西藏野生石榴果实重要性状与综合评价

樊瑶羽薇, 仁增朗加, 董建梅, 任媛, 葛大朋, 招雪晴, 苑兆和

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 73-80.

PDF(1883 KB)
PDF(1883 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 73-80. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2006.202203035
专题报道:乡村振兴视域下经济林果培育专题(Ⅱ)(执行主编 李维林 方升佐)

西藏野生石榴果实重要性状与综合评价

作者信息 +

Comprehensive evaluation on important traits of wild pomegranate fruits from Tibet

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】对西藏干热河谷地区采集的21个野生石榴单株果实样本,进行综合分析与评价,为野生石榴种质资源的保存表型数据库提供资料,也为选育优良石榴品种提供科学依据。【方法】采用游标卡尺、电子天平、质构仪和蒽酮比色法等测定21个石榴样本的果实外观和内在品质,并进行相关性分析;采用“合理-满意度”和多维价值理论合并规则的综合评价方法,将单果质量、果形指数、果皮厚度、籽粒硬度、百粒质量、出籽率、可溶性糖、可溶性固形物、可滴定酸、维生素C含量、糖酸比和固酸比等12个指标进行对比分析和综合评价。【结果】格布5号果型指数最大;军拥1号单果质量最小,果皮最薄,百粒质量最小,糖酸比最低;则拉1号的果皮厚度最大;昌西1号百粒质量最大;叶巴1号出籽率最大;古拉3号出籽率最低;古拉1号可溶性固形物和可溶性糖含量最高;昌西3号维生素C含量最高;珠拉1号糖酸比和固酸比最大。部分指标存在显著(P<0.05)或极显著(P<0.01)正相关或负相关;合成“合理-满意度”最高的为珠拉1号。【结论】21个野生石榴样本间的果实品质差异明显,野生石榴大多具有果小、硬籽、较酸的特点,且样本间的果实品质差异明显,从表型层面展现了野生石榴资源丰富的遗传变异性。从最终合成的“合理-满意度”来看,珠拉1号的整体果实内外品质性状最佳,可进行引种,选育。

Abstract

【Objective】The fruit samples of 21 wild pomegranate plants collected in the dry-hot valley area of Tibet were comprehensively analyzed and evaluated to provide information for phenotypic database of wild pomegranate germplasms and provide scientific basis for breeding excellent pomegranate varieties.【Method】The fruit external and internal qualities of 21 pomegranate samples were determined by vernier caliper, electronic balance, texture analyzer and anthrone colorimetry, and the correlation analysis was carried out. Based on the comprehensive evaluation methods including ‘reasonable satisfaction’ and multidimensional value theory, 12 indexes, such as single fruit weight, fruit shape index, peel thickness, seed hardness, 100-aril weight, seed yield, soluble sugar content, soluble solids content, titratable acid content, vitamin C content, sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio were selected to analyze and evaluate comprehensively.【Result】The fruit shape index of Gebu 5 was the largest. Junyong 1 had the smallest single fruit weight, the thinnest peel, the smallest 100-aril weight, and the lowest sugar-acid ratio. The peel thickness of Zela 1 was the largest; Changxi 1 had the largest 100-aril weight; the seed yield of Yeba 1 was the highest while Gula 3 the lowest. The content of soluble solids and soluble sugar in Gula 1 was the highest. Changxi 3 had the highest vitamin C content; sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio of Zhula 1 were the largest. Correlations between some indexes were significant (P<0.05) or extremely significant (P < 0.01) positive or negative. The highest synthetic ‘reasonable satisfaction’ was Zhula 1. 【Conclusion】The fruit qualities of 21 wild pomegranate samples were significantly different. Most of wild pomegranates were characterized by small fruit, hard seed and high content of acids, indicating a rich genetic variability of wild pomegranate resources at the phenotypic level. According to the results of final synthetic ‘reasonable-satisfaction’, the overall fruit external and internal quality traits of Zhula 1 are optimal, which can be used as resources for introduction and selective breeding.

