海南濒危植物蕉木种群结构与动态特征

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201907004

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 116-122.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201907004

海南濒危植物蕉木种群结构与动态特征

江杏香¹(), 陈玉凯¹^,^*(), 吴石松², 陈庆³

1.热带岛屿生态学教育部重点实验室,海南师范大学生命科学学院,海南海口 571158
2.海南会山省级自然保护区管理站,海南琼海 571400
3.海南霸王岭国家级自然保护区管理局,海南昌江 572722

收稿日期:2019-07-10 接受日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2021-01-30 发布日期:2021-02-01
通讯作者: 陈玉凯
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31760119);海南省自然科学基金项目(317126)

Population structure and dynamics of the endangered plant Chieniodendron hainanense in Hainan

JIANG Xingxiang¹(), CHEN Yukai¹^,^*(), WU Shisong², CHEN Qing³

1. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China
2. Hainan Huishan Provincial Nature Reserve Administration, Qionghai 571400, China
3. Hainan Bawangling National Nature Reserve Administration, Changjiang 572722, China

Received:2019-07-10 Accepted:2020-04-08 Online:2021-01-30 Published:2021-02-01
Contact: CHEN Yukai

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】分析海南濒危植物蕉木的年龄结构和数量动态特征,探讨两种干扰程度下蕉木种群生存现状和动态变化趋势,揭示蕉木种群与环境之间的关系,探索蕉木种群濒临灭绝的原因,为维护和恢复蕉木种群提供依据。【方法】利用典型群落样方法对海南蕉木分布的9个典型样地进行群落学调查,详细记录各样地的海拔、坡度、坡向、林分郁闭度、植被群落等生境指标。同时,调查每个样地内和其他非典型群落分布点蕉木个体的树高、胸径等指标;在对蕉木典型群落组成和结构调查的基础上,将所有蕉木种群个体所在群落分为受人为干扰较强和较弱两种生境进行比较和分析;将蕉木胸径大小划分为7个径级,并以胸径代替龄级来反映种群结构;将龄级与胸径大小级对应,绘制蕉木种群的径级结构图;使用种群动态量化方法编制种群的静态生命表,分析其存活曲线、死亡率曲线等重要参数;运用时间序列模型模拟并推测蕉木种群的数量动态和发展趋势。【结果】①典型蕉木群落中乔木层和灌木层的物种多样性均较高;②两种干扰生境中的蕉木种群年龄结构有所差异,但幼龄和中龄植株总数量均占有一定优势,种群具有一定的恢复潜力;③两种干扰生境的蕉木幼苗数量均较少,Ⅱ龄级呈现衰退趋势,种群自我更新能力较差,对外界的干扰具有较高的敏感性;④种群生存呈Deevey-Ⅱ型存活曲线,曲线呈对角型,各龄级阶段具基本相同的死亡率;⑤人为干扰程度强的生境中蕉木种群存活能力比人为干扰程度弱的生境中低。【结论】人为活动导致的适宜生境地减少和种子自然萌发率低是蕉木种群濒危的主要原因。因此,应加强对蕉木种群及栖息地的保护,保护蕉木现有的成年个体;而对于蕉木植株分布较密集区域,在果实成熟季节应定期采收蕉木种子并加以一定的人工抚育促进种子萌发和幼苗的更新;可通过适当修剪老龄的蕉木个体促进其萌芽,提高开花结实率;对于干扰程度较强生境的蕉木种群应加强植物的保护宣教工作,降低人为干扰;而在干扰程度较弱生境,也应加强对中小径级蕉木个体的人工抚育,促进蕉木种群的自然更新和恢复。

关键词: 蕉木, 种群结构, 动态特征, 存活曲线, 时间序列预测, 海南

Abstract:

