不同氮素施肥方法对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202005040

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 107-113.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202005040

不同氮素施肥方法对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响

倪铭¹(), 高振洲¹, 吴文², 张于卉², 喻方圆¹^,^*()

1.南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037
2.上海市林业总站,上海 200040

收稿日期:2020-05-22 接受日期:2021-05-31 出版日期:2021-07-30 发布日期:2021-07-30
通讯作者: 喻方圆
基金资助:
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD);上海市科技兴农项目(沪农科推字)(2017第1-7号)

Effects of different nitrogen fertilization methods on growth and non-structure carbohydrate accumulation of Quercus nuttallii seedlings

NI Ming¹(), GAO Zhenzhou¹, WU Wen², ZHANG Yuhui², YU Fangyuan¹^,^*()

1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Shanghai Forestry Station, Shanghai 200040, China

Received:2020-05-22 Accepted:2021-05-31 Online:2021-07-30 Published:2021-07-30
Contact: YU Fangyuan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究不同氮素施肥方式和不同施氮量对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响,揭示苗木需肥规律并确定最佳施肥方式与施氮量。【方法】以纳塔栎1年生容器苗为试验材料,设置平均施肥和指数施肥两种施肥方式,每种方式设置4个浓度梯度的施肥处理,对照组不施肥,施肥间隔为7 d,共施肥15次。施肥结束后进行苗高、地径的测量,并收获苗木将其烘干,测定生物量和非结构性碳水化合物含量。【结果】平均施肥和指数施肥均显著促进了纳塔栎1年生容器苗的生长,指数施肥效果整体优于平均施肥;随着施氮量的增加,苗高、地径、地上部分生物量、地下部分生物量以及总生物量均在指数施肥900 mg/株(Z900)处理下取得最大值97.90 cm、10.33 mm、12.21 g、26.74 g和38.95 g,是CK的1.53、1.15、1.75、2.47和2.19倍。施氮更多地促进生物量分配给纳塔栎容器苗的茎和叶;纳塔栎容器苗茎、叶、根的可溶性糖含量在各施氮处理组中均有提升,且指数施肥处理效果更优;施氮显著促进叶部淀粉积累,抑制根部淀粉累积。【结论】就纳塔栎容器苗而言,指数施肥效果优于平均施肥。Z900处理下,纳塔栎1年生容器苗的生长发育最好,为纳塔栎容器苗生长最佳施肥处理。

关键词: 纳塔栎, 指数施肥, 平均施肥, 生长特性, 非结构性碳水化合物, 容器苗

Abstract:

【Objective】The effects of different fertilization methods and different nitrogen application rates on the growth and non-structure carbohydrate accumulation of Quercus nuttallii container seedlings were investigated in this study. This was done to reveal the fertilizer demand of Q. nuttallii seedlings so that optimal fertilization methods and nitrogen application rates could be determined.【Method】Two fertilization methods of average fertilization and exponential fertilization levels were set with one-year-old Q. nuttallii container seedlings as the experimental objects. Fertilization treatments along four concentration gradients were set for each method. The fertilization interval was 7 days and 15 rounds of fertilizer applications were applied. The seedling height and ground diameter were measured after fertilization. Seedling samples were harvested and dried to measure biomass, soluble sugar and starch contents at the end of the experiment.【Result】Both ave-rage fertilization and exponential fertilization significantly promoted the growth of one-year-old Q. nuttallii container seedlings, and the effect of exponential fertilization was better than that of average fertilization. With the increase in nitrogen application, seedling height, ground diameter, aboveground biomass, underground biomass and total biomass all reached the maximum values of 97.90 cm, 10.33 mm, 12.21 g, 26.74 g, and 38.95 g, respectively, under the treatment of Z900; which was 1.53, 1.15, 1.75, 2.47 and 2.19 times the values of CK, respectively. The application of nitrogen fertilizer assigned more biomass to the stems and leaves. Further, the soluble sugar content of each organ increased significantly in each fertilization group and the effect of exponential fertilization was better, whereas the starch content decreased significantly in the roots.【Conclusion】The exponential fertilization was found to be better than the traditional fertilization. The growth and development of one-year-old Quercus nuttallii container seedlings treated with Z900 were the most impressive, suggesting that this treatment is an ideal fertilization treatment for Quercus nuttallii container seedlings.