关键词

石榴 / 果实品质 / 相关性分析 / 多维价值理论

Key words

Punica granatum (pomegranate) / fruit quality / correlation analysis / multidimensional value theory

引用本文

导出引用
樊瑶羽薇, 仁增朗加, 董建梅, . 西藏野生石榴果实重要性状与综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2023, 47(4): 73-80 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2006.202203035
FAN Yaoyuwei, Renzeng Langjia, DONG Jianmei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on important traits of wild pomegranate fruits from Tibet[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2023, 47(4): 73-80 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2006.202203035
中图分类号: S665.4   

参考文献

[1]
赵琳, 郎南军, 郑科, 等. 云南干热河谷生态环境特性研究[J]. 林业调查规划, 2006, 31(3):114-117.
ZHAO L, LANG N J, ZHENG K, et al. A study on eco-environmental characteristics of dry and hot valley of Yunnan Province[J]. For Invent Plan, 2006, 31(3):114-117.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2006.03.029.
[2]
刘方炎, 李昆, 孙永玉, 等. 横断山区干热河谷气候及其对植被恢复的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(12):1386-1391.
LIU F Y, LI K, SUN Y Y, et al. Effects of climate on vegetaion recovery in dry-hot valleys of Hengduan Mountainous region in southwest China[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2010, 19(12):1386-1391.
[3]
张荣祖. 横断山区干旱河谷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992:116-131.
ZHANG R Z. The dry valleys of the Hengduan Mountains region[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1992:116-131.
[4]
李保印. 石榴[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004:1-20.
LI B Y. Pomegranate[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2004:1-20.
[5]
GRAHAM S A, HALL J, SYTSMA K, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the Lythraceae based on four gene regions and morphology[J]. Int J Plant Sci, 2005, 166(6):995-1017.DOI: 10.1086/432631.
[6]
KHEYRODIN H. Important of pomegranates in Iran[J]. Int J Res Stud Agric Sci, 2017, 3(10):1-9.DOI: 10.20431/2454-6224.0310001.
[7]
JAIN K, DESAI N. Pomegranate the cash crop of India:a comprehensive review on agricultural practices and diseases[J]. Int J Hea Sci Res, 2018, 8(5):315-336.
[8]
AKPAROV Z I, BAYRAMOVA D B, MUSTAFAYEVA Z P, et al. Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genetic diversity in Azerbaijan[J]. Acta Hortic, 2015(1089):253-256.DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1089.32.
[9]
SHAYGANNIA E, BAHMANI M, ZAMANZAD B, et al. A review study on Punica granatum L.[J]. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med, 2016, 21(3):221-227.DOI: 10.1177/2156587215598039.
[10]
段盛烺, 宗学普, 刘效义, 等. 西藏果树资源考察初报[J]. 园艺学报, 1983, 10(4):217-224.
DUAN S L, ZONG X P, LIU X Y, et al. Preliminary report on the fruit germplasm resources in the autonomous region of Xizang[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 1983, 10(4):217-224.
[11]
李乡旺, 毛品一, 尹秉高, 等. 西藏古树的初步研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 1991, 11(2):134-138.
LI X W, MAO P Y, YIN B G, et al. A preliminary study on ancient trees of Tibet[J]. J Southwest For Coll, 1991, 11(2):134-138.
[12]
邓健康, 刘璇, 吴昕烨, 等. 基于层次分析和灰色关联度法的苹果(等外果)汁品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报, 2017, 17(4):197-208.
DENG J K, LIU X, WU X Y, et al. Quality evaluation of apple(substandard) juice from different cultivars based on analytic hierarchy process and grey interconnect degree analysis[J]. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol, 2017, 17(4):197-208.DOI: 10.16429/j.1009-7848.2017.04.025.
[13]
孙颖, 刘儒, 雷小林, 等. 日本野漆树果实品质的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(4):38-43.
SUN Y, LIU R, LEI X L, et al. Grey relativity analysis on seed quality of introduced wild sumac[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2017, 37(4):38-43.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.04.007.
[14]
NAFEES M, JASKANI M J, AHMAD S, et al. Biochemical diversity in wild and cultivated pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in Pakistan[J]. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol, 2017, 92(2):199-205.DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2016.1252250.
[15]
陆新华, 孙德权, 吴青松, 等. 12个泰国菠萝品种的果实品质评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(12):2205-2208.
LU X H, SUN D Q, WU Q S, et al. Evaluation on fruit quality of 12 pineapple cultivars introduced from Thailand[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2011, 32(12):2205-2208.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2011.12.001.
[16]
张志良. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社,1990.
ZHANG Z L. Experimental instruction of plant physiology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press,1990.
[17]
