海滨城市道路绿化树种综合评价体系构建

王圳; 高亚军; 闫凡峰; 王晓伟; 李华清; 姜雷

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007030

海滨城市道路绿化树种综合评价体系构建

王圳, 高亚军, 闫凡峰, 王晓伟, 李华清, 姜雷

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 187-196.

PDF(1466 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1466 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 187-196. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007030

研究论文

海滨城市道路绿化树种综合评价体系构建

王圳 ¹ ,
高亚军 ¹ ,
闫凡峰 ² ,
王晓伟 ³ ,
李华清 ¹ ,
姜雷 ¹

作者信息 +

Construction of a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】对树种进行综合评价可以为自然条件复杂的海滨城市道路绿化和廊道生态系统构建提供科学参考。【方法】以连云港市为例,对道路绿化常见的55个树种进行科学监测、调查和分析,采用层次分析法,设置5个一级指标:生态性、景观性、适应性、经济性和负面性,在此基础上设置30个二级指标,对各指标进行量化打分,确定各评价指标的权重值和赋值,建立海滨城市道路绿化树种综合评价体系。应用该评价体系,明确树种使用过程中存在的优劣势,并以最终得分对树种进行逐级分类。【结果】生态性方面,遮阴降温权重值最高(0.513 7);景观性方面,叶色、叶量和花的权重值最高(0.181 8);适应性方面,抗风、抗病虫害和耐盐碱性的权重值最高(0.174 0);经济性方面,指标层苗木价格和养护强度权重值均为0.4;负面性方面,飞絮花粉权重值最高为0.6。准则层各权重值中,生态性、景观性和适应性均为0.3,占比90%;经济性、负面性权重仅为0.05。评价结果表明,树形高大、枝叶浓密、抗逆性强的树种具有更高的评价得分。【结论】缓解热岛效应、改善生态环境是当前海滨城市绿化的主要目标。在树种选择时,应加大乡土树种应用比例,并在今后的道路绿化上作为骨架树种重点推广使用,同时应统筹考虑养护管理的经济性和飘絮花粉等负面影响。

Abstract

【Objective】Comprehensive assessment of tree species can provide scientific references for road greening and gallery ecosystem construction in coastal cities with complex natural conditions.【Method】Lianyungang City was chosen as the case study. Fifty-five commonly seen tree species were scientifically monitored, surveyed and analyzed. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was adopted, and five Level-Ⅰ indexes were designed, including the ecological indexes, landscape indexes, adaptability indexes, economic indexes and negative consequences. On this basis, 30 Level-Ⅱ indexes were put forward and quantitatively marked. The weights and assignments of each assessment index were identified. Subsequently, a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities was developed. The assessment system is used to clarify the strengths and weaknesses of tree species in practical situations. The tree species were graded according to final scores.【Result】In terms of ecological indexes, the weight of overshadow and cooling performance was the highest (0.513 7). In terms of landscape indexes, the weight of leaf color, leaf amount and flower were the highest (0.181 8). In terms of adaptability indexes, the weight of resistance against wind, plant diseases, insect diseases, and salt and alkali were the highest (0.174 0). In terms of economic indexes, the weights of the seedling price and maintenance intensity at the index layer were both 0.4. In terms of negative consequences, the weight of fluffy catkin and pollen was the highest (0.6). At the criterion layer, the weight of ecological indexes, landscape indexes and adaptability was 0.3, accounting for 90% of the total; the weight of economic indexes and negative consequence was only 0.05. The assessment results suggest tree species are tall and large, with dense branches and leaves, and which are resistant to adverse conditions, scored higher.【Conclusion】Improving the ecological environment is the main greening goal of coastal cities. In choosing tree species, the authorities should increase the percentage of local tree species and promote them as backbone tree species for future road greening. At the same time, the economic performance of maintenance and management, and the negative consequences of fluffy catkin and pollen should be taken into consideration.

