[1]吕国屏,廖承锐,徐雁南*,等.基于CAMarkov模型的喀斯特地区县域生态系统服务价值动态模拟[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(05):049-56.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201612022]
 LYU Guoping,LIAO Chengrui,XU Yannan*,et al.Dynamic simulation of future ecosystem service value in Puding County, Guizhou Province based on CA-Markov model[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2017,41(05):049-56.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201612022]
点击复制

基于CAMarkov模型的喀斯特地区县域生态系统服务价值动态模拟
分享到:

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

卷:
41
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
049-56
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2017-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dynamic simulation of future ecosystem service value in Puding County, Guizhou Province based on CA-Markov model
文章编号:
1000-2006(2017)05-0049-08
作者:
吕国屏1廖承锐1徐雁南1*张 婷1李海东2*
吕国屏1,廖承锐1,徐雁南1*,张 婷1,李海东2*
Author(s):
LYU Guoping1 LIAO Chengrui1 XU Yannan1* ZHANG Ting1 LI Haidong2*
1. Centre of Co-Innovation for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.Nanjing Institute of Environment Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210042,China
关键词:
生态系统服务价值 CA-Markov模型 土地利用 景观格局 驱动机制 喀斯特地区 贵州普定
Keywords:
Keywords:ecosystem service value CA-Markov model land use landscape pattern driving mechanism Karst landform area Puding County of Guizhou Province
分类号:
S757; F205
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201612022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【目的】评估贵州喀斯特典型地区土地利用及生态系统服务价值变化趋势,为退耕还林(草)工程的实施提供理论支撑。【方法】在“3S”技术支持下,以贵州省普定县1999年、2003年、2009年和2015年4期Landsat遥感影像为主要数据源,根据CART决策树模型分类结果,提取普定县土地利用/覆被及景观格局信息,对1999—2015年间生态系统服务价值进行动态评估; 在此基础上结合CA-Markov模型,预测普定县2021年土地利用景观格局及生态系统服务价值变化趋势。【结果】1999—2015年间,研究区生态系统服务价值平稳增加,其中林地、农田和水域3类景观的生态系统服务价值占总价值的90%以上,是生态系统服务主体。在土地利用生态系统单项服务价值方面,水源涵养、土壤形成与保护和废物处理这3项生态服务功能合计贡献率在50%左右。【结论】贵州普定县域生态系统服务价值变化的主要驱动因素是退耕还林(草)政策的实施。2021年普定县生态系统服务价值总量为9.58亿元,比2015年减少约0.3亿元,说明现有退耕还林政策下,普定县生态系统服务价值在未来5年呈下降趋势。
Abstract:
【Objective】Exploring the variations in land use and ecosystem service value in a typical Karst land area in Puding County plays an important role in the implementation of a “grain-for-green” restoration project.【Method】We determined land use/land cover and landscape patterns based on the classification results of a CART decision tree using “3S” technology. The ecological system services values for the period of 1999 to 2015 were estimated based on the ecological principles. Combined with a CA-Markov model, the land use pattern and ecological system services value of 2021 was predicted. 【Result】The ecological system services value steadily increased from 1999 to 2015. The forest, field and water landscape areas were the largest part of the ecological system services, collectively providing more than 90% of the total ecological system services value. Water conservation, soil formation and protection, and waste disposal were almost 50% of the total contribution to total land-use ecosystem service values.【Conclusion】The leading factor in the changes in ecological system service value in the study area was the grain-for-green project. Results of the forecast showed that the total ecological system services value of Puding County in 2021 would be 9.58 billion Yuan, a decrease of 0.3 billion Yuan compared to 2015.

参考文献/References:

