南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 21-28.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202002018
所属专题: 青钱柳培育与选优专题
收稿日期:
2020-02-11
接受日期:
2020-06-12
出版日期:
2021-01-30
发布日期:
2021-02-01
通讯作者:
洑香香
基金资助:
TIAN Li(), XU Chengwei, SHANG Xulan, FU Xiangxiang*()
Received:
2020-02-11
Accepted:
2020-06-12
Online:
2021-01-30
Published:
2021-02-01
Contact:
FU Xiangxiang
摘要:
【目的】以青钱柳表型性状作为优良单株第1轮选择依据,结合叶生物活性物质含量进行第2轮选择,再基于年度间稳定性评价进行决选,为青钱柳生物活性物质原料生产提供优良种植材料。【方法】2017年3月,根据植株叶片(叶色、叶形、叶面积)、分枝角、冠型(扁平和饱满)等表型性状,结合优良种源进行第1轮优良单株选择;并于当年9月底采收入选单株叶片测定总黄酮、总三萜和多糖含量,评价入选单株的改良潜力并进行第2轮选择。2018年9月对第2轮选择出的优株进行生物活性物质含量年度稳定性评价并进行优良单株决选。【结果】第1轮选择出的36份材料叶片的3种生物活性物质含量均存在显著差异,总黄酮、总三萜和水溶性多糖的改良潜力分别为34.3%、43.43%和36.41%;据此,单指标结合多指标第2轮选择出10株优良单株。比较第2轮选择优株连续两年叶内的活性物质含量,决选出含量稳定的3株优株LC1、LC4和CP3。分析表明,嫩叶红色的表型性状与叶内总黄酮、总三萜含量呈极显著相关;总三萜含量与植株具较大分枝角和饱满冠型分别呈极显著和显著相关关系;但水溶性多糖含量与观测的表型性状无显著相关。【结论】基于青钱柳红色嫩叶、大分枝角和饱满冠型与植株叶内总黄酮、总三萜含量呈显著相关性,可将3种表型特征作为药用优株的选择依据。终选优株LC1、LC4和CP3 叶内生物活性物质不仅含量高,而且年度间表达稳定。为了保证高产稳产,需对选择优株进行多点试验并研究其遗传与环境互作效应,以确定其适宜生境和相应的栽培策略。
中图分类号:
田力,徐骋炜,尚旭岚,等. 青钱柳药用优良单株评价与选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1): 21-28.
TIAN Li, XU Chengwei, SHANG Xulan, FU Xiangxiang. Evaluation and selection on superior individuals for medicinal use of Cyclocarya paliurus[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(1): 21-28.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202002018.
表1
青钱柳第1轮选择优株的基本信息"
选择标准 (代码) selection criterion | 编号 code | 种源 provenance | 形态特征 morphological characteristic | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
优良种源 (MT) superior provenance | MT1 | 沐川Muchuan(MC) | 叶大、盛,分枝角45°~50° | |||
MT2 | 沐川MC | 叶大、多,冠圆,分枝角45°~50° | ||||
MT3 | 沐川MC | 冠型好,叶茂 | ||||
分枝角(BA) branch angle | BA1 | 张家界Zhangjiajie(ZJJ) | 分枝角大(下>70°,上>60°) | |||
BA2 | / | 分枝角>60°,叶大、量多,嫩叶微红 | ||||
冠型扁平 (CP) flat crown | CP1 | 沐川MC | 冠扁平,分枝角<30° | |||
CP2 | 千岛湖Qiandaohu(QDH) | 冠扁平,分枝角45°,叶量大 | ||||
CP3 | 五峰Wufeng(WF) | 冠扁平,分枝角45°,叶大 | ||||
CP4 | 张家界ZJJ | 冠扁平,叶脉多,叶量大 | ||||
CP5 | 千岛湖QDH | 冠扁平,叶大,嫩叶红 | ||||
CP6 | 五峰WF | 冠扁平,叶大,嫩叶稍红 | ||||
CP7 | 沐川MC | 冠扁平,叶较大、多 | ||||
冠型饱满 (CR) round crown | CR1 | 千岛湖QDH | 树冠饱满,叶稍大、叶量多 | |||
CR2 | / | 树冠饱满,分枝角45°~60°,叶小、较多 | ||||
CR3 | / | 树冠饱满,叶较大,分枝角较大 | ||||
CR4 | / | 树冠饱满,叶较大,分枝直立 | ||||
CR5 | / | 树冠饱满,叶较大 | ||||
CR6 | / | 冠型圆,分枝角大,叶尖稍红、叶较大 | ||||
CR7 | / | 冠型饱满,分枝均匀,叶量中,嫩叶微红 | ||||
叶型(LF) leaf shape | LF1 | 张家界ZJJ | 叶脉多、厚、略卷,冠圆,分枝角>40° | |||
LF2 | / | 叶卷(截干) | ||||
LF3 | / | 叶表面皱,叶量多、较大 | ||||
LF4 | / | 叶卷、量多,分枝多 | ||||
选择标准 (代码) selection criterion | 编号 code | 种源 provenance | 形态特征 morphological characteristic | |||
叶面积(LS) leaf area | LS1 | 沐川MC | 叶大、多,分枝角50° | |||
LS2 | 千岛湖QDH | 叶较大、较多,冠稍平 | ||||
LS3 | 五峰WF | 叶大、稀,分枝角约30° | ||||
LS4 | 沐川MC | 叶超大、较稀,抗病性差 | ||||
LS5 | / | 叶大,嫩叶稍红,分枝较开 | ||||
叶色(LC) leaf color | LC1 | 千岛湖QDH | 叶红、味浓,叶大、较稀 | |||
LC2 | / | 嫩叶偏红,叶小,分枝角<30° | ||||