【Objective】Understanding the survival status of endangered plants and their population dynamics is of great significance for their conservation in Hainan Province, China. The present study analyzed the age structure and population dynamics of the endangered plant Chieniodendron hainanense in two habitats with different disturbance intensities, explored the relationship between the C. hainanense population and the environment, and discussed the main factors threatening C. hainanense. It aimed to provide evidence for the maintenance and restoration of C. hainanense. 【Method】 In 2018-2019, a community investigation was carried out in nine typical plots of C. hainanense in Hainan using the quadrat method. The elevation, slope, aspect, canopy density and vegetation of each plot were recorded. The height and diameter at breast height (DBH) of each C. hainanense individual were recorded both in typical and atypical communities. Based on the composition and structure of the typical communities, all the surveyed communities were assigned to habitats with either high or low levels of human disturbance. The DBH of the C. hainanense population was divided into seven diameter classes, which were used as a surrogate of its age class to examine the population structure. The size structure of the C. hainanense population was analyzed. We used the quantitative analysis to establish a static life table of the C. hainanense population, analyzing survival and mortality curves, and other important parameters. A time series model was applied to model and predict the quantitative dynamics and development trend of the C. hainanense population. 【Result】①Species diversity in the tree and shrub layers were both higher in the typical communities. ②The age structure of the C. hainanense population differed between the two habitats. The young and middle-aged individuals were somewhat prominent, suggesting the potential for restoration of the population. ③The number of seedlings in the two habitats was low, with the age class II population showing a decreasing trend. The population showed a low self-renewal capacity and was vulnerable to external disturbances. ④The population survival curve belonged to the Deevey-Ⅱtype, and was diagonally shaped, with each age class stage showing the same overall mortality. ⑤The survival ability of the C. hainanense population was lower in the high disturbance habitats than in the low disturbance habitats. 【Conclusion】 The loss of suitable habitats caused by human activities and the low natural germination rate of seeds are the two most influential factors that endanger the C. hainanense population. Therefore, the protection of existing C. hainanense adults and their suitable habitats should be strengthened. For the C. hainanense aggregated areas, it is proposed to harvest the seeds regularly during the fruit maturation period and apply artificial care to promote seed germination and seedling regeneration. It is also proposed to prune the old C. hainanense individuals appropriately to increase seed germination and flowering and fruiting rates. Finally, around the high disturbance areas, it is necessary to improve the public awareness of plant protection to minimize human disturbance. Similarly, in the low disturbance areas, artificial care should be strengthened for the medium and small-sized C. hainanense individuals to promote the natural regeneration and restoration of the C. hainanense population.

Key words: Chieniodendron hainanense, population structure, dynamic feature, survival curve, time sequence prediction, Hainan Province

中图分类号:

S718

江杏香,陈玉凯,吴石松,等. 海南濒危植物蕉木种群结构与动态特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 116-122.

JIANG Xingxiang, CHEN Yukai, WU Shisong, CHEN Qing. Population structure and dynamics of the endangered plant Chieniodendron hainanense in Hainan[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(1): 116-122.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201907004.

