以杨木、刺槐及异氰酸酯胶黏剂(EPI)制成胶合构件,进行了胶层剪切强度的测试及在宏观范围内胶合性能的压痕表征。结果表明:刺槐间、杨木间的胶层剪切强度分别为7.9、6.2 MPa,杨木与刺槐间胶层剪切强度为5.4～5.7 MPa。460 N荷载条件下,1.6 MPa和1.0 MPa胶合压力制备的杨木与刺槐间胶层部位压痕蠕变分别为21.31%和25.37%,杨木间和刺槐间的压痕蠕变差异不显著。杨木/刺槐间胶层部位的塑性变形功与压痕功比值介于杨木间和刺槐间的值,EPI胶层对杨木抗塑性变形有贡献但对刺槐的作用不明显。杨木与刺槐间胶层部位的名义硬度比杨木与杨木间大,比刺槐与刺槐间小。
Abstract
The shear strength and macro indentation characterization on bonding parts of gluing specimen that made from poplar, black locust and emulsion polymer-isocyanate adhesive(EPI)were tested and characterized. The results showed that shear strength of black locust composite and poplar composite were 7.9 MPa and 6.2 MPa respectively, and the shear strength range of black locust/poplar composite was from 5.4 to 5.7 MPa. The indentation creep at test force 460 N on the bonding parts of poplar/black locust composite made under bonding pressures 1.6 MPa and 1.0 MPa were 21.31% and 25.37%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between black locust composite and poplar composite. The ratio of plastic deformation indentation work to total indentation work on the bonding parts of poplar/black locus composite was in the range of which on the bonding parts of poplar composite and black locus composite, the EPI adhesive layer contributed to the plastic deformation resistance of poplar and not to black locus. The normal hardness of the bonding part of poplar/black locus composite was higher than poplar and poplar composite, while lower than black and black locus composite.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Tabor D. The Hardness of Metals [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.
[2] 岳珠峰, 万建松, 吕震宙. 由压痕蠕变试验确定材料的蠕变性能参数[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2003, 24(3): 275-281. Yue Z F, Wan J S, Lv Z Z. Determination of creep parameters from indentation creep experiments[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2003, 24(3): 275-281.
[3] Liu Y J, Zhao B, Xu B X, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the method to determine the creep parameters from the indentation creep testing[J].Materials Science and Engineering A, 2007,456(1-2):103-108.
[4] 姜鹏,张泰华,杨荣,等. 基于球形压入法提取材料的塑性力学参数[J]. 力学学报,2009,41(5): 730-738. Jiang P, Zhang T H, Yang R, et al. A new spherical indentation-based method to extract plastic material parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2009,41(5): 730-738.
[5] 马德军. 材料力学性能仪器化压入测试原理[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社,2010.
[6] Kamke F A, Lee J N. Adhesive penetration in wood——a review[J]. Wood and Fiber Science, 2007, 39(2):205-220.
[7] Gavrilovic-Grmusa I, Dunky M, Miljkovic J, et al. Influence of the viscosity of UF resins on the radial and tangential penetration into poplar wood and on the shear strength of adhesive joints[J]. Holzforschung, 2012, 66: 849-856.
[8] 刘美华, 李鸿琦, 计宏伟, 等. 压痕硬度测试法的主要研究内容及其应用[J]. 理化检验:物理分册, 2009, 44(9): 485-490. Liu M H, Li H Q, Ji H W, et al. Application and studying current status of the indentation hardness testing[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part A: Physical Testing, 2009, 44(9): 485-490.
[9] Low I M, Che Z Y, Latella B A, et al. Mechanical and fracture properties of bamboo[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2006, 312: 15-20.
[10] 李坚.木材科学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
[11] 吕建雄, 王金林, 黄安民. 中国杨树木材加工利用研究进展[C]// 第二届中国林业学术大会论文集. 南宁,2009. Lv J X, Wang J L, Huang A M. Research progress of China poplar processing and utilization[C]//Symposium of the Second Conference on China Forestry. Nanning, 2009.
[12] 江丽媛. 刺槐和栓皮栎几种生物化学因子与热值关系的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2011. Jiang L Y. The relationship between several biochemical factors and caloric value of Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus variabilis [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.
[13] 虞伟良. 硬度测试技术的新动态与发展趋势[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2003, 39(8): 401-406. Yu W L. Study of the latest development and trend of hardness measurement technology[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part A: Physical Testing, 2003, 39(8): 401-406.
[14] 葛建春,宋氏凤,孙敏洋,等.基于压痕加载曲线的毛竹硬度性能[J].竹子研究汇刊,2012,31(4):28-30. Ge J C, Tong P, Sun M Y, et al. Moso bamboo hardness based on indentation loading curve[J]. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2012,31(4):28-30.
[15] 邵卓平. 木材硬度测试方法的探讨[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 1998, 25(1): 34-37. Shao Z P. Discussion on testing methods of wood hardness[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 1998, 25(1): 34-37.
[16] Johnson K L. Contact Mechanics [M]. England: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1985.
基金
收稿日期:2013-02-28 修回日期:2014-01-17
基金项目:国家科技富民强县专项行动计划项目(BN2010212); 江苏省产学研联合创新资金重大创新载体(苏北集聚)科技项目(BY2011013); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:闫薇,硕士生。*通信作者:朱一辛,教授。E-mail: zhuyixin@njfu.edu.cn。
引文格式:闫薇,宋氏凤,朱一辛,等. 杨木/刺槐复合结构胶合性能的压痕表征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(4):168-172.
PDF(1408410 KB)
