黄连木容器苗生长对缓释肥的响应

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201707035

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (03): 117-122.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201707035

黄连木容器苗生长对缓释肥的响应

宋协海¹,郭欢欢¹,刘勇^1*,贺国鑫²,薛敦孟²,李成²

1.省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京林业大学林学院,北京 100083; 2.北京市大东流苗圃,北京 102211

出版日期:2018-06-06 发布日期:2018-06-06
基金资助:
基金项目:北京园林绿化增彩延绿科技创新工程科研项目(CEG-2015-01,CEG-2016-01) 第一作者:宋协海(songxiehai@bjfu.edu.cn),博士生。*通信作者:刘勇(lyong@bjfu.edu.cn),教授。

The growth response of Pistacia chinensis Bunge containerized seedlings to slow-release fertilizer

SONG Xiehai¹,GUO Huanhuan¹, LIU Yong^1*,HE Guoxin²,XUE Dunmeng², LI Cheng²

1.Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,College of Forestry,Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 2.Beijing Dadongliu Nursery,Beijing 102211, China

Online:2018-06-06 Published:2018-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】揭示黄连木(Pistacia chinensis Bunge)容器苗生长、根系发育和养分状况对缓释肥的响应规律,筛选最佳施肥量。【方法】设置3个包膜缓释肥(美国奥绿肥5号)施肥量(0.4、0.8、1.6 g/株)和1个空白对照(未施肥),生长季末测定4个处理下苗木形态指标、养分状况和根系发育情况。用方差分析、多重比较等方法,探明苗木生长对不同施肥量的响应差异,同时将地径、苗高、根生物量、茎生物量、全株生物量分别与施肥量建立数学模型,预测最佳施肥量。【结果】苗木地径、苗高、全株生物量、根总长、根表面积、根体积和氮、磷、钾含量随着缓释肥施肥量的提高而显著增大,其中施肥量为1.6 g/株时达到最大,苗高、地径和全株生物量分别为24.0 cm、4.9 mm和3.9 g/株。根茎比则随施肥量的提高而减少,对照最大为2.8。地径、苗高、根生物量、茎生物量和全株生物量与施肥量构建的数学模型R²均大于0.95。【结论】低施肥量下养分主要用于根系的生长,随着施肥量增加,大部分养分开始往地上部分转移,促进茎和叶的生长。地下部分的第1径级(0<d≤0.5 mm)和第6径级(d>3.0 mm)根随着施肥量增加显著增加。综合5个数学模型预测结果,认为黄连木容器苗缓释肥最佳施肥量在1.28～1.95 g/株之间。

Abstract: Abstract: 【Objective】The aim of this study was to elucidate the growth pattern, root development and nutrient status of Pistacia chinensis Bunge containerized seedlings in response to slow-release fertilizer to determine the optimal fertilizer amount. 【Method】Three application levels of film-coated and slow-release fertilizer(0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 g/seedling)by Osmocote USA, and a blank control(CK)were used as treatments. The morphological attributes, nutrient status, and root development of the treated seedlings were measured at the end of the growing season. The data was tested by means of variance analysis and multiple comparisons. Mathematical models between the fertilizer amount and the root-collar diameter(RCD), seedling height, root biomass, stem biomass and total plant biomass were established to predict the optimal fertilization amount.【Result】 The RCD, seedling height, total plant biomass, root length, root surface area, root volume, and the contents of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased with increasing fertilizer amount. When the amount of applied slow-release fertilizer was 1.6 g per plant, the seedling height, RCD and total plant biomass showed the maximum levels of 24.0 cm, 4.9 mm and 3.9 g/seedling, respectively. The ratio of root to stem decreased with increasing fertilizer amount, with the highest value of 2.8 observed in the control treatment. The mathematical model coefficient was higher than 0.95.【Conclusion】 Nutrients are mainly used for root growth when fertilizer concentration is low. However, most nutrients begin to translocate to the stem with increasing amount of available fertilizer, promoting the growth of stems and leaves. The first(0<d≤0.5 mm)and sixth(d>3.0 mm)grades of root diameter increased significantly with increasing fertilizer amount. The results of the five mathematical models indicated that the optimal amount of the slow-release fertilizer for P. chinensis containerized seedlings varied between 1.28 and 1.95 g per seedling.

