指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811061

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 91-97.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811061

指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响

杨阳¹(), 施皓然², 及利¹, 杨立学¹^,^*()

1.东北林业大学林学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040
2.昭通市林业科学研究所,云南昭通 657000

收稿日期:2018-11-28 修回日期:2019-03-18 出版日期:2020-03-30 发布日期:2020-04-01
通讯作者: 杨立学
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0600606-04)

Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and root morphology of Tilia amurensis seedlings

YANG Yang¹(), SHI Haoran², JI Li¹, YANG Lixue¹^,^*()

1. College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
2. Forestry Research Institute of Zhaotong City, Yunnan Province, Zhaotong 657000, China

Received:2018-11-28 Revised:2019-03-18 Online:2020-03-30 Published:2020-04-01
Contact: YANG Lixue

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】指数施肥是根据苗木的相对生长速率添加与幼苗对应养分需求剂量的养分加载方式之一。研究不同施肥方式及不同施氮(N)量对紫椴(Tilia amurensis Rupr.)幼苗生长、养分含量、根系形态的影响,旨在揭示紫椴对N素的需求利用规律,为苗圃培育优质合格紫椴苗木提供参考。【方法】以1年生紫椴播种(实生)苗为供试材料,在大田培育环境下,设定常规施肥(200 mg/株,CK)、1倍指数施肥(207.46 mg/株,编号E100)和2倍指数施肥(414.92 mg/株,编号E200)3种施肥处理。每次施肥间隔时间为7 d,共施氮肥10次至整个生长季结束,每周进行紫椴幼苗苗高、地径的测定,用于绘制生长曲线。最终苗木收获时,先分离出根系进行形态指标的扫描,获得总根长、总根表面积、总根体积。最后全株烘干用于测定各器官的生物量、N积累量及N浓度。【结果】指数施肥比常规施肥显著促进紫椴幼苗的苗高、地径的增长。不同指数施肥处理下,单株生物量以E100、E200处理分别比CK高出1.63与1.66倍(P<0.05),不同处理下根茎比大小表现为CK>E100>E200。3种处理下苗木的根、茎、叶含N量大小顺序均为E200>E100>CK,全株含N量分别达到349.24、338.21、94.48 mg/株。不同处理下根、茎、叶中N浓度大小顺序均为E100>E200>CK。不同处理下幼苗的根长、根表面积、根体积、比根长、比根表面积、根系组织密度具有相同的趋势均为E100 >E200 >CK。不同施肥处理苗木N素收获指数大小表现为E100>E200>CK,E100是CK的3.45倍。E100处理下的苗木质量指数比CK提高了0.89倍。【结论】指数施肥与常规施肥相比显著提高了苗木的生长、养分积累利用、根系形态特征和N肥收获指数,依据以上评价指标,可得指数施肥E100(207.46 mg/株)处理下的紫椴播种苗生长表现为最好。

关键词: 紫椴, 指数施肥, 苗木生长, 根系形态, 氮素利用

Abstract:

【Objective】 Exponential fertilization is one of the nutrient loading methods, which adds the required nutrients into soil, according to the relative growth rate of seedlings. The effects of different fertilization methods and different nitrogen content on the growth, nutrient content and root morphology of seedlings were investigated in this study to reveal the regularity of the nitrogen absorption and the utilization ofTilia amurensis seedlings and provide scientific reference for cultivation of high quality seedlings. 【Method】 Under field conditions, nitrogen fertilization experiment was conducted with one-year-old seedlings of Tilia amurensis. Further, three treatments were applied: conventional fertilization (200 mg per seedling, CK), 1 time exponential fertilization (207.46 mg per seedling, No.E100), and 2 times exponential fertilization (414.92 mg per seedling, No.E200). The fertilization interval time was seven days, and nitrogen fertilizer was applied for 10 weeks until the end of the growing season. During the experimental period, the height and base diameter of seedlings were measured weekly after fertilization, and the data were used to plot the growth curve. When these seedlings were harvested, roots were separated from the plants for scanning and calculating their morphological indexes (root length, root surface area, root volume). After drying, the biomass, nitrogen content and nitrogen concentration of each plant organs were determined. 【Result】 Exponential fertilization significantly improved the height and base diameter growth ofT. amurensis seedlings compared with those by conventional fertilization. The seedling mean biomass of E100 and E200 treatments were 1.63 and 1.66 times higher than that of CK (P<0.05), respectively. The of shoot to root ratio was CK > E100 > E200 with increasing amount of nitrogen. The tendency of N content in roots, stems and leaves of seedlings was E200 > E100 > CK. The nitrogen content of the whole plant in E200 was 349.24 mg per seedling, whereas nitrogen contents of the whole plant in E100 and CK were 338.21 and 94.48 mg per seedling, respectively. The order of N concentration in roots, stems and leaves was E100 > E200 > CK. The root length, root surface area root volume, specific root length, specific root surface area, and root tissue density of the seedlings had the same trend which was expressed as E100 > E200 > CK. The nitrogen harvest index of seedlings showed E100 > E200 > CK (the index of E100 was 3.45 times of CK). The seedling quality index of E100 was 0.89 times higher than that of CK.【Conclusion】 Seedlings with nitrogen exponential fertilization have a better performance in growth, nutrient accumulation and root morphological characteristics than that of conventional fertilization, and the seedlings ofTilia amurensis treated with exponential fertilization at E100 (207.46 mg per seedling) grew best based on earlier measured indexes.

