欧美杨PdMODD基因克隆与表达特性分析

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007015

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 43-50.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007015

欧美杨PdMODD基因克隆与表达特性分析

张腾倩¹(), 张伟溪¹, 丁昌俊¹, 张静¹, 胡赞民², 苏晓华¹^,^*()

1.林木遗传育种国家重点实验室,国家林业和草原局林木培育重点实验室,中国林业科学研究院林业研究所, 北京 100091
2.中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所,北京 100101

收稿日期:2020-07-15 接受日期:2020-11-30 出版日期:2021-03-30 发布日期:2021-04-09
通讯作者: 苏晓华
基金资助:
国家转基因生物新品种培育科技重大专项(2018ZX08020002)

Cloning and expression characteristics of PdMODD genes in Populus × euramericana

ZHANG Tengqian¹(), ZHANG Weixi¹, DING Changjun¹, ZHANG Jing¹, HU Zanmin², SU Xiaohua¹^,^*()

1. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2. Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2020-07-15 Accepted:2020-11-30 Online:2021-03-30 Published:2021-04-09
Contact: SU Xiaohua

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究杨树重要胁迫响应新基因,为揭示杨树抗逆分子机制、培育优良抗逆杨树新品种提供理论依据。【方法】基于水稻MODD氨基酸序列,通过BLAST在美洲黑杨基因组中筛选得到3条基因(Podel.08G114100、Podel.10G158900和Podel.17G098500),并以其序列为参考,以‘渤丰3号’杨cDNA为模板克隆得到3条基因(PdMODD1、PdMODD2和PdMODD3)。利用生物信息学分析PdMODD蛋白的结构特征及与其同源蛋白的亲缘关系。通过基因枪轰击法分析PdMODD基因亚细胞定位。采用实时荧光定量(qRT-PCR)技术,分析PdMODD基因组织特异性和不同胁迫条件下的的表达模式。【结果】PdMODD1~3基因的开放阅读框(ORF)全长分别为1 065、1 065和1 074 bp,编码354、354和357个氨基酸,均为不稳定的亲水性蛋白。PdMODD基因均为NINJA家族成员,含有3个保守结构域,其中一个为转录抑制基序EAR。系统进化树分析显示,PdMODD1蛋白与毛果杨PtAFP2亲缘性较高并与拟南芥AtAFP1和木薯MeAFP2位于同一个分支;PdMODD2蛋白与麻疯树JcAFP2亲缘关系最近,并与拟南芥AtAFP2聚成一个分支;PdMODD3与毛果杨PtAFP3-1亲缘关系最近,与栓皮槠QsAFP3、拟南芥AtAFP4属于同一分支。亚细胞定位结果表明PdMODD基因均定位于细胞核。组织特异性分析显示,PdMODD1~3在根、茎、叶中均能表达,且在叶中表达量最高,根中表达量最低。胁迫响应表达模式结果显示,NaCl和聚乙二醇(PEG)胁迫处理下,PdMODD1~3在根、茎、叶组织中主要为显著上调表达。【结论】PdMODD1~3均为NINJA家族成员,含有保守的转录抑制基序EAR,具有组织特异性,在叶中高表达,且能被NaCl和PEG胁迫显著诱导表达,推测PdMODD1、PdMODD2 和PdMODD3可能会在‘渤丰3号’杨对盐和干旱胁迫响应中发挥重要的调节作用。

关键词: ‘渤丰3号’杨, PdMODD, 生物信息学分析, 表达模式分析

Abstract:

