社会经济地位下城市绿地可达性对居民心理健康的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206004

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 248-256.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206004

社会经济地位下城市绿地可达性对居民心理健康的影响

杨赫¹(), 米锋²^,^*()

1.安徽农业大学经济管理学院,安徽合肥 230036
2.北京林业大学经济管理学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2022-06-03 修回日期:2023-07-24 出版日期:2024-01-30 发布日期:2024-01-24
通讯作者: 米锋
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(重点培育项目)(2021SJZ01)

Associations between urban green space accessibility and mental health of residents from the perspective of socio-economic status

YANG He¹(), MI Feng²^,^*()

1. School of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2022-06-03 Revised:2023-07-24 Online:2024-01-30 Published:2024-01-24
Contact: MI Feng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】快速城市化引发的环境社会问题日益威胁着城市居民健康,优化配置城市公园绿地已成为特大城市建成环境干预居民心理健康的重要途径。本研究结合社会经济条件,从可达性角度分析城市绿地环境健康效益。【方法】基于“自然-心理-社会”的理论分析,运用天津市1 559份居民调查数据,构建有序Logit与调节效应模型探讨了城市公园绿地对居民心理健康的影响,并考察了社会经济地位的调节效应在其中引发的健康不平等问题。【结果】基准回归结果表明,提高城市公园绿地可达性能够正向影响居民心理健康,且这种正向影响呈现出由中心城区向城市外围不断衰减的趋势。调节效应分析发现,社会经济地位在城市公园绿地可达性促进居民心理健康的关系中具有正向调节作用,社会经济地位显著强化了公园绿地可达性对居民心理健康的正向影响。异质性分析发现,城市公园绿地可达性的心理健康促进作用,在不同户籍、性别及年龄群体间存在异质性,且在社会经济地位的调节作用下,城市相对于农村、女性相对于男性、老年人相对于青年人更容易发生公园绿地可达性差异引发的心理健康不平等问题。【结论】为提升全民心理健康水平,应从优化绿地规划布局、提升绿地服务质量及强化绿地管理制度3个方面,促进城市公园绿地更加公平、高效地发挥心理健康效益。

关键词: 城市公园绿地, 可达性, 社会经济地位, 居民心理健康, 环境正义

Abstract:

【Objective】Environmental and social problems caused by rapid urbanization are increasingly threatening the health of residents, and the optimal allocation of urban park green spaces has become an essential strategy for the built environment of megacities to contribute to mental health positively. This study is to analyze the environmental and health benefits of urban green spaces from the perspective of accessibility, taking into account socio-economic conditions. 【Method】Based on the theoretical analysis of “nature-psychology-society”, an ordered logit and moderating effect model was constructed to explore the impact of urban park green spaces on mental health and to investigate the health inequalities resulting from the moderating effect of socio-economic status. 【Result】The baseline regression results show that improving the accessibility of urban park green spaces can positively influence mental health, and this positive effect tends to decay from the city center to its periphery. The moderating effect analysis revealed that socio-economic status had a positive moderating effect on the relationship between urban park accessibility and the mental health of residents, and significantly strengthened the positive effect of park accessibility on mental health. Heterogeneity analysis revealed that the mental health promotion effect of urban park accessibility was heterogeneous across household registration, gender, and age group and moderated by socioe-conomic status. Urban versus rural, female versus male, and elderly versus youth are more likely to suffer from mental health inequality risks induced by differences in park accessibility. 【Conclusion】To improve the mental health of all urban residents, three aspects should be adopted: optimizing green space layout planning, improving the quality of green space services, and strengthening the management system of green spaces.

Key words: urban park green spaces, accessibility, socioe-conomic status, resident mental health, environmental justice

中图分类号:

TU986

杨赫,米锋. 社会经济地位下城市绿地可达性对居民心理健康的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 248-256.

YANG He, MI Feng. Associations between urban green space accessibility and mental health of residents from the perspective of socio-economic status[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(1): 248-256.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206004.