Key words: Tilia amurensis Rupr., exponential fertilization, seedling growth, root morphology, nitrogen utilization

中图分类号:

S723

杨阳,施皓然,及利,等. 指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 91-97.

YANG Yang, SHI Haoran, JI Li, YANG Lixue. Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and root morphology of Tilia amurensis seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(2): 91-97.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811061.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

表3

参考文献 31

[1]	OLIET J A, PLANELLES R, ARTERO F, et al. Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition[J]. New Forests, 2009, 37(3):313-331. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3. doi: 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
[2]	OLIET J A, TEJADA M, SALIFU K F, et al. Performance and nutrient dynamics of holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) seedlings in relation to nursery nutrient loading and post-transplant fertility[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 128(3):253-263. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-009-0261-y. doi: 10.1007/s10342-009-0261-y
[3]	TIMMER V R. Exponential nutrient loading: a new fertilization technique to improve seedling performance on competitive sites[J]. New Forests, 1997, 13(1/2/3):279-299. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006502830067. doi: 10.1023/A:1006502830067
[4]	HAWKINS J, BURGESS D, MITCHELL K. Growth and nutrient dynamics of western hemlock with conventional or exponential greenhouse fertilization and planting in different fertility conditions[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 35(4):1002-1016. DOI: 10.1139/x05-026. doi: 10.1139/x05-026
[5]	MALIK V, TIMMER V R. Biomass partitioning and nitrogen retranslocation in black spruce seedlings on competitive mixedwood sites: a bioassay study[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1998, 28(2):206-215. DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-28-2-206. doi: 10.1139/x97-207
[6]	SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F, BIRGE Z K D. Nursery nitrogen loading improves field performance of bareroot oak seedlings planted on abandoned mine lands[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2009, 17(3):339-349. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00373.x. doi: 10.1111/rec.2009.17.issue-3
[7]	SALIFU K F, TIMMER V R. Nutrient retranslocation response of seedlings to nitrogen supply[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001, 65(3):905. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2001.653905x. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2001.653905x
[8]	ISLAM M A, APOSTOL K G, JACOBS D F, et al. Fall fertilization of Pinus resinosa seedlings: nutrient uptake, cold hardiness,and morphological development[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2009, 66(7):704. DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009061. doi: 10.1051/forest/2009061
[9]	林平, 邹尚庆, 李国雷, 等. 油松容器苗生长和氮吸收对指数施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(3):23-28.
	LIN P, ZOU S Q, LI G L, et al. Response of growth and N uptake of Pinus tabulaeformis container seedlings to exponential fertilization [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2013,37(3):23-28.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.03.005.
[10]	TIMMER V R, MUNSON A D. Site-specific growth and nutrition of planted Picea mariana in the Ontario Clay Belt. IV. Nitrogen loading response[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1991, 21(7):1058-1065. DOI: 10.1139/x91-145. doi: 10.1139/x91-145
[11]	郝龙飞, 王庆成, 张彦东, 等. 指数施肥对山桃稠李播种苗生物量及养分动态的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2012,48(6):33-39.
	HAO L F, WANG Q C, ZHANG Y D, et al. Effect of exponential fertilization on biomass and nutrient dynamics ofPadus maackii seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012,48(6):33-39.
[12]	李国雷, 祝燕, 蒋乐, 等. 指数施肥对栓皮栎容器苗生长和氮积累的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012,40(11):6-9.
	LI G L, ZHU Y, JIANG L, et al. Effect of exponential fertilization on growth and nitrogen storage of containerized quercus variabilis seedlings [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2012,40(11):6-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2012.11.002.
[13]	王益明, 万福绪, 胡菲, 等. 指数施肥对美国山核桃幼苗根系形态的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018,46(3):29-32.
	WANG Y M, WAN F X, HU F, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on root morphology of pecan seedlings[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018,46(3):29-32. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2018.03.006.
[14]	唐桂兰, 刘小星, 芦建国. 氮素指数施肥对夏蜡梅幼苗生长、养分分配的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(6):134-140.