中图分类号:

S723.7

宋协海,郭欢欢,刘勇,等. 黄连木容器苗生长对缓释肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 117-122.

SONG Xiehai,GUO Huanhuan, LIU Yong,HE Guoxin,XUE Dunmeng, LI Cheng. The growth response of Pistacia chinensis Bunge containerized seedlings to slow-release fertilizer[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 42(03): 117-122.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201707035.

参考文献

[1] 唐拴虎,张发宝,黄旭,等. 缓/控释肥料对辣椒生长及养分利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2008,19(5): 986-991.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2008.0180. TANG S H, ZHANG F B, HUANG X, et al. Effects of slow/controlled release fertilizers on the growth and nutrient use efficiency of pepper[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(5): 986-991.
[2] 楚秀丽,王秀花,张东北,等. 基质配比和缓释肥添加量对浙江楠大规格容器苗质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(6): 67-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.013. CHU X L, WANG X H, ZHANG D B, et al. Effect of substrate ratio and slow-release fertilizer loading on the quality of large size container seedlings of Phoebe chekiangensis[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(6): 67-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.013.
[3] 万芳芳,刘勇,李国雷,等. 底部渗灌下缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长和氮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(1): 75-81. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.012. WAN F F, LIU Y, LI G L, et al. Effect of sub-irrigation with slow-release fertilizer on growth and accumulation of nitrogen of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr. container seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(1): 75-81.
[4] 魏红旭,徐程扬,马履一,等. 缓释肥和有机肥对长白落叶松容器苗养分库构建的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(7): 1731-1736. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0245. WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. Effects of controlled-release fertilizer and organic amendment on the construction of nutrients reserves in Larix olgensis container seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(7): 1731-1736.
[5] 秦飞,郭同斌,刘忠刚,等. 中国黄连木研究综述[J]. 经济林研究,2007,25(4): 90-96. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2007.04.026. QIN F, GUO T B, LIU Z G, et al. Literature review of researches on Pistacia chinensis bunge[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2007, 25(4): 90-96.
[6] 杜乐山,杨洪晓,郭晓蕾,等. 黄连木群落种间联结指数-等级格局模型研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2013,35(5): 37-45. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.2013.05.021. DU L S, YANG H X, GUO X L, et al. Interspecific associations of Pistacia chinensis community and association index-rank pattern model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(5): 37-45.
[7] 符瑜,潘学标,高浩. 中国黄连木的地理分布与生境气候特征分析[J]. 中国农业气象,2009,30(3): 318-322. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2009.03.008. FU Y, PAN X B, GAO H. Geographical distribution and climate characteristics of habitat of Pistacia chinensis Bunge in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2009, 30(3): 318-322.
[8] 侯新村,左海涛,牟洪香. 能源植物黄连木在我国的地理分布规律[J]. 生态环境学报,2010,19(5): 1160-1164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.05.030. HOU X C, ZUO H T, MOU H X. Geographical distribution of energy plant Pistacia chinensis Bunge in China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(5): 1160-1164.
[9] 鲍士旦. 面向21世纪课程教材:土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:1-495.
[10] 王艺,王秀花,吴小林,等. 缓释肥加载对浙江楠和闽楠容器苗生长和养分库构建的影响[J]. 林业科学,2013,49(12): 57-63. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20131209. WANG Y, WANG X H, WU X L, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilizer loading on growth and construction of nutrients reserves of Phoebe chekiangensis and Phoebe bournei container seedlings[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(12): 57-63.