导出引用

王圳, 高亚军, 闫凡峰, 等. 海滨城市道路绿化树种综合评价体系构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2021, 45(2): 187-196 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007030

WANG Zhen, GAO Yajun, YAN Fanfeng, et al. Construction of a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(2): 187-196 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007030

中图分类号： S731.8

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	徐彩瑶, 濮励杰, 朱明. 沿海滩涂围垦对生态环境的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(3):1148-1162. XU C Y, PU L J, ZHU M. Effect of reclamation activity on coastal ecological environment:progress and perspectives[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(3):1148-1162. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201611142316. 本文引用 [1]

[2]

孟紫琪, 龙凌波, 佘倩楠, 等. 基于土地利用/覆盖变化的中国大陆沿海地区生态状况评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(10):3337-3346.

MENG Z

, LONG L

, SHE Q

, et al. Assessment of ecological conditions over China’s coastal areas based on land use/cover change[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018,29(10):3337-3346. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.016.

本文引用 [2]

[3]	许凤娇, 吕晓. 基于土地利用变化的江苏沿海地区生态风险格局[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(20):7312-7325. XU F J, LYU X. Ecological risk pattern based on land use changes in Jiangsu coastal areas[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(20):7312-7325.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201709041596. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	高宾, 李小玉, 李志刚, 等. 基于景观格局的锦州湾沿海经济开发区生态风险分析[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(12):3441-3450. GAO B, LI X Y, LI Z G, et al. Assessment of ecological risk of coastal economic developing zone in Jinzhou Bay based on landscape pattern[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011,31(12):3441-3450. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	HUBBARD R K, STRICKLAND T C, PHATAK S. Effects of cover crop systems on soil physical properties and carbon/nitrogen relationships in the coastal plain of southeastern USA[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2013,126:276-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2012.07.009. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	毛志刚, 谷孝鸿, 刘金娥, 等. 盐城海滨盐沼湿地及围垦农田的土壤质量演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(8):1986-1992. MAO Z G, GU X H, LIU J E, et al. Evolvement of soil quality in salt marshes and reclaimed farmlands in Yancheng coastal wetland[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010,21(8):1986-1992. 本文引用 [1]

[7]

张濛, 濮励杰, 王小涵, 等. 长期耕种对江苏沿海围垦区滨海盐土理化性质和小麦产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(16):5088-5097.

ZHANG

, PU L

, WANG X

, et al. Effects of long-time cultivation on physicochemical properties of coastal saline soil and wheat production at reclamation areas of Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016,36(16):5088-5097. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201502060296.

本文引用 [1]

[8]	牛东玲, 王启基. 盐碱地治理研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2002,33(6):449-455. NIU D L, WANG Q J. Research progress on saline-alkali field control[J]. Chin J Soil Sci, 2002,33(6):449-455. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2002.06.014. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	赖小红, 李名扬, 刘聪, 等. 植物物候对重庆主城区热岛效应的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(19):7025-7034. LAI X H, LI M Y, LIU C, et al. The phenological responses of plants to the heat island effect in the main urban area of Chongqing[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019,39(19):7025-7034. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201809252082. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	武小钢, 蔺银鼎. 城市道路隔离带绿化模式对人行道空气质量的影响评价[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015,35(4):984-990. WU X G, LIN Y D. Impact of plant configuration mode of greening segregating belt on air quality of adjacent sidewalk in urban street[J]. Acta Sci Circumstantiae, 2015,35(4):984-990. DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2014.0863. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	李萍, 王松, 王亚英, 等. 城市道路绿化带 “微峡谷效应” 及其对非机动车道污染物浓度的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(10):2888-2896. LI P, WANG S, WANG Y Y, et al. “Micro-canyon effect” of city road green belt and its effect on the pollutant concentration above roads for non-motorized vehicles[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011,31(10):2888-2896. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	蔡红艳, 杨小唤, 张树文. 植物物候对城市热岛响应的研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014,33(1):221-228. CAI H Y, YANG X H, ZHANG S W. Research advances in plant phenological responses to urban heat island[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2014,33(1):221-228.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.20131220.0003. 本文引用 [2]