图/表 6

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

参考文献 33

[1]	陈阳, 张琳琳, 马仁锋, 等. 城市绿色空间可达性与居民分布的空间匹配与影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(24):9971-9980.
	CHEN Y, ZHANG L L, MA R F, et al. Spatial match between urban residents’ distribution and green space accessibility and its driving force[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(24):9971-9980.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202106151586.
[2]	张丹婷, 陈崇贤, 洪波, 等. 城市绿地健康效益的群体差异及绿化投入影响研究[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(4):651-658.
	ZHANG D T, CHEN C X, HONG B, et al. Group differences in urban green space health benefits and the impact of greening control regulations[J]. J Northwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 49(4):651-658.DOI: 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2019-04-017.
[3]	董玉萍, 刘合林, 齐君. 城市绿地与居民健康关系研究进展[J]. 国际城市规划, 2020, 35(5):70-79.
	DONG Y P, LIU H L, QI J. Progress of studies on the relationship between urban green space and public health[J]. Urban Plan Int, 2020, 35(5):70-79.DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2019.651.
[4]	王甫勤, 马瑜寅. 社会经济地位、社会资本与健康不平等[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 34(6):59-66.
	WANG F Q, MA Y Y. Socioeconomic status,social capital and health inequality[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol (Soc Sci Ed), 2020, 34(6):59-66.DOI: 10.19648/j.cnki.jhustss1980.2020.06.07.
[5]	BARTON J, PRETTY J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44(10):3947-3955.DOI: 10.1021/es903183r.
[6]	辛昱铮, 陆伟, 孙佩锦. 基于公众心理健康视角的绿色空间研究与展望[J]. 风景园林, 2022, 29(3):79-85.
	XIN Y Z, LU W, SUN P J. Research and prospect of green space from the perspective of public mental health[J]. Landsc Archit, 2022, 29(3):79-85.DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.03.0079.07.
[7]	KELLERT S, WILSON E McVAY S, et al. The biophilia hypothesis[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1993.
[8]	HAAHTELA T. A biodiversity hypothesis[J]. Allergy, 2019, 74(8):1445-1456.DOI: 10.1111/all.13763.
[9]	AERTS R, HONNAY O, VAN NIEUWENHUYSE A. Biodiversity and human health:mechanisms and evidence of the positive health effects of diversity in nature and green spaces[J]. Br Med Bull, 2018, 127(1):5-22.DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldy021.
[10]	ROOK G A. Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment:an ecosystem service essential to health[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110(46):18360-18367.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313731110.
[11]	KAPLAN S. The restorative benefits of nature:toward an integrative framework[J]. J Environ Psychol, 1995, 15(3):169-182.DOI: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
[12]	时珍, 邢露华, 郑琳琳, 等. 城市公园绿地游憩供需协同度评价及优化策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2):197-204.
	SHI Z, XING L H, ZHENG L L, et al. Evaluations and optimization strategies of synergy degree of park green space based on balance of supply and demand for recreation[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(2):197-204. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004036
[13]	楚晗, 谢涤湘, 常江. 国外环境绅士化研究进展与启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(4):170-180.
	CHU H, XIE D X, CHANG J. Environmental gentrification research in foreign countries: progress and implications[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(4):170-180. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.04.202105.
[14]	史春云, 陶玉国. 城市绿地空间环境公平研究进展[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(3):621-630.
	SHI C Y, TAO Y G. Literature review on environmental justice of urban green space[J]. World Reg Stud, 2020, 29(3):621-630.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.03.2019082.
[15]	AMBREY C L. Greenspace,physical activity and well-being in Australian capital cities:how does population size moderate the relationship?[J]. Public Health, 2016, 133:38-44.DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.11.013.
[16]	COLDWELL D F, EVANS K L. Visits to urban green-space and the countryside associate with different components of mental well-being and are better predictors than perceived or actual local urbanisation intensity[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2018, 175:114-122.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.007.
[17]	屠星月, 黄甘霖, 邬建国. 城市绿地可达性和居民福祉关系研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2):421-431.
	TU X Y, HUANG G L, WU J G. Review of the relationship between urban greenspace accessibility and human well-being[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(2):421-431.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201802030294.
[18]	王志鹏, 王薇, 邢思懿. 城市公园绿地特征和使用方式与人群健康关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):223-231.