【Objective】To explore the function of PdMODD in the growth and development of Populus × euramericana, we analyzed their sequence characteristics, subcellular localization and expression patterns in response to salt and drought stress, which will provide a theoretical basis for revealing the molecular mechanisms of stress resistance and breeding new poplar varieties. 【Method】Based on the rice MODD amino acid sequence, Podel.08G114100, Podel.10G158900 and Podel.17G098500 were selected using BLAST in the genome of Populus deltoides WV94 v2.1. Using these gene sequences as references and Populus × euramericana ‘Bofeng 3 hao’ cDNA as template, three genes (PdMODD1,PdMODD2 and PdMODD3) were cloned. The structural characteristics of the PdMODD protein and its genetic relationship with its homologous proteins were analyzed using bioinformatics methods. The subcellular localization of PdMODD genes was analyzed using particle bombardment. The expression characteristics of PdMODD genes in different tissues and their response to different stresses were analyzed using qRT-PCR. 【Results】The open reading frames of PDMODD1-PDMODD3 genes were 1 065, 1 065 and 1 074 bp, encoding 354, 354 and 357 amino acids, respectively, all of which were unstable hydrophilic proteins located in the nucleus.PdMODD genes are all members of the NINJA family and contain three conserved domains, one of which is the transcriptional repression motif EAR. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that PdMODD1 protein was closely related to PtAFP2 (Populus trichocarpa) and located in the same branch as AtAFP1 (Arabidopsis thaliana) and MeAFP2 (Manihot esculenta). PdMODD2 protein had a close relationship with JcAFP2 (Jatropha curcas) and converged into a branch with AtAFP2; PdMODD3 was closely related to PtAFP3-1 and located in the same branch as QsAFP3 (Quercus suber) and AtAFP4. The subcellular localization results showed that PdMODD genes were localized in the nucleus. The results of tissue specificity analysis showed that PdMODD genes were highly expressed in the leaves and the least expressed in the roots. The expression patterns of stress response showed that under NaCl and PEG stress, PdMODD1, PdMODD2 and PdMODD3 were significantly upregulated in the root, stem and leaf tissues. 【Conclusion】PdMODD1-PdMODD3 are all members of the NINJA family, with the conserved transcriptional repression motif EAR and tissue specificity. They were highly expressed in the leaves, significantly induced by NaCl and PEG stress, and were in a branch with AtAFP1, AtAFP2 and AtAFP4, which had negative regulatory effects on ABA and salt stress. It is hypothesized that PdMODD1, PdMODD2 and PdMODD3 may play an important regulatory role in response to P. euramericana ‘Bofeng 3 hao’ salt and drought stress.

Key words: Populus × euramaricana ‘Bofeng 3 hao’, PdMODD, bioinformatics analysis, expression pattern analysis

中图分类号:

S785.5

张腾倩,张伟溪,丁昌俊,等. 欧美杨PdMODD基因克隆与表达特性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 43-50.

ZHANG Tengqian, ZHANG Weixi, DING Changjun, ZHANG Jing, HU Zanmin, SU Xiaohua. Cloning and expression characteristics of PdMODD genes in Populus × euramericana[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(2): 43-50.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007015.

