南水北调中线工程水源地土壤有机碳密度空间分异及驱动因素研究

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012016

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 35-43.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012016

所属专题： “双碳”视域下的生态系统固碳增汇

• 专题报道Ⅰ："双碳"视域下的生态系统固碳增汇（执行主编阮宏华李萍萍） • 上一篇下一篇

南水北调中线工程水源地土壤有机碳密度空间分异及驱动因素研究

刘珂¹(), 李明阳¹^,^*(), 李灵²^,^*(), 田康³, 樊亚男³, 王志刚⁴, 瞿明凯³, 黄标³

1.南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037
2.武夷学院生态与资源工程学院,福建武夷山 354300
3.中国科学院南京土壤研究所,土壤环境与污染修复重点实验室,江苏南京 210008
4.长江水利委员会长江科学院,湖北武汉 430010

收稿日期:2020-12-19 接受日期:2021-12-14 出版日期:2022-03-30 发布日期:2022-04-08
通讯作者: 李明阳,李灵
基金资助:
国家科技基础性工作专项(2015FY110400-2)

Spatial heterogeneity of the soil organic carbon density and its driving factors in the water source area of the Middle Route of China South-to-North Water Diversion Project

LIU Ke¹(), LI Mingyang¹^,^*(), LI Ling²^,^*(), TIAN Kang³, FAN Ya’nan³, WANG Zhigang⁴, QU Mingkai³, HUANG Biao³

1. College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. College of Ecology and Resources Engineering, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
3. Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
4. Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan 430010, China

Received:2020-12-19 Accepted:2021-12-14 Online:2022-03-30 Published:2022-04-08
Contact: LI Mingyang,LI Ling

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】通过分析中国南水北调中线工程水源地较大空间尺度土壤有机碳密度(SOCD)的空间分布及驱动因素,为该区域的土地资源合理利用及土壤有机碳(SOC)管理提供科学依据。【方法】在考虑海拔、土壤类型、土地利用等空间因素的基础上布设样地,通过野外取样和室内分析,借助GIS研究区域土壤有机碳密度空间分布格局,利用地理探测器模型分析各影响因子对土壤有机碳密度的解释力及各因子之间相互作用程度的差异,判定影响研究区SOCD空间分布的主要驱动因子,揭示其空间差异及随海拔、土壤类型、土地利用及森林类型的变化规律。【结果】①南水北调中线工程水源地0~20 cm与≥20~40 cm土层的SOCD分别为4.18和2.67 kg/m²,其中0~20 cm土层SOCD比全国平均水平(2.67 kg/m²)高出56.55%。②SOCD呈现南北林区高、中间农田和草地低的格局,SOCD大于10 kg/m²的集中在海拔≥1 000~2 000 m的林地,小于1 kg/m²的集中在海拔<500 m的草地。在海拔上,SOCD随海拔梯度升高先增大后减小,0~20 cm与≥20~40 cm土层SOCD均在海拔≥1 500~2 000 m出现峰值(7.32 kg/m²,4.94 kg/m²);在土壤类型上,SOCD最大的是石灰(岩)土,最小的是褐土,黄棕壤和棕壤在0~20 cm土层SOC储量最高,分别为2.005 Pg和0.815 Pg,二者占总储量的72.83%;在土地利用类型上,林地和农田是主要的土地利用方式,0~20 cm与≥20~40 cm林地土层SOCD分别为4.87 kg/m²和3.05 kg/m²,农田分别为2.75 kg/m²和2.00 kg/m²(比林地分别下降77.09%和52.50%);林地碳储量占87.48%,农田占12.02%。③对SOCD空间分布解释力较大的是海拔(0.25)和土地利用(0.20),其次是土壤黏粒(0.11)。不同驱动因子在交互作用下的解释力明显高于单因素的解释力。【结论】海拔和土地利用是影响南水北调中线工程水源地SOCD空间格局的主导因子,不同驱动因子交互后呈现双因子协同增强效应。农田SOCD明显低于林地,因此,应加强生态工程建设,进行林地保护和植被恢复,提高该区域土壤碳固存能力。

