[1]王 瑾,聂 影*.中国松香贸易风险的综合评价方法研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(02):207-212.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201606034]
 WANG Jin,NIE Ying*.A comprehensive evaluation method of Chinese rosin trade risk[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2018,42(02):207-212.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201606034]
点击复制

中国松香贸易风险的综合评价方法研究
分享到:

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

卷:
42
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
207-212
栏目:
研究简报
出版日期:
2018-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comprehensive evaluation method of Chinese rosin trade risk
文章编号:
1000-2006(2018)02-0207-05
作者:
王 瑾 聂 影*
南京林业大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210037
Author(s):
WANG Jin NIE Ying*
College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
关键词:
中国松香贸易 贸易风险 模糊评价 风险管理 综合评价模型
Keywords:
Keywords:Chinese rosin trade trade risk fuzzy evaluation risk management comprehensive evaluation model
分类号:
S7-9; F7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201606034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【目的】通过模糊评价分析中国松香贸易的对应风险,给出综合评价,并提出有针对性的作业风险控制和管理策略。【方法】立足当前中国松香贸易的实际情况,结合国内外风险管理研究现状,通过现有方法及实际调研,从不同角度鉴别和分析了中国松香贸易可能面临的贸易风险及其影响因素,将其影响因素按照不同特性归纳为合同风险、市场风险、信用风险、其他风险共四大类,据此设计出中国松香贸易风险评价指标体系,并就中国松香贸易风险评价的方法、依据、过程以及评价结果的效用等问题进行了研究。【结果】各类中国松香贸易的服务项目、作业情况和风险控制水平均有所区别,市场影响最大,合同次之,信用最小。中国松香贸易风险处于良好等级,仍需进一步发现存在的安全隐患,同时分析其危险作业环节,对其作业风险管理进行持续改进和完善,不断提高作业风险评价等级。在此基础上,通过算例分析,构建了中国松香贸易模糊综合评价模型B=WiR,确立了相关的指标体系、评语集和单因素模糊评价矩阵。 【结论】中国松香贸易应该从辅助生产设施、自然条件影响、工艺适用性等几个方面着手,对其作业风险进行评价、控制和管理,改善和优化中国松香贸易环境与工艺因素,进而提高中国松香贸易风险控制的整体水平。
Abstract:
【Objective】 Analyze the risk of Chinese rosin trade by fuzzy evaluation and performing a comprehensive evaluation, and proposing targeted operation risk control and management strategy. 【Method】 Based on the actual situation of the current Chinese rosin trade, along with the risk management research status at home and abroad, the study uses existing methods and actual investigation for the identification and analysis of the Chinese rosin trade risk and the various factors influencing it. The factors inducing contract risk, market risk, credit risk and four other risk categories are identified according to the designed rosin trade risk evaluation index system of Chinese. This paper analyzes the methods, basis, processes and effectiveness of China rosin trade risk assessment. 【Results】 There are differences in the service items, operating conditions, and risk control levels in all kinds of Chinese rosin trade. It is found that the market has the biggest influence, followed by the contract. Credit has the least influence. Rosin trade risk is at a good level in China, but there is still the need to uncover hidden trouble, and to analyze its dangerous operations to continuously improve and perfect the operational risk management, and constantly improve the level of operation risk assessment. Based on the analysis, this paper constructs a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of the Chinese rosin trade, and establishes the relevant index system, evaluation set, and single factor fuzzy evaluation matrix. 【Conclusion】Chinese rosin trade is influenced by auxiliary production facilities, the natural conditions, applicability and matching technology, etc. There is a need to evaluate the operational risk, control and management, and to improve and optimize the environment of the Chinese rosin trade and technological factors, thereby enhancing the overall level of Chinese rosin trade risk control.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李俊.上海XD进出口公司国际贸易风险分析及对策研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2014:71-72. LI J. Shanghai XD international trade import and export company risk analysis and countermeasure research [D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014:71-72.
[2] 刘丽影,李敏.后金融危机时代中国出口贸易风险规避研究[J]. 世界农业,2013(8):85-88. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-4433.2013.08.022. LIU L Y, LI M. After the financial crisis era of Chinese export trade risk aversion research [J]. Journal of World Agriculture, 2013(8): 85-88.
[3] 吕继佳.宁波港化工码头区域环境风险评价及管理[D].大连:大连海事大学,2006:19-21. LYU J J. Assessment and management of regional environmental risk assessment and management of Ningbo Port chemical dock [D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2006:19-21.
[4] 邱云明.临海港口航道航行环境安全综合评价及计算机辅助实现[D]. 上海: 上海海事大学,2004:55-56. QIU Y M. Comprehensive evaluation of environmental safety of navigation environment of Linhai Port and its computer aided realization [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Maritime University, 2004:55-56.
[5] 陈亮.煤层渗透性评价模型研究[D]. 阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2009:57-58. CHEN L.Study on the evaluation model of coal seam permeability [D]. Buxing: Liaoning Technical University, 2009:57-58.
[6] 李礼.煤矿企业安全培训体系评价研究[D]. 阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2009:40-42. LI L. Study on Evaluation of safety training system for coal mine enterprise [D]. Buxing: Liaoning Technical University, 2009:40-42
[7] 和莹.我国商业银行国际贸易融资业务的风险评价与控制[D]. 天津:河北工业大学,2010:41-43. HE Y. Risk assessment and control of international trade financing business of commercial banks in China[D].Tianjing: Hebei University of Technology, 2010:41-43.
[8] 周杰.国际贸易实务中存在的主要风险和规避[J].经营管理者,2016(31):261. ZHOU J. Major risks existing in the practice of international trade and avoid [J].Journal of Management, 2016(31): 261.
[9] 李昕.渤海湾客滚船航行安全评价——启航安全评价的研究[D]. 大连:大连海事大学,2003:30-33. LI X. Safety evaluation of RO passenger ship in Bohai Bay—Study on safety evaluation of sailing [D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2003:30-33.
[10] 张雪锋.铁路施工企业突发事件应急能力评价与提升研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2009:26-28. ZHANG X F. Study on evaluation and promotion of emergency response capacity of railway construction enterprises [D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2009:26-28.
[11] 王吉靓.海上溢油风险评价及应急响应设备的优化配置[D]. 大连:大连海事大学,2011:66-68. WANG J L. Risk assessment of oil spill at sea and optimal allocation of emergency response equipment [D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2011:66-68.
[12] 李力红,张怡. AHP-模糊综合评判法在心理学中的应用[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,58(3):169-174.DOI: 10.16164/j.cnki.22-1062/c.2008.03.02. LI L H., ZHANG Y. Application of AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in psychology[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2008, 58(3):169-174.
[13] 代纪元.采矿权设置方案评价体系构建与应用研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2014:78-79 DAI J Y. Construction and application of evaluation system of mining right setting scheme [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2014:78-79
[14] 韩科明.采煤沉陷区稳定性评价研究[D].北京:煤炭科学研究总院,2008:40-45. HAN K M. Study on stability evaluation of coal mining subsidence area[D]. Beijing: Institute of Coal Science Research, 2008:40-45.
[15] 张文静,何海洋,李昊洋. 基于熵权模糊模型在人工回灌水源优化决策中的应用[J].长春理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,38(6):159-162. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9870.2015.06.037. ZHANG W J, HE H Y, LI H Y. Application of fuzzy model based on entropy weight to optimization of artificial recharge of water resources [J]. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2015,38(6): 159-162.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201204107) 第一作者:王瑾(hollywood@njfu.edu.cn),博士生。*通信作者:聂影(ynieh@njfu.edu.cn),教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-12