森林认证对纸和纸浆产品国际贸易的影响效应

陈娇娇, 宋维明, 陆文明, 杨超, 夏恩龙, 李楠

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 222-230.

PDF(1448 KB)
PDF(1448 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 222-230. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011021
研究论文

森林认证对纸和纸浆产品国际贸易的影响效应

作者信息 +

Effects of forest certification on international trade in paper and pulp products

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究和实践证明森林认证对林产品贸易有重要的影响,纸和纸浆是林产品的重要组成部分。从全球视角评估森林认证对不同经济体国家的纸和纸浆产品国际贸易的影响效应,为中国森林认证制度、机制和政策的建设提供科学的依据和指导。【方法】将消费者不完全信息条件引入森林认证对不同国家贸易影响的理论框架,并将森林认证纳入扩展的引力模型,以处理引力模型的异方差和零贸易值问题,使用2009—2018年68个国家纸和纸浆产品森林认证数据和双边贸易的数据,从出口国的森林认证出口竞争效应、进口国的贸易壁垒效应、由进出口国森林认证的相互作用所获得的共同语言效应3个方面分解影响效应,并将总样本细分为4个子模型以评估对不同经济体的影响。【结果】森林认证对纸和纸浆产品国际贸易的影响呈现效应不对称。森林认证对纸和纸浆产品具有显著的出口竞争效应,且发展中国家优于发达国家;在与发达国家贸易的过程中,森林认证产生了贸易壁垒效应,且对于发展中国家更明显。森林认证的通用语言效应在发展中国家的双边贸易中并未显现,而在发达国家与发展中国家贸易过程中具有通用语言效应。【结论】对我国纸和纸浆产品乃至其他林产品生产和贸易来说,森林认证是其发展不可回避的环境和资源因素,并且其影响效应呈不断增强的趋势。因此,需要从宏观制度、机制和政策建设的层面,高度关注并切实推进森林认证在国内的发展。

Abstract

【Objective】Research and practice have demonstrated that forest certification has a substantial impact on trade in forest products. Paper and pulp products are an important component of forest products. This paper assessed the impact of forest certification on the international trade in paper and pulp products in different economies from a global perspective, to provide scientific guidance for the construction of China’s forest certification system, mechanism and policy. 【Method】The consumer incomplete information condition was introduced into the theoretical framework of the impact of forest certification on trade for different countries. Forest certification was also incorporated into the extended gravity model. Based on data of the number of forest certifications and the bilateral trade value of paper and pulp products for 68 countries from 2009 to 2018, the impact effect is decomposed from three aspects: export competition effects of forest certification in exporting countries, trade barrier effects in importing countries, and common language effect coming from the interaction of forest certification in importing and exporting countries. The total sample was further subdivided into four sub-models to assess the impact on different economies. 【Result】The effect of forest certification on the international trade in paper and pulp products is asymmetric. Forest certification has a significant export competitive effect on paper and pulp products, which is more pronounced in developing countries than in developed countries. In the process of trade with developed countries, forest certification has a trade barrier effect, which has a stronger influence in developing countries. The common language effect of forest certification does not exist during the trade of developing countries, while it plays a role in trade between developed and developing countries. 【Conclusion】Forest certification is an unavoidable environmental and resource factor in the development of the production and trade of paper and pulp products, as well as the other forest products in China, and its influence is increasing. It is necessary to pay strong attention to and promote the development of forest certification in China at the level of the macro system, mechanism and policy construction.

