[1]吕仕洪,黄甫昭,曾丹娟,等.石漠化地区先锋树种茶条木伐桩的萌蘖特性[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(03):065-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.013]
 LYU Shihong,HUANG Fuzhao,ZENG Danjuan,et al.The stump sprouting characteristics of the pioneer tree Delavaya toxocarpa in rocky desertification region[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2015,39(03):065-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.013]
点击复制

石漠化地区先锋树种茶条木伐桩的萌蘖特性/HTML
分享到:

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

卷:
39
期数:
2015年03期
页码:
065-70
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2015-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The stump sprouting characteristics of the pioneer tree Delavaya toxocarpa in rocky desertification region
文章编号:
1000-2006(2015)03-0065-06
作者:
吕仕洪黄甫昭曾丹娟徐广平李先琨
广西壮族自治区·中国科学院广西植物研究所,广西 桂林 541006
Author(s):
LYU Shihong HUANG Fuzhao ZENG Danjuan XU Guangping LI Xiankun
Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region &
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China
关键词:
石漠化地区 先锋树种 萌蘖特性 茶条木
Keywords:
rocky desertification region pioneer tree species sprouting characteristics Delavaya toxocarpa
分类号:
S723
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探讨石漠化地区先锋树种茶条木伐桩的萌蘖特性,以砍伐强度和伐桩高度为因子,研究了茶条木在不同砍伐强度(全伐和择伐)和伐桩高度(20、40和60 cm)处理下的伐桩存活情况,以及萌条的数量和生长量等特征。结果表明:砍伐近1年后茶条木伐桩的萌蘖率和存活率分别为99.24%和88.55%,其中伐桩存活率显示择伐大于全伐、高桩大于低桩并与伐桩基径大小呈一定程度的正相关。茶条木伐桩萌蘖具有较强的季节性,萌条死亡率较高,单个伐桩的萌条总数和萌条存活率分别为7.3个和54.9%,两者在砍伐强度相同时随伐桩高度增加而增大。主萌条的平均株高和平均基径分别为168.7 cm和12.38 mm,伐桩萌条平均生长率为40.8%,三者均表现出全伐时随伐桩高度增加而增大、择伐时随伐桩高度增加而下降的特点。根据试验观察结果并结合石漠化区植被恢复的需要,择伐和留桩20 cm是茶条木比较理想的砍伐利用方式。
Abstract:
In order to explore the stump sprouting characteristics of a pioneer tree, Delavaya toxocarpa, in rocky desertification region, the present study investigated the survival percentage of the stumps, sprout number and sprout growth increment under different cutting intensity(clear cutting and selective cutting)and stump height treatments(20, 40 and 60 cm). The results showed that the sprouting rate and survival percentage after one-year cutting were 99.24% and 88.55%, respectively. The survival percentage of stumps indicated the trends that selective cutting was greater than clear cutting, the higher stump was greater than lower stump, and there was a positive relationship between base diameter and the stump survival percentage.The number of sprouts produced by stump changed with seasons, and the mortality rate of sprouts was high. The average number of sprouts produced by per stump and the survival percentage were 7.3 and 54.9%, respectively. Both of them increased with the increasing of stump height under the same cutting intensity. The mean plant height, base diameter and growth rate of the biggest sprout were 168.7 cm, 12.38 mm and 40.8%, respectively. All of them increased by clear cutting with the increasing of stump height, and decreased by selective cutting with the increasing of stump height. According to the experimental results and the needs of vegetation restoration in rocky desertification region, the method of selective cutting with stump height 20 cm maight be an ideal way for logging utilization of Delavaya toxocarpa.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李小双, 彭明春, 党承林. 植物自然更新研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(12): 2081-2088.Li X S, Peng M C, Dang C L. Research progress on natural regeneration of plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(12): 2081-2088.
[2] 朱万泽, 王金锡, 罗成荣, 等. 森林萌生更新研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(9): 74-82.Zhu W Z, Wang J X, Luo C R, et al. Progresses of studies on forest sprout regeneration[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007, 43(9): 74-82.
