
乌兰布和沙漠绿洲防护林体系小气候效应研究
罗凤敏, 高君亮, 辛智鸣, 郝玉光, 李新乐, 段瑞兵
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 143-152.
乌兰布和沙漠绿洲防护林体系小气候效应研究
Study on the microclimate effects of oasis shelter forest in the Ulan Buh Desert
【目的】 研究绿洲防护林体系的小气候效应,为绿洲防护林体系的长期经营与健康发展提供科学数据。【方法】 对乌兰布和沙漠绿洲防护林内、外2个气象站36 a(1983—2018年)连续监测的气象数据进行了统计分析,研究了2个站点的大气温度、地表温度、相对湿度、降水量、蒸发量,以及风速的年、季和月变化特征,分析了绿洲防护林内、外小气候的差异并探讨了产生差异的原因。【结果】 ①绿洲防护林内、外的大气温度、地表温度和降水量年际变化特征总体呈上升趋势,相对湿度、蒸发量和风速总体呈下降趋势,绿洲防护林体系使大气温度降低0.2~1.6 ℃,地表温度降低0.10~5.49 ℃,相对湿度增加0.5%~18.6%,降水量增加0.5~100.7 mm,蒸发量降低18.4~1 282.8 mm,风速减小0.45~1.98 m/s;②绿洲防护林内、外的每10 a的气温变化倾向率分别为0.27、0.32 ℃,地温变化倾向率分别为0.28、0.36 ℃,降水量变化倾向率分别为1.8、2.5 mm,相对湿度变化倾向率分别为-0.2%、-1.3%,蒸发量变化倾向率分别为-42.5、-78.4 mm,风速变化倾向率分别为-0.1、-0.2 m/s;③绿洲防护林内和林外大气温度、地表温度、相对湿度、降水量和蒸发量的年内变化规律均为先增加后降低,为单峰曲线,而风速的年内变化曲线为双峰曲线;④绿洲防护林内、外各环境因子具有明显的季节差异,春、夏、秋、冬四季大气温度、地表温度和蒸发量增长率均为林外高于林内;四季相对湿度均为林内高于林外,风速则相反;降水量春、夏季林内高于林外,秋、冬季为林内低于林外。【结论】 绿洲防护林体系具有降低气温和地温、减少蒸发、降低风速、增加空气相对湿度和降水等生态功能,防护林及其内农作物生长季节尤为明显,这对于提高作物产量起着积极作用,进而改良土壤,并对维持绿洲可持续发展起着重要作用。
【Objective】 The oasis in arid areas is a necessary element for economic prosperity and development, and climate factors play a vital role in maintaining the sustainable development of the oasis. Studying the microclimate effect of oasis shelter forests can provide scientific data for the long-term management and healthy development of oasis shelter forests. 【Method】 Inside and outside the oasis shelter forest system of the Ulan Buh Desert was used as the research object, and statistical analysis of 36 years (1983-2018) meteorological data continuously monitored by the two meteorological stations set on the grounds of both oasis shelter forest and desert-oasis ecotone in the Ulan Buh Desert was used. The interannual, annual and seasonal variations in air temperature, soil temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, evaporation, wind speed and the differences in microclimate inside and outside the oasis shelter forest system were analyzed, and the reasons for the observed differences were discussed.【Result】 ① The interannual variation characteristics of air temperature, soil temperature, and precipitation within internal and external shelterbelts showed an increasing trend, but the interannual variation characteristics of relative humidity, evaporation and wind speed showed a decreasing trend. The oasis shelterbelt could reduce the air temperature by 0.2-1.6 ℃ and the soil temperature by 0.10-5.49 ℃; it increased the humidity by 0.5%-18.6% and precipitation by 0.5-100.7 mm; the evaporation decreased by 18.4-1 282.8 mm, and the wind speed decreased by 0.45-1.98 m/s. ② The change trend every 10 years in temperature was 0.27, 0.32 ℃;land ground temperature was 0.28, 0.36 ℃;precipitation was 1.8, 2.5 mm; relative humidity was -0.2%, -1.3%;evaporation was -42.5, -78.4 mm; wind speed was -0.1, -0.2 m/s, respectively, within internal and external shelterbelts. ③The annual variation characteristics of air temperature, soil temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, evaporation within internal and external shelterbelts increased and then decreased; a single-peak curve was observed. The annual variation in wind speed was a double-peak curve. The air temperature, soil temperature, evaporation and wind speed of the internal shelterbelt