
林分空间结构优化栅格间伐模型
A grid thinning model based on forest spatial structure optimization
【目的】构建林分空间结构优化栅格间伐模型,以期获得高效、便捷的间伐方案。【方法】在随机间伐模型的基础上,提出将林地栅格化处理的栅格间伐法,并使用随机间伐法对栅格间伐法进行检验,最后以金盆山次生林为例验证模型的适用性。【结果】间伐模拟前,次生林空间结构整体表现不够理想,在角尺度、开敞度和竞争指数方面有待提高;恢复年限33、40、45 a次生林的最佳间伐强度分别为34.69%、21.14%、29.90%,评价指数分别提高了47.94%、53.94%和79.73%,其中33和40 a次生林适用于栅格间伐法,采伐方式分别为栅格边长7 m栅格内伐去3株胸径最小的林木和栅格边长6 m栅格内伐去3株胸径最小的林木。【结论】栅格间伐模型能有效地改善林分空间分布格局,但仅适用于林木分布较为均匀的次生林林分,对于分布不均匀的林分,模型只能确定样地内的间伐木及间伐强度。
【Objective】 A grid thinning model based on forest spatial structure optimization was constructed to obtain an efficient and convenient thinning method. 【Method】 Based on the random thinning model, the grid thinning method was proposed, and the random thinning method was used to test the grid thinning method. The grid thinning method indicates that the rasterized forest land is divided into several continuous square grids with the length of integer A, the cutting amount K, and square grid edge length A. Using these variables, all possible thinning methods were enumerated to simulate thinning. Finally, the applicability of the model was verified using the secondary forest of the Jinpenshan Mountain. 【Result】The spatial structure of the secondary forest is not ideal and needs to be improved in terms of the uniform angle index, opening degree and competition index. The optimal thinning intensities of the 33, 40 and 45 years old secondary forests were 34.69%, 21.14% and 29.90%, respectively, and the evaluation index increased by 47.94%, 53.94% and 79.73%, respectively. The 33 and 40 years old forests were suitable for using the grid thinning method, with cutting methods as follows: three trees with the smallest DBH were removed from the grid having a length of 7 m; three trees with the smallest DBH were removed from the grid having a length of 6 m. 【Conclusion】The grid thinning model can effectively improve the spatial distribution pattern of stands, but it is only applicable to the secondary stands with a more uniform forest distribution. For unevenly distributed stands, the model can only determine the interlogging and thinning intensities for the sample plots.
spatial structure optimization / grid thinning / random thinning / secondary forest
[1] |
惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 徐海. 森林空间结构的量化分析方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2005,33(S):45-48, 60.
|
[2] |
刘红民, 邢兆凯, 顾宇书, 等. 辽东山区天然次生阔叶混交林空间结构的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012,27(3):150-154,173.
|
[3] |
朱教君. 次生林经营基础研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002,13(12):1689-1694.
|
[4] |
魏红洋, 董灵波, 刘兆刚. 大兴安岭主要森林类型林分空间结构优化模拟[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(11):3824-3832.
|
[5] |
徐庆祥, 卫星, 王庆成, 等. 抚育间伐对兴安落叶松天然林生长和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2013,29(3):6-9.
|
[6] |
明安刚, 张治军, 谌红辉, 等. 抚育间伐对马尾松人工林生物量与碳贮量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013,49(10):1-6.
|
[7] |
管惠文, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 间伐强度对大兴安岭落叶松天然次生林水文性能的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,42(6):68-76.
|
[8] |
朱玉杰, 董希斌. 大兴安岭地区落叶松用材林不同抚育间伐强度经营效果评价[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(12):29-38.
|
[9] |
冯颖, 赵媛媛, 郭跃, 等. 不同经营模式对华北落叶松人工林林下植被的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):64-69,75.
|
[10] |
尤文忠, 赵刚, 张慧东, 等. 抚育间伐对蒙古栎次生林生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(1):56-64.
|
[11] |
游晓庆, 彭诗涛, 郭孝玉, 等. 闽楠天然次生林林分空间结构研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2016,38(4):660-667.
|
[12] |
吕飞舟, 吕勇, 张江. 青石冈林场木荷次生林空间结构调控研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014,34(7):67-72.
|
[13] |
曹小玉, 李际平, 胡园杰, 等. 杉木生态林林分间伐空间结构优化模型[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017,36(4):1134-1141.
|
[14] |
许晓东, 刘丽婷, 邓海燕, 等. 桉树人工林抚育间伐调控技术研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019,39(4):52-58.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
惠刚盈, 胡艳波. 混交林树种空间隔离程度表达方式的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001,14(1):23-27.
|
[17] |
邓送求, 闫家锋, 关庆伟. 南京紫金山枫香风景林空间结构分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,34(4):117-122.
|
[18] |
惠刚盈. 角尺度:一个描述林木个体分布格局的结构参数[J]. 林业科学, 1999,35(1):39-44.
|
[19] |
惠刚盈,
|
[20] |
惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 赵中华, 等. 基于交角的林木竞争指数[J]. 林业科学, 2013,49(6):68-73.
|
[21] |
钱颂迪. 运筹学[M]. 3版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2005: 446.
|
[22] |
陈霞, 袁在翔, 金雪梅, 等. 紫金山针阔混交林主要树种空间分布格局及种间关联性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,42(6):84-90.
|
[23] |
王涛, 董灵波, 刘兆刚, 等. 大兴安岭天然次生林林木补植空间优化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019,41(5):127-136.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |