碳限额与交易下木质林产品供应链内部融资机制

宋烨, 彭红军, 孙铭君

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 232-238.

PDF(1598 KB)
PDF(1598 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 232-238. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006043
研究论文

碳限额与交易下木质林产品供应链内部融资机制

作者信息 +

Internal financing mechanisms of wood forest product supply chain under the cap-and-trade scheme

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探究在碳限额与交易的背景下,营林企业能否利用木质林产品供应链内部融资缓解其融资压力、碳排放限额和折扣系数等不同因素对供应链各成员决策变量和供应链整体利润的影响。方法 通过构建Stackelberg博弈模型,研究预付款内部融资机制下供应链主体的最优策略,并在综合考虑相关研究文献及木质林产品供应链的实际情况后选取合适的数值参数,利用算例分析比较内外部融资模式下木质林产品供应链的利润情况。结果 当木材和碳汇价格折扣率在适当范围内时,内部融资机制下营林企业和制造企业的利润水平均高于外部融资机制。内部融资机制下,营林主体的碳汇林规模随着木材和碳汇价格折扣率、碳排放限额的增加而缩减,随着政府对碳汇林经营补贴的增加而扩大;制造企业的单位碳减排量随着木材和碳汇价格折扣率的增加而增加,随着碳排放限额、政府对碳汇林经营补贴的增加而降低。结论 营林主体向制造企业进行供应链内部融资不仅解决了自身的融资问题,提高了制造企业的减排水平,还改善了供应链整体的环境和经济表现。政府可发挥市场引导者的职能,推动缺乏资金的上游营林主体与肩负减排任务的下游制造企业之间的合作,推行预付款内部融资机制,从而降低整个供应链的融资成本和减排成本,达到供应链的帕累托(Pareto)最优。

Abstract

【Objective】 Regarding the carbon cap-and-trade scheme, we explored whether a forest company can use an internal financing mechanism within the wood forest product supply chain to ease its financing pressure, and how different factors, such as carbon emission cap and discount coefficients, affect the decision variables of each member and the overall profit of the supply chain.【Method】 By constructing the Stackelberg game model, the optimal strategy of the member of the supply chain under an advance payment financing mechanism is studied. After comprehensively considering relevant research literature and the actual situation of the wood forest product supply chain, appropriate numerical parameters were selected, which were used to analyze and compare the profit levels of the wood forest product supply chain under internal and external financing mechanisms. 【Result】 The results show that when the discount rate of wood and carbon sink prices is within the appropriate range, the profit levels of the forest company as well as the manufacturers under internal financing mechanisms are higher than under external financing mechanisms. Under the internal financing mechanism, the scale of the carbon sink forest decreases as the discount rate of wood, carbon sink prices and carbon emission limits increase, which increases with greater government subsidies for carbon sink forest. In addition, the unit carbon emission reduction of the manufacturers increases with a higher discount rate of wood and carbon sink prices and decreases with greater carbon emission limits and government subsidies for carbon sink forest. 【Conclusion】 Within the supply chain, the forest company’s internal financing from the manufacturing company not only solves its own financing problems and improves the emission reduction level of the manufacturer, but also improves the overall environment and economic performances of the supply chain. The government can play the role of a market leader, promote cooperation between the upstream forest company that lacks funds and the downstream manufacturer that is responsible for emission reduction tasks, and implement advance payment internal financing mechanisms, thereby reducing the financing costs and emission reduction costs of the entire supply chain, and achieve the Pareto optimum of the supply chain.

关键词

碳限额与交易 / 木质林产品 / 碳汇林 / 供应链 / 内部融资

Key words

cap-and-trade / wood forest products / carbon sink forest / supply chain / internal financing

引用本文

导出引用
宋烨, 彭红军, 孙铭君. 碳限额与交易下木质林产品供应链内部融资机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2021, 45(6): 232-238 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006043
SONG Ye, PENG Hongjun, SUN Mingjun. Internal financing mechanisms of wood forest product supply chain under the cap-and-trade scheme[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(6): 232-238 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006043
中图分类号: X322;F326.2;S7-9   

