合肥环城公园开放空间与游憩行为关系研究

吴文清; 许克福

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011003

合肥环城公园开放空间与游憩行为关系研究

吴文清, 许克福

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 217-224.

PDF(4020 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(4020 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 217-224. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011003

研究论文

合肥环城公园开放空间与游憩行为关系研究

吴文清 ¹^,² ,
许克福 ²^,^*

作者信息 +

Recreational preferences among different open spaces in a ring city park of Hefei

WU Wenqing ¹^,² ,
XU Kefu ²^,^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探究各类开放空间与游憩行为之间的关系,提出该类型城市公园开放空间的景观提升与规划建议。方法以合肥老城区的环城公园开放空间为研究对象,采用游憩行为观察法(SOPARC)、大数据分析、核密度估算法(KDE)、主成分分析等研究方法,从定性和定量相结合的角度把握该类城市公园开放空间与游憩行为之间的关系。结果 ①城市公园开放空间中游憩行为的需求主要来自附近居民、儿童及老人;②不同类型的开放空间与游憩行为之间的关系差异较大:绿化空间中游憩行为数量和丰富度最高;铺地空间和广场空间游憩行为发生频率较高,但类型较少;滨水空间游憩行为频率和丰富度均较低;③空间开敞度、空间绿化与铺装程度、空间可达性、空间亲水性是空间品质的主要影响因子;④大部分空间中观赏性游憩行为每百平方米密度低于3.0件,且主要集中在滨水空间;休闲性游憩行为每百平方米密度最高达10.34件;娱乐性游憩行为密度整体较低且波动趋势平缓;体育性游憩行为密度波动较大。结论城市公园开放空间内游憩行为的类型和特征差异较大,且各类游憩行为对空间品质的偏好度不同。

Abstract

【Objective】 Based on the relationship between various types of open spaces and recreation behaviors, we propose landscape improvement and planning suggestions for urban park open spaces. 【Method】 In this study, we used the open space of the ring park in the old town of Hefei as the research object and analytical methods including the system for observing play and recreation in communities(SOPARC), big data analytics, kernel density estimation(KDE) and the principal component analysis, to determine the relationship between the urban park open spaces and recreation behaviors from a combined qualitative and quantitative perspective.【Result】 ① The demand for recreation behaviors in urban park open spaces is mainly from nearby residents, children and the elderly. ② The relationship between the different types of open spaces and recreation behaviors is quite different: the number and richness of recreation activities are the highest in green spaces, and the frequency of recreation behaviors is high, but the types are less in pavement and square spaces, the frequency and richness of recreation behavior in the waterfront space are low. ③ Space openness, space greenness, pavement degree, space accessibility and space hydrophilicity are the main factors influencing the space quality. ④ In most spaces, the density of ornamental recreation activities per 100 square meters is less than 3.0 instances, mainly concentrated in the waterfront space. The average density of amusement activities per 100 square meters is the highest, with up to 10.34 instances. The density of leisure activities is low, and the fluctuation trend is gentle. The density of sports recreation behavior fluctuates significantly.【Conclusion】 The types and characteristics of recreation behaviors in open spaces of urban parks vary considerably, and the degree of preference of various recreational behaviors to the space quality is different.

导出引用

吴文清, 许克福. 合肥环城公园开放空间与游憩行为关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2021, 45(6): 217-224 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011003

WU Wenqing, XU Kefu. Recreational preferences among different open spaces in a ring city park of Hefei[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(6): 217-224 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011003

中图分类号： X24;S718.6

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	张旭. 基于环境—行为层面的成都浣花溪公园空间组织研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2011. ZHANG X. The spatial organization study that based on the level environment-behavior research of Chengdu Huanhuaxi Park[D]. Ya’an:Sichuan Agricultural University, 2011. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	斯蒂芬·史密斯. 游憩地理学理论与方法[M]. 吴必虎, 等, 译. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1992:56-62. SMITH S. Theory and method of recreation geography[M]. WU B H, et al, Translate. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1992:56-62. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	张帆. 日常生活视野下的旧城开放空间重构研究[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2016:4-8. ZHANG F. Reconstruction of open space in old city from the perspective of daily life[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2016:4-8. 本文引用 [1]

[4]

张婷, 叶莉. 城市居民家庭结构与游憩需求意向关系研究:以长沙市居民为例[J]. 开发研究, 2010(4):34-38.

