基于三生空间耦合的生态安全格局构建与优化——以扬州市为例

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004045

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 133-142.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004045

基于三生空间耦合的生态安全格局构建与优化——以扬州市为例

郭天威¹(), 陆春锋², 王君櫹¹, 刘瑞程¹, 周生路¹^,^*()

1. 南京大学地理与海洋学院,江苏南京 210093
2. 江苏第二师范学院城市与资源环境学院,江苏南京 210013

收稿日期:2020-04-22 接受日期:2021-04-13 出版日期:2021-09-30 发布日期:2021-09-30
通讯作者: 周生路
基金资助:
江苏省自然资源科技项目(KJXM2019018);江苏省自然资源科技项目(KJXM2020006);自然资源部海岸带开发与保护重点实验室开放基金项目(2019CZEPK01);国家自然科学基金项目(41771243)

Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on the coupling of ecological-production-living spaces: taking Yangzhou City as an example

GUO Tianwei¹(), LU Chunfeng², WANG Junxiao¹, LIU Ruicheng¹, ZHOU Shenglu¹^,^*()

1. School of Geography and Ocean Scinence,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China
2. Department of City and Resources of Environment, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing 210013,China

Received:2020-04-22 Accepted:2021-04-13 Online:2021-09-30 Published:2021-09-30
Contact: ZHOU Shenglu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 充分考量生态、生产和生活空间(三生空间)的相互影响,为生态安全格局优化提供新的思路,并为扬州市在保护生态安全前提下优化空间开发格局提供决策参考。【方法】 以扬州市为例,基于1:5 000土地利用变更调查数据,综合考虑未来城镇扩张和生产空间缓冲作用对生态安全格局的影响,借助多情景基础方案冲突协调评价和环形梯度分析的方法,从三生耦合角度对区域生态安全格局进行构建并优化。【结果】 构建了“三生主体功能量化-多情景基础方案冲突协调评价-基于三生规律分析分区协调情景评价”三生耦合优化框架,扬州市生态安全格局网络优化后,生态源地与廊道面积共计2 444.63 km²,占全域面积的36.85%;研究区生态安全格局网络由底线功能用地、缓冲功能用地、连通功能用地组成,占全域的面积比例分别为23.16%、12.01%和1.68%。【结论】 本研究形成的三生耦合优化框架,可以为区域生态安全格局优化提供新思路,进而有效指导相关规划。

关键词: 生态安全格局, 生态空间, 生活空间, 机器学习, 耦合模型, 协调规划, 扬州市

Abstract:

【Objective】 By considering the interactions among ecology, production and living spaces, this paper provided a new idea for the optimization of ecological security patterns, as well as a decision reference for Yangzhou City to optimize its spatial development pattern under the premise of protecting ecological security.【Method】 This study uses Yangzhou as an example and is based on survey data of land use change at a scale of 1:5 000. This study has taken into consideration, future urban expansion and the impact of production space cushions on the ecological security pattern. From the perspective of good coupling, multi-scenario-based conflict coordination program evaluation and circular gradient analysis method are used to build and optimize regional ecological security patterns.【Result】 The ecological-production-living coupling optimization framework of “Ecological-production-living main function quantification-Multi-scenario basic scheme conflict coordination evaluation-Analysis of sub-region coordination scenario evaluation based on the ecological-production-living rule” was formed. Based on the coordination plan, the results showed that after the optimization of the ecological security pattern network, the area of ecological sources and corridors of Yangzhou City was 2 444.63 km², accounting for 36.85% of the total area. The ecological security pattern network in the research area comprised the baseline function land, buffer function land, and connection function land, and their corresponding area proportions of the whole area were 23.16%, 12.01% and 1.68%, respectively.【Conclusion】 In this study, the ecological-production-living coupling optimization framework could provide new ideas for regional ecological security pattern optimization and effectively guide relevant planning.

Key words: ecological security pattern, ecospace, living space, machine learning, coupled model, coordination plan, Yangzhou City

中图分类号:

X321

郭天威,陆春锋,王君櫹,等. 基于三生空间耦合的生态安全格局构建与优化——以扬州市为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 133-142.