关键词: 土壤有机碳密度, 空间分异, 地理探测器, 水源地, 南水北调中线工程

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of analyzing the spatial distribution characteristics and driving factors of soil organic carbon density on a large spatial scale in the water source area of the Middle Route of China South-to-North Water Diversion Project is to reveal its spatial differences and the changes with the altitude, soil types, land use, and forest types. This work should provide a scientific basis for the rational utilization of land resources and soil organic carbon (SOC) management in the area. The spatial distribution and driving factors of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) were explored to provide a scientific basis for the accurate assessment of the ecosystem carbon cycle in the climate transition zone.【Method】Based on a comprehensive assessment of spatial factors such as the elevation, soil types, and land use, the spatial variations of SOCD in this region were evaluated by the field sampling and indoor analysis with the help of a geographic information system (GIS). In addition, the main driving factors affecting the spatial distribution of SOCD in the study area were determined by analyzing the explanatory power of various influencing factors on soil organic carbon density and the difference in the degree of interaction among various factors using the geographic detector model. 【Result】(1)The results showed that the average SOCD in 0-20 cm and ≥20-40 cm soil layers was 4.18 kg/m² and 2.67 kg/m² respectively, in which the SOCD of 0-20 cm soil layer was 56.55% higher than the national average level (2.67 kg/m²).(2)Over the entire region, the SOCD was higher in forests in the northern and southern areas and lower in farmlands and grasslands in the middle area. The soil organic carbon density greater than 10 kg/m² is concentrated in the forest land with an altitude of ≥1 500-2 000 m, and less than 1 kg/m² is concentrated in grasslands with altitudes <500 m. The SOCD first increased and then decreased with an increasing elevation. The SOCD of 0-20 cm and ≥20-40 cm soil layers showed peak values (7.32 kg/m² and 4.94 kg/m²) at an altitude of ≥1 500-2 000 m. In terms of soil types, the average SOCD of limestone soil is the greatest and that of cinnamon soils is the smallest. The SOCD storage of yellow-brown earths and brown earths in the 0-20 cm soil layer was the highest, 2.005 Pg and 0.815 Pg, respectively, accounting for 72.83% of the total storage. In terms of land-use types, the forest and farmland were the main land-use types. The SOCD of 0-20 cm and ≥20-40 cm soil layers in the forest land were 4.87 kg/m² and 3.05 kg/m², respectively, and that of farmlands were 2.75 kg/m² and 2.00 kg/m², respectively. These levels were 77.09% and 52.50% lower than that of the forest land, and the SOC storage of the forest land accounted for 87.48% of the total C storage, followed by farmlands (12.02%).(3)The most powerful explanation for the spatial distribution of SOCD was the altitude (0.25) and land use (0.20), followed by soil clay (0.11). The explanatory power of the different driving factors under interaction was significantly higher than that of a single factor. 【Conclusion】The altitude and land use were the main driving factors affecting the spatial patterns of SOCD in this region. After the interaction of different driving factors, there was a synergistic effect of the two factors. The SOCD of farmlands was significantly lower than that of the forest land. Therefore, the ecological engineering construction in the study area should be strengthened, the forest protection and vegetation restoration should be carried out, and the soil carbon storage capacity of the water source in the Middle Route of China South-to-North Water Diversion Project should be improved.

Key words: soil organic carbon density(SOCD), spatial heterogeneity, geographic detector model, the water source area, the Middle Route of China South-to-North Water Diversion Project

中图分类号:

S714

刘珂,李明阳,李灵,等. 南水北调中线工程水源地土壤有机碳密度空间分异及驱动因素研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 35-43.

LIU Ke, LI Mingyang, LI Ling, TIAN Kang, FAN Ya’nan, WANG Zhigang, QU Mingkai, HUANG Biao. Spatial heterogeneity of the soil organic carbon density and its driving factors in the water source area of the Middle Route of China South-to-North Water Diversion Project[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(2): 35-43.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012016.