[1] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, GROOT R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387:253-260.
[2] 谢高地,张钇锂.中国自然草地生态系统服务价值[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(1):47-52. XIE G D, ZHANG Y L. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2001,16(1):47-52.
[3] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal on Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
[4] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明,等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(8):1243-1254. DOI:10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001. XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal on Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8):1243-1245.
[5] 欧阳志云, 王效科. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607-613. OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 607-613.
[6] 欧阳志云, 王如松. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(5): 635-640. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.1999.0166. OUYANG Z Y, WANG R S. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(5): 635-640.
[7] 曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5): 163-169. DOI:10.3961/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026. CAO M, XUE J H. Review of service function and value research on Chongming Dongtan wetland ecosystem[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(5): 163-169.
[8] 李海东, 沈渭寿, 贾明, 等. 大型露天矿山生态破坏与环境污染损失的评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6): 112-118. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.020. LI H D, SHEN W S, JIA M, et al. Economic losses assessment for ecological destruction and environmental pollution in large-scale opencast mine[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(6): 112-118.
[9] 张莉莉,王智,梁凤超,等.基于GIS的温泉地区景观格局与生态系统服务价值动态分析[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(5):1047-1051. ZHANG L L, WANG Z, LIANG F C, et al. Dynamic analysis of landscape pattern and ecosystem service value in Wenquan area based on GIS[J], Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010,47(5):1047-1051.
[10] 赖元长,李贤伟,冯帅,等.退耕还林工程对四川盆周低山丘陵区生态系统服务价值的影响[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(5):755-768. LAI Y C, LI X W, FENG S, et al. Impact of grain for green projection ecosystem service values in the Hilly region in Sichuan basin: a case study of Hongya County[J]. Journal on Natural Resources, 2011,26(5):755-768.
[11] GAN S, YUAN X P, SUN G, et al. Karst rocky desertification remote sensing monitoring by integrating land use diagnoses in southeast of Yunnan Province[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2013, 444/445:869-873.
[12] LI S, REN H D, XUE L, et al. Influence of bare rocks on surrounding soil moisture in the Karst rocky desertification regions under drought conditions[J]. Catena, 2014, 116: 157-162.
[13] TANG Y, LI J, ZHANG X, et al. Fractal characteristics and stability of soil aggregates in Karst rocky desertification areas[J]. Natural Hazards, 2013, 65(1): 563-579.DOI:10.1007/S/1069-012-0383-3.
[14] 袁道先. 岩溶石漠化问题的全球视野和我国的治理对策与经验[J]. 草业科学, 2008, 25(9): 19-25. YUAN D X. Global view on Karst rock desertification and integrating control measures and experiences of China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(9): 19-25.
[15] 周德成, 赵淑清, 朱超. 退耕还林工程对黄土高原土地利用/覆被变化的影响——以陕西省安塞县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(11): 1866-1878. ZHOU D C, ZHAO S Q, ZHU C. Impacts of the sloping land conversion program on the land use /cover change in the Loess Plateau: a case study in Ansai County of Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Journal on Natural Resources, 2011, 26(11): 1866-1878.
[16] MA S, ZHU X L, AN Y L. Remote sensing image classification based on decision tree in the Karst rocky desertification areas: a case study of Kaizuo township[J]. Asian Agricultural Research, 2014, 6(7): 58-62.
[17] 高凤杰, 张柏, 王宗明, 等. 基于 GIS 与 USLE 的牡丹江市退耕还林前后水土流失变化研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2010, 31(5): 612-616. GAO F J, ZHANG B, WANG Z M, et al. Study on soil and water erosion changes before and after returning farmland to forest project In Mudanjiang City based on GIS and USLE[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2010, 31(5): 612-616.
[18] LINDENMAYER D, WILLINCK E, CRANE M, et al. Murray catchment habitat restoration: lessons from landscape-level research and monitoring[J]. Ecological Management & Restoration, 2013, 14(2): 80-92.DOI:10.1111/emr.12051.
[19] 万合锋, 武玉祥, 龙云川,等. 西南喀斯特地区石漠化研究评述[J]. 林业调查规划, 2015, 40(5):137-142. DOI: 10. 3969 /j. issn. 1671-3168. 2015. 05. 030. WAN H F, WU Y X, LONG Y C, et al. Research on rocky desertification in southwest Karst region of China[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2015, 40(5):137-142.
[20] 郜红娟, 罗绪强, 韩会庆, 等. 贵州山区公路沿线生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(1): 135-141. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.01.022. GAO H J, LUO X Q, HAN H Q, et al. The change of ecosystem service value along the road in mountainous region:a case study of provincial road 309 in Majiang County, Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(1): 135-141.
[21] 张信宝, 王世杰, 白晓永, 等. 贵州石漠化空间分布与喀斯特地貌, 岩性, 降水和人口密度的关系[J]. 地球与环境, 2013,41(1): 1-6. DOI:10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2013.01.001. ZHANG X B, WANG S J, BAI X Y, et al. Relationships between the spatial distribution of Karst land desertification and geomorphology, lithology, precipitation, and population density in Guizhou Province[J]. Earth and Environment, 2013,41(1): 1-6.
[22] YAN X, CAI Y L. Multi-scale anthropogenic driving forces of Karst rocky desertification in southwest China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2015, 26(2): 193-200.
