坡面方胸材小蠹鉴定与风险分析

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006003

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 201-208.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006003

坡面方胸材小蠹鉴定与风险分析

王立超¹, 陈凤毛¹^,^*(), 仇才楼², 唐进根¹, 丁学农³, 任吉星³

1. 南京林业大学林学院,南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210037
2. 江苏省森林病虫害防治检疫站, 江苏南京 210036
3. 江苏省东台林场,江苏盐城 224200

收稿日期:2020-06-02 接受日期:2021-02-05 出版日期:2021-09-30 发布日期:2021-09-30
通讯作者: 陈凤毛
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0600104)

Identification and risk analyses of Euwallacea interjectus

WANG Lichao¹, CHEN Fengmao¹^,^*(), QIU Cailou², TANG Jingen¹, DING Xuenong³, REN Jixing³

1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Jiangsu Province Forest Pest Control and Quarantine Station, Nanjing 210036, China
3. Dongtai City Forest Farm of Jiangsu Province, Yancheng 224200, China

Received:2020-06-02 Accepted:2021-02-05 Online:2021-09-30 Published:2021-09-30
Contact: CHEN Fengmao

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 杨树是我国主要的人工林造林树种,同时也是重要的绿化和用材树种。准确鉴定枯死杨树内小蠹虫的种类,并确定其在中国境内的风险大小,为该小蠹虫的防控提供理论参考。【方法】 采用传统的形态学鉴定方法,观察和测定小蠹虫(采自江苏东台林场枯死杨树内的样本虫株JSYC-beetle)头部、前胸背板、触角以及鞘翅等形态指标,初步判定小蠹虫的分类地位;使用CTAB法提取小蠹虫的基因组DNA,使用小蠹虫28S rDNA、COI和CAD基因引物分别对基因组DNA进行扩增,扩增产物经过生物公司测序、拼接,在NCBI网站进行同源性分析比对,选择同源性排名前10~15的相似序列,以NJ法分别构建3个基因系统进化树,根据系统进化树的聚类结果对小蠹虫JSYC-beetle进行分子鉴定。为预测小蠹虫的危害性,根据有害生物危险性评价定量分析方法对小蠹虫JSYC-beetle在中国的分布和潜在危害进行风险分析。【结果】 小蠹虫JSYC-beetle雌虫体色红褐色至黑色,体长3.3~3.7 mm,宽1.49~1.64 mm;雄虫体色黄褐色,体长2.264 mm,宽1.195 mm。虫体具有金属光泽,触角鞭节5节,第1节长度小于其余各节,触角末节球状,有2条明显的横缝。复眼肾形,头部藏在前胸背板下,前胸背板近方形,凸出明显,前缘阔圆形,宽略大于长,前半部分分布鳞状齿,后半部分光滑。小盾片舌状,鞘翅宽略大于前胸背板的宽度,鞘翅斜面从基部至端部逐渐倾斜,鞘翅轮廓如舌,鞘翅列间部上的刻点与沟内刻点大小相近,分布均匀,鞘翅茸毛长。前足胫节具有8~14个齿瘤不等,第1跗节小于其余跗节长度之和。以上形态比对结果表明小蠹虫JSYC-beetle的形态特征与坡面方胸材小蠹形态特征最为相似;28S rDNA、COI和CAD基因扩增产物经琼脂糖凝胶电泳结果表明,3对引物均能扩增出单一、明亮条带,其中COI 基因扩增出的条带大小在700~1 000 bp,28S rDNA基因扩增的条带大小约为500 bp, CAD 基因扩增出的条带大小在400~500 bp。NCBI序列比对结果显示COI、28S rDNA以及CAD序列均与坡面方胸材小蠹同源性最高,其相似性依次为99.14%、99.38%和99.36%;以NJ法构建的系统进化树结果显示小蠹虫JSYC-beetle均与坡面方胸材小蠹虫聚在一个分支上,进一步表明小蠹虫JSYC-beetle虫株与坡面方胸材小蠹关系最近,基于小蠹虫JSYC-beetle虫株形态学和分子生物学鉴定结果,最终将枯死杨树内小蠹虫JSYC-beetle虫株鉴定为坡面方胸材小蠹。风险分析结果显示坡面方胸材小蠹风险R值为2.01,在我国属于高危险度生物。【结论】 实验使用小蠹虫是从杨树林采集,经鉴定枯死杨树内小蠹虫为坡面方胸材小蠹,该生物在中国境内属于高危生物,已报可能危害健康杨树。采集地有大量杨树死亡,因此需要加强管理,以防止该生物对杨树及其他寄主植物造成重大危害。

