海水处理对沼泽小叶桦苗木生长和生理的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004043

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 102-108.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004043

海水处理对沼泽小叶桦苗木生长和生理的影响

佘建炜(), 张康, 郑旭, 赵小军, 程方, 唐罗忠^*()

南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2020-04-21 接受日期:2020-10-12 出版日期:2021-09-30 发布日期:2021-09-30
通讯作者: 唐罗忠
基金资助:
江苏省重点研发计划(BE2018392);国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0600402);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

Effects of seawater on growth and physiology of Betula microphylla var. paludosa cutting seedlings

SHE Jianwei(), ZHANG Kang, ZHENG Xu, ZHAO Xiaojun, CHENG Fang, TANG Luozhong^*()

Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,College of Forestry,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2020-04-21 Accepted:2020-10-12 Online:2021-09-30 Published:2021-09-30
Contact: TANG Luozhong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 了解沼泽小叶桦(Betula microphylla var. paludosa)在海水处理土壤和海水处理叶片两种条件下的生长和生理响应,为耐盐树种的选择与应用提供依据。【方法】 用稀释成不同盐度(含盐量)的海水对1.5年生的沼泽小叶桦扦插苗进行根系浇灌和叶片喷雾处理。根系浇灌处理的盐度为盆栽基质质量的0%(CK)、0.2%、0.4%、0.6%(质量分数,下同);叶片喷雾处理的盐度为0(CK)、3.07、6.14、15.35 g/L。观察苗木的形态变化,并测定其生长和生理指标。【结果】 当用海水处理土壤(根系浇灌)的盐度在0.6%以下、处理叶片(叶片喷雾)的盐度在6.14 g/L以下时,沼泽小叶桦苗所受盐害较小,存活率均为100%。低盐度的海水处理(0.2%)土壤能提高沼泽小叶桦叶片叶绿素含量和可溶性蛋白含量,并促进苗木生长。海水处理土壤和海水处理叶片均导致叶片相对电导率升高,且海水处理叶片的涨幅更大。海水处理土壤条件下的苗木叶片丙二醛(MDA)含量低于CK,海水处理叶片条件下的MDA含量高于CK,但差异均不显著。除高盐度的海水处理(15.35 g/L)叶片外,其他海水处理的苗木叶片SOD活性总体上均低于CK。海水处理后,苗木叶片过氧化物酶(POD)活性在处理早期高于CK,在处理后期低于CK。【结论】 沼泽小叶桦能耐受盐度为0.6%的土壤海水浇灌处理或盐度为6.14 g/L的叶片海水喷雾处理,表现出较强的耐盐特性,在滨海盐碱地绿化中具有一定的应用潜力。

关键词: 沼泽小叶桦, 盐胁迫, 海水处理, 苗木生长, 生理特性

Abstract:

【Objective】 The aim of this research is to study the growth and physiological responses of Betula microphylla var. paludosa exposed to salt stress in seawater and provide the basis for the selection of seawater-tolerant tree species. 【Method】 Seawater diluted to different salinities (salt content) was used for root irrigation and leaf spray treatment of 1.5-year-old B. microphylla var. paludosa cutting seedlings. The root irrigating salinity was 0% (CK), 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.6% (mass fraction, same as below), respectively. The salinity of spray treatment on the leaves was 0 (CK), 3.07, 6.14, and 15.35 g/L, respectively. We observed morphological changes in the cutting seedlings and measured their growth and physiological indexes. 【Result】 When the salinity of the soil seawater treatment was below 0.6%, and the salinity of the leaf seawater treatment was below 6.14 g/L, the cutting seedlings suffered less salt damage and survived completely. Low salinity (0.2%) of seawater treatment on the soil could increase the content of chlorophyll and soluble protein in leaves to a certain extent and promote the growth of cutting seedlings. Both seawater treatments on the soil and the leaves could lead to an increase in the relative conductivity of leaves, but the increase in seawater treatment on the leaves had a more significant effect than that on the soil. The malondialdehyde (MDA) content of leaves under seawater treatment on the roots was lower than that of the control treatment (CK), and the MDA content of leaves under the seawater treatment on the leaves was higher than that of CK, but the difference between them was not significant. In addition to the high salinity (15.35 g/L) of seawater treatment on the leaves, the activity of superoxide dismutase in the leaves of other seawater treatments was lower than that of CK. After seawater treatment of the soil and leaves, the peroxidase activity of cutting seedling leaves was higher than that of CK in the early stage and lower than that of CK in the later stage. 【Conclusion】 B. microphylla var. paludosa could withstand soil seawater treatment with a salinity of 0.6% or leaf seawater treatment with a salinity of 6.14 g/L, showing a strong tolerance to seawater, and had substantial application potential in saline land greening.