[13]	许格希, 裴顺祥, 郭泉水, 等. 城市热岛效应对气候变暖和植物物候的影响[J]. 世界林业研究, 2011,24(6):12-17. XU G X, PEI S X, GUO Q S, et al. Influence of urban heat island effect on climate warming and plant phenology[J]. World For Res, 2011,24(6):12-17.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2011.06.003. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	MORRIS C J G, SIMMONDS I. Associations between varying magnitudes of the urban heat island and the synoptic climatology in Melbourne,Australia[J]. Int J Climatol, 2000,20(15):1931-1954. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0088(200012)20:151931::AID-JOC578>3.0.CO;2-D. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	马赫, 张天海, 罗宏森, 等. 沿海快速城市化地区能值生态足迹变化分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(18):6465-6472. MA H, ZHANG T H, LUO H S, et al. Analysis of emergy ecological footprint change of coastal rapid urbanization areas[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(18):6465-6472. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201803010409. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	马静娜. 防护林生态效益评价研究综述[J]. 防护林科技, 2012(1):79-82.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2012.01.027. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	李庆贱, 陈志强, 时瑞亭, 等. 白榆家系苗期耐盐碱研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010,32(5):74-81. LI Q J, CHEN Z Q, SHI R T, et al. Alkaline-salt tolerance indices of Ulmus pumila L.seedling and family evaluation on alkaline-salt tolerance[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2010,32(5):74-81.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.05.023. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	张华新, 刘正祥, 刘秋芳. 盐胁迫下树种幼苗生长及其耐盐性[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(5):2263-2271. ZHANG H X, LIU Z X, LIU Q F. Seedling growth and salt tolerance of tree species under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009,29(5):2263-2271. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.010. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	韩燕燕, 鲁艳, 吕光辉. 植物耐盐的生理机制及基因工程新进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2007(4):10-14,18. HAN Y Y, LU Y, LYU G H. Advances in research on the mechanism of plant salinity tolerance and recent experimentation with transgenic plants[J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2007(4):10-14,18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5464.2007.04.003. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	ZHU J K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2002,53:247-273. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329. 本文引用 [1]

[21]

唐桂兰, 游良旺, 芦建国. 城市道路绿化对行车视线诱导的植物合理种植间距[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(5):180-184.

TANG G

, YOU L

, LU J

. The reasonable planting distance of urban road greening induced by driving sight line[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017,41(5):180-184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201605002.

本文引用 [1]

[22]	LI H E, LI B T. Relation between traffic environment and heavy metal, Lead and Cadium contents of roadside trees in urban[J]. Environmental Protection in Transportation, 2001,22(5):10-14. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	CHRISTOFOROU C S, SALMON L G, HANNIGAN M P, et al. Trends in fine particle concentration and chemical composition in southern California[J]. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 2000,50(1):43-53. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10463985. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	FREER-SMITH P H, HOLLOWAY S, GOODMAN A. The uptake of particulates by an urban woodland:Site description and particulate composition[J]. Environ Pollut, 1997,95(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(96)00119-4. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	ZHOU X H, BRANDLE J R, MIZE C W, et al. Three-dimensional aerodynamic structure of a tree shelterbelt:definition,characterization and working models[J]. Agroforest Syst, 2005,63(2):133-147. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-004-3147-5. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	SHASHUA-BAR L, POTCHTER O, BITAN A, et al. Microclimate modelling of street tree species effects within the varied urban morphology in the Mediterranean City of Tel Aviv,Israel[J]. Int J Climatol, 2010,30(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1002/joc.1869. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	于金涛, 肖文发, 王鹏程, 等. 防护林健康评价研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2013,26(1):31-36. YU J T, XIAO W F, WANG P C, et al. Research advances of health assessment of shelterbelts[J]. World For Res, 2013,26(1):31-36. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	杨琴军, 苏洪明, 夏欣, 等. 基于植物多样性的武汉市道路绿化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,31(4):98-102. YANG Q J, SU H M, XIA X, et al. Researches of street greening based on plant diversity investigation in Wuhan[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2007,31(4):98-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2007.04.022. 本文引用 [2]