关键词: 坡面方胸材小蠹, 杨树, 形态鉴定, 分子鉴定, 风险分析

Abstract:

【Objective】 Poplars are important tree species in plantations and timber in China. We aimed to identify the species of the JSYC-beetle strain in dead poplar and determine its risk, and provide a theoretical reference for the control of the beetle. 【Method】 The head, pronotum, antennae and elytron of the beetle were observed and measured by the traditional morphological identification method. The DNA of the beetle was extracted by using the CTAB method, and the corresponding COI, 28S rDNA and CAD regions were amplified. The amplified products were sequenced and spliced by biological companies, homology analysis was conducted on the NCBI website, and similar sequences with the top 10-15 homology were selected to construct three gene phylogenetic trees by using the NJ method. According to the clustering results of the phylogenetic tree, JSYC-beetle strain were identified. In order to predict the possible damage degree, the distribution and potential hazards of the JSYC-beetle in China were analyzed according to the quantitative analysis method of pest risk assessment.【Result】 The female JSYC-beetle was reddish-brown to black, with a body length of 3.3-3.7 mm and a width of 1.49-1.64 mm. The male was yellowish-brown, with a body length of 2.264 mm and a body width of 1.195 mm. The insect body had a metallic luster. The flagellum had five segments, and the length of the first segment was shorter than that of the other segments. The end segments of the antennae were spherical, with two obvious transverse seams. The compound eyes were kidney shaped. The head was hidden in the anterior sternal plate. The anteroposterior plate was nearly square in shape and protrudes. The front edge was wide and round, and its width was slightly larger than its length. The front part was distributed with squamous teeth, and the latter part was smooth. The scutellum was ligulate, and the width of the elytron was slightly larger than that of the pronotum. The oblique plane of the elytron gradually inclinesd from the base to the end. The elytron was shaped similarly to a tongue. The size of the incisions on the intercostal part of the elytron was similar to that in the groove, and the distribution was uniform. There were 8-14 odontomas in the tibial segment of the forefoot, and the first segment of the trasi was shorter than the sum of the other segment lengths. According to the aforementioned morphological comparison, the morphological characteristics of the bark beetle JSYC-beetle strain were most similar to those of E. interjectus. The COI, 28S rDNA and CAD genes were amplified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The results showed that COI, 28S rDNA and CAD genes could amplify single and bright bands and that the size of the electrophoresis band was 700-1 000 bp, approximately 500 bp and 400-500 bp, respectively. The results of NCBI sequence alignment showed that the COI, 28S rDNA and CAD sequences had the highest homology with E. interjectus, with similarities of 99.14%, 99.38% and 99.36%, respectively. The phylogenetic tree showed that the JSYC-beetle strain was clustered in one branch with E. interjectus, further indicating that the JSYC-beetle had the closest relationship with E. interjectus. On the basis of these results, the JSYC-beetle was identified as E. interjectus. The results of risk analysis showed that the risk R value was 2.01, which was a high-risk organism in China. 【Conclusion】 The bark beetles in dead poplar trees are E. interjectus, a high-risk organism in China. The beetle may harm healthy poplar and has been collected from poplars in China; there are many dead poplars in the collection area. Therefore, strengthening management to prevent major harm to poplar and other host plants is necessary.

Key words: Euwallacea interjectus, poplar, morphological identification, molecular identification, risk analysis

中图分类号:

S763

王立超,陈凤毛,仇才楼,等. 坡面方胸材小蠹鉴定与风险分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 201-208.

WANG Lichao, CHEN Fengmao, QIU Cailou, TANG Jingen, DING Xuenong, REN Jixing. Identification and risk analyses of Euwallacea interjectus[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(5): 201-208.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006003.

图/表 6

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

表3

坡面方胸材小蠹多指标综合评价体系"