图/表 6

表1

表2

图1

表3

图2

表4

参考文献 22

[1]	CHEN Y K, YANG X B, YANG Q, et al. Factors affecting the distribution pattern of wild plants with extremely small populations in Hainan Island,China[J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(5):e97751.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097751 pmid: 24830683
[2]	邵云云, 徐凤霞. 蕉木(Oncodostigma hainanense)内轮花瓣近轴面瘤状突起发育及功能[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015,33(5):595-601. doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.50595
	SHAO Y Y, XU F X. Development and function of the strumae on the adaxial sides of the inner petals of Oncodostigma hainanense[J]. Plant Sci J, 2015,33(5):595-601.DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.50595.
[3]	朱华. 探讨海南岛生物地理起源上有意义的一些种子植物科和属[J]. 生物多样性, 2017,25(8):816-822.
	ZHU H. Families and genera of seed plants in relation to biogeographical origin on Hainan Island[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2017,25(8):816-822.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017009.
[4]	孙同兴, 陈新芳, 杨秉耀, 等. 中国番荔枝科8属植物叶的扫描电镜观察[J]. 电子显微学报, 2002,21(2):146-152.
	SUN T X, CHEN X F, YANG B Y, et al. Studies on epidermal micromorphology of eight genera in Annonaceae from China by SEM[J]. J Chin Electron Microsc Soc, 2002,21(2):146-152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6281.2002.02.012.
[5]	张婕, 上官铁梁, 段毅豪, 等. 灵空山辽东栎种群年龄结构与动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(11):3125-3130.
	ZHANG J, SHANGGUAN T L, DUAN Y H, et al. Age structure and dynamics of Quercus wutaishanica population in lingkong mountain of Shanxi Province,China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014,25(11):3125-3130.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140918.010.
[6]	姜在民, 和子森, 宿昊, 等. 濒危植物羽叶丁香种群结构与动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(7):2471-2480. doi: 10.5846/stxb201704250753
	JIANG Z M, HE Z S, SU H, et al. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of endangered Syringa pinnatifolia Hemsl[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(7):2471-2480.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201704250753.
[7]	李翔, 侯璐, 李双喜, 等. 濒危树种庙台槭种群数量特征及动态分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2018,36(4):524-533.
	LI X, HOU L, LI S X, et al. Population quantitative characteristics and dynamic analysis of the endangered plant Acer miaotaiense[J]. Plant Sci J, 2018,36(4):524-533.DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2018.40524.
[8]	龚子同, 张甘霖, 漆智平. 海南岛土系概论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
	GONG Z T, ZHANG G L, QI Z P. Introduction to Hainan soil system[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
[9]	韩广轩, 王光美, 毛培利, 等. 山东半岛北部黑松海防林幼龄植株更新动态及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(12):158-164. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20101226
	HAN G X, WANG G M, MAO P L, et al. Regeneration dynamics of young Pinus thunbergii and its influencing factors in the coastal protection forests in northern Shandong peninsula[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2010,46(12):158-164.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20101226.
[10]	张恒庆, 张文辉. 保护生物学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
	ZHANG H Q, ZHANG W H. Conservation biology[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
[11]	尚玉昌. 普通生态学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010.
	SHANG Y C. General ecology[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2010.
[12]	FROST I, RYDIN H. Spatial pattern and size distribution of the animal-dispersed tree Quercus robur in two spruce-dominated forests[J]. Écoscience, 2000,7(1):38-44.DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2000.11682569. doi: 10.1080/11956860.2000.11682569
[13]	陈晓德. 植物种群与群落结构动态量化分析方法研究[J]. 生态学报, 1998,18(2):214-217.
	CHEN X D. A study on the method of quantitative analysis for plant population and community structural dynamics[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1998,18(2):214-217.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1998.02.017.
[14]	解婷婷, 苏培玺, 周紫鹃, 等. 荒漠绿洲过渡带沙拐枣种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(15):4272-4279. doi: <a href='http://dx.doi.org/10.5846/stxb201212101776'>10.5846/stxb201212101776</a>
	XIE T T, SU P X, ZHOU Z J, et al. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Calligonum mongolicum population in the desert-oasis ecotone[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014,34(15):4272-4279.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201212101776.
[15]	胡满, 曾思齐, 龙时胜, 等. 青冈栎次生林种群结构及动态特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017,37(11):110-114.
	HU M, ZENG S Q, LONG S S, et al. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Cyclobalanopsis glauca secondary forests[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2017,37(11):110-114.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.018.
[16]	刘玉平, 苏慧, 刘贵峰, 等. 罕山自然保护区森林植物群落优势种的种群结构与动态[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016,31(4):170-175,200.
	LIU Y P, SU H, LIU G F, et al. Population structure and dynamics of dominant species of main forest community in Hanshan Nature Reserves[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2016,31(4):170-175,200.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.04.29.
[17]	徐加汉, 司马永康, 徐涛, 等. 极小种群野生植物馨香木兰的种群结构及动态[J]. 西部林业科学, 2016,45(2):35-40,51.
	XU J H, SIMA Y K, XU T, et al. Population structure and dynamics of Lirianthe odoratissma (Y.W.Law et R.Z.Zhou) N.H.Xia et C.Y.Wu, a plant species with extremely small populations[J]. J West China For Sci, 2016,45(2):35-40, 51. DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2016.02.006.
[18]	谢宗强, 陈伟烈, 路鹏, 等. 濒危植物银杉的种群统计与年龄结构[J]. 生态学报, 1999,19(4):523-528.
	XIE Z Q, CHEN W L, LU P, et al. The demography and age structure of the endangered plant population of Cathaya argyrophylla[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1999,19(4):523-528.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1999.06.002.
[19]	谢春平, 吴昌魁, 付桂, 等. 五指山地区海南苏铁种群结构特征与动态[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019,39(1):77-85.
	XIE C P, WU C K, FU G, et al. Population structure characteristics and dynamics of Cycas hainanensis in Wuzhi Mountains,Hainan Province[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2019,39(1):77-85.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.01.013.
[20]	项小燕, 吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 等. 大别山五针松种群结构及动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016,25(1):55-62. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601007
	XIANG X Y, WU G L, DUAN R Y, et al. Studies on population structure and dynamics of Pinus dabeshanensis[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2016,25(1):55-62.DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601007.
[21]	卢杰, 李江荣, 郭其强, 等. 藏东南林芝云杉种群结构与数量动态[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(4):67-73.
	LU J, LI J R, GUO Q Q, et al. Population structure and quantitative dynamics of Picea likiangensis var. linzhiensis in southeast Tibet[J]. For Resour Manage, 2014(4):67-73. DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.04.014.
[22]	白卫国, 徐惠玲, 吴庆标, 等. 广西雅长林区铁坚油杉种群结构分布研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(3):71-76.
	BAI W G, XU H L, WU Q B, et al. Ecological study of Keteleeria davidiana populations of Yachang Forest Farm in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 2017,41(3):71-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201604046.

