[1]程满环,翟大才,毕淑峰.黄山松与马尾松松针挥发性成分对比分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(03):093-98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709022]
 Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles ofPinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana.Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles ofPinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2018,42(03):093-98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709022]
点击复制

黄山松与马尾松松针挥发性成分对比分析
分享到:

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

卷:
42
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
093-98
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2018-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana
文章编号:
1000-2006(2018)03-0093-06
作者:
程满环1翟大才2毕淑峰2
1.黄山学院现代教育技术中心,安徽 黄山 245041; 2.黄山学院生命与环境科学学院,安徽 黄山 245041
Author(s):
Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana
1.Modern Educational Technology Center, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041, China; 2. College of Life and Environment Science, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041,China
关键词:
黄山松 马尾松 松针 挥发性成分 顶空-固相微萃取 气相色谱-质谱
Keywords:
Keywords:Pinus taiwanensis P. massoniana pine needles volatile components HS-SPME GC-MS
分类号:
S713; R284. 1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【目的】研究黄山松松针挥发性成分,并与马尾松松针对比,以期为黄山松松针的开发利用奠定基础。【方法】采用顶空-固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用技术(HS-SPME-GC-MS)分析黄山松、马尾松松针的挥发性成分,并对两者的分析结果进行比较。【结果】从黄山松和马尾松松针挥发性成分中分别鉴定出59种和42种化合物。两种松针中含有共有成分36种,占各自总峰面积的90.26%(黄山松)和96.09%(马尾松)。含量最高的挥发性成分均为α-蒎烯,黄山松松针中α-蒎烯含量(质量分数)为24.08%,马尾松松针中α-蒎烯含量(质量分数)为36.25%。黄山松松针中鉴定出23种独有成分,其中含量最高的为伞花烃(5.67%)。【结论】两种松针主要挥发性成分种类相似但含量差异明显; 黄山松松针含有更多种类的挥发性成分及活性成分。
Abstract:
Abstract: 【Objective】 The volatile components from the pine needles of P. taiwanensis were analyzed and contrasted with those of P. massoniana to aid in the development and utilization of the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis.【Methods】The comparative methods of head-space solid phase micro-extraction and GC-MS have been explored, and were applied for the first time to comparatively analyze the differences in the components of pine needles from the two species.【Results】The results showed that 59 and 42 kinds of compounds were identified from the pine needles of P. taiwanensis and P. massoniana, respectively. The two pine species had 36 components in common, accounting for 90.26%(P. taiwanensis)and 96.09%(P. massoniana)of the total peak area. The compound α-pinene was the highest in content, which was 24.08% for P. taiwanensis and 36.25% for P. massoniana. However, 23 types of components were found only in the needles of P. taiwanensis; of which, p-cymene(5.67%)was the highest in content. 【Conclusion】The types of the main volatile components in the two species were similar, but there were also obvious differences in their contents. Compared with P. massoniana, the pine needles of P. taiwanensis contained more kinds of volatile and active components. This study provided scientific evidence for the development and utilization of the pine needles from P. taiwanensis.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李时珍. 本草纲目 [M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,1982:1917. LI S Z. Compendium of materia medica [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 1982:1917.
[2] 劳业兴, 张冰若, 苏薇薇. 松针化学成分及药理研究进展 [J]. 中药材, 2003, 26(9):681-683. DOI: 10.13863/j.issn1001-4454.2003.09.035. LAO Y X, ZHANG B R, SU W W. Study progress of chemical composition and pharmacological action of pine needles [J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2003, 26(9):681-683.
[3] FENG S, ZENG W, LUO F, et al. Antibacterial activity of organic acids in aqueous extracts from pine needles(Pinus massoniana Lamb.)[J]. Food Science and Biotechnology, 2010, 19(1):35-41. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-010-0005-2.