Key words: Quercus nuttallii, exponential fertilization, average fertilization, growth character, non-structure carbohydrate, container seedling

中图分类号:

S723

倪铭,高振洲,吴文,等. 不同氮素施肥方法对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 107-113.

NI Ming, GAO Zhenzhou, WU Wen, ZHANG Yuhui, YU Fangyuan. Effects of different nitrogen fertilization methods on growth and non-structure carbohydrate accumulation of Quercus nuttallii seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(4): 107-113.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202005040.

图/表 5

表1

图1

表2

图2

表3

参考文献 36

[1]	魏宁, 李国雷, 蔡梦雪, 等. 缓释肥施氮量对4种国外栎苗木质量及移栽成活率的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(3):53-60.
	WEI N, LI G L, CAI M X, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilization rates on seedling quality and field survival rates of four exotic oaks[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed ), 2021, 45(3):53-60. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201909002. doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201909002
[2]	INGESTAD T, LUND A B. Theory and techniques for steady state mineral nutrition and growth of plants[J]. Scand J For Res, 1986, 1(1/2/3/4):439-453. DOI: 10.1080/02827588609382436. doi: 10.1080/02827588609382436
[3]	INGESTAD T. New concepts on soil fertility and plant nutrition as illustrated by research on forest trees and stands[J]. Geoderma, 1987, 40(3/4):237-252. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7061(87)90035-8. doi: 10.1016/0016-7061(87)90035-8
[4]	TIMMER V R, MILLER B D. Effects of contrasting fertilization and moisture regimes on biomass, nutrients, and water relations of container grown red pine seedlings[J]. New For, 1991, 5(4):335-348. DOI: 10.1007/BF00118861. doi: 10.1007/BF00118861
[5]	HAWKINS B J, BURGESS D, MITCHELL A K. Growth and nutrient dynamics of western hemlock with conventional or exponential greenhouse fertilization and planting in different fertility conditions[J]. Can J For Res, 2005, 35(4):1002-1016. DOI: 10.1139/x05-026. doi: 10.1139/x05-026
[6]	QUORESHI A M, TIMMER V R. Exponential fertilization increases nutrient uptake and ectomycorrhizal development of black spruce seedlings[J]. Can J For Res, 1998, 28(5):674-682. DOI: 10.1139/x98-024. doi: 10.1139/x98-024
[7]	MCALISTER J A, TIMMER V R. Nutrient enrichment of white spruce seedlings during nursery culture and initial plantation establishment[J]. Tree Physiol, 1998, 18(3):195-202. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/18.3.195. doi: 10.1093/treephys/18.3.195
[8]	BURGESS D. Western hemlock and Douglas-fir seedling development with exponential rates of nutrient addition[J]. For Sci, 1991, 37(1):54-67.
[9]	魏红旭, 徐程扬, 马履一, 等. 不同指数施肥方法下长白落叶松播种苗的需肥规律[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(3):685-690.
	WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. Nutrient upkate of Larix olgensis seedlings in response to different exponential regimes[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(3):685-690.
[10]	刘欢, 王超琦, 吴家森, 等. 氮素指数施肥对杉木无性系苗生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10):3123-3128.
	LIU H, WANG C Q, WU J S, et al. Effects of exponential N fertilization on the growth and nutrient content in clonal Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27(10):3123-3128. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.027. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.027
[11]	王益明. 基于指数施肥法的美国山核桃苗期需肥规律研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2018.
	WANG Y M. Study on fertilizer requirement regularity for seedlings of Carya illinoinensis in response to different exponential regimes[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2018.
[12]	林平, 邹尚庆, 李国雷, 等. 油松容器苗生长和氮吸收对指数施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(3):23-28.
	LIN P, ZOU S Q, LI G L, et al. Response of growth and N uptake of Pinus tabulaeformis container seedlings to exponential fertilization[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013, 37(3):23-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.03.005. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.03.005
[13]	轩寒风. 指数施肥对不同世代杉木容器苗生长和N、P、K养分承载影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2018.
	XUAN H F. Effects of exponential fertilization on the growth and the nutrient loading of N,P and K in different generations of Chinese fir[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2018.
[14]	张华林. 尾巨桉苗期指数施肥及其生理效应研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
	ZHANG H L. Study on exponential fertilization and its physiological effects of Eucalyputs urophylla×E. grandis propagules[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2013.
[15]	许晓波. 新优树种纳塔栎秋色叶变化及其对环境的适应性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(16):14-18.
	XU X B. Variation of autumn-color leaf and the adaptability to environment of Quercus nuttallii[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2015, 31(16):14-18.
[16]	吴媛, 包志毅. 栎属植物资源及其在园林中的应用前景[J]. 北方园艺, 北方园艺, 2008(7):174-177.
	WU Y, BAO Z Y. Resources of the Quercus and their application to landscaping[J]. North Hortic, 2008(7):174-177.
[17]	陈益泰, 孙海菁, 王树凤, 等. 5种北美栎树在我国长三角地区的引种生长表现[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(3):344-351.
	CHEN Y T, SUN H J, WANG S F, et al. Growth perfor-mances of five north Ameirican oak species in Yangzi River Delta of China[J]. For Res, 2013, 26(3):344-351. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2013.03.014. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2013.03.014
[18]	陈叶平, 王林春, 孙圳. 纳塔栎播种育苗试验[J]. 山东林业科技, 2016, 46(4):45-47, 41.
	CHEN Y P, WANG L C, SUN Z, Experiment on sowing and raising seedlings of Quercus nuttallii[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2016, 46(4):45-47, 41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2016.04.011. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2016.04.011
[19]	王松, 何理坤, 范正文, 等. 纳塔栎容器育苗技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018 (16):142-145.
	WANG S, HE L K, FAN Z W, et al. Container seedling technology of Quercus nuttallii[J]. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2018(16):142-145. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2018.16.090. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2018.16.090
[20]	黄利斌, 杨静, 何开跃, 等. 纳塔栎和南方红栎2年生苗耐水湿性试验[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37(5):7-9, 35.