LC3 | / | 叶红、叶大,冠型饱满 | ||||
LC4 | / | 叶红、叶大,较稀 | ||||
LC5 | / | 叶红、叶大,冠型圆 | ||||
CK(对照) | CK1 | / | 嫩叶绿,株型饱满 | |||
CK2 | / | 嫩叶绿,株型饱满 | ||||
CK3 | / | 嫩叶黄绿,株型一般 |
表2
青钱柳药用优株叶片主要生物活性物质的含量比较"
编号 code | 总黄酮 total flavonoids | 总三萜 total triterpenoids | 水溶性多糖 water-soluble polysaccharide | 编号 code | 总黄酮 total flavonoids | 总三萜 total triterpenoids | 水溶性多糖 water-soluble polysaccharide |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT1 | 27.44±1.62 e-h | 21.23±1.00 fgh | 18.86±0.49 b-d | LF3 | 28.39±1.09 de | 22.06±0.46 e-g | 24.96±3.01 ab |
MT2 | 21.72±0.67 lm | 22.66±0.22 ef | 19.44±2.01 b-d | LF4 | 20.13±0.48 l-n | 16.72±0.18 mn | 24.12±1.80 a-c |
MT3 | 20.98±1.19 l-n | 19.29±1.10 i-k | 23.06±2.82 b-d | LS1 | 26.21±1.06 e-j | 21.78±0.56 e-g | 22.73±1.96 b-d |
BA1 | 26.65±0.54 e-j | 23.04±0.47 d-f | 18.52±2.13 b-d | LS2 | 27.12±1.21 e-i | 23.24±1.19 d-f | 24.07±2.80 a-c |
BA2 | 24.70±0.70 h-k | 22.84±0.43 d-f | 20.76±0.62 b-d | LS3 | 16.91±0.34 o | 16.67±1.26 m-o | 18.93±0.29 b-d |
CP1 | 19.81±0.35 mn | 25.34±0.39 c | 20.39±2.06 b-d | LS4 | 25.01±0.58 g-k | 17.26±0.27 lm | 19.34±1.36 b-d |
CP2 | 27.44±0.73 e-h | 18.82±0.70 i-l | 19.49±2.24 b-d | LS5 | 27.89±0.82 e-g | 18.76±0.92 i-l | 21.90±2.95 b-d |
CP3 | 30.57±0.84 cd | 29.08±0.76 a | 22.91±1.37 b-d | LC1 | 34.62±1.68 a | 24.68±0.49 cd | 21.92±3.86 b-d |
CP4 | 21.39±0.60 l-n | 15.31±0.33 n-p | 18.57±1.40 b-d | LC2 | 26.55±1.16 e-j | 28.97±0.21 a | 18.12±0.36 b-d |
CP5 | 29.19±0.71 de | 21.85±1.25 e-g | 21.48±2.47 b-d | LC3 | 24.68±1.21 h-k | 20.30±0.49 g-j | 20.93±0.56 b-d |
CP6 | 24.88±0.80 h-k | 17.59±1.18 k-m | 18.14±1.45 b-d | LC4 | 33.43±0.20 ab | 27.32±0.70 b | 24.26±3.34 a-c |
CP7 | 18.95±0.73 n | 14.97±0.32 np | 17.98±2.80 cd | LC5 | 31.71±0.98 bc | 20.66±0.34 g-i | 23.51±4.18 b-d |
CR1 | 22.56±0.67 kl | 16.66±0.93 m-o | 19.85±2.13 b-d | CK1 | 24.40±0.90 i-k | 19.33±0.54 i-k | 17.21±1.01 d |
CR2 | 27.43±0.73 e-h | 22.87±0.21 d-f | 24.78±0.74 a-c | CK2 | 27.62±1.33 e-h | 17.24±0.19 lm | 22.45±2.47 b-d |
CR3 | 28.38±2.45 de | 17.52±1.47 k-m | 29.26±1.00 a | CK3 | 21.37±1.1 l-n | 18.55±0.86 j-m | 22.55±1.08 b-d |
CR4 | 21.99±0.46 lm | 19.46±0.44 h-k | 22.02±2.10 b-d | P | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
CR5 | 28.07±0.69 d-f | 23.81±0.61 de | 20.60±2.54 b-d | CK均值 mean value of CK | 24.47 | 18.37 | 20.74 |
CR6 | 25.22±0.54 f-k | 30.12±0.28 a | 24.46±1.90 a-c | 33个优株均值mean value in 33 elite trees | 25.90 | 21.24 | 21.52 |
CR7 | 28.98±0.84 de | 17.72±0.16 k-m | 23.47±1.23 b-d | 总均值mean value in all trees | 25.78 | 21.00 | 21.45 |
LF1 | 24.16±1.37 jk | 19.75±1.43 h-j | 22.23±1.91 b-d | 改良潜力/% improvement potential | 34.30 | 43.43 | 36.41 |
LF2 | 31.67±2.49 bc | 22.55±1.44 ef | 18.95±2.63 b-d |
表3
基于叶主要生物活性物质进行单指标选择的青钱柳药用优株"