准则层P_i criterion layer	指标层P_ii index layer	分值 score	评价赋分理由 evaluation reference
国内分布P₁ domestic distribution	国内分布情况P₁₁ domestic distribution	1.8	5%≤有害生物分布面积占其寄主 (包括潜在的寄主) 面积的百分率< 20%
传入,定殖和扩散可能性P₂ possibility of introduced, colonization and spread	有害生物被截获的可能性P₂₁ possibility of pest being intercepted	2.0	寄主植物、产品调运的可能性和携带有害生物的可能性都大
	运输过程中有害生物存活率P₂₂ survival rate of pests during transportation	2.5	存活率≥40%
	有害生物的适生性P₂₃ adaptability of pests	2.5	繁殖能力强,抗逆性一般
	自然扩散能力P₂₄ aatural diffusion capacity	1.2	随介体携带扩散能力或自身扩散能力一般
	国内适生范围P₂₅ domestic suitable range	2.0	≥50%的地区能够适生
潜在危害P₃ potential hazards	潜在经济危害性P₃₁ potential economic harm	2.5	如传入可造成的树木死亡率或产量损失≥20%
	非经济方面的潜在危害性P₃₂ potential damages on social and ecological resource	2.2	潜在环境、生态、社会影响中等
	官方重视程度P₃₃ official attention	0	未被列入我国植物检疫性和危险性有害生物名录
受害寄主重要性P₄ economic importance of the hosts	受害寄主的种类P₄₁ species of damaged host	2.5	10种以上
	受害寄主的分布面积或产量P₄₂ distribution area of damaged-host plants	2.0	分布面积广或产量大
	受害寄主的特殊经济价值P₄₃ special economic value of injured host	2.0	经济价值高,社会影响大
危险性管理难度P₅ obstacles in the risk management	检疫识别的难度P₅₁ quarantine difficulty	2.0	现场识别可靠性一般,由经过专门培训的技术人员才能识别
	除害处理难度P₅₂ prevention effect	2.0	常规方法的除害效率< 50%
	根除的难度P₅₃ prevention cost	2.2	介于效果差、成本高、难度大和效果好、成本低、简便易行之间

