[1]常乐,吴智慧*.室内木制品用空心刨花板吸声性能的研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(02):056-60.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.012]
 CHANG Le,WU Zhihui*.Study on sound absorption performance of extruded tubular particleboard used in indoor wooden products[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2011,35(02):056-60.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.012]
点击复制

室内木制品用空心刨花板吸声性能的研究
分享到:

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

卷:
35
期数:
2011年02期
页码:
056-60
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2011-03-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on sound absorption performance of extruded tubular particleboard used in indoor wooden products
作者:
常乐吴智慧*
南京林业大学家具与工业设计学院,江苏南京210037
Author(s):
CHANG LeWU Zhihui*
College of Furniture and Industry Design,Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
关键词:
空心刨花板吸声性能驻波法
Keywords:
extruded tubular particleboardsound absorption performancestanding wave tube method
分类号:
TU531.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用驻波法测试了挤压法生产的空心刨花板与平压法生产的实心刨花板在不同试验条件下的吸声系数,并探讨了材料结构、孔隙率、表面处理等因素对吸声性能的影响。结果表明:挤压法生产的空心刨花板比平压法生产的实心刨花板吸声性能好。挤压法生产的空心刨花板的平均降噪系数为0.30,是平压法生产的实心刨花板的2倍,其平均吸声系数大于0.2,是理想的吸声材料。空心刨花板孔道的吸声系数纵向排列时要比横向排列时高。采用表面砂光方法对提高两种板材的吸声系数都有一定的效果,其中平压法生产的实心刨花板更明显。
Abstract:
The coefficient of sound absorption of pressed solid particleboard and extruded tubular particleboard was measured by standing wave tube method under different conditions. The effects of material structure, porosity ratio and surface treatment on the sound absorption property were evaluated. The results showed that the sound absorption property of the extruded tubular particleboard was better than that of pressed solid particleboard. The average coefficient of noise reduction was 0.30 in extruded tubular particleboard, which was higher than that in solid particleboard. The average coefficient of sound absorption of extruded tubular particleboard was above 0.2, which proved that the extruded tubular particleboard could be used as a suitable sound absorption material. Moreover, when the holes in tubular particleboard were arranged in vertical direction, the coefficient of sound absorption was higher than that arranged in horizontal direction. The sanding was a useful method to improve the sound absorption property of these particleboards, especially for pressed solid particleboard.

参考文献/References:

[1]龚科.空心刨花板投资前景分析[J].四川林勘设计,2010,3(1):112-114.
[2]高玲,尚福亮.吸声材料的研究与应用[J].化工时刊,2007, 21(2):63-69.
[3]隋仲义,唐伟,王春明,等.竹木复合材吸声性能研究[J].林业机械与木工设备,2006,34(3):13-15.
[4]Jiang Zehui,Zhao Rongjun,Fei Benhua.Sound absorption property of wood for five eucalypt species[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2004,15(3):207-210.
[5](日)渡边治人.木材应用基础[M].张勤丽,张齐生,张彬渊,译.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1986.
[6](美)卡法诺夫,维尔克斯.建筑声学:原理和实践[M].赵樱,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2004.
[7]中国科学院声学研究所.GB/T 18696.1—2004阻抗管中吸声系数和声阻抗的测量第1部分:驻波比法[S].北京:国家标准出版社,2004.
[8]王峥,项端祈,陈金京,等.建筑声学材料与结构:设计和应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2006.
[9]孙广荣.声学材料简析[J].电声技术,2010,34(8):9-12.
[10]周晓燕,华毓坤,朴雪松.定向结构板复合墙体吸声性能的研究[J].南京林业大学学报,2000,24(1):23-26.
[11]王季卿.空间吸声体的设计与应用[J].声学技术, 2003,22(4):213-218.
[12]马大猷.噪声与振动控制工程手册[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2002.
[13]项端祈.实用建筑声学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1992.
[14]Cavanaugh W J.“Acoustical control in buildings” in building construction: materials and types of construction 5th.[C]// Huntington W C, Mickadeit R E. New York:Jhon Wiley and Sons Inc,1981.
[15]冮贵军.木质人造板的吸声性能试验分析[J].林业科技,2008,33(2):51-53.
[16]于海鹏,刘一星,冮贵军.木质类建材的自身吸声特性及影响因素[J].建筑材料学报,2008,11(1):70-75.
[17]陈可娇,王喜明.木材裂纹对吸声系数影响的研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2009,30(3):147-150.

相似文献/References:

[1]周晓燕,华毓坤,朴雪松.定向结构板复合墙体吸声性能的研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(01):023.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2000.01.006]
 ZhouXiaoyan HuaYukun PuXuesong.A Study on the Sound Absorption Property of OS Wallboard[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2000,24(02):023.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2000.01.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2010-05-13修回日期:2010-08-05 基金项目:江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(CX09B-185Z)作者简介:常乐(1983—),博士。*吴智慧(通信作者),教授。Email:wzh550@sina.com。引文格式:常乐,吴智慧. 室内木制品用空心刨花板吸声性能的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(2):56-60.
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-04-13