[1]黄正金,卫云丽,张春红,等.基于层次分析法的5个黑莓杂交品系综合评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(01):135-140.
 HUANG Zhengjin,WEI Yunli,ZHANG Chunhong,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of five blackberry hybrid strains by analytic hierarchy process(AHP)[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2019,43(01):135-140.
点击复制

基于层次分析法的5个黑莓杂交品系综合评价
分享到:

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

卷:
43
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
135-140
栏目:
专题报道
出版日期:
2019-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comprehensive evaluation of five blackberry hybrid strains by analytic hierarchy process(AHP)
文章编号:
1000-2006(2019)01-0135-06
作者:
黄正金1卫云丽1张春红1闾连飞1李维林2*吴文龙1*
1.江苏省中国科学院植物研究所,江苏 南京 210014; 2.南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学林学院,江苏 南京 210037
Author(s):
HUANG Zhengjin1 WEI Yunli1 ZHANG Chunhong1 LYU Lianfei1 LI Weilin2* WU Wenlong1*
1. Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China; 2. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
关键词:
黑莓 层次分析法 杂交品系 综合评价
Keywords:
Blackberry(Rubus spp.) analytic hierarchy process(AHP) hybrid strains comprehensive evaluation
分类号:
S663.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【目的】 对初选的黑莓杂交品系进行综合评价,为进一步选育黑莓优良新品种提供科学依据。【方法】 对5个黑莓杂交品系(5-8-2、6-6-3、7-7-4、7-10-2、7-10-6)及其杂交亲本品种(‘Hull’、‘Chester’、‘Triple Crown’、‘Arapaho’、‘Kiowa’)的生物学性状(果熟期、刺的有无、叶色、植株生长量)和经济学性状(果穗数量、果实大小、果实品质、产量)进行调查与统计,采用层次分析法(AHP)进行综合评价,得到各指标对黑莓杂交品系的综合评价值和等级排名。【结果】 产量和果实品质是黑莓优良品种综合评价的核心指标。黑莓杂交品系6-6-3综合评价等级为Ⅰ级,5-8-2和‘Kiowa’为Ⅱ级,7-7-4、7-10-6、‘Hull’、‘Chester’、‘Triple Crown’和‘Arapaho’为Ⅲ级,7-10-2为Ⅳ级,其中5-8-2和6-6-3品系在南京地区生长、结果表现优良。【结论】 6-6-3和5-8-2品系综合评价值高,具有超亲优势,可作为候选优良新品种进一步观察研究; 7-7-4和7-10-6品系优点不明显; 7-10-2品系综合表现差,可在品种选育中淘汰。
Abstract:
【Objective】This study was performed in order to provide scientific data for blackberry breeding by a comprehensive evaluation of hybrid strains. 【Methods】 For the five blackberry hybrid strains(5-8-2, 6-6-3, 7-7-4, 7-10-2 and 7-10-6)and their parental cultivars(‘Hull’, ‘Chester’, ‘Triple Crown’, ‘Arapaho’ and ‘Kiowa’), the biological characters(fruit ripening period, thorn trait, SPAD value and growth trait)and economic characters(fruit cluster number, fruit weight, fruit quality and yield)were overall investigated and statistically analyzed, and the comprehensive evaluation value and rank were determined by the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)method. 【Results】Fruit yield and quality were decided as core indicators by comprehensive evaluation for blackberry breeding. The comprehensive evaluation rank of hybrid strain 6-6-3 was class Ⅰ, strain 5-8-2 and cultivar ‘Kiowa’ were class Ⅱ, strains 7-7-4, 7-10-6 and cultivars ‘Hull’, ‘Chester’, ‘Triple Crown’, ‘Arapaho’ were class Ⅲ, strain 7-10-2 was calculated as class Ⅳ. Strain 6-6-3 and 5-8-2 showed outstanding performance of growth and fruiting in Nanjing. 【Conclusion】 Strains 5-8-2 and 6-6-3 are promising candidate of new excellent blackberry cultivar because of their high comprehensive evaluation value and heterobeltiosis, the strains 7-7-4 and 7-10-6 are not clear, strain 7-10-2 should be eliminated in subsequent breeding program due to its low evaluation value.