	HUANG L B, YANG J, HE K Y, et al. Response of Quercus nuttallii and Quercus falcata saplings to flooding stress[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2009, 37(5):7-9, 35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2009.05.003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2009.05.003
[21]	陈晨, 吴岐奎, 张子晗, 等. 植物生长调节剂对纳塔栎插穗生根及其生理生化特性的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2019, 39(3):33-39.
	CHEN C, WU Q K, ZHANG Z H, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on rooting capacity and physiological and biochemical characteristic of Quercus nuttallii cuttings[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2019, 39(3):33-39. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201903113. doi: 10.11929/j.swfu.201903113
[22]	郁春柳. 纳塔栎容器育苗基质筛选[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2016, 43(1):18-20.
	YU C L. Substrate selection for container seedling breeding of Quercus nuttallii Palmer[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Tech-nol, 2016, 43(1):18-20. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.01.005. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.01.005
[23]	郑云普, 王贺新, 娄鑫, 等. 木本植物非结构性碳水化合物变化及其影响因子研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(4):1188-1196.
	ZHENG Y P, WANG H X, LOU X, et al. Changes of non-structural carbohydrates and its impact factors in trees: a review[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014, 25(4):1188-1196. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2014.0110. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2014.0110
[24]	陈轶群, 柯梦, 彭钟通, 等. 热带乡土植物大青叶片非结构性碳水化合物及氮磷含量对氮磷添加的响应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(2):389-397.
	CHEN Y Q, KE M, PENG Z T, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on concentrations of leaf non-structural carbohydrates,nitrogen,and phosphorus in Clerodendrum cyrtophyllum in a tropical forest[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2021, 27(2):389-397.DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.02011. doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.02011
[25]	王彪, 江源, 王明昌, 等. 芦芽山不同海拔白杄非结构性碳水化合物含量动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(7):746-752. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0071
	WANG B, JIANG Y, WANG M C, et al. Variations of non-structural carbohydrate concentration of Picea meyeri at different elevations of Luya Mountain,China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(7):746-752. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0071. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0071
[26]	丁钿冉, 郝龙飞, 张静娴, 等. 指数施肥对白桦容器苗生物量及形态特征的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(10):31-34.
	DING T R, HAO L F, ZHANG J X, et al. Effect of exponential fertilization on biomass and morphological characteristics of Betula platyphylla seedlings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2013, 41(10):31-34. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2013.10.015. doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2013.10.015
[27]	杨阳, 施皓然, 及利, 等. 指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(2):91-97.
	YANG Y, SHI H R, JI L, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and root morphologyof Tilia amurensis seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(2):91-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811061. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811061
[28]	唐桂兰, 刘小星, 芦建国. 氮素指数施肥对夏蜡梅幼苗生长、养分分配的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6):134-140.
	TANG G L, LIU X X, LU J G. Effects of nitrogen exponential fertilization on growth and nutrient distribution of Sinocalycanthus chinensis seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 41(6):134-140. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201604043. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201604043
[29]	王益明, 李瑞瑞, 张慧, 等. 指数施肥对美国山核桃幼苗生物量及氮积累的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(10):2920-2926.
	WANG Y M, LI R R, ZHANG H, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on biomass and nitrogen accumulation of Carya illinoensis seedlings[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2018, 37(10):2920-2926. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201810.028. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201810.028
[30]	马卫平, 李银梅, 陈静. 氮素指数施肥对连香树幼苗生长和生物量分配的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2014(11):34-37.
	MA W P, LI Y M, CHEN J. Effects of exponential fertilization on the seedling growth and biomass allocation of katsura tree[J]. Gansu Agric Sci Technol, 2014(11):34-37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2014.11.013. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2014.11.013
[31]	魏红旭, 徐程扬, 马履一, 等. 苗木晚季施肥研究现状与展望[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(7):172-180.
	WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. Current development and prospect on late-season fertilization to tree seedling[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(7):172-180.
[32]	GORDON W S, JACKSON R B. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots[J]. Ecology, 2000, 81(1):275-280. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0275:ncifr]2.0.co;2. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081
[33]	李洪影. 氮磷钾肥对青贮玉米不同形式碳水化合物积累的影响[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2010.
	LI H Y. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on accumulation of different carbohydrate in silage corn[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2010.
[34]	凌岩, 秦健, 尚旭岚, 等. 施氮量对青钱柳幼苗生长和总酚积累的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(4):45-51.
	LING Y, QIN J, SHANG X L, et al. Effect of applying amount of nitrogen on growth and total phenolic accumulation in Cyclocarya paliurus seedling[J]. J Plant Resour Environ,2020,29(4):45-51.10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895. 2020. 04.06.
[35]	杨湘, 郁松林, 孙慧敏, 等. 施氮量对葡萄幼苗叶片蔗糖和淀粉代谢的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(14):53-59.
	YANG X, YU S L, SUN H M, et al. Effects of N fertilizer application on sucrose and starch metabolism in Vitis vinifera L. seedlings[J]. North Hortic, 2019(14):53-59. DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20184685. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20184685
[36]	WRIGHT S J, YAVITT J B, WURZBURGER N, et al. Pota-ssium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest[J]. Ecology, 2011, 92(8):1616-1625. DOI: 10.1890/10-1558.1. doi: 10.1890/10-1558.1

