基质、插穗及促根剂对喜树扦插生根的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.03.001

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (03): 1-8.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.03.001

基质、插穗及促根剂对喜树扦插生根的影响

吴雅琼¹,汪贵斌^1*,曹福亮¹,祖元刚²

1. 南方现代林业协同创新中心, 南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037;
2. 东北林业大学林学院,森林植物生态学教育部重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040

出版日期:2016-06-18 发布日期:2016-06-18
基金资助:
收稿日期:2015-11-23 修回日期:2016-01-15
基金项目:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD21B05); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:吴雅琼(347470439@qq.com)。*通信作者:汪贵斌(gbwang@njfu.edu.cn),教授。
引文格式:吴雅琼,汪贵斌, 曹福亮,等. 基质、插穗及促根剂对喜树扦插生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(3):1-8.

Effects of substrate, cuttings and root promoting agent on rooting of Camptotheca acuminata

WU Yaqiong¹, WANG Guibin^1*, CAO Fuliang¹,ZU Yuangang²

1. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

Online:2016-06-18 Published:2016-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索不同处理对喜树硬枝扦插生根的影响及扦插生根与体内营养物质含量之间的关系,以1年生喜树枝条为材料,从基质种类、插穗部位、长度及粗度、ABT与NAA浓度等方面研究了不同处理对生根的影响,同时测定了喜树生根过程中可溶性糖、淀粉和蛋白质3种营养物质的含量。结果表明,泥炭土中插穗生根率最高,达96.67%; 选用1年生实生苗下部插穗的成活率最高,为97.33%; 粗度为0.6～0.9 cm、长度为10.0～15.0 cm的插穗,更利于生根。沙藏过的喜树插穗生根率高于不沙藏枝条。质量浓度为250 mg/L的ABT处理插穗效果最好,生根率达86.67%。硬枝扦插的喜树插穗是以皮部生根为主,兼有部分愈伤组织生根。生根过程中插穗基部的可溶性糖含量呈急剧下降后升高和再下降再上升的趋势,淀粉含量呈升高—降低—升高—降低的变化趋势,而蛋白质含量变化趋势与前两者都不一致。

Abstract: The research aimed to explore the effects of different treatments on rooting of Camptotheca acuminata hardwood cutting, and the relationship between the content of nutrients and rooting of cuttings. One-year-old stems of C. acuminata was used as studying materials.The changes of soluble sugar, starch and soluble protein contents in cuttings during adventitious root formation were determined. The results were shown as follow: The rooting rate of cuttings in the peat soil was the highest with 96.67%. The one-year-old seedling in the lower part was selected, of which the highest rooting rate reached 97.33%. The optimal treatment for improving survival rate of C. acuminata was ABT 250 mg/L with the rooting rate of 86.67%.Cuttings with diameter of 0.6-0.9 cm and length of 10.0-15.0 cm were conducive to rooting, and the cutting rate stored in wet sand was higher. Roots were mainly induced from the bark and some roots were also developed from the callus tissues in hardwood cuttings. During the rooting process, the soluble sugar content in the base of cutting slips had a changing trend of sharply decreasing initially, then slowly increasing and decreasing again and finally increasing in the end. The starch content ascended initially and descended, then ascended again and descended at last. The changing trend of protein content varied from the former two.

中图分类号:

S722.8

吴雅琼,汪贵斌,曹福亮,等. 基质、插穗及促根剂对喜树扦插生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(03): 1-8.

WU Yaqiong, WANG Guibin, CAO Fuliang,ZU Yuangang. Effects of substrate, cuttings and root promoting agent on rooting of Camptotheca acuminata[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 40(03): 1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.03.001.