[23] XU E Q, ZHANG H Q, LI M X. Object-based mapping of Karst rocky desertification using a support vector machine[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2015, 26(2): 158-167.
[24] YANG Q, JIANG Z, YUAN D, et al. Temporal and spatial changes of Karst rocky desertification in ecological reconstruction region of southwest China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(11): 4483-4489.DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014.3348-9.
[25] BAI X Y, WANG S J, XIONG K N. Assessing spatial-temporal evolution processes of Karst rocky desertification land: indications for restoration strategies[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2013, 24(1): 47-56.DOI:10.1002/ldr.1102.
[26] 张婷, 侍昊, 徐雁南,等. 退耕还林对喀斯特地区土地利用景观格局影响的定量化评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015,37(3):34-43. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140312. ZHANG T, SHI H, XU Y N, et al. evaluation on the impact of the sloping land conversion program on landscape pattern of land use in Karst area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry, University, 2015,37(3):34-43.
[27] 贵州省统计局. 贵州统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2016.
[28] 龙花楼, 刘永强, 李婷婷,等. 生态用地分类初步研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015,24(1):1-7. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.01.001. LONG H L, LIU Y Q, LI T T, et al. A primary study on ecological land use classification [J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(1): 1-7.
[29] 方恺, 王莉红, 李焕承. 基于生态系统服务价值的江南传统农业区土地利用规划影响评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010(S2): 101-107. FANG K, WANG L H, LI H C. Impact assessment of land use planning on traditional agricultural area of the southern Yangze River based on ecosystem services value[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2010(S2): 101-107.
[30] 郑青华, 罗格平, 朱磊, 等. 基于 CA-Markov 模型的伊犁河三角洲景观格局预测[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(4): 873-882. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0123. ZHENG Q H, LUO G P, ZHU L, et al. Prediction of landscape patterns in Ili River Delta based on CA-Markov model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010,21(4): 873-882.
[31] 王友生, 余新晓, 贺康宁, 等. 基于 CA-Markov 模型的藉河流域土地利用变化动态模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(12): 330-336. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2011.12.062. WANG Y S, YU X X, HE K N, et al. Dynamic simulation of land use change in Jihe watershed based on CA-Markov model[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(12): 330-336.
[32] 马士彬, 张勇荣, 安裕伦. 基于 Logistic-CA-Markov 模型的石漠化空间变化规律研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(6): 591-598. DOI: 10.11932/karst20150608. MA S B, ZHANG Y R, AN Y L. Spatial evolution simulation of Karst rocky desertification based on Logistic-CA-Markov models[J]. 2015, 34(6): 591-598.
[33] 秦罗义, 白晓永, 王世杰, 等. 近 40 年来贵州普定典型喀斯特高原景观格局变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(12): 3349-3357. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2014.0299. QIN L Y, BAI X Y, WANG S J, et al. Landscape pattern evolution of typical Karst plateau in Puding, Guizhou during last 40 years[J], Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(12): 3349-3357.
[34] 吴琳娜, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 等. 1976 年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 54-63. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201401005. WU L N, YANG S T, LIU X Y, et al. Response analysis of land use change to the degree of human activities in Beiluo River basin since 1976[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1): 54-63.
[35] 王腊春, 汪文富. 岩溶山区生态环境区划: 以贵州普定县后寨河流域为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2000, 19(1): 90-96. WANG L C, WANG W F. The ecological environment regionalization in karst area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2000, 19(1): 90-96.
[36] 束龙仓, 柯婷婷, 刘丽红, 等. 基于综合法的岩溶山区生态系统脆弱性评价——以贵州省普定县为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2010, 29(2): 141-144. SHU L C, KE T T, LIU L H, et al. Assessment on ecosystem fragility of Karst mountain areas based on synthetic method: a case study in Puding Country, Guizhou Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2010, 29(2): 141-144.
[37] 张文源, 王百田. 贵州喀斯特石漠化分类分级探讨[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(2): 148-154.DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.026. ZHANG W Y, WANG B T. Discussion on classification and gradation of Karst rocky desertification in Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(2): 148-154.
[38] 王思砚, 苏维词, 范新瑞, 等. 喀斯特石漠化地区土壤含水量变化影响因素分析——以贵州省普定县为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(3): 171-175. WANG S Y, SU W C, FAN X R, et al. Influence factors of soil moisture in Karst rocky desertification region: a case study of Puding County, Guizhou Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 17(3): 171-175.

相似文献/References:

[1]韩会庆,杨广斌*,张凤太.基于地貌特征的贵州省土地利用时空变化分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(05):099.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.05.016]
 HAN Huiqing,YANG Guangbin*,ZHANG Fengtai.Spatio-temporal analysis of land use changes in Guizhou Province based on landform characteristics[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2015,39(05):099.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.05.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:江苏省林业三新工程项目(LYSX[2015]19) 第一作者:吕国屏(lvgp0104@foxmail.com)。*通信作者:徐雁南(nfuxyn@126.com),教授,负责指导文章构思和框架审定; 李海东(lihd2020@163.com),副研究员,负责指导生态系统服务价值评估与驱动因素辨识。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01