[4] WANG C, HE L, YAN M, et al. Effects of polyprenols from pine needles of Pinus massoniana on ameliorating cognitive impairment in a D-galactose-induced mouse model [J]. AGE, 2014, 36:9676-9687. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-014-9676-6.
[5] WANG Q, ZHANG R, JIE T, et al. Two new antitumor diterpenes from Pinus sylvestris[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2008, 19(2):187-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2007.11.028.
[6] 林楚慧, 陈宣伶, 郑文玮, 等. 马尾松松针抗氧化酸奶加工工艺研究 [J]. 中国乳品工业, 2014, 42(6):58-61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2230.2014.06.016. LIN C H, CHEN X L, ZHENG W W, et al. Processing technology of masson pine needles yoghourt with antioxidant function [J].China Dairy Industry, 2014, 42(6):58-61.
[7] 杨丽华, 麦啟彬, 杨小翠, 等. 松针绿茶抗氧化复合茶饮料的加工 [J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2014, 40(3):244-247. DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.2014.03.044. YANG L H, MAI Q B, YANG X C, et al. Processing technology of pine needles and green tea compound antioxidant beverage [J]. Food Fermentation Industry, 2014, 40(3):244-247.
[8] 胡满江, 苏立杰, 李瑞姣, 等. 荔枝松针功能酒加工工艺研究 [J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2016, 52(2):72-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-506X.2016.02-017. HU M J, SU L J, LI R J,et al. Study on processing technic of Litchi-Pine needles wine product [J].Food and Fermentation technology, 2016, 52(2):72-81.
[9] 张旭, 及元乔, 李萍, 等. 松针的化学成分研究 [J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2006, 18(4):621-623. DOI: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2006.04.022. ZHANG X, JI Y Q, LI P, et al. Study on chemical constituents of Pinus massoniana leaf [J].Natural Product Research and Development, 2006, 18(4): 621-623.
[10] 张桂芳, 张东杰, 郭希娟, 等. 三种松针活性成分含量及清除自由基能力的比较 [J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2016, 28(7):1066-1070. DOI: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2016.7.014. ZHANG G F,ZHANG D J, GUO X J, et al. Comparison of main bioactive components and free radicals scavenging activities of three pine needles [J].Natural Product Research and Development, 2016, 28(7):1066-1070.
[11] 宗芳芳,包怡红,李德海,等. 盐析辅助水蒸气蒸馏法制备红松壳挥发油研究 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016, 40(6):122-128.DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2006.2016.06.019. ZONG F F, BAO Y H, LI D H, et al. The preparation and component analysis of pine shell volatile oil by salting out-assisted steam distillation [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(6):122-128.
[12] 杨燕, 杨茂发, 杨再华, 等. 云南松松针的挥发性化学成分 [J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(5):173-177. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.05.028. YANG Y, YANG M F, YANG Z H, et al. Chemical constituents of volatile from pine needles of Pinus yunnanensis[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(5):173-177.
[13] 郑万钧, 傅立国. 中国植物志:7 [M]. 北京:科学出版社,1978:266. ZHENG W J, FU L G. Flora of China:7 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1978:266.
[14] 徐丽珊, 张姚杰, 林颖, 等. 黄山松松针挥发油提取、GC-MS分析及与湿地松挥发油的比较 [J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 39(2):187-192. DOI: 10.16218/j.issn.1001-5051.2016.02.011. XU L S, ZHANG Y J, LIN Y, et al. GC-MS analysis of volatile oils from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and comparison with Pinus elliottii[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 39(2): 187-192.
[15] ZHANG Z, GUO S, LIU X, et al. Synergistic antitumor effect of α-pinene and β-pinene with paclitaxel against non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma(NSCLC)[J]. Drug Research, 2015, 65(4):214-218.
[16] 张秋格, 毕良武, 赵振东, 等. 对伞花烃的制备与应用研究进展 [J]. 现代化工, 2008, 28(2):401-406. DOI: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2008.s2.062. ZHANG Q G, BI L W, ZHAO Z D, et al. Research pogress in peparation and aplication of p-cymene [J].Modern Chemical Industry, 2008, 28(2):401-406.