[11] 王迪海,赵忠,李剑. 黄土高原不同气候区刺槐细根表面积的差异[J]. 林业科学,2010,46(5): 70-76. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100512. WANG D H, ZHAO Z, LI J. Difference of surface area of fine roots of Robinia pseudoacacia in the different climate regions of loess plateau[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(5): 70-76.
[12] TRUBAT R, CORTINA J, VILAGROSA A. Plant morphology and root hydraulics are altered by nutrient deficiency in Pistacia lentiscus(L.)[J]. Trees,2006,20(3): 334-339. DOI:10.1007/s00468-005-0045-z.
[13] PREGITZER K S, DEFOREST J L, BURTON A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine north American trees[J]. Ecological Monographs,2002,72(2): 293. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.010.
[14] 滕飞,刘勇,王琰,等. 底部渗灌下容器类型及规格对油松根系结构的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(3): 449-458. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.010. TENG F, LIU Y, WANG Y, et al. Sub-irrigation with different container types and sizes for containerized root growth of Pinus tabuliformis seedlings[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2017, 34(3): 449-458.
[15] 祝燕,马履一,刘勇,等. 控释氮肥对长白落叶松苗木生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(1): 24-28. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.01.006. ZHU Y, MA L Y, LIU Y, et al. Application of controlled-release fertilizer in the cultivation of Larix olgensis seedling[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2011, 35(1): 24-28.
[16] SALIFU K F, TIMMER V R. Optimizing nitrogen loading of Picea mariana seedlings during nursery culture[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2003,33(7): 1287-1294. DOI:10.1139/x03-057.
[17] BOIVIN J R,MILLER B D,TIMMER V R. Late-season fertilization of Picea mariana seedlings under greenhouse culture: biomass and nutrient dynamics[J]. Annals of Forest Science,2002,59(3): 255-264. DOI:10.1051/forest:2002021.
[18] BOIVIN J R,SALIFU K F,TIMMER V R. Late-season fertilization of Picea mariana seedlings: intensive loading and outplanting response on greenhouse bioassays[J]. Annals of Forest Science,2004,61(8): 737-745. DOI:10.1051/forest:2004073.
[19] HAWKINS B J,BURGESS D,MITCHELL A K. Growth and nutrient dynamics of western hemlock with conventional or exponential greenhouse fertilization and planting in different fertility conditions[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2005,35(4): 1002-1016. DOI:10.1139/x05-026.
[20] SCHRÖDER J J,NEETESON J J,WITHAGEN J C M,et al. Effects of N application on agronomic and environmental parameters in silage maize production on sandy soils[J]. Field Crops Research,1998,58(1): 55-67. DOI:10.1016/s0378-4290(98)00086-0.
[21] 侯彦林,陈守伦. 施肥模型研究综述[J]. 土壤通报,2004,35(4): 493-501. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2004.04.022. HOU Y L, CHEN S L. Summarization of fertilization model research[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2004, 35(4): 493-501.
[22] 李贵雨,卫星,汤园园,等. 白桦不同轻基质容器苗生长及养分分析[J]. 林业科学,2016,52(7): 30-37. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160704. LI G Y, WEI X, TANG Y Y, et al. Growth and nutrient content of Betula platyphylla container seedling in different light media[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(7): 30-37.

黄连木容器苗生长对缓释肥的响应

The growth response of Pistacia chinensis Bunge containerized seedlings to slow-release fertilizer

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	韦庆钰, 黄海龙, 吴纯泽, 苏嘉熙, 卫星. 3种倍性青杨扦插苗对覆膜滴肥的生长响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 93-101.
[2]	刘士玲, 陈琳, 杨保国, 贾宏炎, 庞圣江, 张培, 王晖. 氮磷肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 23-29.
[3]	姚光刚,李国雷,郑永林,薛敦孟,李世安,袁启华. 缓释肥施用量对槲栎容器苗苗木质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(01): 69-75.
[4]	卫星杓,戴腾飞,刘诗琦,贾黎明. 施肥对无患子叶片养分动态及产量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(05): 17-24.
[5]	吴家胜;张往祥;曹福亮. 氮磷钾对银杏苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2003, 27(01): 63-66.