[1]严煜,崔志华.基于用地变化的苏北小城镇总体规划实施评估研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,44(4):191-198.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201906034]
 YAN Yu,CUI Zhihua.Implementation of a small-town master plan based on land use change in the north of Jiangsu[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2020,44(4):191-198.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201906034]
点击复制

基于用地变化的苏北小城镇总体规划实施评估研究/HTML
分享到:

《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-2006/CN:32-1161/S]

卷:
44
期数:
2020年4期
页码:
191-198
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2020-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Implementation of a small-town master plan based on land use change in the north of Jiangsu
文章编号:
1000-2006(2020)04-0191-08
作者:
严煜 崔志华
作者单位:南京林业大学风景园林学院,江苏 南京 210037
Author(s):
YAN Yu CUI Zhihua
(College of Landscape Architecture,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China)
关键词:
小城镇规划 城镇总体规划 用地评估 苏北地区 泗阳县裴圩镇
Keywords:
small towns planning town master planning land use evaluation northern Jiangsu Peiwei Town in Siyang County
分类号:
S757;TU23
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201906034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究苏北地区小城镇总体规划中用地实施情况,促进城乡用地布局的合理化。 方法 以江苏省泗阳县裴圩镇为例,利用ARCGIS、GEODA、ENVI等技术,建立裴圩镇总体规划用地实施评估指标体系,同时进行用地一致性、绩效性评估。 结果 以用地评估为评价目标,形成1个目标层、2个准则层、7个指标层的评估体系。根据指标体系评估结果,裴圩镇总规实施情况“一般”,存在一定程度上偏离城镇发展方向、空间管制把控不严、用地布局结构有待完善、重指标轻布局等问题。 结论 对同类型小城镇总体规划的实施过程,建议“加强动态监测、增强空间管制、完善用地布局、增量转存量”,以促进小城镇健康发展,该评估体系也丰富了小城镇总规评估的研究内容。
Abstract:
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the land use implementation of a small-town master plan in the northern part of Jiangsu Province and to promote the rationalization of land layout. Method This study used Peiwei Town in Siyang City, Jiangsu Province to establish an evaluation index system. The implementation of the evaluation index system for a master plan based on the land use of Peiwei Town employed ARCGIS, GEODA and ENVI techniques to formulate conformance-based and performance-based evaluations. Result We take the land use evaluation as the evaluation target, and form an evaluation system of one target layer, two criteria layer and seven index layers .The index system showed that the implementation of the plan was effective in general; however, there were still a number of problems in conformance-based evaluation, including, to some extent, deviating from the direction of town development, lack of space control, incomplete land use, and focusing more on the completion of indicators instead of on land use layout. Furthermore, the performance-based evaluation also had some problems, such as a weaker effect of land use aggregation than planned and a need for improvement of the coupling relationship between people and land. Conclusion This findings of this study will enable the proposal of a few strategies for small towns of the same types, including establishing a dynamic monitoring system, strengthening space control, improving the layout of land use, transferring the increment planning to inventory planning, and coordinating the relationship between people and land. All of the suggestions aim to promote the healthy development of small towns and enrich the research content for small town master plan assessments.

参考文献/References:

1 LI B Q,WANG Z Q,JIN G. Performance evaluation of land consolidation project in the context of the new countryside development[J]. China Land Sci,2015,29(3):68-74,96. DOI:10. 13708/j. cnki. cn11-2640. 2015. 03. 009.
2 YE J Z. Rural revitalization strategy:think about the history, overall layout and path [J]. J South China Norm Univ (Soc Sci Ed),2018(2):64-69.
3 WU Y W,ZHANG C R,JIANG F,et al. The innovation of county rural area construction plan based on the rural revitalization strategy:a case study of Guangde County in Anhui Province[J]. Dev Small Cities Towns,2017(12):16-23.
4 WU J,CAO C,WANG X,et al. Exploration of implementation?oriented spatial plan at County/district level:a case study of the implementation plan for urban?rural spatial development of Qingjiangpu District,Huai an City[J]. City Plan Rev,2019,43(11):37-50.
5 CHADWICK G. A system view of planning[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd,1978.
6 HABERMAS J. The theory of communicative action[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press,1989.
7 SUN S W,ZHOU Y. Evaluation research on urban planning implementation[J]. Urban Plan Forum,2003(2):15-20,27. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1000-3363. 2003. 02. 003.
8 XIE Y,ZHANG J M,SHAN J S. Research summary of master urban plan implementation evaluation of recent five years in China[J]. Shanghai Urban Plan Rev,2015,6(6):21-26. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1673-8985. 2015. 06. 006.
9 LUO Z D, LIAO M Y. Urban master plan implementation evaluation from govemment viewpoint[J]. Planners,2013,29(6):10-17. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1006-0022. 2013. 06. 002.
10 WANG J J,YANG CX,WEI CF,et al. Evaluation of implementation of land use master planning based on spatial consistency: a case study of Rongchang District [J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci,2017,45(16):286-290. DOI:10. 15889/j. issn. 1002-1302. 2017. 16. 069.
11 ZHANG J M,HOU Y Y,XU T. Conformity assessment system concerning urban space development and planning objectives: a case of Jiaonan City in Shandong Province [J]. City Planning Review,2015, 39(6):43-50.
12 GUO X D,MA L B,ZHANG Q Y. A GIS?based research on the spatial evolution characteristics and driving mechanism of the rural settlements in Qin’an County[J]. Econ Geogr,2012,32(7):56-62. DOI:10. 15957/j. cnki. jjdl. 2012. 07. 029.
13 LIN L W,SHEN S, FANG X,et al. A study on evaluation of urban master planning based on analytic hierarchy process: a case study of urban master planning of Xuzhou(2007-2020) [J]. Suzhou Univ Sci Technol (Eng Techonl), 2010,23(2):61-65.
14 LIN L W,SHEN S,JIANG G X. Evaluating urban planning implemention:a research review[J]. Planners,2010,26(3):14-18. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1006-0022. 2010. 03. 003.
15 DAI S X,XU Y Y. Evaluation and countermeasure research on overall planning of urban and rural development of happy village:a case study of Zhuhai[J]. Dev Small Cities Towns,2018(2):71-79. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1002-8439. 2018. 02. 011.
16 XIE X T,HUANG Y Z,HU S,et al. Research on the implementation evaluation of land use master planning based on ecosystem services evaluation[J]. J Zhejiang Agric Sci,2015,56(1):115-118. DOI:10. 16178/j. issn. 0528-9017. 20150137.
17 ZHUANG D F,LIU J Y. Study on the model of regional differentiationof land use degree in China[J]. J Nat Resour,1997,12(2): 105-111. DOI:10. 11849/zrzyxb. 1997. 02. 002.
18 MA X,ZHENG D G,SUN J,et al. Exploration and reflections on the implementation evaluation in the context of master planning reform[J]. Urban Plan Forum,2017(6):62-67. DOI:10. 16361/j. upf. 201706009.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-25
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-13