acerifolia were the proportion of structure soil; the best level were all 20%. However, the best response level of factors for M. grandiflora was soil granule diameter at 3 cm. 【Conclusion】 Through the fuzzy membership method, appropriate substrates selected for G. biloba, C. camphora, P. acerifolia and M. grandiflora were treatment 8(granule diameter 3 cm, formula soil 80%, and soil moisture 50%), 11(granule diameter 1 cm, formula soil 60%, and soil moisture 80%), 8(granule diameter 3 cm, formula soil 80%, and soil moisture 50%), 6(granule diameter 3 cm, formula soil 40%, and soil moisture 80%), respectively.

References

[1] 吕先忠, 楼炉焕,李根有. 杭州市行道树现状调查及布局设想[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2000, 17(3): 309-314. LÜ X Z, LOU L H, LI G Y. Street trees investigation and tree species selection in Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2000, 17(3): 309-314.
[2] 吴泽民,何小弟.全国高等农林院校“十一五”规划教材:园林树木栽培学 [M]. 2版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2012. WU Z M, HE X D. The Eleven-Five planning materials of national agricultural and forestry colleges: aboriculture [M]. 2nd ed. Bejing:China Agriculture Press, 2012.
[3] 卢瑛,龚子同,张甘霖.城市土壤的特性及其管理[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(2): 206-209. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2002.02.021. LU Y, GONG Z T, ZHANG G L. Characteristics and management of urban soils[J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2002, 11(2): 206-209.
[4] 欧阳育林.城市土壤与园林绿化[J]. 热带林业, 2004, 32(1): 31-34. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2004.01.011. OUYANG Y L. Urban soil and landscape[J]. Tropical Forestry, 2004, 32(1): 31-34.
[5] 韩继红,李传省,黄秋萍.城市土壤对园林植物生长的影响及其改善措施[J]. 中国园林, 2003, 19(7): 74-76. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2003.07.020. HAN J H, LI C S, HUANG Q P. The influence of urban soil to the growth of landscape plant and its improvement measures[J]. Chinese Lanscape Architecture, 2003, 19(7): 74-76.
[6] 侯晓丽,丁蕴铮,王焕新,等.土壤钻孔通气法对行道树生长的改善[J]. 中国城市林业, 2005, 3(5): 48-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2005.05.013. HOU X L, DING Y Z, WANG H X, et al. Improving growth of street trees by boring the rhizospheric soil for aeration[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2005, 3(5): 48-50.
[7] MCCRACKIN M L, HARMS T K, GRIMM N B, et al. Responses of soil microorganisms to resource availability in urban, desert soils[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2008, 87(2): 143-155. DOI:10.1007/s10533-007-9173-4.
[8] IMHOFF M L, ZHANG P, WOLFE R E, et al. Remote sensing of the urban heat island effect across biomes in the continental USA[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(3): 504-513. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008.
[9] 孔正红, 李树人, 李有福, 等. 不同硬化地面类型对城市悬铃木物质循环的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 1998, 32(4): 314-319. DOI:10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.1998.04.003. KONG Z H, LI S R, LI Y F, et al. Effects of different hardened grounds on the material recycling of Platanus acerifolia(Ait)wild[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 1998, 32(4): 314-319.
[10] 甄蕾. 济南市新建工程区土壤条件对园林绿化的影响[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2008. ZHEN L. The effects of landscaping under new construction zone soil conditions in Jinan[D].Jinan:Shandong University, 2008.
[11] 杨瑞卿, 王本耀, 彭红玲, 等. 不同栽植基质对上海市4种行道树表型生长和根系发育的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(4): 659-666. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.04.018. YANG R Q, WANG B Y, PENG H L, et al. Effect of planting substrate on phenotypic growth and root development of 4 street tree species in Shanghai[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(4): 659-666.
[12] 范伟国, 杨洪强. 不同基质对平邑甜茶幼树生长、根系形态与营养吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(4): 936-941. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.04.030. FAN W G, YANG H Q. Effects of different medium on growth, root morphology and nutrients uptake of Malus hupehensis[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(4): 936-941.
[12] LUIS V C, LLORCA M, CHIRINO E, et al. Differences in morphology, gas exchange and root hydraulic conductance before planting in Pinus canariensis seedlings growing under different fertilization and light regimes[J]. Trees, 2010, 24(6): 1143-1150. DOI:10.1007/s00468-010-0490-1.
[14] 楚秀丽, 王秀花, 张东北, 等. 基质配比和缓释肥添加量对浙江楠大规格容器苗质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6): 67-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.013. CHU X L, WANG X H, ZHANG D B, et al. Effect of substrate ratio and slow-release fertilizer loading on the quality of large size container seedlings of Phoebe chekiangensis[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(6): 67-73.
[15] FITTER A H, STICKLAND T R. Architectural analysis of plant root systems[J]. New Phytologist,1991, 118(3): 383-389.
[16] SPEK L Y. Generation and visualization of root-like structures in a three-dimensional space[J]. Plant and Soil, 1997, 197(1): 9-18. DOI:10.1023/A:1004236626479.
[17] HO M D, MCCANNON B C, LYNCH J P. Optimization modeling of plant root architecture for water and phosphorus acquisition[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2004, 226(3): 331-340. DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.09.011.
[18] 廖红,戈振扬,严小龙.水磷耦合胁迫下植物磷吸收的理想根构型:模拟与应用[J]. 科学通报, 2001, 46(8): 641-646. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2001.08.005. LIAO H, GE Z Y, YAN X L. The optimal root structure under the deficiency of phosphorus absorption of water and phosphorus: simulation and application[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2001, 46(8): 641-646.
[19] 薛建辉, 王智, 吕祥生. 林木根系与土壤环境相互作用研究综述[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 26(3): 79-84. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2002.03.021. XUE J H, WANG Z, LÜ X S. Progress on the interaction between tree roots and soil environment[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2002, 26(3): 79-84.
[20] WIJESINGHE D K, JOHN E A, BEURSKENS S, et al. Root system size and precision in nutrient foraging: responses to spatial pattern of nutrient supply in six herbaceous species[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2001, 89(6): 972-983. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00618.x.
[21] 周玮,周运超.马尾松幼苗生理特性对施肥的响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(4): 37-41. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2011.04.007. ZHOU W, ZHOU Y C. Response of the physiologic characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings to different fertilizer treatments[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2011, 31(4): 37-41.
[22] 周玮, 周运超, 叶立鹏, 等. 种植密度及土壤养分对马尾松苗木根系的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(11): 18-22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2014.11.004. ZHOU W, ZHOU Y C, YE L P, et al. Effects of planting density and soil nutrients on root system characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(11): 18-22.

Last Update: 2019-07-22