图/表 8

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 30

[1]	KAGALE S, ROZWADOWSKI K. EAR motif-mediated transcriptional repression in plants[J]. Epigenetics, 2011,6(2):141-146.DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.2.13627.
[2]	张健飞, 权瑞党, 黄荣峰. EAR转录抑制子结构及功能的研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2011,13(4):53-57.
	ZHANG J F, QUAN R D, HUANG R F. Studies on structure and function of repressors with EAR motif[J]. J Agric Sci Technol, 2011,13(4):53-57.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0864.2011.04.08.
[3]	TANG N, MA S, ZONG W, et al. MODD mediates deactivation and degradation of OsbZIP46 to negatively regulate ABA signaling and drought resistance in rice[J]. Plant Cell, 2016,28(9):2161-2177.DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00171.
[4]	GARCIA M E, LYNCH T, PEETERS J, et al. A small plant-specific protein family of ABI five binding proteins (AFPs) regulates stress response in germinating Arabidopsis seeds and seedlings[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2008,67(6):643-658.DOI: 10.1007/s11103-008-9344-2.
[5]	PAUWELS L, BARBERO G F, GEERINCK J, et al. NINJA connects the co-repressor TOPLESS to jasmonate signalling[J]. Nature, 2010,464(7289):788-791.DOI: 10.1038/nature08854.
[6]	KAZAN K, MANNERS J M. JAZ repressors and the orchestration of phytohormone crosstalk[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2012,17(1):22-31.DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.10.006.
[7]	DE GEYTER N, GHOLAMI A, GOORMACHTIG S, et al. Transcriptional machineries in jasmonate-elicited plant secondary metabolism[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2012,17(6):349-359.DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.001.
[8]	MA S, TANG N, LI X, et al. Reversible histone H2B monoubiquitination fine-tunes abscisic acid signaling and drought response in rice[J]. Mol Plant, 2019,12(2):263-277.DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.12.005.
[9]	XIANG Y, TANG N, DU H, et al. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice[J]. Plant Physiol, 2008,148(4):1938-1952.DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.128199.
[10]	LU G J, GAO C X, ZHENG X N, et al. Identification of OsbZIP72 as a positive regulator of ABA response and drought tolerance in rice[J]. Planta, 2009,229(3):605-615.DOI: 10.1007/s00425-008-0857-3.
[11]	王倩姿, 王玉, 孙志梅, 等. 腐植酸类物质的施用对盐碱地的改良效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(4):1227-1234.
	WANG Q Z, WANG Y, SUN Z M, et al. Amelioration effect of humic acid on saline-alkali soil[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019,30(4):1227-1234.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.001.
[12]	徐淑平, 卫志明. 基因枪的使用方法介绍[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1998,34(1):41-43.
	XU S P, WEI Z M. Introduction to method of microprojectile bombardment and its application[J]. Plant Physiol Commun, 1998,34(1):41-43.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.1998.01.014.
[13]	LIVAK K J, SCHMITTGEN T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method[J]. Methods (San Diego Calif), 2001,25(4):402-408.DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.
[14]	刘中原, 姜波, 吕佳欣, 等. 刚毛柽柳Th2CysPr_x基因的互作蛋白及其表达模式分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(2):86-92.
	LIU Z Y, JIANG B, LYU J X, et al. Interacting proteins of Tamarix hispida Th2CysPr_x and their expression pattern analysis[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019,43(2):86-92.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806018.
[15]	杜娟, 柴友荣. 植物转录抑制子的结构特征及其作用机理[J]. 植物学通报, 2008,25(3):344-353.
	DU J, CHAI Y R. Structural features and action mechanisms of plant transcriptional repressors[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2008,25(3):344-353.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2008.03.012.
[16]	KAGALE S, LINKS M G, ROZWADOWSKI K. Genome-wide analysis of ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression motif-containing transcriptional regulators in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiol, 2010,152(3):1109-1134.DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.151704.
[17]	WEIGEL R R, PFITZNER U M, GATZ C. Interaction of NIMIN₁ with NPR1 modulates PR gene expression in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell, 2005,17(4):1279-1291.DOI: 10.1105/tpc.104.027441.
[18]	CHERN M, CANLAS P E, FITZGERALD H A, et al. Rice NRR,a negative regulator of disease resistance,interacts with Arabidopsis NPR1 and rice NH₁[J]. Plant J, 2005,43(5):623-635.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02485.x.
[19]	OHTA M, MATSUI K, HIRATSU K, et al. Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression[J]. Plant Cell, 2001,13(8):1959-1968.DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010127.
[20]	LIU W, KAREMERA N J U, WU T, et al. The ethylene response factor AtERF₄ negatively regulates the iron deficiency response in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. PLoS One, 2017,12(10):e0186580.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186580.
[21]	YAISH M W, EL-KEREAMY A, ZHU T, et al. The APETALA-2-like transcription factor OsAP2-39 controls key interactions between abscisic acid and gibberellin in rice[J]. PLoS Genet, 2010,6(9):e1001098.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001098.
[22]	WAN L, ZHANG J, ZHANG H, et al. Transcriptional activation of OsDERF₁ in OsERF₃ and OsAP2-39 negatively modulates ethylene synjournal and drought tolerance in rice[J]. PLoS One, 2011,6(9):e25216.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025216.
[23]	ZHANG H W, ZHANG J F, QUAN R D, et al. EAR motif mutation of rice OsERF₃ alters the regulation of ethylene biosynjournal and drought tolerance[J]. Planta, 2013,237(6):1443-1451.DOI: 10.1007/s00425-013-1852-x.
[24]	PAN I C, LI C W, SU R C, et al. Ectopic expression of an EAR motif deletion mutant of SlERF₃ enhances tolerance to salt stress and Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato[J]. Planta, 2010,232(5):1075-1086.DOI: 10.1007/s00425-010-1235-5.
[25]	HUANG J, YANG X, WANG M M, et al. A novel rice C₂H₂-type zinc finger protein lacking DLN-box/EAR-motif plays a role in salt tolerance[J]. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA)-Gene Struct Expr, 2007,1769(4):220-227.DOI: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2007.02.006.
[26]	LOPEZ-MOLINA L, MONGRAND S, KINOSHITA N, et al. AFP is a novel negative regulator of ABA signaling that promotes ABI₅ protein degradation[J]. Genes Dev, 2003,17(3):410-418.DOI: 10.1101/gad.1055803.
[27]	OHNISHI N, HIMI E, YAMASAKI Y, et al. Differential expression of three ABA-insensitive five binding protein (AFP)-like genes in wheat[J]. Genes Genet Syst, 2008,83(2):167-177.DOI: 10.1266/ggs.83.167.
[28]	WU J, SENG S, CARIANOPOL C, et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel Gladiolus hybridus AFP family gene (GhAFP-like) related to corm dormancy[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2016,471(1):198-204.DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.146.
[29]	HUANG M D, WU W L. Overexpression of TMAC2,a novel negative regulator of abscisic acid and salinity responses,has pleiotropic effects in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2007,63(4):557-569.DOI: 10.1007/s11103-006-9109-8.
[30]	CAO M J, ZHANG Y L, LIU X, et al. Combining chemical and genetic approaches to increase drought resistance in plants[J]. Nat Commun, 2017,8(1):1183.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01239-3.