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

表3

图4

表4

参考文献 29

[1]	SANTINI N S, ADAME M F, NOLAN R H, et al. Storage of organic carbon in the soils of Mexican temperate forests[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2019, 446:115-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.029. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.029
[2]	LAL R, SMITH P, JUNGKUNST H F, et al. The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2018, 73(6):145-152. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.6.145a. doi: 10.2489/jswc.73.6.145a
[3]	ZIMMERMANN M, LEIFELD J, CONEN F, et al. Can composition and physical protection of soil organic matter explain soil respiration temperature sensitivity?[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 107(1/2/3):423-436. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-010-9562-y. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9562-y
[4]	DJUKIC I, ZEHETNER F, TATZBER M, et al. Soil organic-matter stocks and characteristics along an Alpine elevation gradient[J]. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2010, 173(1):30-38. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200900027. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200900027
[5]	卫玮, 党坤良. 秦岭南坡林地土壤有机碳密度空间分异特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5):11-19.
	WEI W, DANG K L. Spatial variation of the density of soil organic carbon in forest land on the southern slope of Qinling Mountains[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(5):11-19. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190502. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190502
[6]	吴小刚, 王文平, 李斌, 等. 中亚热带森林土壤有机碳的海拔梯度变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(6):1539-1547.
	WU X G, WANG W P, LI B, et al. Altitudinal gradient of soil organic carbon in forest soils in the mid-subtropical zone of China[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2020, 57(6):1539-1547. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201909300184. doi: 10.11766/trxb201909300184
[7]	杨玉盛, 谢锦升, 盛浩, 等. 中亚热带山区土地利用变化对土壤有机碳储量和质量的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(11):1123-1131.
	YANG Y S, XIE J S, SHENG H, et al. The impact of land use/cover change on soil organic carbon stocks and quality in mid-subtropical mountainous area of southern China[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2007, 62(11):1123-1131. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.11.001. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.11.001
[8]	梁晨, 安菁, 范雅倩, 等. 北京松山国家级自然保护区典型植被类型表层土壤碳密度及周转速率特征[J]. 地球与环境, 2020, 48(6):672-679.
	LIANG C, AN J, FAN Y Q, et al. Surface soil carbon density and turnover rate of typical vegetation types in Beijing Songshan National Nature Reserve[J]. Earth Environ, 2020, 48(6):672-679. DOI: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2020.48.086. doi: 10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2020.48.086
[9]	WANG L, CHEN W, HUANG G, et al. Changes of the transitional climate zone in East Asia: past and future[J]. Clim Dyn, 2017, 49(4):1463-1477. DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3400-4. doi: 10.1007/s00382-016-3400-4
[10]	周健民, 沈仁芳. 土壤学大辞典[Z]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
	ZHOU J M, SHEN R F. Dictionary of soil science[Z]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.
[11]	张甘霖, 龚子同. 土壤调查实验室分析方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
	ZHANG G L, GONG Z T. Soil survey laboratory methods[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.
[12]	RUBIN D B. Multiple imputation after 18+ years[J]. J Am Stat Assoc, 1996, 91(434):473-489. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908
[13]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1):116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
	WANG J F, XU C D. Geodetector: principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2017, 72(1):116-134. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201701010. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
[14]	张彦军, 郁耀闯, 牛俊杰, 等. 秦岭太白山北坡土壤有机碳储量的海拔梯度格局[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2):629-639.
	ZHANG Y J, YU Y C, NIU J J, et al. The elevational patterns of soil organic carbon storage on the northern slope of Taibai Mountain of Qinling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 629-639. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201808031659. doi: 10.5846/stxb201808031659
[15]	解宪丽, 孙波, 周慧珍, 等. 不同植被下中国土壤有机碳的储量与影响因子[J]. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(5):687-699.
	XIE X L, SUN B, ZHOU H Z, et al. Soil carbon stocks and their influencing factors under native vegetations in China[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2004, 41(5):687-699. DOI: 10.11766/trxb200312090505. doi: 10.11766/trxb200312090505
[16]	薄会娟, 董晓华, 郭梁锋, 等. 湖北省土壤有机碳垂直分布及储量估算[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2018, 41(12):290-296.
	BO H J, DONG X H, GUO L F, et al. Vertical distribution and storage estimation of soil organic carbon in Hubei Province[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2018, 41(12):290-296. DOI: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2018.12.042. doi: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2018.12.042
[17]	宋满珍, 刘琪璟, 吴自荣, 等. 江西省森林土壤有机碳储量研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(2):6-10.
	SONG M Z, LIU Q J, WU Z R, et al. Organic carbon storage of forest soil in Jiangxi Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2010, 34(2):6-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1,000-2006.2010.02.002. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1,000-2006.2010.02.002
[18]	GHOSH A, BHATTACHARYYA R, MEENA M C, et al. Long-term fertilization effects on soil organic carbon sequestration in an inceptisol[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 177: 134-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2017.12.006. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.12.006
[19]	HOYLE F C, D’ANTUONO M, OVERHOU T, et al. Capacity for increasing soil organic carbon stocks in dryland agricultural systems[J]. Soil Research, 2013, 51(7-8): 657-667. DOI: 10.1071/SR12373. doi: 10.1071/SR12373
[20]	秦海龙, 贾重建, 卢瑛, 等. 广东罗浮山土壤有机碳储量与组分垂直分布特征[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 38(3):108-115.
	QIN H L, JIA C J, LU Y, et al. The vertical distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon stocks and fractions in Luofu Mountain of Guangdong[J]. J Southwest For Univ (Nat Sci), 2018, 38(3):108-115. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.03.016. doi: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.03.016
[21]	丁访军, 高艳平, 周凤娇, 等. 贵州西部4种林型土壤有机碳及其剖面分布特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(1):38-43.
	DING F J, GAO Y P, ZHOU F J, et al. Soil organic carbon and its distribution characteristics in the soil profile for four forest types in west Guizhou[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2012, 21(1):38-43. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2012.01.014. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2012.01.014
[22]	杨苏, 李传哲, 王静, 等. 有机物料投入对作物产量及潮土固碳的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020(3):569-576.
	YANG S, LI C Z, WANG J, et al. Effects of organic material input on crop yield and carbon sequestration in tidal soil[J]. 2020(3):569-576. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.03.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.03.006
[23]	罗梅, 郭龙, 张海涛, 等. 基于环境变量的中国土壤有机碳空间分布特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(1):48-59.
	LUO M, GUO L, ZHANG H T, et al.Characterization of spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in China based on environmental variables[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(1):48-59. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201812110454. doi: 10.11766/trxb201812110454
[24]	LI Z W, LIU C, DONG Y T, et al. Response of soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks to soil erosion and land use types in the Loess hilly-gully region of China[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2017, 166:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.10.004. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.10.004
[25]	李志安, 邹碧, 丁永祯, 等. 森林凋落物分解重要影响因子及其研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(6):77-83.
	LI Z A, ZOU B, DING Y Z, et al. Key factors of forest litter decomposition and research progress[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2004, 23(6):77-83. DOI: 10.13292/j.1,000-4890.2004.0204. doi: 10.13292/j.1,000-4890.2004.0204
[26]	肖欣, 王雄涛, 欧阳勋志. 马尾松人工林土壤有机碳特征及其与凋落物质量的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):105-111.
	XIAO X, WANG X T, OUYANG X Z. The characteristic of soil organic carbon and relationship with litter quality in Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(6):105-111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1,000-2006.2015.06.019. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1,000-2006.2015.06.019
[27]	DING J, LI F, YANG G, et al. The permafrost carbon inventory on the Tibetan plateau:a new evaluation using deep sediment cores[J]. Glob Chang Biol, 2016, 22(8):2688-2701. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13257. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13257
[28]	吴小刚, 王文平, 李斌, 等. 中亚热带森林土壤有机碳的海拔梯度变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(6):1539-1547.
	WU X G, WANG W P, LI B, et al.. Altitudinal gradient of soil organic carbon in forest soils in the mid-subtropical zone of China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(6):1539-1547. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201909300184 doi: 10.11766/trxb201909300184
[29]	李龙, 姚云峰, 秦富仓, 等. 赤峰市小流域地形因子对土壤有机碳密度的影响[J]. 中国水土保持, 2014(3):43-46.
	LI L, YAO Y F, QIN F C, et al. Effects of topographic factors on soil organic carbon density in small watershed of Chifeng City[J]. Soil Water Conserv China, 2014(3):43-46. DOI: 10.14123/j.cnki.swcc.2014.03.016. doi: 10.14123/j.cnki.swcc.2014.03.016