ZHANG

, YE

. Study on the relationship between family structure and recreation demand intention of urban residents: take Changsha residents as an example[J]. Research on Development, 2020(4):34-38.DOI: 10.13483/j.cnki.kfyj.2010.04.035.

https://doi.org/10.13483/j.cnki.kfyj.2010.04.035

本文引用 [1]

[5]	AKPINAR A. Factors influencing the use of urban greenways:a case study of Aydin,Turkey[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2016, 16:123-131.DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.004 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S161886671600025X 本文引用 [1]

[6]	徐红蕾, 许凡. 交互性设计理念下城市运动空间研究[J]. 艺术科技, 2019, 32(5):82-83. XU H L, XU F. Research on urban movement space under the concept of interactive design[J]. Art Sci Technol, 2019, 32(5):82-83.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2019.05.045. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2019.05.045 本文引用 [1]

[7]

赵弼皇, 李艳. 基于环境行为学的城市口袋公园空间行为调研与分析——以巢湖市伴园为例[J]. 现代园艺, 2019, 42(23):16-18.

ZHAO B

, LI

. Research and analysis on spatial behavior of urban pocket park based on environmental behavior: take Chaohu Companion Garden as an example[J]. Modern Horticulture, 2019, 42(23):16-18. DOI: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2019.23.006.

https://doi.org/10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2019.23.006

本文引用 [1]

[8]	WU K C, SONG L Y. A case for inclusive design:analyzing the needs of those who frequent Taiwan’s urban parks[J]. Appl Ergon, 2017, 58:254-264.DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.015 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003687016301260 本文引用 [1]

[9]

KIENAST

, DEGENHARDT

, WEILENMANN

, et al. GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation[J]. Lands Urban Plan, 2012, 105(4):385-399.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016920461200031X

本文引用 [1]

[10]	LEE B D. Motives, behaviors and attachments: a comparative study between older travelers younger travelers in a national scenic area[D]. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University, 2005: 137. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	靳敏. 华清池景区游憩行为空间特征调查与评价[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2013. JIN M. Studies on tourists behavioral characteristics with temporal and spatial distribution of Huaqing Pool Paradise[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2013. 本文引用 [1]

[12]

任斌斌, 李延明, 卜燕华, 等. 北京冬季开放性公园使用者游憩行为研究[J]. 中国园林, 2012, 28(4):58-61.

REN B

, LI Y

, BU Y

, et al. Research on users recreation action in open park of Beijing in winter[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2012, 28(4):58-61.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2012.04.016.

https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2012.04.016

本文引用 [1]

[13]	周乐乐. 基于游憩行为需求的城市滨海开放空间优化策略研究 :以青岛西部老城区海滨为例[D]. 青岛:青岛理工大学, 2018. ZHOU L L. Study on optimization strategy of urban coastal open space based on recreation behavior demand:taking the seaside in the old city of western Qingdao as an example[D]. Qingdao:Qingdao Tehcnology University, 2018. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	赵颖. 以游憩需求为导向的北京市城市公园环功能提升与规划优化研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2019. ZHAO Y. Study on improvement of urban park circle function and planning optimization based on recreation demand in Beijing[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2019. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	杨戈. 基于聚类分析的湖泊型公园滨水空间与游憩行为的关联性研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2018. YANG G. Relevance research on waterfront space and recreation behavior of the lake type park based on cluster analysis[D]. Hefei:Hefei University of Technology, 2018. 本文引用 [1]

[16]

曾忠平, 王雅丽, 彭浩轩. 基于SOPARC和KDE的游客游憩行为研究:以武汉东湖绿道为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(12):58-62.

ZENG Z

, WANG Y

, PENG H

. Research on tourist recreation behavior based on SOPARC and KDE: taking Wuhan East Lake greenway as an example[J]. Chin Lands Archi, 2019, 35(12):58-62.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0058.

https://doi.org/10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0058

本文引用 [1]

[17]	李骏豪. 基于行为心理感知的合肥市环城公园POE评价研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2019. LI J H. Research on post occupancy evaluation of ring park based on behavioral and psychological perception in Heifei[D]. Hefei:Hefei University of Technology, 2019. 本文引用 [1]

[18]

赵晓龙, 徐靖然, 刘笑冰, 等. 基于无人机(UAV)观测的寒地城市公园冬季体力活动及空间分布研究:以哈尔滨四个公园为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(12):40-45.

ZHAO X

, XU J

, LIU X

, et al. Observations of winter physical activities in urban parks using UAVs:a case study of four city parks in Harbin[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(12):40-45.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0040.

https://doi.org/10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0040

本文引用 [1]

[19]	郭灿灿. 社区公园体力活动特征及其与环境特征关联性研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2020. GUO C C. Study on the characteristics of physical activity in community parks and its correlation with environmental characteristics[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2020. 本文引用 [1]

[20]

王增. 园艺疗法在公园植物景观设计中的应用——以国家南方药用植物博览园中的五感花园设计为例[J]. 现代园艺2020, 43(12):103-104.

WANG

. Application of horticultural therapy in plant landscape design of park:taking the design of Wugan Garden in the National Southern Medicinal Plant Expo Garden as an example[J]. Xiandai Hortic, 2020, 43(12):103-104.DOI: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2020.12.052.

https://doi.org/10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2020.12.052

本文引用 [1]