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志:第52卷[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1983: 144-147.
[2] 陈植. 观赏树木学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 1984:543.
[3] Sakato K, Misawa M. Effects of chemical and physical conditions on growth of Camptotheca acuminata cell cultures[J]. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1974, 38(3): 491-497.Doi:10.1271/bbb1961.38.491.
[4] Gharpure G, Chavan B, Lele U, et al. Camptothecin accumulation in Ophiorrhiza rugosa var. prostrata from northern Western Ghats[J]. Current Science, 2010,98(3):302-304.
[5] Tomicic M T, Kaina B. Topoisomerase degradation, DSB repair, p53 and IAPs in cancer cell resistance to camptothecin like topoisomerase-I inhibitors[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta(BBA), 2013,1835:11-27.Doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2012.09.002.
[6] Yadav D K, Khan F. QSAR, docking and ADMET studies of camptothecin derivatives as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase-I[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2013,27:21-33.Doi:10.1002/cem.2488.
[7] 符代平. 喜树不同扦插长度对成活率的影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 2014,4(35): 91-92. Fu D P.Effects of different cutting length of common Camptotheca on the survival rate[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2014,4(35):91-92.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5508.2014.04.023.
[8] 潘瑞炽. 植物生理学[M]. 2版.北京:高等教育出版社,1995:174-175.
[9] Pan R C, Zhao Z J. Synergistic effects of plant growth retardants and IBA on the formation of adventitious roots in hypocotyl cuttings of mung bean[J]. Plant Growth Regulation,1994,(14):15-19. Doi:10.1007/BF00024136.
[10] 方升佐, 洑香香. 青钱柳资源培育与开发利用的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,31(1):95-100.Doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2007.01.023. Fang S Z, Fu X X.Progress and prospects on silviculture and utilization of Cyclocurya paliurus[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2007,31(1):95-100.
[11] 王良桂, 杜旭升, 王顺财, 等. 不同楸树品种(类型)嫩枝扦插生根能力及扦插繁殖技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,32(5):127-130.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2008.05.028. Wang L G, Du X S, Wang S C, et al. Study on the rooting ability of different varieties(types)Catalpa spp. and its unlignified branch cutting technique[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2008,32(5):127-130.
[12] 石登红, 陈训. 羊踯躅插穗内源激素及营养物质对其扦插不定根形成的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2010, 38(6):72-75.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2010.06.022. Shi D H, Chen X. Effect of endogenous hormones and nutritive materials in cuttings of Rhododendron molle on its adventitious rooting[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(6):72-75.
[13] 郝建锋, 王德艺, 李艳, 等. 不同林分密度下川北白云山地区喜树人工林的群落结构和物种多样性[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(5):772-778.Doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2015.05.022. Hao J F, Wang D Y, Li Y, et al. Effects of stand density on community structure and species diversity of Camptotheca acuminata plantation in Baiyun Mountain, Mianzhu District,Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2015,35(5):772-778.
[14] 王轶, 吴莹, 王洋, 等. 微量样品中喜树碱含量的高效液相色谱测定[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012, 40(2):100-102.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2012.02.026. Wang Y, Wu Y, Wang Y, et al. Determination of camptothecin in milligram samples by HPLC[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2012,40(2):100-102.
[15] 汪贵斌, 蔡金峰, 何肖华, 等. 涝渍胁迫对喜树幼苗形态和生理的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(1):134-140.Doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.01.015. Wang G B, Cai J F, He X H, et al. Effects of waterlogging stress on morphology and physiology of camptotheca acuminata[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(1):134-140.
[16] 董凤丽, 祖元刚, 王慧梅. 96-Ⅱ喜树叶片高频率植株再生体系建立[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012,40(12):56-59.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2012.12.013. Dong F L, Zu Y G, Wang H M. Establishment of highly efficient regeneration system for leaf pieces of 96-Ⅱ Camptotheca acuminate[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2012,40(12):56-59.
[17] 刘正祥, 张华新, 刘涛. 省沽油硬枝扦插生根特性[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2007,35(7),13-15.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2007.07.005. Liu Z X, Zhang H X, Liu T. Rooting characteristics of hardwood cuttings of Staphylea bumalda[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2007,35(7):13-15.
[18] 王晶英, 敖红, 张杰, 等. 植物生理生化实验技术与原理[M]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社, 2003: 11-24.
[19] 金江群, 郭泉水, 朱莉, 等. 中国特有濒危植物崖柏扦插繁殖研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(1):94-100.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2013.01.016. Jin J Q, Guo Q S, Zhu L, et al.Study on cutting propagation of Thuja sutchuenensis, an endangered species endemic to China[J]. Forest Research, 2013, 26(1):94-100.
[20] 韩路弯, 华建峰, 刘江, 等. 不同扦插基质和扦插时间对‘中山杉118'插条生根的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2015, 44(2):1-4.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2015.02.013. Han L W, Hua J J, Liu J, et al. Effects of different cutting medium and cutting time on rooting of cutting in Taxodium Hybrid ‘Zhongshanshan 118'[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2015, 44(2):1-4.
[21] 曹兵, 高捍东. 希蒙得木的扦插繁殖技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 27(4):62-66.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2003.04.016. Cao B, Gao H D.Technology of cutting propagation of Simmondisa chinensis(Link)Schneider[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2003, 27(4):62-66.
[22] 李永进, 丁贵杰, 全红梅, 等. 插穗直径和洗脱处理对马尾松插穗生根的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2008,28(1):104-107.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2008.01.027. Li Y J, Ding G J, Quan H M, et al. Effects of cutting diameter and different elution treatments on the rooting rate of Pinus massoniana[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2008,28(1):104-107.
[23] Pearse, Harold L. The effect of nutrition and phytohormones on the rooting of vine cuttings[J]. Annals of Botany,1943,7:123-132.
[24] 陆晓丽. 金叶刺槐嫩枝扦插试验[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015,29(2):60-62.Doi:10.13360/j.issn.1000-8101.2015.02.014. Lu X L. Softwood cutting experiment on Robinia pseudoacacia ‘Frisia'[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2015,29(2):60-62.
[25] 陈典, 李金平. 不同激素处理对山茶嫩枝扦插的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2013,31(1):153-155.Doi:10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2013.01.024. Chen D, Li J P. Effects of different hormone treatments on young shoot cutting in Camellia japonica[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2013,31(1):153-155.
[26] 刘玉民, 刘亚敏, 马明, 等. 马尾松扦插生根过程相关生理生化分析[J]. 林业科学, 2010,49(9):28-33.Doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100905. Liu Y M, Liu Y M, Ma M, et al. Analysis of relevant physiological and biochemical characteristics of Pinus massoniana during cuttings rooting[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010,49(9):28-33.
[27] 王政, 申萍, 王照路, 等. 牡丹试管苗与扦插苗生根过程中营养物质含量变化研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2015,49(3):349-352.Doi:10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2015.03.012. Wang Z, Shen P, Wang Z L, et al. Study on the change of nutrient content of peony cuttings and plantlets in vitro during root-inducing[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2015,49(3):349-352.
[28] 张忠微, 石素霞, 张彦广, 等. 金露梅嫩枝插穗生根过程中营养物质含量变化研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2008,31(4):56-59.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2008.04.011. Zhang Z W, Shi S X, Zhang Y G, et al.Study on nutrition concentration in green stem of Potentilla fruticosa L. during rooting[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2008,31(4):56-59.
[29] 董胜君, 刘明国, 戴菲, 等. 2种激素处理的山杏插穗生根过程中营养物质及酶活性的变化[J]. 西部林业科学, 2012,41(6):109-115.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8246.2012.06.005. Dong S J, Liu M G, Dai F, et al.Variation of nutrients and enzyme activities in Armeniaca sibirica softwood cuttings during adventitious root formation under treatments of two hormones[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2012, 41(6):109-115.
[30] Sairam R K, Saxena D C. Oxidatives stress and antioxidants in wheat genotypes: possible mechanism of water stress tolerance[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science,2000,184(1):55-61.Doi:10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00358.x.