土壤类型 soil type	海拔/m elevation	面积/ ×10⁶ hm² area	面积占比/% area proportion	土壤有机碳密度/(kg·m^-2) SOCD		0~20 cm 碳储量/Pg carbon storage in 0~20 cm	储量占比/% carbon storage percentage
土壤类型 soil type	海拔/m elevation	面积/ ×10⁶ hm² area	面积占比/% area proportion	0~20 cm	≥20~40 cm	0~20 cm 碳储量/Pg carbon storage in 0~20 cm	储量占比/% carbon storage percentage
暗棕壤 dark-brown earths	≥1 500~ 2 000	0.058	0.60	5.09±2.27 Aa	2.31±0.75 Bb	0.029	0.76
棕壤 brown earths	≥1 000~ 1 500	1.565	16.44	5.21±2.66 Aa	3.69±2.23 Ba	0.815	21.05
褐土 cinnamon soils		0.097	1.02	3.35±1.71 Ab	2.15±0.83 Bb	0.033	0.84
黄褐土 yellow-cinnamon soils	≥500~ 1 000	0.711	7.46	3.36±1.88 Ab	2.66±1.29 Bab	0.239	6.17
石灰(岩)土 limestone soils		0.454	4.77	5.44±2.51 Aa	3.20±1.65 Ba	0.247	6.38
粗骨土 skeletal soils		0.636	6.68	3.72±1.49 Ab	2.20±0.81 Bb	0.236	6.10
黄棕壤 yellow-brown earths		5.138	53.97	3.93±2.19 Ab	2.49±1.42 Bb	2.005	51.78
水稻土 paddy soils		0.267	2.81	4.64±3.58 Aa	1.82±0.80 Bbc	0.124	3.20
新积土 neo-alluvial soils		0.251	2.64	3.57±2.55 Ab	1.50±0.68 Bc	0.090	2.31
紫色土 purplish soils		0.152	1.60	3.60±1.15 Ab	2.02±0.52 Bb	0.055	1.41