优选等级 class for plus tree selection | 项目 item | 总黄酮 total flavonoids | 总三萜 total triterpenoids | 水溶性多糖 water-soluble polysaccharides |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ级 | 入选标准含量/(mg·g-1) | >29.90 | >24.89 | >24.06 |
入选单株编号 | LC1、LC4、LC5、LF2、CP3 | CR6、CP3、LC2、LC4、CP1 | CR3、LF3、CR2、CR6、LC4、LF4、LS2 | |
入选株数 入选率/% | 5 15.2 | 5 15.2 | 7 21.2 | |
含量均值/(mg·g-1) | 32.40 | 25.34 | 25.13 | |
Ⅱ级 | 入选标准含量/(mg·g-1) | 25.78~29.90 | 21.00~24.89 | 21.45~24.06 |
入选单株编号 | CP5、CR7、LF3、CR3、CR5、LS5、LC7、 MT1、CP2、CR2、LS2、BA1、LC2、LS1 | LC1、CR5、LS2、BA1、CR2、BA2、MT2、 LF2、LF3、CP5、LS1、MT1 | LC5、CR7、MT3、CP3、LS1、LC8、LC7、 LF1、CR4、LC1、LS5、CP5 | |
入选株数 入选率/% | 14 42.4 | 12 36.4 | 12 36.4 | |
含量均值/(mg·g-1) | 27.67 | 22.72 | 22.52 |
表5
青钱柳叶主要生物活性物质含量的年度稳定性评价"
等级 class | 编号* code | 总黄酮 total flavonoids | 总三萜 total triterpenoids | 水溶性多糖 water soluble polysaccharide | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017年 | 2018年 | 2017年 | 2018年 | 2017年 | 2018年 | ||
多指标 选择优株 superior tree selected based on multi index | 1LC4 | 33.43±0.20 Aa | 31.52±1.03 Ba | 27.32±0.70 Ba | 21.62±0.57 Bb | 24.26±3.34 Aa | 21.57±1.23 Ab |
2CP3 | 30.57±0.84 Ba | 26.51±0.96 Cb | 29.08±0.76 Aa | 20.19±0.36 Cb | 22.91±1.37 ABa | 22.61±1.10 Aa | |
3CR6 | 25.22±0.54 Ca | 19.93±0.47 Eb | 30.12±0.28 Aa | 20.01±0.50 Cb | 24.46±1.90 Aa | 20.89±1.65 Ab | |
4LC1 | 34.62±1.68 Aa | 33.75±0.52 Aa | 24.68±0.49 Ca | 21.03±0.11 BCb | 21.92±3.86 ABa | 23.02±0.53 Aa | |
7CR2 | 27.43±0.73 Ca | 26.75±0.68 Ca | 22.87±0.21 Da | 23.58±0.36 Aa | 24.78±0.74 Aa | 22.61±1.74 Ab | |
9LS2 | 27.12±1.21 Ca | 23.43±0.96 Db | 23.24±1.19 CDa | 16.88±0.32 Db | 24.07±2.80 Aa | 24.11±1.54 Aa | |
10LC2 | 26.55±1.16 Ca | 19.46±0.29 Eb | 28.97±0.21 Aa | 22.93±0.60 Ab | 18.12±0.36 Ba | 21.95±1.72 Ab | |
均值mean | 29.28 Ba | 25.90 Cb | 26.61 Ba | 20.89 BCb | 19.39 Aba | 22.39 Ab | |
单指标选择 Ⅱ级优株 Ⅱ class superior tree selected based on single index | CR5 | 28.07±0.69 Aa | 20.45±0.81 Cb | 23.81±0.61 Aa | 19.07±0.59 Ab | 20.6±2.54 Bb | 22.52±0.60 BCa |
BA1 | 26.65±0.54 Ba | 19.89±0.51 Cb | 23.04±0.47 Aa | 17.87±0.43 Bb | 18.52±2.13 Cb | 30.91±1.15 Aa | |
CR4 | 21.99±0.46 Ca | 20.93±0.21 Ca | 19.46±0.44 Ca | 18.92±0.37 Aa | 22.02±2.10 Aa | 19.88±2.01 Db | |
LS5 | 27.89±0.82 Aa | 26.19±0.91 Aa | 18.76±0.92 Ca | 17.52±0.79 Ba | 21.90±2.95 Aa | 21.51±1.44 Ca | |
均值mean | 26.15 Ba | 21.87 Bb | 21.27 Ba | 18.35 ABb | 20.76 Bb | 23.70 Ba | |
未入选 not selected | LS3 | 16.91±0.34 Cb | 18.89±0.20 Ca | 16.67±1.26 Cb | 19.03±0.58 ABa | 18.93±0.29 BCb | 21.92±1.98 Ca |
CP6 | 24.88±0.80 Aa | 19.90±0.35 BCb | 17.59±1.18 BCa | 17.44±0.21 Ca | 18.14±1.45 Cb | 28.35±0.98 Aa | |
LF1 | 24.16±1.37 Ab | 21.94±0.34 Ab | 19.75±1.43 Aa | 19.61±0.30 Aa | 22.23±1.91 Aa | 23.41±1.45 Ba | |
均值mean | 21.98 Ba | 20.24 Ba | 18.00 Ba | 18.69 BCa | 19.77 Bb | 24.56 Ba |
表6
不同表型性状青钱柳优株叶片生物活性物质的含量及其相关性检验"
表型性状 phenotypic characters | 总黄酮含量 total flavonoids content | 总三萜含量 total triterpenoids content | 水溶性多糖含量 water-soluble polysaccharides content |
