以分析靖江地区部分扁铲侧胀试验（DMT）的加载应力路径为基础，应用英国GDS公司生产的标准应力路径三轴试验系统对土体应力路径进行室内模拟试验研究，通过试验得到土体静止压力系数K0、水平基床系数Kh以及侧限垂直排水模量M，并与DMT试验结果进行对比分析。结果表明，这种由应力路径模拟获取的土体参数与扁铲试验由一般经验公式估算得到的结果具有一定的差异性，其中DMT与GDS室内试验模拟得到的静止侧压力系数以及侧限垂直排水模量差异性较大，水平基床系数的差异性相对较小。
Abstract
Based on the analysis of loading path of flat dilatometer test in Jingjiang area situ, with standard stress path triaxial system produced by GDS of UK used, laboratory simulation on stress path of flat dilatometer test (DMT) were carried out. Many geologic parameters are acquired, such as lateral pressure coefficient, horizontal coefficient of subgrade reaction and vertical drainedconfined tangent modulus, by analyzing the laboratory experiment result. The comparative analysis between DTM and laboratory experiment showed that differentiation on result, especially on lateral pressure coefficient and horizontal coefficient of subgrade reaction, but a little differentiation on vertical drainedconfined tangent modulus.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]Marchetti S. In situ tests by flat dilatometer [J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division:The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 1980, 106(3):299-321.
[2]Marchetti S. The flat dilatometer (DMT) and its application to geotechnical design[C]//Japanese Geotechnical Society International Seminar. Tokyo: Japanese Geotechnical Society,1999.
[3]Iwasakik K, Tuachiwa H, Sakai Y, et al. Study of the marchetti dilatometer test to soft ground in Japan[J]. GEOCOAST, 1991(9): 29-32.
[4]Robertson P K, Davis M P, Campanella R G. Design of laterally loaded driven piles using the flat dilatometer [J].Geotechnical Testing Joural, 1998, 12(1):30-38.
[5]Marchetti S, Monaco P， Totani G, et al. The flat dilatometer test (DMT) in soil investigation design [R]. Bali, Indonesia: International Conference on in situ Measurement of Soil Properties, 2001.
[6]《岩土工程手册》编写委员会. 岩土工程手册[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社,1994.
[7]Mayne P W. Determining preconsolidation stress and penetration pore pressures from DTM contact pressures [J].Geotechnical Testing Journal,1987,10(1):146-150.
[8]Ladd C C, Foot R, Ishihara K, et al.Stressdeformation and strength characteristics[C]//Stateofart Report, Tokyo,9th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1977.
[9]Chang M F. Interpretation of overconsolidation ratio from in situ test in recent clay deposits in Singapore and Malaysia [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1991,28(2):210-225.
[10]陈国民. 扁铲侧胀仪试验及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1999, 21(2):177-183.
[11]陈国民, 盛海洋. 用扁铲侧胀试验判定液化[J]. 黄河水利职业技术学院学报, 1999, 11(1):15-20.
[12]唐世栋, 吕建春, 傅纵. 扁铲侧胀试验求解初始水平应力和静止侧压力系数[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(12): 2144-2148.
[13]唐世栋, 傅纵. 扁铲侧胀试验求解土的不排水抗剪强度[J].工程勘察, 2003(5):14-17.
[14]徐鹏逍, 张建根, 李明生. 天津地区静止侧压力系数K0 试验方法探讨[J]. 检测与分析, 2008, 6(12):56-58.
[15]李晓萍，赵亚品. 静止侧压力系数及其试验方法的探讨[J].铁道工程学报, 2008(8):20-23
基金
收稿日期：2010-08-02修回日期：2011-02-20 基金项目：住房与城乡建设部科学技术项目（2010-K3-10）作者简介：王海波(1979—)，实验师，博士生。Email:harbor006@sina.com。
PDF(1478138 KB)