用途 application	引物名称 primer name	上游引物序列(5'-3') forward primer sequence	下游引物序列(5'-3') reverse primer sequence
PdMODD基因克隆 cloning of PdMODD genes	PdMODD1	TAGAGAGGCAGCATCATGGGAG	TTACACAAAGGACGGACCAG
	PdMODD2	ATGGGAGAAGCAAACGCGAAT	TTATTCAAAGGACGGACAAGAAGG
	PdMODD3	GCTGGGATTTGAGGTTGTTGGT	TTAAAAAAAGGGAGAGGGGTGAACC
qRT-PCR	PdMODD1-RT	ATCAAGCAGTGGTGGTGAAG	CCTCCCTATATTTTCTGCAG
	PdMODD2-RT	GATCAAGCAGTGGTGGAGAAG	CCTCCCTCTATTTTCTGCAG
	PdMODD3-RT	TTTGAGAGCCAGCCACTT	CCATTCTCAGTGACTGTAAG
	actin	CATCCAGGCTGTCCTTTCCC	AACGAAGGATGGCGTGTGG
pBI121-PdMODD-GFP 融合表达载体构建 construction of pBI121- PdMODD-GFP fusion expression vector	PdMODD1-GFP	CTCTAGACTGGTACCCA TGGGAGAAGCAAACG	ACTAGTCAGTCGACCCGGTTC AAAGGACGGACAAG
	PdMODD2-GFP	CTCTAGACTGGTACCCATG GGAGAAACAAACG	ACTAGTCAGTCGACCCAAC ACAAAGGACGGACCAG
	PdMODD3-GFP	CTCTAGACTGGTACCCA TGGCACAAACAGAG	ACTAGTCAGTCGACCCGGA AAAAAGGGAGAGGGGTG

基因 gene	ORF 长度/bp ORF length	氨基酸数目 number of amino acid	分子质量/ ku relative molecular weight	理论等电点 pI	亚细胞定位 subcellular localization
PdMODD1	1 065	354	38.83	7.66	细胞核nucleus
PdMODD2	1 065	354	38.71	8.20	细胞核nucleus
PdMODD3	1 074	357	39.56	6.05	细胞核nucleus

欧美杨PdMODD基因克隆与表达特性分析

Cloning and expression characteristics of PdMODD genes in Populus × euramericana

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 30

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	贾展慧, 贾晓东, 许梦洋, 莫正海, 翟敏, 宣继萍, 张计育, 王刚, 王涛, 郭忠仁. 薄壳山核桃原花青素合成关键酶基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 49-57.
[2]	刘增才, 孙婷婷, 王世新, 马依莎, 王旭彤, 孙健, 邹莉. 暴马桑黄MVD基因cDNA全长克隆及表达特性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 79-85.
[3]	祝友朋,刘宏莉,韩长志. 基于全基因组序列的核桃细菌性黑斑病菌分泌蛋白的预测及特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(03): 17-22.
[4]	杨杰,孙璐,王思瑶,李影,翟睿,林香雨,詹亚光,尹静. 3个白桦细胞色素P450基因生物信息学及表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 27-34.
[5]	刘海琳,尹佟明. 全基因组测序技术研究及其在木本植物中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(05): 172-178.
[6]	宁坤,宋鑫,李慧玉. 柽柳 GF14基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(02): 33-40.
[7]	张洪娟, 谭碧玥, 曹福亮. 银杏GbGGPS基因的克隆及序列分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(04): 8-12.
[8]	吴晓宇,胡尚连,曹颖,卢学琴,任鹏,周美娟,李晓瑞. 慈竹CCoAOMT基因的克隆及生物信息学分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(03): 17-22.