---|---|---|---|
BA(分枝角) | 25.67 | 22.84** | 19.64 |
LF(卷叶) | 26.09 | 20.27 | 22.57 |
LS(叶面积) | 24.63 | 19.54 | 21.39 |
CP(冠型扁平) | 24.60 | 20.42 | 19.85 |
CR(冠型饱满) | 26.09 | 21.17* | 23.49 |
LC(红叶) | 30.20** | 24.39** | 21.74 |
CK | 24.47 | 18.37 | 20.74 |
[1] | 岳喜良, 秦健, 洑香香, 等. 氮素水平对青钱柳叶片主要次生代谢物含量和抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020(2):35-42. |
YUE X L, QIN J, FU X X, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on secondary metabolite accumulation and antioxidant capacity of Cycolcurya paliurus(Batal.)Iljinskaja leaves[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020(2):35-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904048. | |
[2] | 刘洋, 秦健, 周明明, 等. 光质和基因型对青钱柳叶黄酮类化合物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,42(3):103-108. |
LIU Y, QIN J, ZHOU M M, et al. Influence of light quality and genetype on flavonoid accumulation in the leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018,42(3):103-108. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201707008. | |
[3] |
LIU Y, FANG S, YANG W, et al. Light quality affects flavonoid production and related gene expression in Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. J Photochem Photobiol B, 2018,179:66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.01.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.01.002 pmid: 29334625 |
[4] | 曹燕妮, 茆慧敏, 尚旭岚, 等. 冲泡条件对青钱柳茶主要内含物浸出规律的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(4):19-24. |
CAO Y N, MAO H M, SHANG X L, et al. Effect of brewing conditions on the leaching rate of Cyclocarya paliurus tea compounds[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017,41(4):19-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201609044. | |
[5] |
LIU Y, QIAN C, DING S, et al. Effect of light regime and provenance on leaf characteristics, growth and flavonoid accumulation in Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal) Iljinskaja coppices[J]. Botanical Studies, 2016,57(1):28. DOI: 10.1186/s40529-016-0145-7.
doi: 10.1186/s40529-016-0145-7 pmid: 28597438 |
[6] | CAO Y N, FANG S Z, FU X X, et al. Seasonal variation in phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) iljinskaja[J]. Forests, 2019,10(8):624. |
[7] | 邓波, 尚旭兰, 刘桂华, 等. 不同季节遮荫对青钱柳生长和主要次生代谢物积累的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017,39(9):66-75. |
DENG B, SHANG X L, LIU G H, et al. Effects of shading and season on growth and accumulation of major secondary metabolites in Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2017,39(9):66-75. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170144. | |
[8] | 童再康, 斯金平. 不同种源厚朴酚类物质含量变异与遗传的初步研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2000,13(3) : 257-261. |