	WANG Z P, WANG W, XING S Y. A study on the relationship between the characteristics and usage of urban park green space and population health[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(5):223-231.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006004.
[19]	BERMAN M G, KROSS E, KRPAN K M, et al. Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression[J]. J Affect Disord, 2012, 140(3):300-305.DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012.
[20]	ZHANG J M, YUE W Z, FAN P L, et al. Measuring the accessibility of public green spaces in urban areas using web map services[J]. Appl Geogr, 2021, 126:102381.DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102381.
[21]	浩飞龙, 张浩然, 王士君. 基于多交通模式的长春市公园绿地空间可达性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(4):695-704.
	HAO F L, ZHANG H R, WANG S J. Spatial accessibility of urban green space in central area of Changchun:an analysis based on the multi-trip model[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2021, 41(4):695-704.DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.04.016.
[22]	谢涤湘, 谢晓亮, 常江. 基于文献计量的公园绿地可达性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(18):7475-7483.
	XIE D X, XIE X L, CHANG J. Accessibility analysis of park green space based on bibliometrics[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(18):7475-7483.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202105271397.
[23]	XIAO Y, WANG Z, LI Z G, et al. An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai: implications for the social equity in urban China[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2017, 157:383-393.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.007.
[24]	国家统计局. 经济社会发展统计图表:第七次全国人口普查超大、特大城市人口基本情况[J]. 求是, 2021(18):79-79.
	National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical tables and graphs on economic and social development: basic information on the population of megacities and mega-cities in the Seventh National Population Census[J]. Seeking Truth, 2021(18):79-79. http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2021-09/16/c_1127863567.htm.
[25]	王宇. 智能手机使用对老年人主观健康的影响研究:基于2016年中国老年社会追踪调查(CLASS)数据[J]. 人口与发展, 2020, 26(6):65-75,112.
	WANG Y. Study on the effect of smartphone use on the subjective health of the elderly: base on the China longitudinal aging social survey of 2016[J]. Popul Dev, 2020, 26(6):65-75,112.
[26]	ADLER N E. Socioeconomic inequalities in health[J]. JAMA, 1993, 269(24):3140.DOI: 10.1001/jama.1993.03500240084031.
[27]	崔红志. 农村老年人主观幸福感影响因素分析:基于全国8省(区)农户问卷调查数据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015(4):72-80.
	CUI H Z. Analysis on the influencing factors of subjective well-being of the rural elderly:based on the survey data of farmers in eight provinces (regions)[J]. Chin Rural Econ, 2015(4):72-80.
[28]	王兰, 孙文尧, 吴莹. 主观感知的城市环境对居民健康的影响研究:基于全国60个县市的大样本调查[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(2):55-64.
	WANG L, SUN W Y, WU Y. Study on the impact of subjective perception of urban environment on residents’ health:based on a large sample survey of 60 counties and cities in China[J]. Hum Geogr, 2020, 35(2):55-64.DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.02.007.
[29]	范红丽, 杨嘉乐, 张晓慧. 社会文化组织对农村居民幸福感的影响:基于中国劳动力动态调查数据的分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2022(4):170-184.
	FAN H L, YANG J L, ZHANG X H. The impact of social cultural organizations on rural residents’ happiness:an analysis based on data analysis from CLDS survey[J]. China Rural Surv, 2022(4):170-184.
[30]	杜本峰, 穆跃瑄, 盛见. 老年人自评健康的预测因素、贡献程度及群体差异[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2022, 15(4):8-16.
	DU B F, MU Y X, SHENG J. Predictive factors,contributions and group difference of self-rated health of older people[J]. Chin J Heath Policy, 2022, 15(4):8-16.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2022.04.002.
[31]	杨俊, 鲍雅君, 金翠, 等. 大连城市绿地可达性对房价影响的差异性分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(12):1952-1960.
	YANG J, BAO Y J, JIN C, et al. The impact of urban green space accessibility on house prices in Dalian City[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2018, 38(12):1952-1960.DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.12.002.
[32]	杨赫, 曾智, 陈天宇, 等. 居民需求视角下超大城市绿色空间的公平性研究——来自天津市1 655个微观样本的证据[J]. 城市问题, 2021(10): 36-45.
	YANG H, ZENG Z, CHEN T Y, et al. Research on the fairness of green space in megacity from the perspective of resident demand:evidence from 1 655 micro-samples in Tianjin[J]. Urban Probl, 2021(10):36-45.DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.211004.
[33]	何安明, 万娇娇, 惠秋平. 手机依赖与青少年心理健康的关系:学业倦怠的中介作用和应对方式的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3):391-398.
	HE A M, WAN J J, HUI Q P. The relationship between mobile phone dependence and mental health in adolescents:the mediating role of academic burnout and the moderating role of coping style[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2022, 38(3):391-398.DOI: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.03.10.