关键词

森林认证 / 纸和纸浆产品 / 国际贸易 / 效应不对称

Key words

forest certification / paper and pulp products / international trade / effect asymmetry

引用本文

导出引用
陈娇娇, 宋维明, 陆文明, . 森林认证对纸和纸浆产品国际贸易的影响效应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022, 46(3): 222-230 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011021
CHEN Jiaojiao, SONG Weiming, LU Wenming, et al. Effects of forest certification on international trade in paper and pulp products[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2022, 46(3): 222-230 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011021
中图分类号: F74   

参考文献

[1]
田萃, 韩传峰, 杨竹山, 等. 国际经济治理机制对中国贸易水平影响:国际公共产品视角[J]. 中国软科学, 2018(10):158-167.
TIAN C, HAN C F, YANG Z S, et al. The effects of international economic governance mechanism on China’s trade level:international public goods perspective[J]. China Soft Sci, 2018(10):158-167.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2018.10.016.
[2]
KORHONEN J, PÄTÄRI S, TOPPINEN A, et al. The role of environmental regulation in the future competitiveness of the pulp and paper industry: the case of the sulfur emissions directive in northern Europe[J]. J Clean Prod, 2015, 108:864-872.DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.003.
[3]
郑义, 余建辉. 后危机时代中国纸和纸板出口波动影响因素分析[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2013, 29(12):17-24.
ZHENG Y, YU J H. Cause analysis of export fluctuations of Chinese paper and paperboard in the post-crisis period[J]. Int Econ Trade Res, 2013, 29(12):17-24.DOI: 10.13687/j.cnki.gjjmts.2013.12.001.
[4]
管志杰, 沈杰, 贾卫国. 森林认证对关税壁垒的替代效应分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 9(1):110-113.
GUAN Z J, SHEN J, JIA W G. Substituting effects analysis of forest certification against tariff barriers[J]. J Beijing For Univ (Soc Sci),2010, 9(1):110-113.DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2010.01.024.
[5]
KORHONEN J, TOPPINEN A, KUULUVAINEN J, et al. Recycling,certification, and international trade of paper and paperboard: demand in Germany and the United States[J]. For Sci, 2017, 63(5):449-458.DOI: 10.5849/fs-2016-073r2.
[6]
鲁艳增. 森林认证对我国纸产品企业经济效益的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011.
LU Y Z. Forest certification affect of the paper products efficiency in China-analysis based on chain of custody certification[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.
[7]
LATTA G S, PLANTINGA A J, SLOGGY M R. The effects of internet use on global demand for paper products[J]. J For, 2016, 114(4):433-440.DOI: 10.5849/jof.15-096.
[8]
GIANNICHI M L, DALLIMER M, BAKER T R, et al. Divergent landowners’ expectations may hinder the uptake of a forest certificate trading scheme[J]. Conserv Lett, 2018, 11(3):e12409.DOI: 10.1111/conl.12409.
[9]
徐媛霞. 森林认证对中国林产品出口的影响[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2018.
XU Y X. The influence of forest certification on the export of Chinese forest products[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2018.
[10]
RAMETSTEINER E, SIMULA M. Forest certification: an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?[J]. J Environ Manag, 2003, 67(1):87-98.DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00191-3.
[11]
李春顶, 陈诗阳. 技术性贸易壁垒效应不对称的原因[J]. 产业经济研究, 2007(4):27-35.
LI C D, CHEN S Y. Causations of asymmetry effects in technical barriers to trade[J]. Ind Econ Res, 2007(4):27-35.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9301.2007.04.004.
[12]
尹翔硕, 李春顶. 国际贸易摩擦南北不对称与摩擦的形成:基于一个三国贸易模型的分析[J]. 南开经济研究, 2007(5):53-66,90.
YIN X S, LI C D. North-south dissymmetry in international trade friction and the formation of frictions: an analysis based on three country differential products trade model[J]. Nankai Econ Stud, 2007(5):53-66, 90.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4691.2007.05.004.
[13]
OVERDEVEST C, RICKENBACH M G. Forest certification and institutional governance: an empirical study of forest stewardship council certificate holders in the United States[J]. For Policy Econ, 2006, 9(1):93-102.DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.014.
[14]
GARELLA P G, PETRAKIS E. Minimum quality standards and consumers’ information[J]. Econ Theory, 2008, 36(2):283-302.DOI: 10.1007/s00199-007-0269-9.
[15]