土地利用类型 land use type	面积/ ×10⁴ hm² area	面积占比/% area percentage	土壤有机碳密度变幅/ (kg·m^-2) SOCD variation range		土壤有机碳密度/ (kg·m^-2) SOCD		0~20 cm 碳储量/Pg carbon storage in 0~20 cm	碳储量占比/% carbon storage percentage
土地利用类型 land use type	面积/ ×10⁴ hm² area	面积占比/% area percentage	0~20 cm	≥20~40 cm	0~20 cm	≥20~40 cm	0~20 cm 碳储量/Pg carbon storage in 0~20 cm	碳储量占比/% carbon storage percentage
林地 forest	736.691	77.380	1.33~17.07	0.31~13.75	4.87±2.38 Aa	3.05±1.75 Ba	3.590 0	87.48
灌丛 bushwood	0.092	0.009	0.60~9.91	1.11~5.65	4.55±2.57 Aa	2.59±1.19 Bb	0.000 4	0.01
农田 cropland	179.030	18.810	0.75~6.71	0.37~6.11	2.75±1.09 Ab	2.00±0.93 Bc	0.490 0	12.02
草地 grassland	13.901	1.460	0.29~ 6.69	0.21~3.37	1.45±1.41 Ac	1.15±0.84 Bd	0.022 0	0.49

森林类型 forest type	土壤有机碳密度变幅/(kg·m^-2) SOCD variation range		土壤有机碳密度/(kg·m^-2) SOCD		变异系数/% coefficient of variation
森林类型 forest type	0~20 cm	≥20~40 cm	0~20 cm	≥20~40 cm	0~20 cm	≥20~40 cm
阔叶林broad-leaf forest	1.47~17.07	0.60~8.73	5.35±2.48 Aa	3.25±1.66 Ba	46.36	51.11
针叶林coniferous forest	1.87~12.39	0.31~5.87	4.43±2.43 Ab	2.65±1.36 Bb	54.92	51.40
混交林mixed forest	1.68~15.22	0.83~13.75	4.53±2.36 Aab	2.80±2.03 Bab	52.11	72.68

交互因子 interaction factor	土地利用 land use	海拔 elevation	土壤类型 soil type	黏粒 clay	砂粒 sandy	容重 bulk density
海拔elevation	0.35↑
土壤类型soil type	0.26↑	0.32↑↑
黏粒clay	0.30↑	0.33↑	0.23↑↑
砂粒sandy	0.29↑↑	0.32↑	0.18↑↑	0.15↑
容重bulk density	0.27↑↑	0.34↑↑	0.18↑↑	0.19↑↑	0.20↑↑
pH	0.25↑	0.29↑	0.21↑↑	0.23↑↑	0.18↑↑	0.22↑↑

南水北调中线工程水源地土壤有机碳密度空间分异及驱动因素研究

Spatial heterogeneity of the soil organic carbon density and its driving factors in the water source area of the Middle Route of China South-to-North Water Diversion Project

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 29

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	张相, 丁鸣鸣, 林杰, 李卓远, 崔琳琳, 郭赓, 杨皓. 水蚀作用下红壤丘陵区土壤特性的空间分异特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 77-84.
[2]	朱志洪, 周本智, 王懿祥, 祁军, 李爱博, 黄润霞. 近30年千岛湖流域产水量时空变化及其影响因子分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 111-119.
[3]	蔡汉, 朱权, 罗云建, 马坤. 快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 181-188.
[4]	田耀武,刘谊锋,王聪,王罡,和武宇恒. 伏牛山森林土壤有机碳密度与环境因子的关联性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(01): 83-90.