PARKER A K, HOFMANN R W, VAN LEEUWEN C, et al. Manipulating the leaf area to fruit mass ratio alters the synchrony of total soluble solids accumulation and titratable acidity of grape berries[J]. Aust J Grape Wine Res, 2015, 21(2):266-276.DOI: 10.1111/ajgw.12132.
[18]
郑丽静, 聂继云, 李明强, 等. 苹果风味评价指标的筛选研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(14):2796-2805.
ZHENG L J, NIE J Y, LI M Q, et al. Study on screening of taste evaluation indexes for apple[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(14):2796-2805.DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.14.011.
[19]
高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006:200-204.
GAO J F. Experimental guidance for plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006:200-204.
[20]
穆茜, 张丹丹, 李千惠, 等. 5个海棠品种果实品质分析及评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(5):971-978.
MU Q, ZHANG D D, LI Q H, et al. Evaluation of fruit quality of five crabapple (Malus spp.) cultivars[J]. J South Agric, 2018, 49(5):971-978.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2018.05.21.
[21]
曹茂林. 层次分析法确定评价指标权重及Excel计算[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2012(2):39-40.
CAO M L. Determination of evaluation index weight by analytic hierarchy process and excel calculation[J]. Jiangsu Sci & Technol Inf, 2012(2):39-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7530.2012.02.019.
[22]
赵登超, 孙蕾, 王小芳, 等. 枣庄石榴种质资源果实经济性状分析与评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2013, 31(4):148-151.
ZHAO D C, SUN L, WANG X F, et al. Analysis and evaluation on main economic characters of pomegranate germplasm resources in Zaozhuang City[J]. Nonwood For Res, 2013, 31(4):148-151.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2013.04.025.
[23]
焦艺, 刘璇, 毕金峰, 等. 不同品种白桃(Prunus persica L. Batsch)果汁的品质评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2014, 40(8):114-119,125.
JIAO Y, LIU X, BI J F, et al. Quality evaluation of white-flesh peach juices from different cultivars[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2014, 40(8):114-119,125.DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.2014.08.033.
[24]
陆新华, 孙德权, 吴青松, 等. 12个泰国菠萝品种的果实品质评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(12):2205-2208.
LU X H, SUN D Q, WU Q S, et al. Evaluation on fruit quality of 12 pineapple cultivars introduced from Thailand[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2011, 32(12):2205-2208.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2011.12.001.
[25]
高雪, 章印, 辛广, 等. 不同成熟度软枣猕猴桃果实的划分标准及贮藏特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(10):1784-1796.
GAO X, ZHANG Y, XIN G, et al. Classification criteria and storage characteristics of Actinidia arguta fruits with different maturities[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52(10):1784-1796.DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.10.011.
[26]
THAKUR N S, DHAYGUDE G S, GUPTA A. Physico-chemical characteristics of wild pomegranate fruits in different locations of Himachal Pradesh[J]. Int J Farm Sci, 2011, 1(2):37-44.
[27]
SHARMA S D, SHARMA V K. Variation for chemical characters in some promising strains of wild pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)[J]. Euphytica, 1990, 49(2):131-133.DOI: 10.1007/BF00027262.
[28]
THAKUR N S, BHAT M M, RANA N, et al. Standardization of pre-treatments for the preparation of dried arils from wild pomegranate[J]. J Food Sci Technol, 2010, 47(6):620-625.DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0091-4.
[29]
KHADIVI A, MIRHEIDARI F, MORADI Y, et al. Morphological variability of wild pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) accessions from natural habitats in the Northern parts of Iran[J]. Sci Hortic, 2020, 264:109165.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109165.
[30]
吴林, 张强, 臧慧明, 等. 云南丽江和吉林靖宇蓝莓糖酸组分差异化分析[J]. 中国果树, 2019(6):54-58,64.
WU L, ZHANG Q, ZANG H M, et al. Determination of sugar and acid components in blueberries from Lijiang,Yunnan and Jingyu,Jilin[J]. China Fruits, 2019(6):54-58, 64.DOI: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2019.06.011.
[31]
梁俊, 郭燕, 刘玉莲, 等. 不同品种苹果果实中糖酸组成与含量分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(10):163-170.
LIANG J, GUO Y, LIU Y L, et al. Analysis of contents and constituents of sugar and organic acid in different apple cultivars[J]. J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011, 39(10):163-170.DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2011.10.020.
[32]
乔宇, 吕辉华, 吴继军, 等. 不同品种桑椹中糖酸组成和甜酸风味评价[J]. 食品科学技术学报, 2016, 34(4):44-49.
QIAO Y, LYU H H, WU J J, et al. Analysis of organic acids and sugar compositions and flavor evaluation of different mulberry cultivars[J]. J Food Sci Technol, 2016, 34(4):44-49.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6002.2016.04.008.

基金

西藏自然科学基金项目(XZ2019ZRG-153)

编辑: 吴祝华
PDF(1883 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/