处理 treat- ment	施肥量/(mg·株^-1) fertilization amount															总量 total
处理 treat- ment	1周	2周	3周	4周	5周	6周	7周	8周	9周	10周	11周	12周	13周	14周	15周	总量 total
CK	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
C300	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	300
C500	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	33.33	500
C700	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	46.67	700
C900	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	60.00	900
Z300	11.16	12.04	13.17	14.01	15.11	16.12	17.58	18.97	20.46	22.06	23.81	25.68	27.70	29.88	32.23	300
Z500	15.02	16.61	18.36	20.32	22.46	24.84	27.47	30.38	33.60	37.16	41.09	45.44	50.25	55.58	61.46	500
Z700	17.88	20.13	22.68	25.53	28.75	32.37	36.45	41.05	46.23	52.05	58.61	66.01	74.32	83.70	94.24	700
Z900	20.17	23.03	26.31	30.04	34.32	39.20	44.78	51.14	58.41	66.71	76.20	87.04	99.41	113.55	129.68	900

处理 treatment	生物量/g biomass
处理 treatment	地下部分 underground part	地上部分 aboveground part	总生物量 total biomass
CK	6.978±0.148 f	10.818±0.324 f	17.795±0.471 g
C300	7.867±0.151 e	18.336±0.353 d	26.203±0.462 e
C500	10.011±0.166 d	20.383±0.422 c	30.394±0.288 d
C700	10.584±0.231 c	21.975±0.310 b	32.559±0.191 bc
C900	10.175±0.152 cd	21.390±0.374 bc	31.573±0.434 c
Z300	7.362±0.126 ef	17.208±0.194 e	24.570±0.305 f
Z500	11.190±0.178 b	21.301±0.142 bc	32.491±0.098 bc
Z700	11.897±0.199 a	21.715±0.042 b	33.613±0.229 b
Z900	12.208±0.216 a	26.743±0.516 a	38.951±0.553 a

