对林权主体和林权的物权属性这两个林权制度改革中的基本问题进行分析。首先，以林地的归属为标准将林权主体划分为林地所有者和林地使用者两个不同类型，并对二者间的关系进行阐述；其次，将狭义的林权与土地承包经营权进行比较，分析二者间的相同与不同之处，进而对林权的占有、使用、收益、处分这4项用益物权权能进行分析，提出林权人合理的权利和义务。
Abstract
The subject and the legal nature of forest tenure which is the basic problem of collective forest tenure reform was analyzed in this paper. The agents of forest tenure were first divided into two types—the owners and the users of woodland according to the woodland tenures, and their relationship was explained. Secondly, through the comparison between forest tenure and rural land contracted management right, the authors pointed out their differences and similarities. Finally, four rights of functions of forest tenure were treated respectively.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]吕祥熙. 林权客体的物权法分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:人文社会科学版,2008,8(2):79-85.
[2]沈文星,赵元刚. 江苏省林业产权制度改革中权属关系之研究[J]. 林业经济问题,2001,21(6):333-336.
[3]张五常. 新制度经济学的现状及其发展趋势[J]. 当代财经,2008,284(7):5-9.
[4]沈文星,杨红强. 非公有制林业发展的法律政策问题研究[J]. 林业经济问题,2005,25(5):278-281.
[5]隋彭生. 用益债权——新概念的提出与探析[J]. 政法论坛,2008,26(3):58.
[6]袁小荣. 土地承包经营权流转的物权法分析[J]. 广东土地科学,2007,6(5):27.
基金
收稿日期：2009-03-27修回日期：2009-08-10基金项目：江苏省林业局软科学项目作者简介：吕祥熙(1982—)，博士生。*沈文星(通信作者)，教授。Email: swx@njfu.edu.cn。引文格式：吕祥熙,沈文星. 林权主体及林权的物权属性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(1):121-124.