TONG Z K, SI J P. Study on variation and inheritance of phenolic compound concentrations in Magnolia officinalis of different seed sources[J]. Forest Research, 2000,13(3):257-261. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2000.03.005. | |
[9] | 李永杰, 刘容秀, 田文仓, 等. 不同种源黄芩(子代)药用成分含量的地理变异研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2018,43(13) : 2664-2669. |
LI Y J, LIU R X, TIAN W C, et al. Study on geographical variation of medicinal ingredients contents in Scutellaria baicalensis from different provenances[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2018,43(13):2664-2669. DOI: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20180510.009. | |
[10] | 谷战英, 王承南, 黄瑞春. 银杏不同种源主要器官成分含量比较分析研究[J]. 经济林研究, 2003,21(3) : 41-43. |
GU Z Y, WANG C N, HUANG R C. Comparative analysis of Ginkgo organ contents from different seed sources[J]. Economic Forest Researches, 2003,21(3):41-43. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2003.03.012. | |
[11] | 刘振鹏. 铁皮石斛不同家系叶片主要功效成分变异规律研究[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2015. |
LIU Z P. Study on the variation pattern of main functional components in different strains of Dendrobium officinale leaves[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2015. | |
[12] | 程广有, 高峰, 葛春华, 等. 中国境内东北红豆杉天然群体紫杉醇含量变异规律[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005 (4) : 7-11. |
CHENG G Y, GAO F, GE C H, et al. Variation regularity of taxol contentin natural populations of Taxus cuspidata Sieb. Et Zucc. in china[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2005(4):7-11. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2005.04.002. | |
[13] | 楚秀丽, 杨万霞, 方升佐, 等. 不同种源青钱柳叶黄酮类物质含量的动态变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011,33(2) :130-133. |
CHU X L, YANG W X, FANG S Z, et al. Dynamic change of flavonoids content in Cyclocarya paliurus leaves from different provenances[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011,33(2):130-133. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2011.02.021. | |
[14] | CAO Y, DENG B, FANG S, et al. Genotypic variation in tree growth and selected flavonoids in leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. Southern Forests, 2018,80(1):67-74. DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2016.1274862. |
[15] | 杨万霞, 佘诚棋, 方升佐. 青钱柳叶中黄酮类化合物的地理变异[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2009,26(4) : 522-527. |
YANG W X, SHE C Q, FANG S Z. Geographic variation of flavonoid compounds in Cyclocarya paliurus leaves[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2009,26(4):522-527. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2009.04.012. | |
[16] |
YANG L, PEI C. Geographic variation in the chemical composition and antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds from Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal) Iljinskaja leaves.[J]. Molecules, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102440.