GUO Tianwei, LU Chunfeng, WANG Junxiao, LIU Ruicheng, ZHOU Shenglu. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on the coupling of ecological-production-living spaces: taking Yangzhou City as an example[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(5): 133-142.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004045.

图/表 9

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

图6

图7

参考文献 31

[1]	WOOD S L R, JONES S K, JOHNSON J A, et al. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the sustainable development goals[J]. Ecosyst Serv, 2018, 29:70-82.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010
[2]	车通, 罗云建. 量化社会经济发展对城市景观破碎化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1):154-162.
	CHE T, LUO Y J. Quantifying effects of socioeconomic development on urban landscape fragmentation[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(1):154-162.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201807016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201807016
[3]	金贵, 邓祥征, 张倩, 等. 武汉城市圈国土空间综合功能分区[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3):541-552. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703012
	JIN G, DENG X Z, ZHANG Q, et al. Comprehensive function zoning of national land space for Wuhan metropolitan region[J]. Geogr Res, 2017, 36(3):541-552.DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201703012. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703012
[4]	YU K J, LI H L, LI D H. The negative approach and ecological infrastructure:the smart preservation of natural systems in the process of Urbanization Full-text in English[J]. J Nat Resour, 2008, 23(6):937-958.
[5]	李月辉, 胡志斌, 高琼, 等. 沈阳市城市空间扩展的生态安全格局[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(6):875-881.
	LI Y H, HU Z B, GAO Q, et al. Ecological safety pattern of spatial extension in Shenyang City[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2007, 26(6):875-881.
[6]	陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 基于“重要性-敏感性-连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3):471-484. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
	CHEN X, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al. Constructing ecological security patterns in Yunfu City based on the framework of importance-sensitivity-connectivity[J]. Geogr Res, 2017, 36(3):471-484.DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201703006. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
[7]	俞孔坚. 景观生态战略点识别方法与理论地理学的表面模型[J]. 地理学报, 1998, 53(S1):11-20.
	YU K J. Ecologically strategic points in landscape and surface model[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 1998, 53(S1):11-20.
[8]	RESHMIDEVI T V, ELDHO T I, JANA R. A GIS-integrated fuzzy rule-based inference system for land suitability evaluation in agricultural watersheds[J]. Agric Syst, 2009, 101(1/2):101-109.DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.04.001. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.04.001
[9]	SZABÓ S, CSORBA P, SZILASSI P. Tools for landscape ecological planning-scale,and aggregation sensitivity of the contagion type landscape metric indices[J]. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci, 2012, 7(3):127-136.
[10]	俞孔坚. 与自然和谐共生的城市规划设计理念与方法[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2019:1-19.
	YU K J. Urban planning and design concept and method of harmonious coexistence with nature[J]. Frontiers, 2019:1-19.
[11]	钟太洋, 黄贤金, 王柏源. 经济增长与建设用地扩张的脱钩分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1):18-31.
	ZHONG T Y, HUANG X J, WANG B Y. On the degrees of decoupling and Recoupling of economic growth and expansion of construction land in China from 2002 to 2007[J]. J Nat Resour, 2010, 25(1):18-31.
[12]	彭建, 郭小楠, 胡熠娜, 等. 基于地质灾害敏感性的山地生态安全格局构建:以云南省玉溪市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2):627-635.
	PENG J, GUO X N, HU Y N, et al. Constructing ecological security patterns in mountain areas based on geological disaster sensitivity:a case study in Yuxi City,Yunnan Province,China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017, 28(2):627-635.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201702.013. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201702.013
[13]	汤旭, 冯彦, 王慧, 等. 湖南省县域森林生态安全评价与时空分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4):61-67.
	TANG X, FENG Y, WANG H, et al. County forest ecological security evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis in Hunan Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(4):61-67.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201705039. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201705039
[14]	张雅琦. 三峡水库中长期来水水量平衡模型研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2017(2):90-93.
	ZHANG Y Q. Research on middle-term and long-term hydrological forecast of Three Gorges Reservoir based on water balance model[J]. China Rural Water Hydropower, 2017(2):90-93.
[15]	钱大文, 曹广民, 杜岩功, 等. 2000—2015年祁连山南坡生态系统服务价值时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4):1392-1404.
	QIAN D W, CAO G M, DU Y G, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of ecosystem service value in the southern slope of Qilian Mountain from 2000 to 2015[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(4):1392-1404.
[16]	刘婵, 刘冰, 赵文智, 等. 黑河流域植被水分利用效率时空分异及其对降水和气温的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(3):888-899.
	LIU C, LIU B, ZHAO W Z, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of water use efficiency of vegetation and its response to precipitation and temperature in Heihe River Basin[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(3):888-899.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201810282323. doi: 10.5846/stxb201810282323
[17]	廖启林, 刘聪, 许艳, 等. 江苏省土壤元素地球化学基准值[J]. 中国地质, 2011, 38(5):1363-1378.