特征 characteristic	类别 category	访问绿地频数 frequency	比例/% proportion	特征 characteristic	类别 category	访问绿地频数 frequency	比例/% proportion
性别 gender	男	690	44.26	受教育程度 educational attainment	未上过学	24	1.54
	女	869	55.74		小学	47	3.01
年龄/a age	<18	143	9.17		初中	177	11.35
	18~30	485	31.11		高中或中专	383	24.57
	31~40	409	26.23		大专或本科	811	52.02
	41~50	202	12.96		研究生及以上	117	7.51
	51~65	209	13.40	年均收入水平/万元 average annual income	<8	412	26.43
	>65	111	7.12		[8,15)	553	35.47
婚姻状况 marriage status	已婚	1 011	64.85		[15,30)	417	26.75
	其他	548	35.15		[30,50)	128	8.21
户籍类型 household type	城市	1 226	78.64		[50,100)	38	2.44
	农村	333	21.36		≥100	11	0.70

类型 type		变量 variable		变量说明及赋值 variable description and assignment		平均值 mean	标准差 SD
被解释变量 explained variable		居民自评健康(Y)		很差=1;较差=2;一般=3;较好=4;很好=5		3.74	0.83
核心解释变量 core explanatory variable		公园绿地可达性(X)		10 km以外=1;[5,10)km=2;[3,5)km=3;[500 m,3 km)=4;500 m以内=5		3.79	0.99
调节变量 adjustment variable		社会经济地位(M) socio-economic status	受教育程度	未上过学=0;小学=1;初中=2;高中或中专=3;大专或本科=4;研究生及以上=5	4.45		1.00
			职业类型	退休=0;学生=1;其他=2;农民、工人、职员=3;企业管理人员=4;专业人士=5;公职人员=6	2.29		1.61
			年均收入	<8万元=1;[8,15)万元=2;[15,30)万元=3;[30,50)万元=4;[50~100)万元=5;≥100万元=6	2.27		1.06
控制变量 (C) control variable	个体层面 individual dimension		性别	男=1;女=0	0.44		0.50
			年龄	18岁以下=1;18~30岁=2;31~40岁=3;41~50岁=4;51~65岁=5;65岁以上=6	3.12		1.40
			婚姻状况	已婚=1;其他=0	0.65		0.48
			户籍类型	城镇=1;农村=0	0.79		0.41
	家庭层面 household dimension		房屋类型	买房=1;租房=0	1.81		0.40
			居住时长	<1年=1;[1,3)年=2;[3,5)年=3;[5,10)年=4; ≥10年=5	4.26		1.27
			家中老人数	0人=0;1人=1;2人=2;3人=3;4人=4;5人及以上=5	0.75		1.02
			家中儿童数	0人=0;1人=1;2人=2;3人=3;4人=4;5人及以上=5	0.64		0.72
	公园绿地层面 greenfield dimension		游览时长	<1 h=1;[1,1.5) h=2;[1.5,2)=3;[2,2.5) h=4;≥2.5 h=5	2.56		1.13
	公园绿地层面 greenfield dimension		月游览频次	0~2次=1; 3~4次=2;5~9次=3;10~20次=4;≥20次=5	2.58		1.33