doi: 10.3390/molecules26030649 pmid: 33513715 |
[17] | 李彬彬, 侯智霞, 杨俊枫, 等. ‘北陆’蓝莓叶片变色过程中类黄酮和糖的变化特性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018,20(3):20-29. |
LI B B, HOU Z X, YANG J F, et al. Variations of flavonoids and soluble sugars in ‘northland’ blueberry leaf during the color changing process[J]. J Agric Sci Technol, 2018,20(3):20-29. DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0210. | |
[18] | 李崇晖, 黄少华, 黄明忠, 等. 文心兰唇瓣花色表型及类黄酮色素组成[J]. 热带作物学报, 2013,34(6) :1133-1138. |
LI C H, HUANG S H, HUANG M Z, et al. Labellum colors of Oncidium Alliance and their flavonoid composition[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2013,34(6):1133-1138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2013.06.024. | |
[19] | 徐朝斌, 钟全林, 程栋梁, 等. 江西4刨花楠种源苗木叶片表型性状与生物量分配的比较[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2012,39(6) :920-924. |
XU C B, ZHONG Q L, CHENG D L, et al. Comparison of leaf phenotypic traits and biomass allocation of different provenances of Machilus pauhoi[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2012,39(6):920-924. DOI: 0.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.2012.06.029. | |
[20] |
CLARK B, BULLOCK S. Shedding light on plant competition: modelling the influence of plant morphology on light capture (and vice versa)[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2007,244(2):208-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.032.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.032 pmid: 16978653 |
[21] | 李峰卿, 陈焕伟, 周志春, 等. 红豆树优树种子和幼苗性状的变异分析及优良家系的初选[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2018,27(2):57-65. |
LI F Q, CHEN H W, ZHOU Z C, et al. Analysis on variation of seed and seedling traits of superior trees of Ormosia hosiei and primary screening of optimum family[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2018,27(2):57-65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2018.02.08. | |
[22] | 曾祥艳, 陈金艳, 廖健明, 等. 广西多穗柯叶片性状变异及幼苗生长量研究[J]. 广西植物, 2015,35(6) :885-890. |
ZENG X Y, CHEN J Y, LIAO J M, et al. Variation of leaf traits and seedling growth of Lithocarpus polystachyus in Guangxi[J]. Guihaia, 2015,35(6):885-890. DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201404032. | |
[23] | 郝志, 田纪春, 姜小苓. 小麦主要亲缘种籽粒的Fe、Zn、Cu、Mn含量及其聚类分析[J]. 作物学报, 2007,33(11):1834-1839. |
HAO Z, TIAN J C, JIANG X L. Analyses of Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn contents in drains and grouping based on the contents for main kindred germplasm of common wheat(Triticum aestivum)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007,33(11):1834-1839. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.11.015. | |
[24] | WEN H, AN X, HAI N, et al. Optimised ultrasonic-assisted extraction of flavonoids from Folium eucommiae and evaluation of antioxidant activity in multi-test systems in vitro[J]. Food Chemistry, 2009,114(3):1147-1154. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.079. |
[25] | FU X X, ZHOU X D, DENG B, et al. Seasonal and genotypic variation of water-soluble polysaccharide content in leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. South For:a J For Sci, 2015,77(3):231-236. DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2015.1010698. |
[26] |
FAN J P, HE C H. Simultaneous quantification of three major bioactive triterpene acids in the leaves of Diospyros kaki by high-performance liquid chromatography method[J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2006,41(3):950-956. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.01.044.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.01.044 pmid: 16527439 |