相似文献/References:

[1]建徐超,吴小芹,林司曦,等.马尾松根部蛋白双向电泳分离体系的构[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(01):015.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.01.004]
 XU Chao,WU Xiaoqin,LIN Sixi,et al.Establishment of twodimensional gel electrophoresis system for analyzing the root protein of Pinus massoniana[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2011,35(03):015.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.01.004]
[2]渠纪腾,阎毛毛,戴晓港,等.马尾松、黄山松及其杂种域球果形态和种子性状变异[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(06):143.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.06.029]
 QU Jiteng,YAN Maomao,DAI Xiaogang,et al.Variation in cone morphology and seed characteristics for Pinus massoniana Lamb., P. taiwanensis Hayata, and their hybrid zone[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2012,36(03):143.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.06.029]
[3]赵桂华.马尾松蓝变木材中长喙壳属的两个新种[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(03):115.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2005.03.029]
 ZHAO Gui-hua.Two New Species of Ceratocystis on Pinus massoniana Staining Wood[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2005,29(03):115.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2005.03.029]
[4]喻方圆,邵岚,陈淑芬.杉木、马尾松种子细胞质冻结和玻璃化的比较[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(05):001.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2006.05.001]
 YU Fang-yuan,SHAO Lan,CHEN Shu-fen.A Comparison on Cytoplasmic Vitrification and Freezing Point of Chinese Fir and Masson Pine Seeds[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2006,30(03):001.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2006.05.001]
[5]陈顺立,张飞萍,童应华.松突圆蚧在不同梢位间的扩散与分布[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(06):079.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2006.06.018]
 CHEN Shun-li,ZHANG Fei-ping,TONG Ying-hua.Spread and Distribution of Hemiberlesia pitysophila Takagi on the Different Tips of Pine[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2006,30(03):079.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2006.06.018]
[6]俞元春,余健,房莉,等.缺磷胁迫下马尾松和杉木苗根系有机酸的分泌[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(02):009.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2007.02.003]
 YU Yuan-chun,YU Jian,FANG Li,et al.Organic Acids Exudation from the Roots of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Pinus massoniana Seedlings Under Low Phosphorus Stress[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2007,31(03):009.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2007.02.003]
[7]张治军,王彦辉*,于澎涛,等.不同优势度马尾松的生物量及根系分布特征[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(04):071.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2008.04.016]
 ZHANG Zhi-jun,WANG Yan-hui*,YU Peng-tao,et al.Characteristics of biomass and root distribution of Pinus massoniana with different dominance[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2008,32(03):071.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2008.04.016]
[8]马文秀.黄山松松脂树脂酸少量成份研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1989,13(04):069.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.1989.04.012]
 Ma Wenxiu.A STUDY ON MINOR CONSTITUENTS OF RESIN ACIDS IN PINUS TAIWANENSIS[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),1989,13(03):069.[doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.1989.04.012]
[9]刘飞鹏,储双双,裴向阳,等.华南3种人工林土壤有机质和养分含量及其综合评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(02):081.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.016]
 LIU Feipeng,CHU Shuangshuang,PEI Xiangyang,et al.Soil organic matter and nutrient contents and integrated evaluation of them under three typical planted forests in south China[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2014,38(03):081.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.016]
[10]李桂娥,吴小芹*.水拉恩氏菌JZ-GX1及其诱变菌株对马尾松苗的促生效应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(03):083.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.03.016]
 LI Guie,WU Xiaoqin*.A study on growth promotion effect of Rahnella aquatilis JZ-GX1 and its excellent mutant strains on masson pine seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2014,38(03):083.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.03.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:安徽省高等学校自然科研研究项目(KJHS2017B14,KJ2007B049); 国家科技基础条件平台工作项目(2005DKA210003) 第一作者:程满环(chengmanhuan@163.com.),实验师。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-06