	LIAO Q L, LIU C, XU Y, et al. Geochemical baseline values of elements in soil of Jiangsu Province[J]. Geology in China, 2011, 38(5):1363-1378. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2011.05.023. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2011.05.023
[18]	刘瑞程, 沈春竹, 贾振毅, 等. 道路景观胁迫下沿海滩涂地区生态网络构建与优化:以盐城市大丰区为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(3):828-837.
	LIU R C, SHEN C Z, JIA Z Y, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological network under the stress of road landscape in coastal beach area:a case study of Dafeng District,Yancheng City[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2019, 38(3):828-837.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201903.017. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201903.017
[19]	奉婷, 张凤荣, 李灿, 等. 基于耕地质量综合评价的县域基本农田空间布局[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(1):200-210.
	FENG T, ZHANG F R, LI C, et al. Spatial distribution of prime farmland based on cultivated land quality comprehensive evaluation at County scale[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2014, 30(1):200-210.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.01.026. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.01.026
[20]	戴文举, 王东杰, 卢瑛, 等. 华南地区县域耕地质量和产能评价研究:以广东吴川为例[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(4):419-430.
	DAI W J, WANG D J, LU Y, et al. Evaluation of County level cultivated land quality and productivity in south China:a case study of Wuchuan City,Guangdong Province[J]. J Agric Resour Environ, 2019, 36(4):419-430.DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2019.0221. doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2019.0221
[21]	蔡雪娇, 吴志峰, 程炯. 基于核密度估算的路网格局与景观破碎化分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(1):158-164.
	CAI X J, WU Z F, CHENG J. Analysis of road network pattern and landscape fragmentation based on kernel density estimation[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2012, 31(1):158-164.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0035. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0035
[22]	陈凯, 刘凯, 柳林, 等. 基于随机森林的元胞自动机城市扩展模拟:以佛山市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(8):937-946. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.08.001
	CHEN K, LIU K, LIU L, et al. Urban expansion simulation by random-forest-based cellular automata:a case study of Foshan City[J]. Prog Geogr, 2015, 34(8):937-946.
[23]	吴榛, 王浩. 扬州市绿地生态网络构建与优化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(7):1976-1985.
	WU Z, WANG H. Establishment and optimization of green ecological networks in Yangzhou City[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34(7):1976-1985.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.20150616.003. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.20150616.003
[24]	张豆, 渠丽萍, 张桀滈. 基于生态供需视角的生态安全格局构建与优化:以长三角地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20):7525-7537.
	ZHANG D, QU L P, ZHANG J H. Ecological security pattern construction method based on the perspective of ecological supply and demand:a case study of Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(20):7525-7537.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201808301854. doi: 10.5846/stxb201808301854
[25]	KNAAPEN J P, SCHEFFER M, HARMS B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 1992, 23(1):1-16.DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D
[26]	李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1):49-65. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601004
	LI G D, FANG C L. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2016, 71(1):49-65.DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201601004. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601004
[27]	廖李红, 戴文远, 陈娟, 等. 平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(10):1823-1833.
	LIAO L H, DAI W Y, CHEN J, et al. Spatial conflict between ecological-production-living spaces on Pingtan Island during rapid urbanization[J]. Resour Sci, 2017, 39(10):1823-1833.DOI: 10.18402/resci.2017.10.03. doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.10.03
[28]	柯新利, 唐兰萍. 城市扩张与耕地保护耦合对陆地生态系统碳储量的影响:以湖北省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 10(2):672-683.
	KE X L, TANG L P. Impact of cascading processes of urban expansion and cropland reclamation on the ecosystem of a carbon storage service in Hubei Province,China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 10(2):672-683.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201712042177. doi: 10.5846/stxb201712042177
[29]	昌亭, 周生路, 戴靓, 等. 金坛市土地生态质量的城乡梯度规律研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(3):130-135.
	CHANG T, ZHOU S L, DAI L, et al. Study on urban and rural gradient rule of land ecological quality in Jintan City[J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2014, 21(3):130-135.DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2014.03.025. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2014.03.025
[30]	许萍萍, 赵言文, 陈颢明, 等. 江苏省农田生态系统碳源/汇、碳足迹动态变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(5):238-243.
	XU P P, ZHAO Y W, CHEN H M, et al. Dynamic change of carbon source/sink and carbon footprint of farmland ecosystem in Jiangsu Province[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2018, 38(5):238-243.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.05.038. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.05.038
[31]	尹鑫, 沙海飞, 张海滨, 等. 基于分区分类功能的江苏省河湖空间管控框架[J]. 水资源保护, 2020, 36(6):86-92.
	YIN X, SHA H F, ZHANG H B, et al. Spatial control framework of rivers and lakes in Jiangsu Province based on function of zoning and classification[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2020, 36(6):86-92. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2020.06.014. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2020.06.014