参考文献/References:

[1] SAATY T L. The analytic hierarchy process [M]. New York: McGraw Hill Inc, 1980: 50.
[2] 蒋文伟, 向其柏. 层次分析法在干旱区园林树木评选中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2000, 24(6): 63-67. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2000.06.015.
JIANG W W, XIANG Q B. Application of analytic hierarchy process to evaluation and selection of garden trees in arid regions [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2000, 24(6): 63-67.
[3] 丁香乾, 石硕. 层次分析法在项目风险管理中的应用[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 34(1): 97-102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5174.2004.01.009.
DING X Q, SHI S. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to project risk management [J]. Journal of Ocean University of China(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 34(1): 97-102.
[4] 李昆仑. 层次分析法在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2005, 38(1): 143-147. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8844.2005.01.032.
LI K L. Using analytic hierarchy process in urban road landscape evaluation [J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University(Engineering Edition), 2005, 38(1): 143-147.
[5] 喻良, 伊武军. 层次分析法在城市生态环境质量评价中的应用[J]. 四川环境, 2002, 21(4):38-40. DOI:10.14034/j.cnki.schj.2002.04.011.
YU L, YI W J. Application research of analytic hierarchy process(AHP)in urban ecotope quality evaluation [J].Sichuan Environment, 2002, 21(4): 38-40.
[6] 陈金富, 赵云飞, 周任军. 层次分析法及其在电力系统中的应用[J]. 华北电力技术, 2004(12): 20-23. DOI:10.16308/j.cnki.issn1003-9171.2004.12.007.
CHEN J F, ZHAO Y F, ZHOU R J. Analytic hierarchy process and its application in power system [J]. North China Electric Power, 2004(12):20-23.
[7] 黄启堂, 游水生, 黄榕辉, 等. 运用层次分析法评价木质藤本观赏植物资源[J]. 福建林学院学报, 1997,17(3): 269-272. DOI: 10.13324 /j.cnki.jfcf.1997.03.019.
HUANG Q T, YOU S S, HUANG R H, et al. Appraising ornamental wooden vines resources by analytic hierarchy process [J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 1997, 17(3):269-272.
[8] 黄清平. 利用层次分析法评价三明市野生观赏植物的引种驯化效果[J]. 中国园林, 2009, 25(12): 93-96. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2009.12.029.
HUANG Q P. Evaluation on the introduction and domestication of wild ornamental plants by analytic hierarchy process(AHP)in Sanming City [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2009, 25(12):93-96.
[9] 岳超源. 决策理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2003.
YUE C Y. Decision theory and method [M].Beijing: Science Press, 2003.
[10] 闾连飞, 吴文龙, 李维林, 等. 黑莓优良品种扦插和压条繁殖技术[J]. 林业科技开发,2009,23(1):85-87. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2009.01.025.
LV L F, WU W L, LI W L, et al. Cuttage and strip propagation techniques of Blackberry [J].China Forestry Science and Technology, 2009, 23(1):85-87.
[11] 吴文龙, 孙醉君, 蔡剑华. 黑莓适宜栽植密度与修剪量的研究[J]. 落叶果树,1998(3):26-27.
WU W L, SUN Z J, CAI J H. Study on the suitable planting density and pruning of blackberry [J].Deciduous Fruits,1998(3):26-27.
[12] 闾连飞, 黄钢, 吴文龙, 等. 不同品种黑莓在南京地区的生长表现[J]. 经济林研究, 2008(3):74-79. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2008.03.011.
LV L F, HUANG G, WU W L, et al. Growth performance of different blackberry cultivars in Nanjing [J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2008(3):74-79.
[13] 刘豹, 许树柏, 赵焕臣, 等. 层次分析法——规划决策的工具[J]. 系统工程, 1984(2):23-30.
LIU B, XU S B, ZHAO H C, et al. Analytic hierarchy process: a tool for planning decision [J]. Systems Engineering, 1984(2):23-30.
[14] 芦建国,杜毅. 层次分析法在高速公路缀花草地评价中的应用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,34(3):161-164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2010.03.033.
LU J G, DU Y. Application of analytic hierarchy process for evaluating flower meadow in expressway greening [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2010, 34(3):161-164.
[15] 吴祈宗, 李有文. 层次分析法中矩阵的判断一致性研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 1999, 19(4): 502-505. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0645.1999.04.024.
WU Q Z, LI Y W. Uniformity of judgement matrix in analytic hierarchy process [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 1999, 19(4): 502-505.
[16] 梁维坚, 解明. 榛子新品种选育研究[J]. 中国果树, 2000(2): 4-6. DOI:10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2000.02.002.
LIANG W J, XIE M. Study on the selection and breeding of new hazelnut varieties [J]. China Fruits, 2000(2): 4-6.
[17] 景士西. 关于编制我国果树种质资源评价系统若干问题的商榷[J]. 园艺学报, 1993(4): 353-357.
JING S X. On some problems concerned with compiling the descriptors of fruit germplasm in China [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1993(4): 353-357.
[18] 孙升. 李属资源若干数量性状评价标准探讨[J]. 园艺学报, 1999, 26(1): 7-12. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.1999.01.002.
SUN S. Study on the evaluating criteria of some quantitative character of plum resources [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1999, 26(1): 7-12.
[19] 王海波, 陈学森, 辛培刚, 等. 几个早熟苹果品种果实糖酸组分及风味品质的评价[J]. 果树学报, 2007, 24(4): 513-516. DOI:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.2007.04.022.
WANG H B, CHEN X S, XIN P G, et al. Study on sugar and acid constituents in several early apple cultivars and evaluation of their flavor quality [J].Journal of Fruit Science, 2007, 24(4): 513-516.
[20] 孙玉刚. 甜樱桃种质资源评价与高效种植技术调查研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2004.
SUN Y G. Study on evaluation of germplasm and cultivated technology in sweet cherry [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2004.
[21] 刘遵春, 包东娥, 廖明安. 层次分析法在金花梨果实品质评价上的应用[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(8): 125-128. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2006.08.025.
LIU Z C, BAO D E, LIAO M A. Application of analytic hierarchy process in evaluating Jinhua pear quality [J].Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2006, 34(8): 125-128.
[22] 夏永秀. 9个甜樱桃品种特性比较与评价及其选优研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2011.
XIA Y X. The characteristics comparison and evaluation of 9 sweet cherry varieties and elite selection study [D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2011.
[23] 吴文龙, 闾连飞, 李维林, 等. 不同品种黑莓在南京地区的结实表现[J]. 林业科技开发, 2008, 22(4): 24-29. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2008.04.006.
WU W L, LV L F, LI W L, et al. The fruit characters of different blackberry cultivars in Nanjing [J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2008, 22(4): 24-29.