基质、插穗及促根剂对喜树扦插生根的影响

Effects of substrate, cuttings and root promoting agent on rooting of Camptotheca acuminata

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	王改萍, 王良桂, 王晓聪, 张晨, 章雷, 刘彬. 楸树嫩枝扦插生根发育及根系特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 94-102.
[2]	王改萍, 张磊, 姚雪冰, 祝遵凌. 金叶银杏叶色变化特性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 41-48.
[3]	易敏, 张露, 雷蕾, 程子珊, 孙世武, 赖猛. 湿地松转录组SSR分析及EST-SSR标记开发[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 75-83.
[4]	成铁龙,孟岩1,3,陈金慧1,3,施季森. 茉莉酸甲酯对杂交鹅掌楸体胚发育的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 41-46.
[5]	陈茜,范佳露,王宝腾,王瑞琪,袁斌玲,魏子涵,陈颖. 落叶型冬青雌、雄株茎段的组织培养技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 181-186.
[6]	谭健晖,冯源恒,黄永利,杨章旗. 26年生马尾松初级种子园半同胞子代变异及家系选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(03): 189-192.
[7]	方乐金;施季森. 杉木种子园无性系结实稳定性的遗传变异[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2004, 28(01): 17-20.
[8]	桂仁意;曹福亮;沈惠娟;谢寅峰. 多胺代谢对石竹试管苗成花中内源激素含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2003, 27(04): 27-30.
[9]	方乐金. 杉木种子园冠幅指数与产量的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2000, 24(05): 53-55.