层次 level	物种 species	相对密度/% relative density	相对频度/% relative frequency	相对显著度/% relative significance	重要值 important value
乔木 arbor	砂糖椰子Arenga pinnata	1.76	1.02	13.80	5.53
	大叶鼠刺Itea macrophylla	0.59	0.26	14.65	5.16
	山苦茶Mallotus peltatus	6.83	1.02	0.52	2.79
	白茶Koilodepas hainanense	6.24	1.02	0.93	2.73
	蕉木Chieniodendron hainanense	2.63	1.02	3.81	2.49
	野荔枝Litchi chinensis	1.46	1.02	4.02	2.17
灌木 shrub	白茶Koilodepas hainanense	7.23	0.77	0.99	3.00
	山苦茶Mallotus oblongifolius	6.97	0.77	0.67	2.80
	海南暗罗Polyalthia laui	2.19	0.77	1.37	1.44
草本 herba- ceou	穗花轴榈Licuala fordiana	16.67	16.67	12.82	15.39
草本 herba- ceou	百足藤Pothos repens	5.56	8.33	17.09	10.33

种群动态指数级 dynamic index	人为干扰较强 high levels of human disturbance	人为干扰较弱 low levels of human disturbance
V₁	-45.45	-64.29
V₂	27.27	35.71
V₃	62.50	-25.00
V₄	-25.00	8.33
V₅	50.00	54.55
V₆	0.00	60.00
V_pi	19.18	17.03
V'_pi	1.37	1.22

生境类型 habitat type	龄级 age class	a_x	A_x	l_x	lnl_x	d_x	q_x/%	L_x	T_x	e_x	K_x	S_x
人为干扰较强 high levels of human disturbance	Ⅰ	6	9	1 000	6.908	222	22.22	889	3 278	3.278	0.251	0.778
	Ⅱ	11	7	778	6.656	111	14.29	722	2 389	3.071	0.154	0.857
	Ⅲ	8	6	667	6.502	222	33.33	556	1 667	2.500	0.405	0.667
	Ⅳ	3	4	444	6.097	111	25.00	389	1 111	2.500	0.288	0.750
	Ⅴ	4	3	333	5.809	0	0.00	333	722	2.167	0.000	1.000
	Ⅵ	2	3	333	5.809	111	33.33	278	389	1.167	0.405	0.667
	Ⅶ	2	2	222	5.404	-	-	111	111	0.500	5.404	-
人为干扰较弱 low levels of human disturbance	Ⅰ	5	11	1 000	6.908	91	9.09	955	4 136	4.136	0.095	0.909
	Ⅱ	14	10	909	6.812	182	20.00	818	3 182	3.500	0.223	0.800
	Ⅲ	9	8	727	6.589	91	12.50	682	2 364	3.250	0.134	0.875
	Ⅳ	12	7	636	6.456	91	14.29	591	1 682	2.643	0.154	0.857
	Ⅴ	11	6	545	6.302	91	16.67	500	1 091	2.000	0.182	0.833
	Ⅵ	5	5	455	6.119	91	20.00	409	591	1.300	0.223	0.800
	Ⅶ	2	4	364	5.896	-	-	182	182	0.500	5.896	-