自评心理健康 self-assessed mental health	基准模型估计 baseline model estimation				调节效应模型估计 moderating effect model estimation
自评心理健康 self-assessed mental health	全样本 complete sample	中心城区 center city	环城区 ring city	远郊区 outer suburbs	全样本 complete sample	中心城区 center city	环城区 ring city	远郊区 outer suburbs city
X_distance	0.194^*** (3.31)	0.325^*** (3.79)	0.273^* (1.76)	0.068 (0.65)	0.155^** (2.08)	0.266^** (2.19)	0.329^** (2.28)	0.061 (0.23)
M_i					0.118^* (1.67)	0.100^*** (2.59)	0.126^* (1.71)	0.274 (0.70)
X_distance×M_i					0.013^** (2.26)	0.023^*** (2.60)	0.056^* (1.94)	0.048 (0.51)
C	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
样本数samples	1 559	619	394	546	1 559	619	394	546
R²	0.008 1	0.014 3	0.014 3	0.010 3	0.008 6	0.018 9	0.025 6	0.011 4

自评心理健康 self-assessed mental health	替换被解释变量 substitute explained variable	替换核心变量 substitute core explanatory variable	替换调节变量 substitute adjustment variable
X_distance	0.244^* (1.95)		0.178^*** (2.99)
M_i	0.052^** (2.30)	0.192^** (2.13)
X_distance×M_i	0.020^** (2.45)
M_average			0.041^** (2.19)
X_distance×M_average			0.003^** (2.08)
X_time		0.233^* (1.88)
X_time×M_i		0.069^** (2.49)
C	控制	控制	控制
样本数samiples	1 559	1 559	1 559
R²	0.019 8	0.006 8	0.008 8

自评心理健康 self-assessed mental health	户口 household		性别 gender		年龄 age
自评心理健康 self-assessed mental health	农村 rural	城市 urban	男性 male	女性 female	青少年 adolescent	青年 youth	中年 middle age	老年 old age
X_distance	0.073 (0.22)	0.137^* (1.84)	0.048^** (2.23)	0.184^** (2.91)	0.252 (0.40)	0.278^** (2.22)	0.252^* (1.87)	0.461^** (2.54)
M_i	0.303 (0.59)	0.062^** (2.28)	0.076 (1.28)	0.174^*** (2.28)	0.890 (0.57)	0.214 (0.72)	0.196^** (2.52)	3.506^** (2.03)
X_distance×M_i	0.042 (0.33)	0.016^** (2.29)	0.036^** (2.54)	0.014^*** (3.19)	0.080 (0.23)	0.045 (0.60)	0.061^* (1.66)	0.778^*** (2.93)
C	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
样本数samples	333	1 226	690	869	143	894	411	111
R²	0.022 7	0.009 2	0.010 4	0.014 9	0.057 5	0.013 3	0.037 5	0.056 8

社会经济地位下城市绿地可达性对居民心理健康的影响

Associations between urban green space accessibility and mental health of residents from the perspective of socio-economic status

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 33

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	许浩, 黄婷, 刘伟, 王浩. 长三角风景名胜区空间分布与可达性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 294-303.
[2]	侯秀娟, 闫晓云, 王波, 李心愿, 包红光. 夏季干旱半干旱城市公园绿地空气负离子与空气颗粒物变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 212-220.
[3]	赵梦蕾, 姚正阳, 毛达. 基于i2SFCA的新乡市主城区公园绿地空间步行可达性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 227-232.
[4]	张金光,赵兵. 基于可达性的城市公园选址及布局优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 151-158.
[5]	叶洁楠,王浩. 城市公园绿地灾时避难功能结构和空间布局转换的可行性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 175-181.
[6]	刘源,张凯云,王浩. 城市公园绿地整体性发展分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(06): 101-106.
[7]	严军. 城市广场的物质环境建构[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2004, 28(01): 61-65.