[27] | 王友生, 林秀凤, 李海燕, 等. 南方红豆杉药用型优树选择研究[J]. 林业勘察设计, 2012(1):97-101. |
WANG Y S, LIN X F, LI H Y, et al. Study on the selection of medicinal superior trees of Taxus chinensis[J]. Forestry Prospect and Design, 2012(1):97-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2180.2012.01.025. | |
[28] | 彭兴民, 吴疆翀, 程金焕, 等. 印楝农药原料林优树选择方法与标准[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2010,30(3):265-269. |
PENG X M, WU J C, CHEN J H, et al. A study on method and standard of Azadirachta indica superior tree selection for pesticide raw material production plantations[J]. J Fujian Coll For, 2010,30(3):265-269. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2010.03.016. | |
[29] | 孙玉琴, 陈中坚, 李一果, 等. 三七的植株性状差异观察[J]. 现代中药研究与实践, 2003,17(S1) : 16-17. |
SUN Y X, CHEN Z J, LI Y G, et al. Observation on the difference of plant characters of Panax notoginseng[J]. Research and Practice on Chinese Medicines, 2003,17(S1):16-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6427.2003.z1.006. | |
[30] | 方升佐, 洑香香. 青钱柳资源培育与开发利用的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007(1) : 95-100. |
FANG S Z, FU X X. Progress and prospects on silviculture and utilization of Cylclocarya paliurus resources[J]. J Nanjing For Uni(Nat Sci Ed), 2007,31(1):95-100. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2007.01.023. | |
[31] | 林源, 陈培, 周明明, 等. 天然居群青钱柳叶主要生物活性物质及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,44(2):10-16. |
LIN Y, CHEN P, ZHOU M M, et al. Key bioactive substances and their antioxidant activities in Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal) Iljinskaja leaves collected from natural populations[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020,44(2):10-16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006. | |
[32] | CHEN X L, YU W, HU Z, et al. Localization and dynamic change of saponins in Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.)lljinskkaja[J]. Plos One, 2019,14(10):1-10.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223421. |
[1] | 陶涛, 刘耀辉, 薛中俊, 高越, 袁璐鸿, 郑芬, 吴炜, 黄界颍. 7株香榧优株坚果表型性状与品质特性的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 37-44. |
[2] | 张赟齐, 董宁光, 郝艳宾, 陈永浩, 张俊佩, 侯智霞, 苏淑钗, 吴佳庆, 齐建勋. 109份丰产核桃单株坚果表型多样性分析及性状评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(3): 87-96. |
[3] | 方升佐. 青钱柳产业发展历程及资源培育研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6): 115-126. |
[4] | 张庆源, 田野, 王淼, 翟政, 周诗朝. 美洲黑杨与青杨杂交F1代苗期表型性状的分化及其类型划分[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5): 40-48. |
[5] | 朱显亮, 周长品, 贾翠蓉, 翁启杰, 李发根. 尾细桉生长和木材密度关联SNP挖掘与候选基因定位[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4): 143-150. |
[6] | 刘曙光,段佩玲,张利霞,段祥光,郭丽丽,刘伟,侯小改. 氮素形态对‘凤丹’表型性状、光合及产量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(04): 161-168. |
[7] | 麦宝莹,洪舟,徐大平,罗明道,张宁南,黄锡钊. 不同家系交趾黄檀种子萌发及幼苗生长差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(02): 153-160. |
[8] | 张琳,郭丽丽,郭大龙,侯小改. 牡丹杂交F1代性状分离规律及混合遗传分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(06): 51-60. |
[9] | 刘志龙,马跃,谌红辉,刘光金,李洪果,全昭孔,莫慧华,蒙明君. 顶果木天然林优树的选择标准[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(05): 153-156. |
[10] | 靳高中,任华东,姚小华,王开良,杨水平. 滇西腾冲红花油茶天然居群种实表型性状变异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(06): 53-58. |
[11] | 侯伯鑫1,林峰1,余格非1,张新华2,向绍坚3. 福建柏地理种源试验幼林期综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 30(03): 41-46. |
[12] | 周雄尊;В.И.雅高金. 苏联树木绿冠化学加工概况[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 1991, 15(03): 82-85. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||