相似文献/References:

[1]沈烈英,汪求来,卢学鹤,等.上海公益林生态效益评价指标体系的分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(04):151.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2008.04.036]
 SHEN Lie-ying,WANG Qiu-lai,LU Xue-he,et al.Study on assessment index system for the ecological benefit of public welfare forest in Shanghai[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2008,32(01):151.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2008.04.036]
[2]王晓荣,刘学全*,唐万鹏,等.丹江口库区龙口林场水源涵养林林分质量评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(04):063.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.012]
 WANG Xiaorong,LIU Xuequan*,TANG Wanpeng,et al.Evaluation on stand quality of water conservation forest in Longkou Forest Farm on Danjiangkou reservoir area[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2013,37(01):063.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.012]
[3]史佑海,祝晓航.海口市城市公园主要观花树种资源及观赏特性评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(增刊):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.S1.024]
 SHI Youhai,ZHU Xiaohang.Resources of flowering trees & shrubs and quantitative evaluation of ornamental characters in urban parks of Haikou[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2014,38(01):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.S1.024]
[4]吴晓星,刘凤栾,房义福*,等.36个欧美观赏海棠品种(种)应用价值的综合评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(01):093.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.017]
 WU Xiaoxing,LIU Fengluan,FANG Yifu*,et al.A comprehensive evaluation on application value of 36 Euro-American ornamental crabapples[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2015,39(01):093.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.017]
[5]张春红,熊振豪,吴文龙*,等.黑莓果实发育成熟期木质素合成CAD酶及其基因表达[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(01):141.
 ZHANG Chunhong,XIONG Zhenhao,WU Wenlong*,et al.CAD enzyme activity and gene expression in connection with lignin synthesis during fruit development and ripening process of blackberry[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2019,43(01):141.
[6]熊振豪,张春红,李维林*,等.不同硬度黑莓果实发育成熟进程中的解剖构造[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(01):149.
 XIONG Zhenhao,ZHANG Chunhong,LI Weilin*,et al.Anatomical structure characteristics of blackberry fruits with differential firmness during ripening[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2019,43(01):149.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-05-02 修回日期:2018-09-29基金项目:南京市科技计划项目(201716052); 江苏现代农业产业技术体系建设项目(JATS[2018]317)。 第一作者:黄正金(hzj90@qq.com),研究实习员。*通信作者:李维林(wlli@njfu.edu.cn),研究员,指导论文写作和修改,ORCID(0000-0002-7216-2776); 吴文龙(1964wwl@163.com),研究员,指导论文设计和综合评价方法,ORCID(0000-0002-7630-6255)。引文格式:黄正金,卫云丽,张春红,等. 基于层次分析法的5个黑莓杂交品系综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(1):135-140.
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-28