参考文献

[1]
孙铭君, 彭红军, 王帅. 碳限额下木质林产品供应链生产与碳减排策略[J]. 林业经济, 2018, 40(12):77-81.
SUN M J, PENG H J, WANG S. Production and carbon emission reduction strategy of wood forest products supply chain under carbon emission constraints[J]. For Econ, 2018, 40(12):77-81.DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2018.12.014.
[2]
QIN T, TIAN Z W, GU X S, et al. Investigation and analysis of the lending needs of forestry households in China:based on data from Zhejiang,Fujian,Guangxi,and Jiangxi Provinces[J]. J Sustain For, 2014, 33(8):814-826.DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2014.925812.
[3]
ISLAM A R M, LUO R H. Financing constraints and investment efficiency:evidence from a panel of Canadian forest firms[J]. Appl Econ, 2018, 50(48):5142-5154.DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2018.1478387.
[4]
MCCARTHY S, OLIVER B, VERREYNNE M L. Bank financing and credit rationing of Australian SMEs[J]. Aust J Manag, 2017, 42(1):58-85.DOI: 10.1177/0312896215587316.
[5]
TOMASELLI M F, TIMKO J, KOZAK R. Assessing small and medium forest enterprises’ access to microfinance:case studies from the Gambia[J]. J Dev Stud, 2013, 49(3):334-347.DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2012.740018.
[6]
谷艾婷, 吕佳, 王震. 中国木质林产品碳足迹的产业链分布特征分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(12):247-252.
GU A T, LV J, WANG Z. Carbon footprint characteristics of wooden products industry chain in China[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2014, 37(12):247-252.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2014.12.046.
[7]
GENG A, CHEN J, YANG H. Assessing the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of harvested wood products substitution in China[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2019, 53(3):1732-1740.DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06510.
[8]
SWALLOW B M, GODDARD T W. Value chains for bio-carbon sequestration services:lessons from contrasting cases in Canada,Kenya and Mozambique[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31:81-89.DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.002.
[9]
GREN I M, AKLILU A Z. Policy design for forest carbon sequestration:a review of the literature[J]. For Policy Econ, 2016, 70:128-136.DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.008.
[10]
韩丽晶, 曹玉昆, 陈丽荣, 等. 木材可追溯性、林产品市场准入标准与中国林产品贸易[J]. 林业经济问题, 2015, 35(3):251-256.
HAN L J, CAO Y K, CHEN L R, et al. Timber traceability,forest product market access standards and Chinese forest product trade[J]. Issues For Econ, 2015, 35(3):251-256. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2015.03.012.
[11]
DEMIRCI U, ÖZTÜRK A. Carbon markets as a financial instrument in the forestry sector in Turkey[J]. Int Forest Rev, 2015, 17(2):141-152.DOI: 10.1505/146554815815500606.
[12]
朱添金, 赵庆建, 杨慧, 等. 基于VAR模型的碳汇价值对我国木材价格的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(5):191-195.
ZHU T J, ZHAO Q J, YANG H, et al. Influence of carbon sink value on China’s wood price based on VAR model[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(5):191-195.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201707003.
[13]
朱玮强, 顾蕾, 李佳, 等. 基于B-S期权定价的安吉县CCER竹林经营碳汇项目经济效益评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4):18-24.
ZHU W Q, GU L, LI J, et al. Economic benefit assessment of CCER bamboo forest management carbon sequestration in Anji County based on B-S option pricing model[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(4):18-24.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709008.
[14]
张旭芳, 杨红强. 应对气候变化的中美木质林产品碳储量和碳减排比较[J]. 林业经济, 2014, 36(7):26-31.
ZHANG X F, YANG H Q. Comparisons of carbon stock and reduction in harvest wood products of China and the United States based on climate change[J]. For Econ, 2014, 36(7):26-31.DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2014.07.004.
[15]
SUN M J, PENG H J, WANG S. Cost-sharing mechanisms for a wood forest product supply chain under carbon cap-and-trade[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(12):4345.DOI: 10.3390/su10124345.
[16]
王维芳, 陈彩艳, 王薇淇, 等. 基于穆棱市下属林场的森林碳储量估算及空间分布的研究[J]. 森林工程, 2019, 35(5):27-31.
WANG W F, CHEN C Y, WANG W Q, et al. Research on the estimation and spatial distribution of forest carbon storage based on Muling subordinate forest farmfull text replacement[J]. Forest Engineering, 2019, 35(5):27-31.
[17]
李小勇, 温亚利, 陈晓倩, 等. 林产品绿色政府采购的理论机理和影响分析[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2012, 28(10):921-925.
LI X Y, WEN Y L, CHEN X Q, et al. Study on theoretical mechanism of green government procurement of forestry products and its influence[J]. Resour Dev & Mark, 2012, 28(10):921-925.
[18]
季春艺, 杨红强, 聂影, 等. 气候变化与中国林产品的减排潜力[J]. 林业经济, 2014, 36(7):20-25.
JI C Y, YANG H Q, NIE Y, et al. Study on climate change and the potential of Chinese HWP carbon sequestration[J]. For Econ, 2014, 36(7):20-25.DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2014.07.003.
[19]
WANG M, ZHAO L D, HERTY M. Joint replenishment and carbon trading in fresh food supply chains[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2019, 277(2):561-573.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.004.
[20]
WU D D, YANG L P, OLSON D L. Green supply chain management under capital constraint[J]. Int J Prod Econ, 2019, 215:3-10.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.016.
[21]
QIN J J, ZHAO Y H, XIA L J. Carbon emission reduction with capital constraint under greening financing and cost sharing contract[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Heal, 2018, 15(4):750.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040750.
[22]
HAN Q, WANG Y Y. Decision and coordination in a low-carbon E-supply chain considering the manufacturer’s carbon emission reduction behavior[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(5):1686.DOI: 10.3390/su10051686.
[23]
YANG L, CHEN Y F, JI J N. Cooperation modes of operations and financing in a low-carbon supply chain[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(3):821.DOI: 10.3390/su10030821.
[24]
李洋, 王雅提. 非木质林产品绿色供应链研究综述[J]. 林业经济, 2017, 39(6):42-48.
LI Y, WANG Y T. Literature review on green supply chain of non-timber forest products[J]. For Econ, 2017, 39(6):42-48.DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2017.06.009.
[25]
SONG Y, PENG H J. Strategies of forestry carbon sink under forest insurance and subsidies[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(17):4607.DOI: 10.3390/su11174607.
[26]
CAO E B, DU L X, RUAN J H. Financing preferences and performance for an emission-dependent supply chain:supplier vs.bank[J]. Int J Prod Econ, 2019, 208:383-399.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.001.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(71201164)
国家社会科学基金项目(17BGL236)

编辑: 李燕文

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(1598 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/