[29]	赵瑾, 李文银, 魏国仁, 等. 宝鸡市5种乡土树种抗旱性综合评价和研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019,34(6):74-81. ZHAO J, LI W Y, WEI G R, et al. Comprehensive study and evaluationon drought resistance of nativetress speciesin BaoJi[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2019,34(6):74-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.06.12. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	闫晓云, 张秋良, 韩鹏, 等. 呼和浩特市绿化树种综合评价及树种选择[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011,25(3):135-140. YAN X Y, ZHANG Q L, HAN P, et al. Comprehensive assessment and selection for urban tree species in Hohhot[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2011,25(3):135-140.DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2011.03.026. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	丁纯璐, 马健霄, 朱宁. 基于层次分析法的城市绿道综合评价研究[J]. 森林工程, 2020,36(2):81-90. DING C L, MA J X, ZHU N. Research on comprehensive evaluation of urban greenway based on AHP[J]. Forest Engineering, 2020,36(2):81-90. 本文引用 [1]

[32]

林玮, 白青松, 陈雪梅, 等. 华南主要造林树种碳汇能力评价体系构建及优良碳汇树种筛选[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2020,40(1):28-37.

LIN

, BAI Q

, CHEN X

, et al. Construction of the carbon sink capacity evaluation system of main afforestation tree species in south China and selection of the fine carbon sink species[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2020,40(1):28-37. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201812070.

本文引用 [2]

[33]	张锁成, 谷建才, 王秀芳, 等. 基于AHP方法的高速公路中央分隔带绿化植物综合评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012,27(4):100-102,107. ZHANG S C, GU J C, WANG X F, et al. Evaluation of greening plants in expressway divider based on AHP method[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2012,27(4):100-102,107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.04.18. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范 GB/T 38582—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	王嘉楠, 赵德先, 刘慧, 等. 不同类型参与者对城市绿地树种的评价与选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2017,34(6):1120-1127. WANG J N, ZHAO D X, LIU H, et al. Selection of tree species in an urban green space by local participants[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2017,34(6):1120-1127. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.021. 本文引用 [1]

[36]

黄少雄, 卢明明, 陈捷, 等. 层次分析法在粤北高速公路沿线绿化树种选择中的运用[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2016,45(2):177-182.

HUANG S

, LU M

, CHEN

, et al. The application of analytic hierarchy process on choice of greening tree species along expressway in north of Guangdong Province[J]. Subtrop Plant Sci, 2016,45(2):177-182.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2016.02.017.

本文引用 [1]

[37]	许秀玉, 肖莉, 王明怀, 等. 沿海抗台风树种评价体系构建与选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015,32(4):516-522. XU X Y, XIAO L, WANG M H, et al. A comprehensive evaluation system for anti-typhoon performance of trees in coastal areas[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2015,32(4):516-522.DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.04.004. 本文引用 [1]

[38]

林玮, 白青松, 陈雪梅, 等. 华南主要造林树种碳汇能力评价体系构建及优良碳汇树种筛选[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2020,40(1):28-37.

LIN

, BAI Q

, CHEN X

本文引用 [1]

[39]

谢春平, 方彦, 刘大伟, 等. 基于层次分析法的江苏宁镇山脉乡土树种评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2019,48(2):161-168.

XIE C

, FANG

, LIU D

, et al. Evaluation of native trees species in Ningzhen Mountains of Jiangsu Province by analytic hierarchy process[J]. Subtrop Plant Sci, 2019,48(2):161-168.DOI: 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2019.04.148.

本文引用 [1]

[40]	杨静怡, 张政文, 吴峰. 贵阳市主要绿化树种功能评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020,48(3):156-161. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2020.03.027. 本文引用 [1]

[41]

张德顺, 刘鸣. 基于“植物功能性状-生态系统服务”评价框架的园林树种选择方法:以上海为例[J]. 中国园林, 2020,36(2):106-111.

ZHANG D

, LIU

. A “Plant Functional Traits-ecosystem Services” approach for the selection of landscape trees:a case study in Shanghai[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2020,36(2):106-111. DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2020.02.0106.

本文引用 [1]