were lower than those of the external shelterbelt, and the relative humidity and precipitation of the internal shelterbelt were higher than those of the external shelterbelt. ④ Meteorological factors of internal and external shelterbelts had seasonal differences. The growth rates of air temperature, soil temperature, and evaporation in spring, summer autumn and winter in the external shelterbelt were higher than those in the internal shelterbelt in four seasons. The relative humidity of the four seasons within the internal shelterbelt was higher than that of the external shelterbelt. The wind speed of the four seasons within the internal shelterbelt was lower than that of the external shelterbelt. The precipitation of the internal shelterbelt in the spring, summer, higher than that of the external shelterbelt, but were the opposite in autumn and winter. 【Conclusion】 The oasis shelter forest system has the ecological functions of reducing air temperature, soil temperature, evaporation and wind speed while increasing air relative humidity and precipitation. This function is observed in the shelter forest and its crop growing seasons. It also has a positive effect on crop yield, further improving the soil. The function of the oasis shelter forest system plays an essential role in maintaining the sustainable development of the oasis.
小气候效应 / 气象因子 / 沙漠绿洲 / 防护林体系 / 乌兰布和沙漠
microclimate effect / meteorological factor / oasis / shelter forest system / Ulan Buh Desert
[1] |
申元村, 汪久文, 伍光和, 等. 中国绿洲[M]. 开封: 河南大学出版社, 2001.
|
[2] |
王涛. 我国绿洲化及其研究的若干问题初探[J]. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30(5):995-998.
|
[3] |
董智. 乌兰布和沙漠绿洲农田沙害及其控制机理研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2004.
|
[4] |
王君厚, 周士威, 路兆明. 乌兰布和荒漠人工绿洲小气候效应研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 1998, 15(1):27-34.
|
[5] |
韩会庆, 张娇艳, 马庚, 等. 气候变化对生态系统服务影响的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(2):184-190.
|
[6] |
穆桂金, 贺俊霞, 雷加强, 等. 再议绿洲-沙漠过渡带:以策勒绿洲-沙漠过渡带为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(2):195-202.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
杜鹤强, 薛娴, 孙家欢. 乌兰布和沙漠沿黄河区域下垫面特征及风沙活动观测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(22):156-165.
|
[9] |
郝玉光. 乌兰布和沙漠东北部绿洲化过程生态效应研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2007.
|
[10] |
包岩峰. 基于流场分析的绿洲防护林防风效果研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2015.
|
[11] |
张延旭. 乌兰布和沙漠绿洲防护林结构及其防风效果研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2011.
|
[12] |
高君亮, 辛智鸣, 刘芳, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北部大气降尘特征及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014, 28(8):145-150.
|
[13] |
汪季, 董智. 荒漠绿洲下垫面粒度特征与供尘关系的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(6):9-11,14.
|
[14] |
罗凤敏, 高君亮, 辛智鸣, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘防护林内外沙尘暴低空结构特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(4):1032-1040.
|
[15] |
罗凤敏, 辛智鸣, 高君亮, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘近地层风速和降尘量特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(24):147-154.
|
[16] |
张红利, 张秋良, 马利强. 乌兰布和沙地东北缘不同配置的农田防护林小气候效应的对比研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2009, 23(11):191-194.
|
[17] |
肖彩虹, 郝玉光, 贾培云. 乌兰布和沙漠东北部磴口绿洲近52a水分因子的变化[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(6):161-165.