表3

参考文献 29

[1]	殷惠芬. 中国经济昆虫志: 第二十九册, 鞘翅目小蠹科[M]. 北京: 中国科学出版社. YIN H F. Economic entomology of China: Vol. 29, Coleoptera Coleopterae[M]. Beijing: China Science Press, 1984.
[2]	WOOD S L. A reclassification of the genera of Scolytidae (Coleoptera)[J]. Gt Basin Nat Mem, 1986, 10:126.
[3]	王志良, 张润志. 小蠹亚科的分类地位(鞘翅目,象虫科)[J]. 动物分类学报,2012,37(2):291-295.WANG Z L,ZHANG R Z.Taxonomic status of bark beetles (Coleoptera,Curculionidae)[J]. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin, 2012, 37(2):291-295.
[4]	张俊华, 王新国, 宋光远, 等. 进口原木携带方胸小蠹属昆虫的鉴定[J]. 植物检疫, 2019, 33(3):23-28. ZHANG J H, WANG X G, SONG G Y, et al. Identification of Euwallacea intercepted from imported logs[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2019, 33(3):23-28. DOI: 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2019.03.006. doi: 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2019.03.006
[5]	COGNATO A I, HOEBEKE E R, KAJIMURA H, et al. History of the exotic ambrosia beetles Euwallacea interjectus and Euwallacea validus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Xyleborini) in the United States[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2015, 108(3):1129-1135. DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov073. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov073
[6]	LUCAS L, BRACCINI C L, KNížEK M, et al. A newly detected exotic ambrosia beetle in Argentina: Euwallacea interjectus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)[J]. Florida Entomologist, 2019, 102(1):240-242. DOI: 10.1653/024.102.0141. doi: 10.1653/024.102.0141
[7]	KANGKAMANEE T, SITTICHAYA W, NGAMPONGSAI A, et al. Wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae, Curculionidae; Platypodinae and Scolytinae) infesting rubberwood sawn timber in southern Thailand[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 16(4):302-308. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-010-0224-7. doi: 10.1007/s10310-010-0224-7
[8]	CHANG H, LIU Q, HAO D J, et al. DNA barcodes and molecular diagnostics for distinguishing introduced Xyleborus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) species in China[J]. Mitochondrial DNA, 2014, 25(1):63-69. DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2013.779260. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2013.779260
[9]	The World Bank. Bangladesh Sustainable Forest and Livelihood (SUFAL) Project[R]. Bangladesh, 2018.
[10]	KAJII C, MORITA T, JIKUMARU S, et al. Xylem dysfunction in Ficus carica infected with wilt fungus Ceratocystis ficicola and the role of the vector beetle Euwallacea interjectus[J]. IAWA Journal, 2013, 34(3):301-312. DOI: 10.1163/22941932-00000025. doi: 10.1163/22941932-00000025
[11]	林玲玲, 黄蓬英, 林振基, 等. 厦门口岸进境原木截获的小蠹科害虫调查[J]. 生物安全学报, 2015, 24(3):215-218. LIN L L, HUANG P Y, LIN Z J, et al. Survey on intercepted scolitids of Xiamen ports[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2015, 24(3):215-218. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2015.03.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2015.03.006
[12]	王越, 孙涛. 重庆口岸首次截获芦笛长小蠹[J]. 中国检验检疫, 2018,(3): 15. WANG Y, SUN T. The first interception of Platypus calamus at Chongqing port[J]. Inspection and Quarantine of China, 2018, (3):15.
[13]	吕佳, 赖盛昌, 田尚, 等. 江西材小蠹族Xyleborini(Coleoptera:Scolytinae)分类研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(4):840-852. LV J, LAI S C, TIAN S, et al. Taxonomic studies on the Xyleborini beetles from Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(4):840-852. DOI: 10. 3969 /j.issn.1674-0858.2018.04.16. doi: 10. 3969 /j.issn.1674-0858.2018.04.16
[14]	柴希民, 何志华, 章今方, 等. 浙江省木材害虫种类调查[J]. 浙江林业科技, 1993,13(5):33-35. CHAI X M, HE Z H, ZHANG J F, et al. Investigation on injurious insects on timber in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science & Technology, 1993, 13(5):33-35.
[15]	田尚. 重庆地区小蠹多样性再调查与分子鉴定[D].南昌:江西农业大学, 2018. TIAN S. Biodiversity and molecular identification of the Scolytinae reinvestigation in Chongqing area[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2018.
[16]	COGNATO A I, HULCR J, DOLE S A, et al. Phylogeny of haplo-diploid, fungus-growing ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) inferred from molecular and morphological data[J]. Zoologica Scripta, 2011, 40(2):174-186. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00466.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00466.x
[17]	黄蓬英, 方志鹏, 林玲玲, 等. 南部松齿小蠹和长林小蠹幼虫分子鉴定[J]. 植物检疫, 2018, 32(4):43-47. HUANG P Y, FANG Z P, LIN L L, et al. Molecular identification for larvae of Ips grandicollis Eichhoff and Hylurgus ligniperda Fabricius[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2018, 32(4):43-47. DOI: 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2018.04.007. doi: 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2018.04.007
[18]	罗禄怡. 坡面材小蠹的为害及防治[J]. 昆虫知识, 1984,(4):166-167. LUO L Y. Damage and control of Xyleborus interjectus[J]. Journal of Insect Knowledge, 1984, (4):166-167.
[19]	常虹. 口岸截获小蠹科昆虫DNA条形码技术研究[D].南京:南京林业大学, 2013. CHANG H. Study on DNA barcoding of Scolytidae species intercepted from ports[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2013.
[20]	李娟, 赵宇翔, 陈小平, 等. 林业有害生物风险分析指标体系及赋分标准的探讨[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2013, 32(3):10-15. LI J, ZHAO Y X, CHEN X P, et al. Discussion on the forest pest risk analysis index system and standard of natural endowments[J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2013, 32(3):10-15. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2013.03.003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2013.03.003
[21]	程强, 吴小芹, 叶建仁, 等. 菊方翅网蝽在南京分布及其对中国的风险分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1):125-130. CHENG Q, WU X Q, YE J R, et al. Distribution of Corythucha marmorata in Nanjing and its risk analysis in China[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(1):125-130. DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2006.201811019. doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2006.201811019
[22]	O’DONNELL K, LIBESKIND-HADAS R, HULCR J, et al. Invasive Asian Fusarium-Euwallacea ambrosia beetle mutualists pose a serious threat to forests, urban landscapes and the avocado industry[J]. Phytoparasitica, 2016, 44(4):435-442. DOI: 10.1007/s12600-016-0543-0. doi: 10.1007/s12600-016-0543-0
[23]	DEMIRCI F, MADEN S. A severe dieback of box elder (Acer negundo) caused by Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. in Turkey[J]. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 2006, 1(1):13-15. DOI: 10.1071/dn06007. doi: 10.1071/dn06007
[24]	ZHANG C Q, LIU Y H, XU B C. First report of Fusarium root rot on Chinese hickory(Carya cathayensis)caused by Fusarium oxysporum in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2015, 99(9): 1284 ref.3. DOI: 10.1094/pdis-01-15-0073-pdn. doi: 10.1094/pdis-01-15-0073-pdn
[25]	李伶俐, 韩正敏, 吕明亮, 等. 杨树枯萎病菌茄类镰刀菌的生物学特性[J]. 林业科技开发, 2009, 23(4):51-54.
	LI L L, HAN Z M, LV M L, et al. Biological Characteristics of Fusarium solani causing poplar blight[J]. Forestry Science and Technology, 2009, 23(4):51-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2009.04.012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2009.04.012
[26]	MENDEL Z, PROTASOV A, SHARON M, et al. An Asian ambrosia beetle Euwallacea fornicatus and its novel symbiotic fungus Fusarium sp. pose a serious threat to the Israeli avocado industry[J]. Phytoparasitica, 2012, 40(3):235-238. DOI: 10.1007/s12600-012-0223-7. doi: 10.1007/s12600-012-0223-7
[27]	PAAP T, BEER Z W, MIGLIORINI D, et al. The polyphagous shot hole borer (PSHB) and its fungal symbiont Fusarium euwallaceae: a new invasion in South Africa[J]. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2018, 47(2):231-237. DOI: 10.1007/s13313-018-0545-0. doi: 10.1007/s13313-018-0545-0
[28]	KAJITANI Y. The possibility of transmission of Fig ceratocystis canker disease by an ambrosia beetle (Xyleborus interjectus Eichhoff)[J]. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 1996, 62:275.
[29]	张悦, 冯会丽, 王维枫, 等. 洪泽湖地区杨树人工林碳水通量昼夜和季节变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(5):113-120.
	ZHANG Y, FENG H L, WANG W F, et al. Diurnal and seasonal changes of fluxes over a poplar plantation in Hongze Lake basin[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(5):113-120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806032