生境类型 habitat type	龄级 age class	原始数据 primary data	M2	M4	M6	生境类型 habitat type	龄级 age class	原始数据 primary data	M2	M4	M6
人为干扰较强 high levels of human disturbance	Ⅰ	6				人为干扰较弱 low levels of human disturbance	Ⅰ	5
	Ⅱ	11	9				Ⅱ	14	10
	Ⅲ	8	10				Ⅲ	9	12
	Ⅳ	3	6	7			Ⅳ	12	11	10
	Ⅴ	4	4	7			Ⅴ	11	12	12
	Ⅵ	2	3	4	6		Ⅵ	5	8	9	9
	Ⅶ	2	2	3	5		Ⅶ	2	4	8	9

海南濒危植物蕉木种群结构与动态特征

Population structure and dynamics of the endangered plant Chieniodendron hainanense in Hainan

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	邹朋峻, 关庆伟, 袁在翔, 谷雨晴, 吴茜, 牛莹莹, 陈霞, 金雪梅. 紫金山南麓枫香种群结构与动态特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 157-163.
[2]	张育诚, 韩念龙, 胡珂, 于淼, 黎兴强. 海南岛中部山区土地利用变化对碳储量时空分异的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 115-122.
[3]	李广洋, 寇卫利, 陈帮乾, 吴志祥, 张希财, 云挺, 马俊, 孙瑞, 李莹. 近30年海南岛橡胶林时空变化分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 189-198.
[4]	姜钰婷, 李成德, 范咏梅. 跳小蜂科一中国新记录属及一新种记述[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 209-211.
[5]	王春晖, 陈昕, 王本忠, 徐展宏. 湖南高望界国家级自然保护区雪峰山梭罗种群结构与动态特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 57-64.
[6]	彭智奇, 董鹏, 朱弘, 朱淑霞, 董京京, 钟育谦, 翟飞飞, 郑爱春, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵. 江苏云台山山樱花种群结构及点格局分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 167-176.
[7]	马丹丹, 库伟鹏, 夏国华, 毛洁莹, 薛建辉. 珍稀濒危植物堇叶紫金牛种群结构及动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 159-164.
[8]	许恒,刘艳红. 极小种群梓叶槭种群结构及动态特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 47-54.
[9]	. 感染松萎蔫病的葡萄牙海岸松中内生细菌的分离[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(03): 32-.
[10]	关亚丽1，潘琴1，黄敏仁2. 民族植物学与海南黎药资源开发[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2009, 33(04): 145-149.
[11]	高俊香1，梅盛龙2，鲁小珍1*，李美琴2. 凤阳山自然保护区麂角杜鹃种群结构与分布[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2009, 33(02): 35-.
[12]	张明1,2,刘福德1,王中生1,安树青1*,王文进3,宋长虹4,郑建伟1,杨文杰1. 热带山地雨林演替早期先锋树种与非先锋树种叶片特征的差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 32(04): 28-32.
[13]	刘红梅1,2,蒋菊生2,董双林1. 海南胶林林下植被的生物多样性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 30(06): 55-60.
[14]	史军辉1,2,3,黄忠良1*,周小勇4,张池1,2,欧阳学军1,2,李林1,2. 鼎湖山针阔混交林木本植物种群的空间分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 30(05): 34-38.
[15]	方彦1,谢春平2. 海南岛珍稀濒危植物区系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 30(04): 138-140.