处理 treatment	可溶性糖含量 soluble sugar content			淀粉含量 starch content
处理 treatment	根root	茎stem	叶leaf	根root	茎stem	叶leaf
CK	61.653±1.042 cd	49.822±0.274 c	22.525±2.084 c	185.607±0.744 ab	112.427±4.337 c	54.762±0.398 cd
C300	56.098±3.780 d	68.212±2.534 a	23.691±2.708 c	155.921±6.988 cd	103.572±7.228 cd	59.915±7.605 b
C500	64.372±2.750 bc	57.987±2.390 bc	21.288±0.098 cd	170.129±12.173 bc	115.639±16.688 bc	67.844±0.178 a
C700	65.869±1.211 bc	67.924±0.783 a	28.898±1.394 b	188.455±1.278 ab	103.391±1.257 cd	65.123±5.039 a
C900	75.712±6.767 ab	68.212±0.661 a	23.648±0.179 c	142.838±9.659 de	99.199±5.667 e	66.338±8.653 a
Z300	84.953±4.616 a	67.496±7.029 a	40.915±2.231 a	124.185±9.072 e	104.098±0.911 cd	55.651±2.650 c
Z500	82.254±2.119 ab	70.025±0.025 a	44.674±1.964 a	200.921±14.614 a	97.802±6.662 e	51.477±1.288 d
Z700	70.186±5.044 b	68.360±0.634 a	16.966±1.072 d	177.568±5.489 b	116.528±2.681 bc	67.572±4.819 a
Z900	67.123±4.054 bc	66.157±3.781 ab	33.402±1.187 b	170.564±6.872 bc	127.977±0.450 a	58.209±2.409 bc

不同氮素施肥方法对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响

Effects of different nitrogen fertilization methods on growth and non-structure carbohydrate accumulation of Quercus nuttallii seedlings

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	丰伟, 单昌丹, 张慧, 刘家蔓, 柳国昂, 姚增玉. 施肥方式和施肥量对华山松幼苗生长及针叶营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 191-198.
[2]	杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[3]	魏绪英, 张瑶, 马美霞, 姜雪茹, 陈慧婷, 吴靖, 杨玉, 蔡军火. 石蒜年生长周期内NSC及其代谢酶活性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 106-114.
[4]	梁文超, 步行, 罗思谦, 谢寅峰, 胡加玲, 张往祥. 施肥对增温促花后‘长寿冠’海棠叶片生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[5]	魏亚娟, 郭靖, 党晓宏, 解云虎, 汪季, 李小乐, 吴慧敏. 吉兰泰荒漠绿洲过渡带不同生境下白刺灌丛沙堆形态特征与影响机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 172-180.
[6]	林强, 陆天宇, 沈海龙, 王元兴, 张鹏. 长期结实和不结实红松针叶光合生理参数的差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 137-146.
[7]	孙薇, 王斌, 楚秀丽, 王秀花, 张东北, 吴小林, 周志春. 马尾松容器苗生长和养分性状对磷添加和接种菌根菌的响应及关联[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 226-233.
[8]	刘泽茂, 晏昕, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 竹炭添加对大叶榉树容器苗生长和营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 111-118.
[9]	季艳红, 潘平平, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰. 不同泥炭替代基质对薄壳山核桃幼苗生长及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 145-155.
[10]	张晓荣, 段广德, 郝龙飞, 刘婷岩, 张友, 张盛晰. 氮沉降和接种菌根真菌对灌木铁线莲非结构性碳水化合物及根际土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 171-178.
[11]	季艳红, 汤文华, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰. 施肥对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 47-56.
[12]	魏龙鑫, 章异平, 李艺杰, 张玉茹. 栓皮栎叶片和枝条非结构性碳水化合物调配关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 96-102.
[13]	张亦弛, 郭素娟. 植物生长延缓剂对板栗苗枝条生长及叶片非结构性碳水化合物的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 85-93.
[14]	杨阳, 施皓然, 及利, 杨立学. 指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 91-97.
[15]	李峰卿, 王秀花, 楚秀丽, 张东北, 吴小林, 周生财, 叶明. 缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生苗生长和养分库构建的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 72-80.