	TANG G L, LIU X X, LU J G. Effects of nitrogen exponential fertilization on growth and nutrient distribution ofSinocalycanthus chinensis seedlings [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,41(6):134-140. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201604043.
[15]	CHEN L, WANG C S, DELL B, et al. Growth and nutrient dynamics of Betula alnoides seedlings under exponential fertilization[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 29(1):111-119. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-017-0427-2. doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0427-2
[16]	LYNCH J. Root architecture and plant productivity[J]. Plant Physiology, 1995, 109(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7
[17]	杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量、品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(1):36-46.
	YANG J C. Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and the nutrient absorption and utilization[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011,44(1):36-46. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.01.005.
[18]	EISSENSTAT D M, WELLS C E, YANAI R D, et al. Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity[J]. New Phytologist, 2000, 147(1):33-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00686.x. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00686.x
[19]	CHAPIN F S, MATSON P A, MOONEK P M. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology[M]. New York: Springer, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9504-9.
[20]	王文娜, 王燕, 王韶仲, 等. 氮有效性增加对细根解剖、形态特征和菌根侵染的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(4):1294-1302.
	WANG W N, WANG Y, WANG S Z, et al. Effects of elevated N availability on anatomy, morphology and mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(4):1294-1302. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201604.032.
[21]	王九龄, 杨建平. 紫椴种子休眠原因的初步研究[J]. 林业科学, 1981,17(3):317-324.
	WANG J L, YANG J P. Preliminary study on seed dormancy of Tilia amurensis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1981,17(3):317-324.
[22]	王海南, 沈海龙, 杨立学. 紫椴嫩枝扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 经济林研究, 2012,30(3):106-110.
	WANG H N, SHEN H L, YANG L X. Techniques of softwood cuttings propagation in Tilia amurensis [J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2012,30(3):106-110. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2012.03.027.
[23]	张羽, 陈祥伟, 杨立学, 等. 化控物质对紫椴棚式育苗生长和抗寒性的效应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2001,29(2):21-26.
	ZHANG Y, CHEN X W, YANG L X, et al. The seedling growth and cold-resistance of Tilia amurensis treated by chemical control substances [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2001,29(2):21-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2001.02.006.
[24]	IMO M, TIMMER V R. Nitrogen uptake of mesquite seedlings at conventional and exponential fertilization schedules[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1992, 56(3):927. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030041x. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030041x
[25]	张彦东, 范志强. 不同形态N素对水曲柳幼苗生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000,11(5): 665-667.
	ZHANG Y D, FAN Z Q. Effect of different nitrogen forms on growth of Fraxinus mandshurica seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000,11(5): 665-667. DOI: http://ir.xtbg.org.cn/handle/353005/2438.
[26]	BURGESS D. Western hemlock and Douglas-fir seedling development with exponential rates of nutrient addition[J]. Forest Science, 1991, 37(37):54-67.
[27]	TIMMER V R, MILLER B D. Effects of contrasting fertilization and moisture regimes on biomass, nutrients, and water relations of container grown red pine seedlings[J]. New Forests, 1991, 5(4):335-348. DOI: 10.1007/bf00118861. doi: 10.1007/BF00118861
[28]	TIMMER V R, ARMSTRONG G. Growth and nutrition of containerized Pinus resinosa at exponentially increasing nutrient additions[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1987, 17(7):644-647. DOI: 10.1139/x87-105. doi: 10.1139/x87-105
[29]	XU X, TIMMER V R. Biomass and nutrient dynamics of Chinese fir seedlings under conventional and exponential fertilization regimes[J]. Plant & Soil, 1998, 203(2):313-322.
[30]	QU L Y, QUORESHI A M, KOIKE T. Root growth characteristics, biomass and nutrient dynamics of seedlings of two larch species raised under different fertilization regimes[J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 255(1):293-302. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026159709246. doi: 10.1023/A:1026159709246
[31]	HODGE A. The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients[J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 162(1):9-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01015.x. doi: 10.1111/nph.2004.162.issue-1

施肥处理 exponetial fertilization treatment	苗高/cm seedling height	地径/mm base diameter	根茎生物量比 biomass ratio of root to stem	生物量/g biomass
施肥处理 exponetial fertilization treatment	苗高/cm seedling height	地径/mm base diameter	根茎生物量比 biomass ratio of root to stem	根 root	茎 stem	叶 leaf	全株 total
CK	14.35±1.82 b	4.02±0.25 b	2.27±0.16 a	2.27±0.45 b	1.09±0.27 b	1.93±0.60 b	5.01±1.15 b
E100	28.62±2.20 a	5.79±0.39 a	1.79±0.10 a	5.44±0.77 a	3.17±0.55 a	4.59±0.31 a	13.20±1.52 a
E200	28.56±2.68 a	5.60±0.32 a	1.72±0.14 b	5.68±0.72 a	3.42±0.42 a	4.78±0.79 a	13.35±1.86 a

施肥处理 exponetial fertilization treatment	总根长/cm root length	总根表面积/cm² root surface area	总根体积/cm³ root volume	比根长/ (cm·g^-1) specific root length	比根表面积/ (cm²·g^-1) specific root surface area	根组织密度/ (g·cm^-3) root tissue density
CK	1 463.32±298.20 b	215.48±31.62 b	2.91±0.25 b	770.78±152.10 a	129.71±34.81 a	0.76±0.14 a
E100	5 476.30±609.42 a	664.56±80.88 a	9.77±1.56 a	1 186.76±237.96 a	135.22±22.71 a	0.61±0.07 a
E200	5 186.77±539.03 a	663.90±72.84 a	9.38±1.10 a	982.31±112.03 a	121.73±8.95 a	0.61±0.04 a

施肥处理 exponetial fertilization treatment	生物量收获指数/% biomass harvest index	N素收获指数/% nitrogen harvest index	苗木质量指数 seedling quality index
CK	25.06±5.76 b	47.24±1.84 c	1.22±0.28 b
E100	63.74±7.33 a	163.03±6.23 a	2.30±0.26 a
E200	32.16±4.48 b	84.17±2.38 b	2.48±0.34 a

指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响

Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and root morphology of Tilia amurensis seedlings

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	丰伟, 单昌丹, 张慧, 刘家蔓, 柳国昂, 姚增玉. 施肥方式和施肥量对华山松幼苗生长及针叶营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 191-198.
[2]	杨甲定, 刘雨节, 冯建元, 张远兰. 树木叶片衰老中的氮素再吸收机制研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 1-8.
[3]	李振双, 王倩, 朱媛, 杨富成, 梁俊峰, 陆俊锟. 外源信号物质对檀香幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 271-278.
[4]	刘泽茂, 晏昕, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 竹炭添加对大叶榉树容器苗生长和营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 111-118.
[5]	佘建炜, 张康, 郑旭, 赵小军, 程方, 唐罗忠. 海水处理对沼泽小叶桦苗木生长和生理的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 102-108.
[6]	倪铭, 高振洲, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 不同氮素施肥方法对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 107-113.
[7]	刘士玲, 陈琳, 杨保国, 贾宏炎, 庞圣江, 张培, 王晖. 氮磷肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 23-29.
[8]	赵小军, 程方, 张康, 黄开栋, 倪云, 孟晓, 唐罗忠. 淹水处理下杨树不同无性系苗木根系形态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 1-8.
[9]	韦如萍,胡德活,陈金慧,施季森. 低磷胁迫下杉木无性系根系形态及养分利用响应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 1-8.
[10]	唐桂兰,刘小星,芦建国. 氮素指数施肥对夏蜡梅幼苗生长、养分分配的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 134-140.
[11]	李因刚,柳新红,马俊伟,石从广,杨少宗. 追施氮肥对浙江楠容器苗生长和叶片养分状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(01): 33-38.
[12]	张华林,彭彦,谢耀坚,罗萍. 两种氮肥施用法对尾巨桉轻基质容器苗生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(01): 53-58.
[13]	林平,邹尚庆,李国雷,黄冬辉,祝燕,蒋乐,史文辉. 油松容器苗生长和氮吸收对指数施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(03): 23-28.
[14]	嵇晓雷,杨平. 基于根系形态的根系固坡作用数值分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 113-117.
[15]	闫德民,董文渊,付建生. 稳态营养施肥对撑绿杂交竹出笋和新竹生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 103-107.