[3] Bell D T. Ecological response syndromes in the flora of southwestern Australia: fire resprouters versus reseeders[J]. The Botanical Review, 2001, 67(4): 417-440.
[4] 马祥庆, 刘爱琴,何智英,等. 杉木免耕萌芽更新生态效果研究[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2000, 20(1): 14-18.Ma X Q,Liu A Q,He Z Y,et al. Study of the ecological effects of regeneration from Chinese fir sprouts without tillage [J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2000, 20(1): 14-18.
[5] 方升佐, 徐锡增. 杨树萌芽更新及持续生产力[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2000, 24(4): 43-48.Fang S Z, Xu X Z.Coppicing techniques of poplars and sustainable production[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2000, 24(4): 43-48.
[6] 叶镜中, 孙 多. 森林经营学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1989.Ye J Z, Sun D. Forest management[M]. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Press, 1989.
[7] Vesk P A, Westoby M. Sprouting ability across diverse disturbances and vegetation types worldwide[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2004, 92(2): 310-320.
[8] 李顺秋.间伐强度对杉木伐桩萌芽特性的影响[J].林业勘察设计(福建)2013,(1): 25-29.Li S Q. Effects of thinning intensity on the stumps sprouting characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Forestry Survey and Design(Fujian), 2013,(1): 25-29.
[9] 丁国华, 叶镜中. 采伐季节对杉木伐桩休眠芽萌发的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 1995, 19(2): 51-54.Ding G H, Ye J Z.Effects of harvesting season on sprouting of Dormant buds from the stumps of Chinese fir[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 1995, 19(2): 51-54.
[10] 高健, 刘令峰, 叶镜中. 伐桩粗度和高度对杉木萌芽更新的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 1995, 22(2): 145-149.Gao J, Liu L F, Ye J Z.Effect of varied height and diameter of stump on sprout regeneration of Chinese fir[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 1995, 22(2): 145-149.
[11] 黄世能. 不同伐桩直径及高度对马占相思萌芽更新影响的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1990, 3(3): 242-248.Huang S N. Study on the effect of stump diameter and height on sprout regeneration in mangium(Acacia mangium Willd.)[J]. Forest Research, 1990, 3(3): 242-248.
[12] Montserrat V, Peter S, Jacob W. Effects of Rosmarinus officinalis neighbors on resprouting of Erica multiflora individuals[J]. Plant Ecol, 1998, 136: 167~173.
[13] Gracia M, Retana J. Effect of site quality and shading on sprouting patterns of holm oak coppices [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 188(1): 39-49.
[14] Kabeya D, Sakai S. The relative importance of carbohydrate and nitrogen for the resprouting ability of Quercus crispula seedlings[J]. Annals of Botany, 2005, 96(3): 479-488.
[15] 薛瑶芹, 张文辉, 周建云,等. 秦岭南坡不同生境条件下栓皮栎伐桩萌芽特性[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(7): 57-64.Xue Y Q, Zhang W H, Zhou J Y, et al. Sprouting and growth characteristics of Quercus variabilis stump after cutting in different habitats of the southern slope of the Qinling Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(7): 57-64.
[16] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志·第四十七卷:第一分册 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985: 69-70.
[17] 钟济新. 广西石灰岩石山植物图谱[M]. 南宁: 广西人民出版社, 1982: 202. Zhong J X. Plant picture of limestone mountains in Guangxi [M]. Nanning:Guangxi People Publishing House, 1982:202.
[18] 李树刚,梁畴芬. 广西植物资源[M]. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 1990: 36-41.Li S G,Liang C F. Plant resources in Guangxi[M].Beijing: Beijing Science and Technology Press, 1990: 36-41.