Key words: Betula microphylla var. paludosa, salt stress, seawater treatment, seedling growth, physiology

中图分类号:

S718

佘建炜,张康,郑旭,等. 海水处理对沼泽小叶桦苗木生长和生理的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 102-108.

SHE Jianwei, ZHANG Kang, ZHENG Xu, ZHAO Xiaojun, CHENG Fang, TANG Luozhong. Effects of seawater on growth and physiology of Betula microphylla var. paludosa cutting seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(5): 102-108.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004043.

图/表 4

表1

表2

图1

表3

参考文献 30

[1]	杨昌友, 王健, 李文华. 新疆桦木属(Betula L.)新分类群[J]. 植物研究, 2006, 26(6):648-655.
	YANG C Y, WANG J, LI W H. New taxa of Betula L. from Xinjiang China[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2006, 26(6):648-655. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.06.003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.06.003
[2]	赵文文, 李术梅, 李莉. NaCl胁迫对沼泽小叶桦光合特性的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(4):42-47.
	ZHAO W W, LI S M, LI L. Effects of NaCl stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameter in leaf of Betula microphylla var.paludosa seedlings[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2016, 36(4):42-47. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.04.007. doi: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.04.007
[3]	王斌, 巨波, 赵慧娟, 等. 不同盐梯度处理下沼泽小叶桦的生理特征及叶片结构[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(10):29-36.
	WANG B, JU B, ZHAO H J, et al. Photosynthetic performance and variation in leaf anatomic structure of Betula microphylla var.paludosa under different saline conditions[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(10):29-36.
[4]	郭洋, 盛建东, 陈波浪, 等. 3种盐生植物干物质积累与养分吸收特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(1):144-149.
	GUO Y, SHENG J D, CHEN B L, et al. Study on dry matter accumulation and nutriention absorption of three halophytes under artificial planting condition[J]. Arid Zone Res, 2016, 33(1):144-149. DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2016.01.18. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2016.01.18
[5]	卞阿娜, 林鸣, 王文卿. 根系与叶片盐处理对枇杷幼苗生长及体内矿质元素分布的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(3):273-279.
	BIAN A, LIN M, WANG W Q. Effects of salt treatment on growth and compartmental allocation of mineral elements in Eriobotrya japonica seedlings[J]. Plant Physiol Commun, 2015, 51(3):273-279.
[6]	赵颖, 王国明, 叶波, 等. 盐雾胁迫对舟山海岛7个造林树种存活和生长的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2016, 25(3):36-44.
	ZHAO Y, WANG G M, YE B, et al. Effect of salt fog stress on survival and growth of seven afforestation tree species in Zhoushan Islands[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2016, 25(3):36-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.03.05. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.03.05
[7]	FERRANTE A, TRIVELLINI A, MALORGIO F, et al. Effect of seawater aerosol on leaves of six plant species potentially useful for ornamental purposes in coastal areas[J]. Sci Hortic, 2011, 128(3):332-341.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.01.008. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.01.008
[8]	廖岩, 彭友贵, 陈桂珠. 植物耐盐性机理研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(5):2077-2089.
	LIAO Y, PENG Y G, CHEN G Z. Research advances in plant salt-tolerance mechanism[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(5):2077-2089. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.05.049. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.05.049
[9]	沈燕, 方升佐, 孙志鸿. 盐胁迫对欧美杂交杨异戊二烯释放和光合参数的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(1):83-88.