引物名称 primer	目的基因 target gene	引物序列(5'→3') sequence
CJ-J-2183-F	COI	CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG
TL2-N-3014-R	COI	TCCAATGCACTAATCTGCCATATTA
D2F1-F	28S rDNA	ACTGTTGGCGACGATGTTCT
D3R2-R	28S rDNA	TCTTCGCCCCTATACCC
CADa-F	CAD	CGTGATGCATATGACAACT
CADb-R	CAD	CGCGCTTTTCATTGAACT

性别 gender	鞘翅长 elytra long	鞘翅宽 elytra width	前胸背板长 prothorax long	前胸背板宽 prothorax width	体长 total
雌虫female	2.121	1.581	1.434	1.440	3.556
雄虫male	1.380	1.195	0.884	1.200	2.264

坡面方胸材小蠹鉴定与风险分析

Identification and risk analyses of Euwallacea interjectus

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	颜铮明, 阮宏华, 廖家辉, 石珂, 倪娟平, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 丁学农, 赵小龙, 庄鑫. 不同林龄杨树人工林地表甲虫群落多样性特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 236-242.
[2]	刘亚梅, 刘盛全, 周亮, 胡建军, 赵自成, 郑向丽. 8个杨树无性系/品种木材解剖特征及其径向变异模式[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 234-240.
[3]	张庆源, 田野, 王淼, 翟政, 周诗朝. 美洲黑杨与青杨杂交F₁代苗期表型性状的分化及其类型划分[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 40-48.
[4]	崔皓, 韩建刚, 郭俨辉, 季淮, 朱咏莉, 李萍萍. 洪泽湖河湖交汇区典型杨树人工林碳通量月尺度变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 19-26.
[5]	王润松, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 施用沼液对杨树人工林细根形态特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 119-124.
[6]	王润松, 孙源, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 施用沼液对杨树人工林细根生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 123-129.
[7]	马永春, 佘诚棋, 方升佐. 不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 137-142.
[8]	惠昊, 关庆伟, 王亚茹, 林鑫宇, 陈斌, 王刚, 胡月, 胡敬东. 不同森林经营模式对土壤氮含量及酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 151-158.
[9]	花伟成, 田佳榕, 孙心雨, 徐雁南. 基于TLS数据的杨树削度方程建立及材积估算[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 41-48.
[10]	王瑞, 王国兵, 徐瑾, 徐晓. 凋落物与蚯蚓对杨树人工林土壤团聚体分布及其碳氮含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 25-29.
[11]	石文广, 李靖, 张玉红, 雷静品, 罗志斌. 7种杨树铅抗性和积累能力的比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 61-70.
[12]	王国兵, 徐瑾, 徐晓, 阮宏华, 曹国华. 蚯蚓与凋落物对杨树人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 8-14.
[13]	何旭东, 郑纪伟, 孙冲, 何开跃, 王保松. 33个杨柳品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 35-42.
[14]	陈玉华, 姚丹, 吴海楠, 陶申童, 吴吉妍, 杨文国, 童春发. 美洲黑杨与小叶杨杂交F₁代扦插无性系苗生长性状动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 45-52.
[15]	储冬生, 郑旭, 秦盛华, 沈树祥, 沈海萍, 唐罗忠. 苏北淤泥质海岸土壤盐分特征及其对杨树生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 140-146.