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

938

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	100	0	0	838

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	865	73
比例	92%	8%

摘要

748

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	748

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	583	165
比例	78%	22%

本文评价

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

通信地址：南京市龙蟠路南京林业大学《南京林业大学学报》编辑部
电子邮件：njlyzrb@vip.163.com
联系电话：025-85428247
邮政编码：210037
备案号：苏ICP备-010872

主体空间 main space	类别 category	赋分 score
生态主体空间 ecological space	环保部门生态红线I级区∩生态主体空间	4
	环保部门生态红线II级区∩生态主体空间	3
	(江淮生态大走廊规划∪生态廊道)∩ 生态主体空间	2
	生态主体空间独有部分	1
生活主体空间 living space	优化开发区	4
	重点开发区	3
	限制开发区	2
	禁止开发区	1
生产主体空间 production space	评价结果标准化分级	4~1

耦合情景 coupling scene	类型 category	面积/ km² area	占冲突斑块总面积比例/% proportion of total conflict plaque area
生态保护优先 priority scenarios for ecological protection	优先划入	24.37	37.67
	应当划入	19.24	29.76
	建议划入	0.41	0.64
	合计	44.02	68.07
优先发展 priority development scenario	优先划入	5.03	7.77
	应当划入	23.13	35.76
	建议划入	13.71	21.20
	合计	41.87	64.73
融合发展 integrated development scenarios	优先划入	24.36	37.66
	应当划入	3.80	5.88
	建议划入	15.70	24.28
	合计	43.86	67.81

基于三生空间耦合的生态安全格局构建与优化——以扬州市为例

Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on the coupling of ecological-production-living spaces: taking Yangzhou City as an example

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 31

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	赵凌霄, 李智扬, 屈磊磊. 基于EMD和CatBoost算法的改进时间序列模型——以大连市PM_2.5预测为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 268-274.
[2]	仇实, 于强, 刘泓君, 王慧媛, 李松, 岳德鹏. 基于生态环境质量评价的酒泉市生态空间网络优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 199-208.
[3]	李史欣, 张福全, 林海峰. 基于机器学习算法的森林火灾风险评估研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 49-56.
[4]	栾春凤, 郭欣然. 生态安全格局视角下的土地利用冲突识别研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 156-164.
[5]	唐晓岚, 王忆梅, 周孔飞. 基于生态安全格局的山岳型风景区景观资源保护利用研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 178-186.
[6]	陈建坤, 牟凤云, 张用川, 田甜, 王俊秀. 基于多机器学习模型的逐小时PM_2.5浓度预测对比[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 152-160.
[7]	车通, 罗云建. 量化社会经济发展对城市景观破碎化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 154-162.
[8]	汤鹏,王浩. 基于MCR模型的现代城市绿地海绵体适宜性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(03): 116-122.