	SHEN Y, FANG S Z, SUN Z H. Effects of salinity stress on isoprene emission and photosynthetic parameters in Populus deltoides × P. nigra[J]. Chinese J App Envir Bio, 2019, 25(1):83-88. DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.03039. doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.03039
[10]	杨振德. 分光光度法测定叶绿素含量的探讨[J]. 广西农业大学学报, 1996, 15(2):145-150.
	YANG Z D. Studies on the determination of chlorophyll content by spectrophotometric method[J]. J Guangxi Agric Univ, 1996, 15(2):145-150.
[11]	BRADFORD M M. a rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding[J]. Anal Biochem, 1976, 72(1/2):248-254. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[12]	张志良. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 4版.北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009.
	ZHANG Z L. Experimental guidance of plant physiology [M].4th ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009.
[13]	陶晶. 东北主要杨树抗盐机理及抗性品种选育的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2002.
	TAO J. Study on salt-tolerance mechanisms and resistance breeding of main popular varieties in westward northeast China[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2002.
[14]	MUNNS R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25(2):239-250. DOI: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
[15]	杨万鹏, 马瑞, 杨永义, 等. NaCl处理对黑果枸杞生长、生理指标的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(13):4437-4447.
	YANG W P, MA R, YANG Y Y, et al. Effects of NaCl treatment on the growth and physiological indexes of Lycium ruthenicum[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2019, 17(13):4437-4447. DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.004437. doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.004437
[16]	张华新, 刘正祥, 刘秋芳. 盐胁迫下树种幼苗生长及其耐盐性[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5):2263-2271.
	ZHANG H X, LIU Z X, LIU Q F. Seedling growth and salt tolerance of tree species under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(5):2263-2271.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.010. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.010
[17]	周琦, 祝遵凌, 施曼. 盐胁迫对鹅耳枥生长及生理生化特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):56-60.
	ZHOU Q, ZHU Z L, SHI M. Effects of salt stress on growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics of Carpinus turczaninowii seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(6):56-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.011. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.011
[18]	程钧, 张晓平, 方炎明. 不同浓度NaCl胁迫对红桤木幼苗生长及部分生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(6):142-145.
	CHENG J, ZHANG X P, FANG Y M. Effects of different NaCl stress on several physiological characteristics and seedling growth of Alnus rubrat[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2010, 26(6):142-145.
[19]	鲁强, 杨玲, 王昊伟, 等. 秀丽四照花光合特性和叶绿体超微结构的盐胁迫响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4):29-36.
	LU Q, YANG L, WANG H W, et al. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure to salt stress in seedlings of Cornus hongkongensis subsp. elegans[J]. J Nanjing Fore Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(4):29-36.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904035. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904035
[20]	石元豹, 汪贵斌, 黄广远, 等. 3个臭椿半同胞家系耐盐性比较研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2016, 34(2):153-160.
	SHI Y B, WANG G B, HUANG G Y, et al. Salt tolerance of 3 half-sib families of Ailanthus altissima[J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2016, 34(2):153-160. DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2016.02.005. doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2016.02.005
[21]	杨颖丽, 徐世键, 保颖, 等. 盐胁迫对两种小麦叶片蛋白质的影响[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 43(1):70-74.
	YANG Y L, XU S J, BAO Y, et al. Effect of NaCl on protein in two cultivar leaves[J]. J Lanzhou Univ (Nat Sci), 2007, 43(1):70-74. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0455-2059.2007.01.015. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0455-2059.2007.01.015
[22]	杨传平, 焦喜才, 刘文祥, 等. 树木的细胞膜透性与抗盐性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1997, 25(1):2-4.
	YANG C P, JIAO X C, LIU W X, et al. The relationship of permeability of plasma membrane and salt resistance of woody plants[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 1997, 25(1):1-3. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.1997.01.001. doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.1997.01.001
[23]	纳晓莹, 王秀伟, 徐浩玉, 等. 4种桦树幼苗耐盐性分析与评价[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(6):873-882.
	NA X Y, WANG X W, XU H Y, et al. Analyzing and evaluating the salt tolerance of four kinds of birch seedlings[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2015, 35(6):873-882. DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2015.06.014. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2015.06.014
[24]	JAIN M, MATHUR G, KOUL S, et al. Ameliorative effects of proline on salt stress-induced lipid peroxidation in cell lines of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2001, 20(5):463-468. DOI: 10.1007/s002990100353. doi: 10.1007/s002990100353
[25]	朱金方, 刘京涛, 陆兆华, 等. 盐胁迫对中国柽柳幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(15):5140-5146.
	ZHU J F, LIU J T, LU Z H, et al. Effects of salt stress on physiological characteristics of Tamarix chinensis Lour.seedlings[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(15):5140-5146. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201312182981. doi: 10.5846/stxb201312182981
[26]	岳健敏, 任琼, 张金池. 植物盐耐机理研究进展[J]. 林业工程学报, 2015, 29(5):9-13.
	YUE J M, REN Q, ZHANG J C. Research progress on salt tolerance mechanism of plants[J]. J Fore Eng, 2015, 29(5):9-13.DOI: 10.13360/j.issn.1000-8101.2015.05.003. doi: 10.13360/j.issn.1000-8101.2015.05.003
[27]	刘凤歧, 刘杰淋, 朱瑞芬, 等. 4种燕麦对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1):183-189.
	LIU F Q, LIU J L, ZHU R F, et al. Physiological responses and tolerance of four oat varieties to salt stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2015, 24(1):183-189. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb20150122. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20150122
[28]	赵可夫, 李法曾. 中国盐生植物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 6.
	ZHAO K F, LI F Z. Chinese halophytes[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1999: 6.
[29]	刘昉勳, 黄致远. 江苏滨海盐土植被的发生与动态的观察[J]. 植物学报, 1980, 22(1):63-66.
	LIU F X, HUANG Z Y. Observations on the symgenesis and dynamic changes of coastal solonchak vegetation at Jiangsu[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 1980, 22(1):63-66.
[30]	卞阿娜, 林鸣, 王文卿. 盐雾胁迫对榄仁幼苗生长及体内矿质元素分布的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(11):1752-1758.
	BIAN A N, LIN M, WANG W Q. Effects of salt spray on growth and compartmental allocation of mineral element of Terminalia catappa seedlings[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2014, 23(11):1752-1758. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2014.11.005. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2014.11.005

处理时间/d treatment time	土壤盐度/% soil salinity				叶片盐度/(g·L^-1) leaf salinity
处理时间/d treatment time	CK	0.20	0.40	0.60	3.07	6.14	15.35
2	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常
6	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常	约1/4的叶片叶缘枯萎	约3/4的叶片叶缘枯萎
14	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常	约1/4的叶片叶缘枯萎,轻微落叶	约4/5的叶片枯萎,严重落叶, 植株下部萌发出较小的新叶
30	正常	正常	下部有少量叶片枯萎脱落	下部有较多叶片枯萎脱落	正常	下部部分老叶脱落, 萌发少量新叶	留有少量老叶,新叶较多但比较小,部分苗木顶梢枯萎

海水处理 treatment	盐度 salinity	存活率/ % survival rate	苗高增量/cm height increment	地径增量/mm ground diameter increment	单株生物量/g biomass
土壤浇灌 soil irrigating	CK	100.0	7.10±0.90 a	0.76±0.14 a	8.62±1.85 a
	0.2%	100.0	6.00±0.82 a	0.80±0.10 a	9.67±1.72 a
	0.4%	100.0	3.50±0.41 b	0.67±0.05 a	7.63±1.45 a
	0.6%	100.0	3.33±0.82 b	0.42±0.04 b	7.04±1.08 a
叶片喷雾 leaf spary	CK	100.0	7.10±0.90 a	0.76±0.14 a	8.62±1.85 a
	3.07 g/L	100.0	6.20±0.86 ab	0.64±0.13 ab	7.08±1.43 a
	6.14 g/L	100.0	6.04±1.87 ab	0.50±0.14 ab	7.52±1.26 a
	15.35 g/L	87.5	4.90±0.73 b	0.45±0.10 b	6.77±0.07 a

指标 index	叶绿素含量 chlorophyll content	可溶性蛋白含量 soluble protein content	相对电导率 relative conductivity	MDA含量 MDA content	SOD活性 SOD activity	POD活性 POD activity
叶绿素含量chlorophyll content	1.000
可溶性蛋白含量soluble protein content	0.265	1.000
相对电导率relative conductivity	0.019	0.092	1.000
MDA含量MDA content	-0.478^**	-0.392^*	0.064	1.000
SOD活性SOD activity	0.059	-0.188	0.479^**	0.430^*	1.000
POD活性POD activity	0.280	-0.055	0.204	-0.209	0.055	1.000

海水处理对沼泽小叶桦苗木生长和生理的影响

Effects of seawater on growth and physiology of Betula microphylla var. paludosa cutting seedlings

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	宋泽君, 李培培, 袁斓方, 郭小兰, 王德炉. 土壤含水率对蓝莓叶片生理及果实品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 147-156.
[2]	芦治国, 华建峰, 殷云龙, 施钦. 盐胁迫下氮素形态对海滨木槿幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 91-98.
[3]	张强, 周鹏, 刘昌来, 余永帆, 张敏, 杨甲定. NaCl处理下全缘冬青和红果冬青根系的转录组活性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 99-108.
[4]	马仕林, 曹鹏翔, 张金池, 刘京, 王金平, 朱凌骏, 袁钟鸣. 盐胁迫下AMF对榉树幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 122-130.
[5]	张磊, 童龙, 谢锦忠, 李俞佳, 张玮. 不同灌水时间下毛竹伐桩根系化学计量及生理特性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 25-30.
[6]	黎梦娟, 朱礼明, 霍俊男, 张景波, 施季森, 成铁龙. 唐古特白刺NtCBL1、NtCBL2基因克隆及表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 93-99.
[7]	崔令军, 刘瑜霞, 林健, 石开明. 丛枝菌根真菌对盐胁迫下桢楠光合生理的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 101-106.
[8]	叶查龙, 颜斌, 申婷婷, 宁坤, 李慧玉. 转BpmiR156基因白桦株系的耐盐性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 147-151.
[9]	周思婕, 王平, 张敏, 陈舒展, 许雯, 朱丽婷, 何销勤, 龚书锐. 大气酸沉降对马尾松幼苗根系生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 111-118.
[10]	鲁强, 杨玲, 王昊伟, 袁佳秋, 洑香香, 方彦. 秀丽四照花光合特性和叶绿体超微结构的盐胁迫响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 29-36.
[11]	崔令军, 刘瑜霞, 林健, 石开明. 盐胁迫下丛枝菌根真菌对桢楠根系生长和激素的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 119-124.
[12]	王昊伟, 杨玲, 鲁强, 洑香香. 盐胁迫对大花四照花种子萌发与幼苗生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 89-94.
[13]	张恒, 刘晓婷, 陈嵩, 周雪燕, 司冬晶, 李莹, 赵曦阳. 盐胁迫下三倍体小黑杨杂种无性系叶片蛋白质差异表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 59-66.
[14]	杨阳, 施皓然, 及利, 杨立学. 指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 91-97.
[15]	王玥琳, 徐大平, 杨曾奖, 刘小金, 洪舟, 张宁南, 陈文德. 乙烯利对降香黄檀生长和光合生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 18-24.