|
[18] |
杨青, 雷加强, 魏文寿, 等. 人工绿洲对夏季气候变化趋势的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(12):2728-2734.
|
[19] |
罗凤敏, 高君亮, 辛智鸣, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘起沙风风况及输沙特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(4):145-152.
|
[20] |
中国气象局. 地面气象观测规范[S]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003: 11.
|
[21] |
朱瑞兆, 谭冠日, 王石立. 应用气候学概论[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2005:2-3.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
张飞, 塔西普拉提·特依拜, 丁建丽, 等. 干旱区绿洲土地利用/覆被及景观格局变化特征——以新疆精河县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3):1251-1263.
|
[25] |
符淙斌, 董文杰, 温刚, 等. 全球变化的区域响应和适应[J]. 气象学报, 2003, 61(2):245-250.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
任朝霞, 杨达源. 西北干旱区近50年气候变化特征与趋势[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2007, 29(1):99-102.
|
[28] |
何云玲, 张一平, 杨小波. 中国内陆热带地区近40年气候变化特征[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(4):499-505.
|
[29] |
张雪琪, 满苏尔·沙比提, 马国飞. 近60年来叶尔羌河平原绿洲气候变化特征分析[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(3):17-24.
|
[30] |
施雅风, 沈永平, 李栋梁, 等. 中国西北气候由暖干向暖湿转型的特征和趋势探讨[J]. 第四纪研究, 2003, 23(2):152-164.
|
[31] |
刘普幸. 近54年民勤绿洲气候变化趋势与周期特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2009, 26(4):471-476.
|
[32] |
张伟, 杨淑敏, 周向玲. 喀什地区沙尘暴天气变化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(6):95-101.
|
[33] |
张鹏, 赵新风, 张涛, 等. 滴灌对干旱区绿洲防护林土壤盐分的淋洗作用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(5):25-30.
|
[34] |
张林源, 王乃昂. 中国的沙漠和绿洲[M]. 兰州: 甘肃教育出版社, 1994.
|
[35] |
王学雷, 吴宜进. 江汉平原湖区农田防护林的小气候效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1999, 8(4):418-420.
|
[36] |
杨玉坡. 长江上游(川江)防护林研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993:7-31.
|
[37] |
孔东升, 金博文, 金铭, 等. 黑河流域中游农田防护林小气候效应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014, 28(1):32-36.
|
[38] |
东北林学院. 森林生态学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1981:19-20.
|
[39] |
张强, 曹晓彦. 敦煌地区荒漠戈壁地表热量和辐射平衡特征的研究[J]. 大气科学, 2003, 27(2):245-254.
|
[40] |
范志平, 曾德慧, 朱教君, 等. 农田防护林生态作用特征研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(4):130-133,140.
|
[41] |
赵娜娜, 王贺年, 张贝贝, 等. 若尔盖湿地流域径流变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 水资源保护, 2019, 35(5):40-47.
|
[42] |
于真. 四川省地表温度时空变化特征及评价模型研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2017.
|
[43] |
罗凤敏, 高君亮, 辛智鸣, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘地温变化特征及其影响因子[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019, 39(1):179-186.
|
[44] |
王葆芳, 熊士平, 任培政. 乌兰布和沙地新开发人工绿洲防护林体系综合效益评价[J]. 林业科学, 1998, 34(6):2-21.
|
[45] |
张瑞麟, 刘果厚, 崔秀萍. 浑善达克沙地黄柳活沙障防风固沙效益的研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006, 26(5):717-721.
|
[46] |
袁素芬, 陈亚宁, 李卫红. 干旱区新垦绿洲防护林体系的防护效益分析:以克拉玛依农业综合开发区为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(4):600-607.
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
邓荣鑫, 张树文, 李颖. 基于田间尺度的东北农田防护林防护效应分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(9):1756-1762.
|
[49] |
高志海, 李增元, 魏怀东, 等. 基于遥感的民勤绿洲植被覆盖变化定量监测[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(4):587-595.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |