城市公园绿地特征和使用方式与人群健康关系研究

王志鹏, 王薇, 邢思懿

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 223-231.

PDF(2364 KB)
PDF(2364 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 223-231. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006004
研究论文

城市公园绿地特征和使用方式与人群健康关系研究

作者信息 +

A study on the relationship between the characteristics and usage of urban park green space and population health

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】 城市公园绿地作为城市空间中的自然因素,对人群健康具有潜在促进效应,通过研究公园绿地特征和人群使用公园方式,探讨城市公园绿地对人群身心健康的影响效应。【方法】 选取合肥市逍遥津公园为研究地点,以人群使用公园时段为分层原则对公园使用者进行分层抽样调查。公园使用者个人特征信息和使用公园方式采用自行设计问卷获取,身心健康状况采用健康调查12条简表(SF-12)进行评估,公园绿地特征运用层次分析法和调查问卷进行评价,利用描述性统计分析、单因素分析及多元线性回归分析进行统计分析。【结果】 生理健康多元线性回归分析表明,每次使用公园时长(变量非标准化系数b=0.922, P<0.01)、每周使用公园频率(b=0.770, P<0.05)、公园生态特征(b=1.353, P<0.01)、服务特征(b=2.057, P<0.01)和美学特征(b=0.375, P<0.05)与使用者生理健康状况得分呈正相关;公园服务特征(标准化后的偏回归系数b'=0.437, P<0.01)对使用者生理健康状况得分的贡献高于生态特征(b'=0.276, P<0.01)和美学特征(b'=0.081, P<0.05)。心理健康多元线性回归分析发现,每次使用公园时长(b=1.402, P<0.01)、公园生态特征(b=1.763, P<0.01)、服务特征(b=0.791, P<0.05)和美学特征(b=3.398, P<0.01)与使用者心理健康状况得分呈正相关,公园美学特征(b'=0.453, P<0.01)对使用者心理健康状况得分的贡献高于生态特征(b'=0.139, P<0.05)和服务特征(b'=0.077, P<0.01)。【结论】 公园绿地对改善人群身心健康状况具有积极效应,绿地特征质量越高,对人群身心健康的促进效应越高,而个人所获得的健康效益因使用方式不同而存在差异性。提高使用公园频率和适当增加使用时间有利于改善人群生理健康状况;增加使用公园频率对改善人群心理健康无明显作用,适当增加使用公园时间和选择9:00—12:00之间使用公园更有利于人群心理健康。

Abstract

【Objective】 As a natural factor in urban spaces, urban park greenspace potentially benefits human health. By studying the attributes of park greenspace and the usage pattern of visiting parks, the effects of urban park greenspace on the physical and mental health of the population were discussed. 【Method】 Xiaoyaojin Park in Hefei City, China, was used as the research site, and park users were investigated by stratified sampling, using the duration of use as the stratification principle. Personal characteristics of park users and how they use the park were obtained by self-designed questionnaires; physical and mental health status was evaluated using the Health Survey SF-12 Brief; the attributes of park greenspace were evaluated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process method and questionnaires; and descriptive statistical analysis, variance analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. 【Result】 Multiple linear regression analysis of physical health revealed that the length of park use each time [the value of variable non-standardized coefficient (b) = 0.922, P < 0.01], the frequency of park use per week (b = 0.770, P < 0.05), ecological attributes of the park (b = 1.353, P < 0.01), service attributes of the park (b = 2.057, P < 0.01), and a esthetic attributes of the park (b = 0.375, P < 0.05) were positively correlated with park users’ physical health scores. The contribution of the service attributes [standardized partial regression coefficient (b') = 0.437, P < 0.01] to users’ physical health was higher than that of ecological (b' = 0.276, P < 0.01) and a esthetic (b' = 0.081, P < 0.05) attributes. Multiple linear regression analysis of mental health revealed that the length of park use per visit (b = 1.402, P < 0.01), ecological attributes of the park (b = 1.763, P < 0.01), service attributes of the park (b = 0.791, P < 0.05), and a esthetic attributes of the park (b = 3.398, P < 0.01) were positively correlated with the scores of park users’ mental health. The contribution of the a esthetic attributes (b' = 0.453, P < 0.01) to users’ physical health was higher than that of the ecological (b' = 0.139, P < 0.05) and service (b' = 0.077, P < 0.01) attributes. 【Conclusion】 Park greenspace improves the physical and mental health of the population. The higher the quality of the attributes of the greenspace, the higher the promotion effect on physical and mental health. Health benefits differ by usage pattern. Increasing the frequency of park use and increasing the time spent using the park benefit physical health. However, increasing the frequency of using the park was not observed to improve mental health. Increasing the time of use at the park and using the park between 9:00 and 12:00 am could make the mental health of park users more healthy.

关键词

城市公园 / 绿地特征 / 使用方式 / 生理健康 / 心理健康 / 合肥

Key words

urban park / park attributes / using pattern / physical health / mental health / Hefei City

引用本文

导出引用
王志鹏, 王薇, 邢思懿. 城市公园绿地特征和使用方式与人群健康关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2021, 45(5): 223-231 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006004
WANG Zhipeng, WANG Wei, XING Siyi. A study on the relationship between the characteristics and usage of urban park green space and population health[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(5): 223-231 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006004
中图分类号: TU986.4   

参考文献

[1]
World Health Organization. Ten threats to global health in 2019[EB/OL]. [2020-05-20]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
[2]
MARKEVYCH I, SCHOIERER J, HARTIG T, et al. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance[J]. Environ Res, 2017, 158:301-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028.
[3]
VAN DEN BOSCH M, ODE SANG Å. Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health: a systematic review of reviews[J]. Environ Res, 2017, 158:373-384.DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040.
[4]
章陆杨, 何侃, 林涛, 等. 城市公园绿地可达性对居民公共健康的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(18):148-153.
ZHANG L Y, HE K, LIN T, et al. Impact of accessibility of urban park green space on residents’ public health[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(18):148-153. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2020.18.029.
[5]
张金光, 赵兵. 基于可达性的城市公园选址及布局优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):151-158.
ZHANG J G, ZHAO B. Location and layout optimization of urban parks based on accessibility[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(6):151-158. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201710022.
[6]
陈瑶, 蔡广鹏, 韩会庆, 等. 居民对城市湿地公园生态系统服务功能认知的分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6):147-152.
CHEN Y, CAI G P, HAN H Q, et al. Residents’ cognition to ecosystem service functions of urban wetland parks[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 41(6):147-152. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201611031.
[7]
MCCORMACK G R, ROCK M, TOOHEY A M, et al. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity:a review of qualitative research[J]. Heal Place, 2010, 16(4):712-726.DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003.
[8]
COLLINS R M, SPAKE R, BROWN K A, et al. A systematic map of research exploring the effect of greenspace on mental health[J]. Landsc Urban plan, 2020, 201:103823.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103823.
[9]
BURROWS E, O’MAHONY M, GERAGHTY D. How urban parks offer opportunities for physical activity in Dublin, Ireland[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(4):815. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040815.
[10]
REID C E, CLOUGHERTY J E, SHMOOL J L C, et al. Is all urban green space the same?A comparison of the health benefits of trees and grass in New York City[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017, 14(11):1411. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111411.
[11]
COHEN D A, HAN B, EVENSON K R, et al. The prevalence and use of walking loops in neighborhood parks:a national study[J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2017, 125(2):170-174.DOI: 10.1289/EHP293.
[12]
VÖLKER S, KISTEMANN T. The impact of blue space on human health and well-being-salutogenetic health effects of inland surface waters:a review[J]. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2011, 214(6):449-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.05.001.
[13]
COHEN D A, MARSH T, WILLIAMSON S, et al. Parks and physical activity:why are some parks used more than others?[J]. Prev Med, 2010, 50(S1):9-12.DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.020.
[14]
郄光发, 王成, 房城, 等. 城市公园绿地享用方式与居民心境健康关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(11):111-113.
QIE G F, WANG C, FANG C, et al. Relationship between tourist’s mood state and method of enjoying parks[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2011, 39(11):111-113.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2011.11.010.
[15]
黄巧玲. 基于人群健康的城市公园绿地空间布局评价:以昆明市五华区为例[D]. 昆明:云南财经大学, 2019.
HUANG Q L. Evaluation of spatial distribution of urban park green space based on population health:a case study of Wuhua District,Kunming City[D]. Kunming:Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2019.
[16]
何荣晓, 张宏巍, 闫蓬勃, 等. 多属性视角下的新版《城市绿地分类标准》分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(5):29-34,98.
HE R X, ZHANG H W, YAN P B, et al. Analysis of standard for classification of urban green space(CJJ/T 85—2017) in the perspective of multiple attributes[J]. For Resour Manag, 2018(5):29-34,98.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.05.006.
[17]
张鹏岩, 杨丹, 李二玲, 等. 人口城镇化与土地城镇化的耦合协调关系:以中原经济区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(8):145-154.
ZHANG P Y, YANG D, LI E L, et al. The coupled coordination relationship between land urbanization and population urbanization:a case study of the Central Plains economic region[J]. Econ Geogr, 2017, 37(8):145-154.DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2017.08.019.
[18]
徐欣, 胡静. 基于GPS数据城市公园游客时空行为研究:以武汉东湖风景区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(6):224-232.
XU X, HU J. Study on spatiotemporal behavior of urban park tourists based on GPS data:a case study of Wuhan East Lake scenic area[J]. Econ Geogr, 2020, 40(6):224-232.DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.06.024.
[19]
王海棠, 任利民, 刘瑶, 等. SF-12健康调查量表的评价研究现状[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2015, 14(7):574-576.
WANG H T, REN L M, LIU Y, et al. The research status of evaluation of SF-12 Health Survey Scale[J]. Chin J Gen Pract, 2015, 14(7):574-576.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2015.07.025.
[20]
何燕, 赵龙超, 刘丹萍, 等. SF-36和SF-12在人群生命质量调查中的性能比较研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2017, 44(5):852-862.
HE Y, ZHAO L C, LIU D P, et al. Psychometric properties of SF-36 and SF-12 as measures of population health status survey[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2017, 44(5):852-862.
[21]
WARE J Jr, KOSINSKI M, KELLER S D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey:construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity[J]. Med Care, 1996, 34(3):220-233.DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
[22]
HOYLE H, HITCHMOUGH J, JORGENSEN A. All about the ‘Wow Factor’? The relationships between aesthetics,restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2017, 164:109-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011.
[23]
唐东芹, 杨学军, 许东新. 园林植物景观评价方法及其应用[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2001, 18(4):394-397.
TANG D Q, YANG X J, XU D X. Study on the method applied in garden plant landscape evaluation[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2001, 18(4):394-397.
[24]
HAZER M, FORMICA M K, DIETERLEN S, et al. The relationship between self-reported exposure to greenspace and human stress in Baltimore,MD[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2018, 169:47-56.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.006.
[25]
HITCHINGS R. Studying the preoccupations that prevent people from going into green space[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2013, 118:98-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.006.
[26]
CLEARY A, FIELDING K S, BELL S L, et al. Exploring potential mechanisms involved in the relationship between eudaimonic wellbeing and nature connection[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2017, 158:119-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003.
[27]
HEGETSCHWEILER K T, DE VRIES S, ARNBERGER A, et al. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: a review of European studies[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2017, 21:48-59.DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002.
[28]
ROE J, ASPINALL P. The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health[J]. Heal Place, 2011, 17(1):103-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.09.003.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(51778001)
安徽省自然科学基金面上项目(1908085ME140)
安徽省高校人文社会科学重点项目(SK2019A0633)
安徽省高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2020JD04)
安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKY2020D100)

编辑: 郑琰燚

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(2364 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/