我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|Table of Contents|

江苏国家城市湿地公园功能布局适宜性评价(PDF)

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

Issue:
2019年06期
Page:
152-158
Column:
研究论文
publishdate:
2019-11-25

Article Info:/Info

Title:
Suitability evaluation of functional layout of National Urban Wetland Park in Jiangsu Province
Article ID:
1000-2006(2019)06-0152-07
Author(s):
XU Xinzhou LU ZhichaoQIU BingWANG Hao*
(College of Landscape Architecture, Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China)
Keywords:
Jiangsu urban wetland park functional layout suitability analysis
Classification number :
TU984
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903006
Document Code:
-
Abstract:
【Objective】 In view of the phenomenon of ecological protection function, neglect of functional layout and insufficiency of function in the National Urban Wetland Park, it is helpful to improve the theoretical system of Urban Wetland Park and solve the practical problems of urban wetland park construction.【Method】Five national urban wetland parks in southern Jiangsu(Changguangxi, Shajiabang, Gucheng Lake, Kunshan and Lushuiwan)were selected with the help of landscape architecture and sociological investigation methods, through questionnaires, interviews, and mathematical statistics, and both relevant indicators and evaluation index systems were established to assess the suitability of the functional layout of urban wetland parks. 【Result】 The selected professional evaluation indicators included the integrity and suitability of the overall functional layout and the integrity of the regional functional layout, whereas the selected user satisfaction indicators included ecological environment, popular science exhibition, tourism activities, and management service satisfaction. Comprehensive evaluation indicated that the functional layout of Shajiabang Urban Wetland Park was suitable, whereas that of Gucheng Lake Urban Wetland Park was not suitable, and that of the other three parks was generally suitable. 【Conclusion】 The main problems with the functional layout of Jiangsu National Urban Wetland Park were the lack of ecological protection areas and ecological buffer zones and the unreasonable relationship between ecological protection functions and tourist activities. Therefore, the future planning and construction of urban wetland parks should consider both the social and economic benefits of parks, as well as the ecological benefits of wetland ecological environment optimization. In addition, from the perspective of tourists’ needs and experiences, future planning and construction should also aim to improve relevant supporting service facilities. At the same time, combined with the planning and design of the park, the planning and design of the urban wetland park should be integrated and integrated.

References

[1] GRAYSON J E, CHAPMAN M G, UNDERWOOD A J. The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999, 43(4): 227-236. DOI:10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00108-x.
[2] 李洪波, 韦妮妮. 城市湿地生态系统服务的空间流转过程研究: 以泉州湾河口湿地为例[J]. 湿地科学, 2015, 13(1): 98-102. DOI:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2015.01.014. LI H B, WEI N N. Spatial transfer process of urban wetland ecosystem services: a case of estuarine wetlands Quanzhou Bay[J]. Wetland Science, 2015, 13(1): 98-102.
[3] LOOKINGBILL T R, ELMORE A J, ENGELHARDT K A M, et al. Influence of wetland networks on bat activity in mixed-use landscapes[J]. Biological Conservation, 2010, 143(4): 974-983. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.011.
[4] 曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5): 163-169. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026. CAO M, XUE J H. Review of service function and value research on Chongming Dongtan wetland ecosystem[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(5): 163-169.
[5] 刘源, 张凯云, 王浩. 城市公园绿地整体性发展分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(6): 101-106.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.06.020. LIU Y, ZHANG K Y, WANG H. Research on overall development of the urban public park[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2013, 37(6): 101-106.
[6] ÅSTEB?L S O, HVITVED-JACOBSEN T, SIMONSEN ?. Sustainable stormwater management at Fornebu: from an airport to an industrial and residential area of the city of Oslo, Norway[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2004, 334/335: 239-249. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.042.
[7] 费文君, 丁佳颖, 曹颖. 从“泄洪沟”到“海绵园”的滨水绿地适用性设计[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(2): 106-111. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2018.02.025. FEI W J, DING J Y, CAO Y. Applicability design in waterfront green space from “flood discharge ditch” to “sponge garden” [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2018, 34(2): 106-111.
[8] 徐跃.草海、洪河湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估及对比分析[D].北京:首都师范大学,2014.

Last Update: 2019-11-30