黑松组培再生植株的感病性及生长性状评价

唐颖,吴小芹,叶建仁*

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (02) : 31-34.

PDF(1776219 KB)
PDF(1776219 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (02) : 31-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.006
研究论文

黑松组培再生植株的感病性及生长性状评价

  • 唐颖,吴小芹,叶建仁*
作者信息 +

Susceptibility and evaluation of growth traits about the tissue of Pinus thunbergii

  • TANG Ying, WU Xiaoqin, YE Jianren*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

比较了黑松组培苗和实生苗对松材线虫的感病性,同时对苗木的生长性状进行了系列观察。结果表明,在生长性状方面:组培苗早期生长缓慢,6个月后生长势优势明显,分蘖率高,但斜生现象严重,性状明显比实生苗成熟;2年生组培苗根系比实生苗粗壮,侧根发达。在抗病性方面:与实生苗相比,组培苗表现感病症状较早,感病率上升迅速,同时段内的感病指数高1~2级。另外,实生苗能够在低感病级别上维持较长时间,组培苗的感病性与代数之间并无明显相关性。

Abstract

In this paper, the susceptibility to pine disease between tissue culture plantlet and seedling of P. thunbergii were compared. Meanwhile, growth traits were under inverstigation. The results showed that: for growth traits, the tissue culture plantlet grew slower,but it grew faster and had higher rate of tillering than seedling 6 months later. Furthermore, it had serious phenomenon of incline when compared to seedling. The root was stronger and lateral root developed better on 2yearold tissue culture plantlet than on seedling. In susceptibility,the susceptibility of tissue culture plantlet was a little higher than seedling. The susceptible symptoms of tissue culture plantlet appeared earlier,and its infection rate was 1—2 times higher than seedling at the same developmental stage,thus changed more evidently. Moreover,seedling could keep at a low susceptible level for a long time. There was no obvious correlation between the generations and susceptibility for tissue culture plantlets.

引用本文

导出引用
唐颖,吴小芹,叶建仁*. 黑松组培再生植株的感病性及生长性状评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2011, 35(02): 31-34 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.006
TANG Ying, WU Xiaoqin, YE Jianren*. Susceptibility and evaluation of growth traits about the tissue of Pinus thunbergii[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2011, 35(02): 31-34 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.02.006
中图分类号: S763   

参考文献

参考文献: [1]孙冬青,王飞,李新凤.组培微环境对葡萄风信子组培苗生长及移栽后生理特性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(4):244-248,262.
[2]王忠华,江乐瑜. 转Bt基因抗虫青菜的苗期性状评价[J]. 江苏农业科学,2007,256(2):93-95.
[3]王明旭,罗宽.人工接种后次代抗松材线虫松树的抗病性[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,31(2):159-161.
[4]张艺,吴小芹,王钰,等.抗松材线虫病赤松家系的抗性测定及组织病理学观察[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2007,31(4):110-114.
[5]吴小芹,张艺,陈蔚诗,等.黑松13个抗病家系对松材线虫的抗性反应及组织病理学观察[J].植物病理学报.2008,38(1):44-50.
[6]McKeand S E, Allen H L. Nutritional and root development factors affecting growth of tissue culture plantlets of loblolly pine[J].Physiol Plant, 1984(61):523-528.
[7]王鹏飞,林俊杰.果树试管苗的炼苗移栽技术[J]. 山西果树,2004(3):20-22.
[8]Thoma I, Loeffler C, Sinha A K, et al. Cyclopentanone Isoprostanes induced by reactive oxygen species trigger defense gene activation and phytoalexin accumulation in plants[J].The Plant Journal,2003,34(3):363-368.
[9]Frampton L J,Amerson H V,Leach G N.Tissue culture method affects ex vitro growth and development of loblolly pine[J].New Forests,1998,16(2):125-138.
[10]Qayyum R A,Sarfraz H S,Saqib S M, et al. Somatic embryogenesis in wild relatives of cotton (Cossypium spp.)[J].J Zhejiang Univ Sci: B,2006,7(4):291-298.
[11]McKeand S E.Expression of mature characteristics by tissue culture plantlets derived from embryos of loblolly pine[J].J Am Soc Hortic Sci,1985,110(5):619-623.

基金

收稿日期:2010-03-05修回日期:2010-06-28 基金项目:国家林业局林业公益性行业科研专项(200704026)作者简介:唐颖(1983—),硕士生。*叶建仁(通信作者),教授。Email: jrye@njfu.com.cn。引文格式:唐颖,吴小芹,叶建仁. 黑松组培再生植株的感病性及生长性状评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(2):31-34.

PDF(1776219 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/