CLOUGHERTY J A, GRAJEK M. International standards and international trade:empirical evidence from ISO 9000 diffusion[J]. Int J Ind Organ, 2014, 36:70-82.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.07.005.
[16]
孙莹. ISO9000标准认证对贸易的影响研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012.
SUN Y. The impact of ISO9000 standards on international trade[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012.
[17]
刘洋, 孟夏. 专利国际化与国际标准对APEC区域内制造业产品出口的影响:基于ISO9000认证与IECEE-CB体系的实证检验[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2017, 33(8):94-112.
LIU Y, MENG X. The impact of patent internationalization and international standards on the exports of manufacturing products within APEC region: an empirical test based on ISO9000 certification and IECEE-CB system[J]. Int Econ Trade Res, 2017, 33(8):94-112.DOI: 10.13687/j.cnki.gjjmts.2017.08.007.
[18]
王绍媛, 李国鹏. TBT对中国装备制造企业出口二元边际影响的实证分析:基于两阶段重力模型[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2016(8):74-83,115.
WANG S Y, LI G P. An empirical analysis of the influence of TBT on the binary marginal effect of Chinese equipment manufacturing enterprises’ export : based on the two-stage gravity model[J]. Macroeconomics, 2016(8):74-83, 115.DOI: 10.16304/j.cnki.11-3952/f.2016.08.009.
[19]
BUONGIORNO J. Gravity models of forest products trade: applications to forecasting and policy analysis[J]. Forestry (Lond), 2016, 89(2):117-126.DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpw005.
[20]
LARSON J, BAKER J, LATTA G, et al. Modeling international trade of forest products: application of PPML to a gravity model of trade[J]. For Prod J, 2018, 68(3):303-316.
[21]
KRUGMAN P. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade[C]// Rethinking International Trade. Boston: The MIT Press, 1990.DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/5933.003.0005.ociation. 1980: 950-959.
[22]
BAIER S L, BERGSTRAND J H. Bonus Vetus OLS: a simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation[J]. J Int Econ, 2009, 77(1):77-85.DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.004.
[23]
SILVA J M C S, TENREYRO S. The log of gravity[J]. Rev Econ Stat, 2006, 88(4):641-658.DOI: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
[24]
GALATI A, GIANGUZZI G, TINERVIA S, et al. Motivations,adoption and impact of voluntary environmental certification in the Italian forest based industry:the case of the FSC standard[J]. For Policy Econ, 2017, 83:169-176.DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.002.
[25]
PALUŠ H, PAROBEK J, ŠULEK R, et al. Understanding sustainable forest management certification in Slovakia:forest owners’ perception of expectations,benefits and problems[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(7):2470.DOI: 10.3390/su10072470.
[26]
熊立春, 程宝栋. 中国林产品贸易成本测算及其影响因素研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2017(11):25-35.
XIONG L C, CHENG B D. Study on trade cost of forest products in China and its influencing factors[J]. J Int Trade, 2017(11):25-35.DOI: 10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2017.11.003.
[27]
GULBRANDSEN L H. Sustainable forestry in Sweden:the effect of competition among private certification schemes[J]. J Environ Dev, 2005, 14(3):338-355.DOI: 10.1177/1070496505280061.
[28]
曹熔琨. 认证纸产品政府采购政策研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2016.
CAO R K. Study on the government procurement policy for certified paper products[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2016.
[29]
李凌超, 程宝栋, 魏思宜, 等. 森林认证对森林转型的影响:来自发展中国家的经验证据[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(5):86-91.
LI L C, CHENG B D, WEI S Y, et al. Effects of forest certification on forest transition:empirical evidence from developing countries[J]. World For Res, 2018, 31(5):86-91.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2018.0070.y.
[30]
ARMINEN H, HUJALA M, TUPPURA A. Emerging market patterns in the recycled paper trade[J]. J Environ Plan Manag, 2015, 58(3):537-553.DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.866544.

基金

国际竹藤中心“基本科研业务费专项资金项目”(1632022003)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(BLX201946)
国家自然科学基金青年项目(72003013)
国家留学基金管理委员会资助2019年国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(201906510023)

编辑: 李燕文
PDF(1448 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/