[19] 李先琨, 吕仕洪, 蒋忠诚, 等. 喀斯特峰丛区复合农林系统优化与植被恢复试验[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1): 92-98.Li X K,Lü S H,Jiang Z C, et al. Experiment on vegetation rehabilitation and optimization of agro-forestry system in Karst Fengcong depression(peak cluster)area in western Guangxi,China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005, 20(1): 92-98.
[20] 吕仕洪, 李先琨, 何成新, 等. 广西岩溶地区茶条木群落特征与人工造林研究初报[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2009(3): 20-24.Lü S H,Li X K, He C X, et al. Preliminary report on community characteristics and artificial afforestation of Delavaya toxocarpa in Karst area of Guangxi [J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2009(3): 20-24.
[21] 吕仕洪,李先琨,陆树华,等. 广西岩溶乡土树种育苗及造林研究[J]. 广西科学, 2006, 13(3): 236-240. Lü S H, Li X K, Lu S H, et al. The preliminary study on seedling and afforestation of native trees in karst region of Guangxi[J]. Guangxi Sciences, 2006,13(3):236-240.
[22] 程菊英,罗四莲,潘于发,等. 广西植物油脂的研究. Ⅰ.五十种植物种子的油脂成分[J]. 广西植物, 1980(2): 26-33.Cheng J Y,Luo S L, Pan Y F, et al. The study on vegetable oil of Guangxi.I.Fat ingredients fifty kinds of plant seeds[J]. Guihaia, 1980(2): 26-33.
[23] 殷庆仓, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 等. 西南喀斯特地区四种造林树种光合作用日变化及生态适应性研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2011, 32(3): 367-370.Yin Q C, Song T Q, Peng W X, et al. Research on diurnal variations of photosynthesis and adaptability of four sylvicultural trees in Karst area, southwest China[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2011, 32(3): 367-370.
[24] 胡雄, 何寻阳, 王惠群. 喀斯特生境模拟对其典型恢复树种茶条木生长和生理的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学,2013(9):24-27,30.Hu X, He X Y, Wang H Q. Influences of karst habitat simulation on growth and physiology of Delavaya Yunnanensis Franch, a typical restoration tree species[J]. Hunan Agricultural Science, 2013(9): 24-27,30.
[25] 张德楠, 徐广平, 黄玉清, 等. 喀斯特地区茶条木种子萌发及生态适应性[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(3): 478-481.Zhang D N, Xu G P, Huang Y Q, et al. Seed germination and ecological adaptability of Delavaya toxocarpa in Karst region[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2013, 44(3): 478-481.
[26] 何成新, 黄玉清, 吕仕洪, 等. 石漠化地区农村能源结构调整及其生态经济效应分析——以广西平果县龙何屯为例[J]. 广西植物, 2008, 27(6): 855-860.He C X, Huang Y Q, Lü S H, et al. Rehabilitation process of “Rocky Desert” region, improvement of farm fuel and its ecological efficiency[J]. Guihaia, 2008, 27(6): 855-860.
[27] Ducrey M, Turrel M. Influence of cutting methods and dates on stump sprouting in Holm oak(Quercus ilex L.)coppice[J]. Annales Des Sciences Forestières EDP Sciences, 1992, 49(5): 449-464.
[28] 易青春, 张文辉, 唐德瑞. 栓皮栎伐桩萌苗保留量对其生长和生物量积累的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(7):34-39.Yi Q C, Zhang W H, Tang D R. Effects of reserved sprout number per stump on sprout development and biomass accumulation of Quercus variabilis[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(7): 34-39.

相似文献/References:

[1]张明,刘福德,王中生,等.热带山地雨林演替早期先锋树种与非先锋树种叶片特征的差异[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(04):028.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2008.04.006]
 ZHANG Ming,LIU Fu-de,WANG Zhong-sheng,et al.Differences of leaf traits between pioneer and non-pioneer tree species in early succession stage of tropical montane rain forest[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2008,32(03):028.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2008.04.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-04-15 修回日期:2014-10-16 䥺Symbol`@@
基金项目:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2010BAE00739-02); 广西科技攻关项目(桂科攻1298003); 中央财政林业科技推广示范跨区域重点推广示范项目(桂林计发
[2013]213号)
第一作者:吕仕洪,副研究员。E-mail: lshh@gxib.cn。
引文格式:吕仕洪,黄甫昭,曾丹娟,等. 石漠化地区先锋树种茶条木伐桩的萌蘖特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(3):65-70.
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-05-30